Dr. Gerald Pollack introduces his outstanding work on the 4th phase of water and its critical but completely ignored role in biology. For example, by molecular count, water makes up 99% of the molecules in a muscle, yet the role of those molecules is, as I understand him to say, completely ignored in the currently accepted model for the action of muscles.
Archive for September 2014
By Jon Rappoport
September 26, 2014
In this article, I’m not going to try to recapitulate everything I’ve written about Ebola so far.
I’ll outline two possible scenarios for the near future in Western nations. Scenario 1 and Modified Scenario 1. Both would be planned ops.
#1: Announcement: a vaccine is available. Authorities will declare who should take it. In an extreme situation, people in certain sectors will be commanded to take it. And if they don’t, they will be quarantined, regardless of their health status.
Quarantines in selected areas would be enforced by police and troops stationed on streets, taking people to their homes, ordering them to stay in their homes. In those areas, businesses would be ordered to close.
Flights in and out of selected areas would be shut down.
The vaccine would be called safe, “according to limited tests,” and “less risky than Ebola.” People who fall ill or worse as a result of the vaccine would tend to be labeled as Ebola cases—“the onset of the disease was more rapid than anticipated.”
“It’s the disease, not the vaccine.”
As part of the overall scenario, Ebola case numbers will be grossly exaggerated. In fact, most cases will be casually diagnosed from visible and general flu-like symptoms—eyeball diagnoses made by doctors and nurses at clinics, hospitals, and offices.
Blood samples taken to confirm these people’s diagnosis, at labs, will shockingly, to a large degree, show no presence of Ebola—but this fact will be covered up, as it was in the case of Swine Flu in 2009 and SARS in 2003.
If no vaccine is released, then the pharmaceutical profit center will focus on medicines that “fight viruses.” These drugs will be toxic and have significant adverse effects. Again, patients who fall ill will be labeled “Ebola rapid-onset.”
Here is Modified Scenario #1:
It can be characterized by the after-op wrap-up: “We in the West escaped by the skin of our teeth. We almost had an uncontrollable nightmare on our hands. But thanks to public-health measures and the tracking of suspected cases, we averted doom…this time.” Heroes named and applauded.
No widespread quarantines. No major troop presence.
In that case, the main target of the op would turn out to be, as it is now, the West African countries. Borders sealed, chaos and massive quarantines inside, debilitation and death from a number of ongoing and long-term causes, none of which really have anything to do with Ebola:
Severe malnutrition; starvation; war; poverty; industrial pollution; contaminated water supplies; stolen farm land; overcrowding; prior toxic vaccine campaigns for yellow fever, polio, meningitis; toxic medical drugs.
All adding up to: destruction of immune systems, after which any germ passing through the territory accelerates dying. Ebola, cholera, flu, pneumocystis, measles, etc. Ebola itself is not the threat.
And if all that is not enough—perhaps the intentional introduction of a virtually undetectable chemical(s) that debilitates and kills for a limited period of time and then dissipates. The victims, of course, will be labeled “Ebola.”
Meanwhile, through brokered IMF “assistance” deals and other backroom agreements—with the West African population too weak to resist—outside financiers, investors, and corporations will expand their stranglehold over the rich mineral resources and land of those countries.
My best guess at this time is we will see Modified Scenario #1, the “by the skin of our teeth we escaped” op. Western nations will not be said to be overrun with Ebola. There will not be massive and widespread quarantines in all nations.
However, enough cases will be announced to scare people.
“We had a brush with disaster. It was a close call. A few more ‘links in the chain’ and we would have had a firestorm on a global scale.”
“Therefore, in the future, listen very closely to the medical experts. Do what they tell you to do immediately. Take your medicines. Get your vaccines, all of them, according to public-health mandated schedules.”
“Those leaders who are running and monitoring health insurance programs around the world should insist that delivering medical care is contingent on recipients taking their vaccines and other drugs as ordered and prescribed.”
Both Scenario #1 and its modified version are sheer reality-invention for the helpless, the mindless, the dupes, the pawns, the suckers, the rubes, and the merely uninformed.
As always, there is a vital relationship between a) those who know the truth and make it known, and b) the merely uninformed.
The number of people who wake up and realize what the op is, and refuse to participate—as they did successfully during the Swine Flu dud—can turn the tables and win.
If there is an X-factor here, you may find it through predictions of Ebola case numbers by the CDC (and the World Health Organization). If they back off a bit and modulate their estimates in a downward direction, you’ll pretty much know that at worst, this will be a “skin of our teeth” op.
If the CDC keeps doubling down with its “1 million Ebola cases” insanity, we could be in for a rocky ride. The CDC always lies. But if they keep these enormous predictive lies in play, it could be a clue the US government intends to fake a whole lot of Ebola.
And that’s what I’m talking about. Fakery.
Further to my post of yesterday, just as I predicted, the Labor “Opposition” passed the legislation with nary a murmur, despite its incredibly draconian consequences for free speech in Australia. Truly breathtaking. Yet no surprise when you understand the game behind the game. It all fits perfectly. But if you don’t understand the chessboard, you will never recognise the pieces for what they are.
But Australians were going to be beheaded. We have to be protected. I saw it on television and read it in the newspapers. Thank you, big daddy Tony (Abbott) for saving us from those terrible Muslims…
Such a perfect example of the Hegelian Dialectic at work in our world.
And overnight, some people, especially overseas journalists have begun to see what has been done, though they don’t understand the chessboard, either.
This article by Ben Grubb provides a good summary of the consequences:
Australian spies will soon have the power to monitor the entire Australian internet with just one warrant, and journalists and whistleblowers will face up to 10 years’ jail for disclosing classified information.
Any operation can be declared “special” and doing so gives ASIO criminal and civil immunity. Many, including lawyers and academics, have said they fear the agency will abuse this power.
Attorney-General George Brandis did not seek to allay their concerns on Thursday but said in a “newly dangerous age” it was vital that those protecting Australia were equipped with the powers and capabilities they needed.
Incredible. Draconian. It places Government actions above the law, and no-one is allowed to comment. Of course, such legislation has been in place in the United States since 1947 with the National Security Act, which was further reinforced by the 2001 Patriot Act, but most don’t even know or understand, unless they have run into it. American politicians and their minions have been hiding their heinous crimes behind the veil of National Security since 1947. But the Australian version has been beefed up to close the door on future Snowdens and their cooperating journalists, as well the NSA-related activities, where everyone’s information is tracked, to protect us from terrorism, that false bogeyman created by the US and others.
And in case you think I’m imagining it all when I say that the US created ISIL, you may like to listen to Bill Engdahl’s view or President Rouhani of Iran at UN General Assembly in the last day or this former CIA contractor.
Are you ready to look for the theatre exits, yet?
But some are waking up, and I want to share with you a little of the dark Internet humour about this that has come my way in just the last 24 hours. It demonstrates there are those in the world who understand what is happening, at least in part.
- Bomb a country
- Bomb radicals created by bombing that country.
- Bomb radicals created by bombing 1st radicals.
- Repeat! #EndlessWar
Thank you, Hedy.
It has been said that history is written by the victors but, in my view, this is only the beginning. In truth, history is continuously adjusted to reflect the views of the current power elite, who at a government level are simply reflecting the agenda of those behind the scenes.
Whilst this revisionism has seen a level of push-back over time, as this action in Texas demonstrates, the protest action by students in several Denver schools seems to me to be a new and exciting phenomenon. They may not make a difference, but they demonstrate that they see what is going on and they will not simply swallow it. May it be a sign that people are waking up to the carefully constructed dream they are inside of.
As my Aussie friends and family are in the middle of what seems to be imminent threats of beheadings by these dangerous ISIL “agents”, they/you may find it difficult to believe what I am about to say. As I’ve said before, beliefs, combined with fear, are powerful drivers and almost impossible to see beyond.
As I’ve pointed out previously, every war in the last 100 years and perhaps the last 200 have been triggered by a false flag event. Documented beyond question. Moreover, 9/11 was without doubt a false flag event. We could begin with the fact that Osama bin Laden was either dead or dying from the complications arising from Marfan Syndrome at the time of the 9/11 event, having been a valuable US asset as the leader of the Mujahedeen fighting the Russians in Afghanistan. A nice piece of recycling, in my view. Never let a good asset go to waste, even if he is dead. And don’t mistake that piece of Obama re-election theatre where bin Laden was supposedly eliminated in 2011 as having anything to do with the truth. We are all trapped inside this global movie theatre and not many have yet begun to look for the exits.
In my view, sitting outside of it as it unfolds (currently in the United States), the application of the Hegelian Dialectic (“problem, reaction, solution”) is in full flight at the moment in Australia, to justify the removal of further freedoms and the ramping up of the police state.
Problem – ISIL agents are threatening to behead Australians for no reason other than they are Australians.
Reaction – They must be stopped at all costs. Government – the people must be protected.
Solution – Draconian new legislation that includes the pursuit and probable imprisonment of journalists without trial and imprisonment for life for those who go to the wrong country without good reason (excuse me if I have the exact details a little wonky since I haven’t yet read the fine print).
For me, this is reminiscent of the way the Patriot Act was rammed through in the United States almost before the dust had settled at Ground Zero, and Susan Lindauer’s experience and subsequent book “Extreme Prejudice” illustrate powerfully what this legislation means to the average American who gets on the wrong side of this machine. Except in Susan they picked the wrong target. She didn’t lie down quietly and take the drugs they wanted to force on her.
And we have this beautiful reinforcement of the Problem with 800 police deployed in New South Wales and Queensland, broadcast on live television, leading to the arrest of princely number of one or two suspects. This episode of Q&A discusses some of the issues rather well, in my view, revealing the Muslim perspective as well as the justifications by the requisite Federal Government minister. I found it interesting that even the eloquent Muslims who could smell a rat, stopped short of suggesting that the police might in any way be accomplices in this obvious piece of theatre.
Then we have the statements by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, such as reduction in freedom necessary to save lives from terrorism threat and Security may come before some freedoms. Then we have the Melbourne attack, to which Abbott says Melbourne attack is proof people are ‘capable of extreme acts’ in Australia. Powerful Reaction-fuelling events and statements.
And the Solution will just sail through Parliament. The Opposition will support it and the public will feel a great sense of relief that big Tony and his Government mates are protecting us all from these nasty ISIL extremists who will clearly stop at nothing. These irrational beheaders of people. I mean, we’ve seen it on television. It must be true. Let’s forget the evidence that ISIL was created by the US or those whose interests they serve, just as the War on Terror was before it – not to mention the Cold War, the Vietnam War… Anyone spot a pattern?
And so it goes. As I said, the Opposition will support it because they are, in fact, on the same side. They are all puppets of those behind the scenes. Most of the time, life goes on apparently calmly, with the political foes bickering over irrelevancies, and Joe Public chooses sides – when they are really the opposite sides of the same face and in these critical moments of great change, they line up in unison and Joe Public thanks them for saving him/her. As Ghis Lanctôt says, whilst we are behaving like sheep, we need a shepherd, provided by Government. Unsurprisingly, Abbott’s approval rating has gone up since his strong action in the face of this “threat”, just as John Howard’s did at the time of the introduction of gun controls. People have been so well conditioned. Except the shepherd is actually a wolf.
I find it interesting that similar actions, though less graphically justified, are being undertaken in the other “five eyes” countries – New Zealand, Canada and the U.K. And one of the features of these legislative changes is to encode into law the right to collect every piece of detail about us all and to prosecute journalists who might reveal material from a future Edward Snowden. It has been challenging enough for Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in the current legislative situation to bring forth Snowden’s revelations about the NSA, and this and WikiLeaks-related actions see Laura, Jacob Appelbaum and Sarah Harrison residing in Berlin, outside the clutches of the United States and the U.K., and Greenwald living in Brazil and being very careful about when and how he returns to the United States. The noose around their necks is being tightened and any collection of data is simply for your protection and well supported by new legislation.
And there is the naïve belief amongst Australians that such things could not happen in their safe and protected country. As I said, it is evident in the way the panellists shied away from fingering the police in the Q&A episode mentioned above.
But it has happened in the past, and several times. For example, I have referred previously to the evidence that Martin Bryant was mind controlled and did not act alone in the Port Arthur massacre of 1996. A lone, relatively untrained gunman could not have created that level and pattern of carnage. And what was the solution? Removing most of the guns from the hands of Australians. One such event was enough in Australia, whereas in the United States it is requiring a whole series of false flag events to build up to the point where the Government feels it is in a position to face down the gun advocates. There is also the evidence that the CIA was behind the dismissal of Gough Whitlam as Australia’s Prime Minister in 1975. I also shared with you the testimony of Toos Nijenhuis, which included her description of time spent in a purpose-built ritualistic torture facility in Melbourne. Innocent and shielded little Australia. Such naivety.
Wake up, my friends, to what is being done to us. It is a classic example of the Hegelian Dialectic at work, and it gets used over and over again. At some point, perhaps, as Ghis Lanctôt advocates, we will withdraw our permission from these goons and remember who and what we are.
At least disconnect your gaze from the movie and see what is actually going on. It is a beginning.
Here is a self-introduction to Dr. Lanctôt from this interview:
Guylaine Lanctôt: As a medical doctor, I practiced medicine for over 20 years in different countries. I went to different provinces in Canada, and I lived in the U.S. for 6 years. I got to know the medical system. I was questioning, “Why is everything so expensive? Why are we getting sicker and sicker and health care is getting more and more expensive, and everybody’s unhappy?” I realized that different systems are totally alike. They have different names but, whether they are a capitalist system, like we have in the U.S., or socialized, like in France, or in between, like in Canada, the bottom line is that the medical systems are all alike. They all serve financiers and not the people. That’s the basic thing. The bottom line is that the medical systems are controlled by financiers in order to serve financiers. Since you cannot serve people unless they get sick, the whole medical system is designed to make people sicker and sicker. When I realized this, I had the choice either to obey the medical authorities and keep my mouth shut or to obey my conscious and speak out. I made a decision to obey my conscious, knowing what the punishments were when one doesn’t obey the system. So, I wrote the book The Medical Mafia: How to Get Out of It Alive and Take Back Our Health and Wealth. Now, the book is not a denunciation of medicine even though the title may lead you to think that. It’s a book that explains how the system works. If we don’t know how it works, we can’t understand anything. It’s so complicated, we think we’re never going to understand it, so, we raise our arms and give up. The medical system is meant to be complicated. I decided to identify the real players, and I’ll show the public where each player stands and how the game is played. This is the first part of my book, explaining how the system works. Next, what are we going to do? I’m a person who likes to come up with solutions, otherwise there is no point complaining. We need a solution.
In this recent interview, Ghis shares her current views of the reality in which we find ourselves and the choices we are faced with. They run very close to my own.
For me, Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin are two of the world’s most outstanding researchers who rigorously use the scientific method to investigate subjects outside of the standard temporal scientific mindset, and Rupert has conducted groundbreaking work in demonstrating, for example, that dogs begin to wait for their owners when their owner DECIDES to go home. And it has been duplicated. Sounds simple enough, but it is profound in its nature. I mention this example because it says so much about Rupert’s approach. Seemingly simple, easy to reproduce, yet profound in its nature.
This outstanding interview by Joe Rogan has Rupert share a little about who he is, where he has walked and what he believes, and quite a powerful introduction to his work.
You may have read about the global temperature record in August this year. It was hard to miss. It was all over the media. The only thing is it doesn’t happen to be true.
If you watch a minute or so of this video, you will see the data before it was misrepresented.
It takes real effort to disconnect from the mainstream media. We are so well trained to accept it as the truth.
I have mentioned the Georgia Guidestones many times in my postings, since they clearly carry a very dark message about the plans that some people have for the future of humanity and the planet. The first of these – you might consider – modern ten commandments is:
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Sounds noble enough, until you recognise that we have over 7BN people on the planet. And if you begin to look, you will find several processes at work to reduce the population in a hidden manner.
But something interesting has just happened to the Georgia Guidestones: apparently there was a notch that was carved into the top of one of them, I believe when they were originally erected in 1979, organised and paid for by the mysterious RC Christian. As this brief video shows, a block has been placed into that notch, carrying the date of 2014. Does this mark the beginning or the completion of their plans, or some other important moment in their unfolding?
An excellent recent interview with Julian Assange discussing, amongst other things, his just released book on Google and its intimate connections with the American Government.