Search results for Jim rickards

Jim Rickards discusses the Road to Ruin and its context

I have previously mentioned Jim Rickards’ most recent book The Road to Ruin: The Global Elites’ Secret Plan for the Next Financial Crisis. In this recent interview, Rickards discusses the book and its context. A great interview that I highly recommend.

In my opinion, we ALL need to understand Rickards’ message, as it is telling us we are facing a financial and economic precipice in our near future, and if you don’t plan for it, you will live to regret it. And this man has been there and done that, as he shares in this interview.

I recommend you read the book, but a starter is this excellent interview.

NB You will need to register to access it.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Jim Rickards – Road to Ruin – Animated Book Summary

The Road to Ruin is Jim Rickards new book about the elites plan for the next financial crisis.
Building on his previous two books (Currency Wars, and Death of the Dollar (which is more accurately referred to as “”The Likely Severe Loss of Confidence of the Current International Monetary System and it’s Likely Replacements & What You Can Do To Protect Your Savings””) this book explores how the next crisis will actually play out. Why it won’t be solved by injecting more liquidity (as in 2008), but will rather be addressed with something cryptically referred to as ICE-9.

End of quote.

Worth seven minutes of your time.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Death of Money by James Rickards – Book Summary

Even Jim Rickards recommends this 8 minute video summary of his book “The Death of Money: The Coming Collapse of the International Monetary System”.

Worth your time, in my opinion.

We live in interesting times…

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Great Recession of 2008 Was Just A Warning!

I recently shared with you some videos in which Lynette Zang of ITM Trading shared her views about the elite’s planned control of remaining global assets via a crypto SDR, controlled by the IMF.

And I have just come across an outstanding summary of the state of our financial world and where it’s heading by Lynette, but you have to do some ferreting to find it.

Go to http://itmtrading.org/, then click on the Webinar Archive link on the top of the page, then scroll until you see the video entitled “Start Here: 2008 Was Just A Warning!!”

Personally, I agree with everything Lynette says, but I’m not saying you should. What I am suggesting is if you don’t consider what she says and draw your own informed conclusions, in my opinion, you run a very serious financial risk that could ruin the party that you call the rest of your life.

Check it out and see what you think. It aligns very powerfully with what Jim Rickards has also been saying.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The global world currency is emerging, and it’s a blockchain SDR, and EVERYTHING will be on the blockchain, including your house title

The pieces are falling into place for the new global currency, forecast for 2018 in The Economist 30 years ago.

And it’s a blockchain version of the IMF global reserve currency, the Special Drawing Right, or SDR. I discussed the SDR in detail about a year ago.

In that article, I mentioned that Jim Rickards saw the SDR as the new global currency, but what was not obvious was how that would be implemented.

Now we know. It will be blockchain.

In this video, ITM Trading’s Lynette Zang reveals her research that shows the elite’s plans to put EVERYTHING on blockchain, including the digitised title of all real estate and linking it to credit, so people are encouraged to fritter their assets away, leaving all assets in the hands of the elite.

Lynette discusses this further on the SGT Report video entitled BREAKING: BANKERS’ NEW SDR CRYPTO BLOCKCHAIN WILL ENSLAVE HUMANITY?? – Lynette Zang.

I share Lynette’s view that we need to understand it and act to stop it, however we can. Widespread exposure is a start.

And Dahboo7 has woken up to it, as he expresses in his impassioned video It Begins: The Blockchain Beast System Is Here .

And he, like me as I look at it, believe that Bitcoin was their creation, not some unknown techie. It has been a stalking horse for their plans, and Lynette Zang’s material from the IMF shows Bitcoin as a feeder into the new crypto SDR.

I encourage you to watch all three videos and spread this message far and wide, and as Dahboo7 says, be prepared.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

After 47 Years, Stephen Lewis Calls It Quits In A Scathing Critique Of Modern Markets

Another respected punter warns of an impending global market “inflection”:

For decades, portfolio managers around the WORLD would receive the periodic “Economics & Policy” newsletter, full of original insights on everything from the markets, to the economy, to geopolitics, as penned by Stephen Lewis, chief economist at ADM (if best known for his tenure at Monument Securities which was eventually absorbed by ADM). Sadly, on Friday Lewis sent out his “Valediction” – the last ever Economic Insights report. Instead of commenting on it, we present his full thoughts in their original form as this particular career epilogue, a scathing critique of capital markets, modern economists, central bankers, and everything else that is broken in today’s society, is a must read for all market participants, as well as economists, politicians and central bankers.

* * *

Economics & Policy

Valediction

By Stephen Lewis of ADM Investor Services International

After more than forty-seven years spent observing and commenting on economies and financial markets, I shall be retiring this week to eke out my remaining days, as is fitting, in contemplation of the eternal verities.

When I  set  out  in  the  markets, on 5 January 1970, the yields on sterling bonds, including  those  issued  by  the  UK government (gilt-edged),  were expressed  in  pounds,  shillings  and  pence. One of the first tasks to which I was put, when I joined the stockbroking firm of Phillips & Drew, was to convert these yields into the decimal form with which our computer, fully occupying the building on the opposite side of the street, could cope.  Back then, the London clearing banks were required to hold in cash an amount equivalent to at least 8% of their deposits and 28% in liquid assets (cash, money at call and Treasury and commercial bills). There was not much risk of a bank liquidity crisis in those days. International asset diversification for UK-based investors was impeded by capital controls, with returns subject to variations in the premium on scarce investment currency as much as in the underlying prices of the assets held. For all the restrictions, though, octogenarians commonly travelled into their offices in the City each working day primarily for the fun of it.  It was a different world, unimaginable to those too young to have known it.  When told that we worked at our desks in candlelight during the power cuts of the three-day week in 1973-74, they naturally find it hard to comprehend what it was that we could possibly have been doing, so dependent have we lately become on electricity.

Since 1970, there have been nine UK prime ministers, thirteen Chancellors of the Exchequer, nine US Presidents, seven Chairs of the Federal Reserve and six Governors of the Bank of England; central bankers tend to stick around. Through most of this period, the trend was towards more liberal economic and social conditions, though latterly a reaction seems to have been setting in under the label of ‘populism’.  While there are vested interests still championing the liberalising process, the election of  President Trump shook the confidence of those who had believed that the ‘end of history’ had come with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It no longer seems inevitable that the future will bring ever more globalisation under the banner of the peculiar set of liberal values developed in the USA during the late twentieth-century. 

However that may be, after almost a half-century of analysis, there are certain conclusions I would draw.

What stands out is the failure of economics, as an intellectual discipline, to come to grips with the real world.  This was obvious at the time of the global financial crisis of 2007-09.  Since then, academic economists have worked on the assumption that their lamentable performance when it came to  warning  of impending troubles has been forgotten,  or  else  they hope the world at large believes they have so refined their understanding that there could be no recurrence of that debacle.  But they have not subjected their ‘science’ to the root and branch criticism that is clearly called for. As they argue whether they have enough Greek  letters in their equations, events take their own course. A particular weakness in economic analysis arises from the tendency of economists to regard these letters as signifying objective entities. Yet to proceed in this way is to overlook the difficulties attaching to the collection of relevant data. There are problems, not only of the familiar kind relating to proper sampling and timeliness, but of a more fundamental nature. We are not entitled to assume that the concepts favoured by economists in their analyses – consumption, investment, etc. – refer to clearly-delineated objective realities that are important in a causal  explanation  of  economic  events. After all, whether an item of expenditure is to be classed as consumption or investment is, to an unsettling degree, a matter of convention. 

The sadness is that central bankers, in moving to an almost exclusively macro-economic focus in conducting monetary policy, have paid increasing attention to the prescriptions of these self-styled ‘scientists’ of the economy.  Virtually all central banks now subscribe to the frankly weird view that economies cannot grow satisfactorily unless they maintain a 2% rate of arbitrarily- defined consumer price inflation.  This is despite the evidence in this and earlier ages that economies can grow quite well in the absence  of  such  inflationary  price  behaviour  (after  all,  the  2%  target  implies  a  doubling  of the price-level every  thirty-five years).  Thus, we are presented with the spectacle of central banks seeking to pump up demand, even when labour markets are tighter than they have been for decades past. The argument  is  that, without  the  prospect  of  higher  prices  in  the  future, consumption and investment spending would both die away.  But that is not how human psychology works. It may well be that investors’ demand for financial assets depends on the outlook for asset prices but consumers and businesses view the markets in goods and services in a different way.  They must do so, or else it would never be possible to launch new products where prices start high but then decline, reflecting economies of scale.

Central banks have come round to accepting the view, first expressed by Milton Friedman, that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.  But this view is misleading. Friedman based his dictum on his reading of history. Money supply and nominal GDP seemed to be broadly correlated. A more precise statement of the underlying relationship is that inflation occurs when central banks accommodate inflationary forces that usually arise from non-monetary economic and social factors. Mr Bernanke, drew the conclusion from his broadly Friedmanite analysis of the Depression years, that monetary policy could prevent deflation, which he understood to mean falling consumer prices over however short a term. Consequently, he led the world into the most extreme policy of monetary  accommodation since the invention of money. The longer-term consequences of the resulting misallocation of capital have still to be seen. In any  case, the efforts of central  banks in the advanced economies to push consumer price inflation up to a sustained 2% pace have so far proved futile.  A 2% inflation rate,  incorporating the hedonic adjustments that the statisticians have adopted over the past twenty years, seems to be above the sustainable rate in current economic conditions. There was a time when central banks needed these adjustments if they were to achieve a published inflation rate as low as 2% but recently the statistical tricks have contributed to the monetary authorities’ embarrassment in continually falling short of their inflation targets.

It is telling that the theory on which central bank policies are now based should have assimilated the behaviour of all economic agents to that of the financial markets. This has been part of  the move away from output and employment as the goals of economic activity towards the generation of financial returns within a short-term  perspective. It is consistent with the development of ‘financial capitalism’, from the 1975 May Day reforms on Wall Street, through London’s ‘Big Bang’ in 1986 to the massive growth in financial instruments in the early years of this century. The academic tide ran, not altogether surprisingly, in a direction favourable to the interests benefiting most from this development of the capitalist economic model. While academic economists whiled away their time refining their mathematical  expressions, the past few decades were witnessing a major shift in political thinking about the economy.  Whereas in 1970 a compromise had been reached between capitalism and government regulation that accorded government a role, albeit limited, in managing markets and the economy, this broke down in face of the mounting strength of market forces and after continual disappointment with economic growth and inflation control.

The first crack came with President Nixon’s ‘closing of the gold window’ on 15 August 1971. This action, which marked the end of the fixed exchange rates that had, for the most part, prevailed up to that time, was arguably the most momentous event in economic policymaking of the past half-century.  In fact, on the day, it caused remarkably little stir in the London markets, only a sense of puzzlement.  This may well have reflected London’s isolation from international developments, stemming from  the very  strict UK exchange control regime in  force  at  that time. But with the advent of the Thatcher and Reagan administrations, free-market ideology was clearly in the ascendant.

The intellectual argument in favour of free markets, as against rigged markets and government intervention, is compelling. However, anyone who has been involved in markets will be aware that they are never perfectly free and fair to all participants. Instead of accepting uncritically the virtues of free markets and indiscriminately breaking down barriers and safeguards, policymakers would have been better employed addressing the dangers posed by the ‘free’ markets as they were developing. This was the lesson of the 2007-09 financial turmoil but it is a lesson that, by and large, has not been heeded.  The post-2008 growth in global credit massively raises the risk of a future crisis, despite official measures requiring more stringent bank capital requirements. Even these strengthened defences would prove flimsy in the event of any future collapse in confidence, a collapse that is all too likely to occur in view of the aforementioned misallocation of capital.

The promoters of free markets are wont to appeal to Adam Smith as their authority. This Enlightenment philosopher has suffered a similar fate to such luminaries as J M Keynes and Karl Marx, in that his followers have presented a distorted view of his insights. The ‘free marketeers’ focus on Smith’s work The Wealth of Nations without paying heed to the ethical presuppositions underlying that analysis.  His assumptions were derived from Hutcheson’s moral philosophy and are set out in his earlier publication, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, a work that is usually ignored or denigrated by Smith’s modern-day adherents. To be sure, his view of human nature, as there set out, is rather benign. He makes no allowance for the cheating and exploitation that characterise behaviour in actual market situations. His failure to understand, or at least to recognise, the moral failings of his fellow-men diminishes the value of his economic analysis as a guide to action.

Free markets have gone hand in hand with globalisation, the strengthening power of transnational commercial interests relative to that of national governments.  At the same time, in the advanced economies, there has been a growing sense among the many that a few are making off with the fruits of economic progress. These developments are probably connected. 

The positive function of the nation-state is to maintain equity between the social classes. The nation-state is the largest unit that can feasibly fulfill this function. I realised something was going badly wrong several years ago when a respected British fund manager said that he felt he had more in common with a banker in Frankfurt than with a factory-worker in Birmingham. The nation-state was no longer fostering a sense that we were all in it together.  The subsequent social tensions and rise of populism were no surprise.  In 1970, the UK ruling elite was seeking to dissolve national sovereignty in a broader European entity.  In view of the unhappy record of subsequent UK-European relations, the 1973 accession to the EEC is likely to be judged a historic mistake.  I had not expected to see the day when that decision would be reversed.  But Mrs May and her advisers seem to understand the crucial importance of the nation-state in preserving social justice.  If they have a chance of living up to their words, the UK may well become a beacon to the world.

With that thought, I shall lay down my pen and depart in peace.

End of quote.

Eerily aligned with the prognostications of Jim Rickards.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Two important commentators from completely different spheres use the term “Extinction Level Event”

My regular readers will know that I look for patterns in things that come into my awareness, and it has happened again this last week.

In this video (and others) Jim Rickards uses the term “Extinction Level Event” when discussing the financial scenario he sees facing the world anytime from today forwards, in his view most likely next year.

Then, looking from a completely different perspective, the predictive linguistic context that he has mastered, Clif High also uses the term “Extinction Level Event” to describe what he is seeing in his data concerning events later in 2017 and beyond.

With a rare and powerful term like this, two examples are enough, especially when it aligns with the time I see that we are in from a higher perspective.

I encourage you to prepare in whatever way is there for you, and listen to both of them make their case.

We live in interesting times…

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Next Subprime Crisis Is Here: 12 Signs That A Day Of Reckoning Has Arrived For The U.S. Auto Industry

In 2008, subprime mortgages almost single-handedly took down the entire financial system, and now a new subprime crisis is here.  In recent years, the auto industry has been able to boost sales by aggressively pushing people into auto loans that they cannot afford.  In particular, auto loans made to consumers with subprime credit have been accounting for an increasingly larger percentage of the market.  Unfortunately, when you make loans to people that should not be getting them, eventually a lot of those loans are going to start to go bad, and that is precisely what is happening now.  Meanwhile, automakers and dealers are starting to panic as sales have begun to fall and used car prices have started to crash.  If you work in the auto industry, you might remember how horrible the last recession was, and this new downturn could eventually turn out to be even worse.  The following are 12 signs that a day of reckoning has arrived for the U.S. auto industry…

#1 Seven out of the eight largest automakers in the United States fell short of their sales projections in March.

#2 Overall, U.S. auto sales so far in 2017 have been described as a “disaster” despite record spending on consumer incentives by automakers.

#3 Dealer inventories are now at the highest level that we have seen since the last financial crisis.  Why this is so troubling is because there are a whole lot of unsold vehicles just sitting there doing nothing, and this is becoming a major financial problem for many dealers.

#4 It now takes an average of 74 days before a dealer is able to sell a new vehicle.  This number is also the highest that it has been since the last financial crisis.

#5 Not only is Ford projecting that sales will fall this year, they are also projecting that sales will fall in 2018 as well.

#6 Used vehicle prices are already starting to decline dramatically

The used-vehicle price index from the National Automobile Dealers Association posted a 3.8% decline in February compared to the prior month. NADA also said wholesale prices fell 1.6%.

#7 As I discussed yesterday, Morgan Stanley is projecting that used car prices “could crash by up to 50%” over the next four or five years.

#8 Right now, more than a million Americans are behind on their payments on their auto loans.  This is something that has not happened since the last financial crisis.

#9 In 2017, U.S. consumers are more “underwater” on their auto loans than they have ever been before.

#10 Subprime auto loan losses have soared to their highest level since the last financial crisis, and the delinquency rate on those loans has risen to the highest level that we have seen since the last financial crisis.  By now, I am sure that you are starting to notice a pattern in these data points.

#11 At this moment, approximately $200,000,000,000 has been loaned out by auto lenders to consumers with subprime credit.

#12 Just like with subprime mortgages in the run up to the last financial crisis, subprime auto loans have been bundled together and sold as “securities” to investors.  And just like last time around, this has turned out to be a recipe for disaster

Many auto loans, including those considered subprime, are securitized and sold to investors. But Morgan Stanley recently reported that the share of auto securities tied to “deep subprime” loans – those given to borrowers with a FICO credit score below 550 — has risen from 5.1 percent in 2010 to 32.5 percent today. It said defaults on those bonds have risen significantly in the past five years.

Almost a quarter of the more than $1.1 trillion in U.S. auto loan debt is owed by subprime borrowers, and delinquency rates have hit their highest point in seven years.

In the old days, you could always count on the U.S. auto industry to bounce back eventually because of the economic strength of average U.S. consumers.

Unfortunately, the middle class in America is being systematically hollowed out by long-term economic trends that our leaders in Washington D.C. have consistently ignored.

We have become a nation of economic extremes.  There are more millionaires in this country than ever before, but meanwhile poverty is exploding in communities all over the country.

If you live in a prosperous area, things may be going great where you live for the moment.  But as Gallup has discovered, an all-time record high percentage of Americans are worrying “a great deal” about hunger and homelessness these days…

Over the past two years, an average of 67% of lower-income U.S. adults, up from 51% from 2010-2011, have worried “a great deal” about the problem of hunger and homelessness in the country. Concern has also increased among middle- and upper-income Americans, but they still worry far less than do lower-income Americans.

You may have plenty of money in your bank account, and so for you hunger and homelessness are not very big issues.  But for those that are just scraping by from month to month, having enough food and a place to sleep at night are top priorities.  Here is more from Gallup

Americans at all income levels are expressing greater concern about hunger and homelessness, and it is the top worry among lower-income Americans, who are most likely to struggle to pay for adequate food and housing.

In addition to the woes of the auto industry, the retail industry is going through the worst wave of store closings in modern American history, pension funds are melting down all over the nation, and stocks are primed for a crash of epic proportions.  Things are lining up just right for the kind of scenario that I laid out in The Beginning Of The End, but unfortunately most people are not listening to the warnings.

The same thing happened just before the great financial crisis of 2008.  All of the warning signs were there well in advance, and many of the experts were warning about what was coming as early as 2005.  But because it did not happen immediately, a lot of people greatly mocked the warnings.

But then the fall of 2008 arrived and all of the mockers suddenly went silent.

As you can see from the numbers that I shared above, a new crisis has already arrived.

The only question now is how bad it will ultimately turn out to be.

As always, let us hope for the best, but let us also get prepared for the worst.

End of quote.

In his book The Road to Ruin, Jim Rickards says you don’t know which snowflake will cause the avalanche or which event will cause the next financial crisis. Is the car loan game the trigger? Who knows?

In time we will know, but only in hindsight and, as Rickards said a couple of days ago, this is an extinction level event. Strong words for an insider.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Update on How the Jewish elite reconstructed the world in the 20th century and why you should care

I recently read two excellent, recently published books that discuss different aspects of the activities of the elite Jews in our world during the 20th century. The first was Alison Weir’s Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel and the second was Benton Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy. As I finished Weir’s book, I felt it was important to discuss it before I got too far into Bradberry’s book; but then I realised they are two contrasting views of overlapping events and, as such, they deserved to be discussed together.

If there is one thing they have in common (besides the obvious), it is the extent and quality of the research. They are both outstanding in this regard.

Weir describes her journey to write her book as being accidental:

What is now known as the “Second Intifada” (Palestinian uprising) was in the news (she’s talking about 2000 – Richard), and I grew curious about it. I decided to follow the news coverage to learn what this conflict was all about, and I fairly quickly noticed how one-sided the coverage was. My background was in journalism (I was at that time the editor of a very small weekly community newspaper), so I was aware that reporters are supposed to give the full picture in a more complete way than I felt was going on.

Because the Internet was available, making information on remote daily events far more accessible than previously, I began to research the news further. In doing so I discovered a far more drastic pattern of Israeli violence against Palestinians than mainstream U.S. news organizations were revealing.

For example, I discovered that large numbers of Palestinian children were being killed by Israeli forces, many of them through gunfire to the head – and that they had been killed before the far smaller number of Israeli children who eventually began also to be tragically killed. Similarly, I found that over 140 Palestinians of all ages had been killed before any Israelis in Israel, even though the media consistently were referring to Israeli violence as retaliatory.

After a few months of looking into this issue, becoming more and more disturbed by what I was finding in the region – and what began to appear to me to be a cover-up in the American media – I finally decided I needed to see for myself what was going on. I quit my job and went to the region as a freelance reporter, traveling independently throughout Gaza and the West Bank during the height of the uprising.

When I returned, I began an organization called “If Americans Knew.” The purpose was to create a nonpartisan, journalistic organization that would provide the facts on this extremely important issue to the American public, and on our connection to it.

End of quote.

None of this is any surprise to anyone with their eyes and ears open and their nose out of the television set. And these experiences sent Weir on a mission:

The Israel Lobby in the U.S. is just the tip of an older and far larger iceberg known as “political Zionism,” an international movement that began in the late 1800s with the goal of creating a Jewish state somewhere in the world. In 1897 this movement, led by a European journalist named Theodor Herzl[4], coalesced in the First Zionist Congress, held in Basel, Switzerland, which established the World Zionist Organization, representing 117 groups the first year; 900 the next.[5]

While Zionists considered such places as Argentina, Uganda, the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, and Texas,[6]they eventually settled on Palestine for the location of their proposed Jewish State, even though Palestine was already inhabited by a population that was 93-96 percent non-Jewish. The best analysis says the population was 96 percent Muslims and Christians,[7] who owned 99 percent of the land.[8]

After the Zionist Congress, Vienna’s rabbis sent two of their number to explore Palestine as a possible Jewish state. These rabbis recognized the obstacle that Palestinians presented to the plan, writing home: “The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man.”[9] Still, Zionists ultimately pushed forward. Numerous Zionist diary entries, letters, and other documents show that they decided to push out these non-Jews – financially, if possible; violently if necessary.[10]

End of quote.

As you can see, Weir quickly gets to a critical understanding – there is a global game in play. And she rapidly fingers the key US on the ground figure:

In 1912 prominent Jewish American attorney Louis Brandeis, who was to go on to become a Supreme Court Justice, became a Zionist.[27] Within two years he became head of the international Zionist Central Office, newly moved to America from Germany.[28]

While Brandeis is an unusually well known Supreme Court Justice, most Americans are unaware of the significant role he played in World War I and of his connection to Palestine.

Some of this work was done with Felix Frankfurter, who became a Supreme Court Justice two decades later.

Perhaps the aspect of Brandeis that is least known to the general public – and often even to academics – is the extent of his zealotry and the degree to which he used covert methods to achieve his aims. (Absolutely classic elite Jewish behaviour – Richard).

While today Brandeis is held in extremely high esteem by almost all Americans, there was significant opposition at the time to his appointment to the Supreme Court, largely centered on widespread accusations of unethical behavior. A typical example was the view that Brandeis was “a man who has certain high ideals in his imagination, but who is utterly unscrupulous, in method in reaching them.”[29]

While today such criticisms of Brandeis are either ignored or attributed to political differences and/or “anti-Semitism,”[30] there is evidence suggesting that such views may have been more accurate than Brandeis partisans would like.

In 1982 historian Bruce Allen Murphy, in a book that won a Certificate of Merit from the American Bar Association, reported that Brandeis and Frankfurter had secretly collaborated over many years on numerous covert political activities. Zionism was one of them.[31]

“[I]n one of the most unique arrangements in the Court’s history,  Brandeis enlisted Frankfurter, then a professor at Harvard Law School, as his paid political lobbyist and lieutenant,” writes Murphy, in his book The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices. “Working together over a period of 25 years, they placed a network of disciples in positions of influence, and labored diligently for the enactment of their desired programs.”[32]

“This adroit use of the politically skillful Frankfurter as an intermediary enabled Brandeis to keep his considerable political endeavors hidden from the public,” continues Murphy.[33]

End of quote.

Weir makes it pretty clear what game is being played and it’s a game that’s played globally and has been for centuries. She then reveals Brandeis’ involvement in The Parushim:

Even more surprising to this author – and even less well-known both to the public and to academics – is Brandeis’s membership in a secret society that covertly pushed Zionism both in the U.S. and internationally.[41]

Israeli professor Dr. Sarah Schmidt first reported this information in an article about the society published in 1978 in the American Jewish Historical Quarterly. She also devoted a chapter to the society in a 1995 book. Author and former New York Times editor Peter Grose, sympathetic to Zionism,[42]also reported on it in both a book and several subsequent articles. [43]

According to Grose, a highly regarded author, Brandeis was a leader of “an elitist secret society called the Parushim, the Hebrew word for ‘Pharisees’ and ‘separate,’ which grew out of Harvard’s Menorah Society.”[44]

Schmidt writes:  “The image that emerges of the Parushim is that of a secret underground guerilla force determined to influence the course of events in a quiet, anonymous way.”

Grose writes that Brandeis used the Parushim “as a private intellectual cadre, a pool of manpower for various assignments.”[45] Brandeis recruited ambitious young men, often from Harvard, to work on the Zionist cause – and further their careers in the process.

“As the Harvard men spread out across the land in their professional pursuits,” Grose reports, “their interests in Zionism were kept alive by secretive exchanges and the trappings of a fraternal order. Each invited initiate underwent a solemn ceremony, swearing the oath ‘to guard and to obey and to keep secret the laws and the labor of the fellowship, its existence and its aims.’”[46]

At the secret initiation ceremony, new members were told:

“You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation.”[47]

End of quote.

Weir then maps the evolution of Zionism and how this “flowering” (perhaps more accurately described as rotting) was covertly aided and abetted by Jewish interests in the US:

A number of groups operated in the U.S. to support Zionist paramilitary groups in Palestine. These often employed clandestine methods and deceptive names. The general American public had little idea about the true nature of these groups and what they were supporting.

 

  1. Irgun Delegation: Hillel Kook as “Peter Bergson“

A covert Irgun delegation operated in the U.S. from the late 1930s through 1948 under a half dozen front organizations, including the “Emergency Committee to Save European Jewry“ and “American Friends of a Jewish Palestine.”[252]

The main leader was Hillel Kook, the senior Irgun officer working outside Palestine. Upon coming to the U.S. he assumed the alias “Peter Bergson,” and the group is often called the “Bergson Boys.”

The other leader was Yitzhak Ben-Ami (father of Jeremy Ben-Ami, founder of today’s lobbying organization J-Street). Also closely involved was Eri Jabotinski, son of right-wing Zionist leader Vladimir “Ze’ev” Jabotinsky.[253] Also associated with the group was Meir Kahane, who twenty years later founded the violent Jewish Defense League (JDL).[254]

Though historians have documented that their purpose in coming to the U.S. was to raise money for Irgun activities in Palestine, this was unknown to the multitude of high-level supporters the group eventually acquired. These supporters included Eleanor Roosevelt,[255] Harry Truman, Dorothy Parker, Herbert Hoover, Will Rogers, Jr., Labor leader William Green, U.S. Solicitor General Fowler Harper, and U.S. Interior Secretary Harold Ickes.[256]

The FBI, however, suspected this illegal fundraising. It investigated the front groups several times, but largely bungled the investigations and failed to produce evidence. As author Rafael Medoff divulges: “In fact, according to Bergson lobbyist Baruch Rabinowitz, funds raised by the Bergsonites in the United States were indeed secretly transferred to the Irgun; the methods of transfer were simply so well concealed that the FBI could not uncover them.”[257]

End of quote.

I think you get the picture. Weir has done an outstanding job of mapping this complex, secretive web in the US that championed and fostered Zionism and the creation and funding of Israel. I commend Weir’s book to you if you want to get a handle on this relationship.

However, in my opinion, there’s a huge gap. Although she traces the history of Zionism, as I show above, she does not explore or even recognise the broader context within which Zionism arises – the behind the scenes global control of our world by the elite Jews, led by the Rothschilds. Indeed, the only mention of them is within the body of the Balfour Declaration. I find it fascinating that so few ask why Lord Balfour addressed this Declaration of November, 1917 to Lord Rothschild!!! Duh!!!

Until you see this and acknowledge it, what she writes so cogently and thoroughly about lacks context. With the context in place, it makes perfect sense. To me, it’s critical that we understand that Zionism is but one element of their activities in the world during the 20th century; indeed, all alternate systems, including communism, socialism, fascism and even capitalism as they allow it to be practised by we lesser mortals are creations of this elite Satanic Jewish control group, and they roll them out and draw them back at their whim, like shadow puppets in a pantomime. However, as Jim Rickards elucidates in his recent book The Road to Ruin, the socialist model, where the public owns little and the elite own all of the world’s assets, is their preferred and planned long-term model:

Schumpeter wrote at a critical juncture between the end of the Great Depression and the start of the Second World War. Capitalism was on trial and socialism was in vogue, including in the United States, where it had failed to take root during previous socialist cycles in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration, 1933–45, was filled with socialist reformers and endeavors from the massive Tennessee Valley Authority power project to agricultural communes like the federal farm camp at Marysville, California.

End of quote.

Rickards goes on to explain that the management of this preferred model is through fascism, which we witness being rolled out more and more every day using global terrorism as the excuse – David Icke’s Totalitarian Tiptoe.

Turning now to Benton Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy, we find a very different take on things. If Weir’s book is thoroughly and painstakingly researched, Bradberry’s book is a tour de force. Those of you who have been reading my scribblings for a while will know I’ve done not a small amount of research into these areas myself, and Bradberry is across all of the things I have looked into, including the original source material, but goes way, way beyond that. Not only that, he writes with a mastery and ease that makes the truth he shares eminently accessible to anyone with an open mind and a willingness to look. Bradberry documents the truth of what happened to Germany in the first half of the 20th century and by whom in a manner and on a level that, in my experience, no one else has approached.

A quick Internet search will show many interviews with Bradberry since his book release in 2015. In my opinion, this interview with Jeff Rense is a good place to start. In fact, I recommend you listen to it as a great introduction to and context for Bradberry’s book. Rense says the book is “about incredible lies about Germany and WWI and II. One of the greatest, worst myths in living memory; in history; modern history, at least. What actually happened is almost 180 degrees the opposite of the official story, it’s that bad and, in many cases, is demonstrably exactly the fact. We are all being lied to about what happened there, every single day”. I couldn’t agree more.

Bradberry is no career journalist or author. A retired military veteran of the cold war era, he is 78 years old, still works full time and “owns a couple of businesses”. It took him 3 ½ years to write.

Bradberry begins by illustrating the myth that we have all been fed as the truth about Germany, and one of his first illustrations is the movie Schindler’s List. I have discussed this movie with people and found, as Bradberry describes, that they take this to be a true story:

Consider the movie, “Schindler’s List,” by the Jewish director, Stephen Spielberg, for example. The Nazi commandant of the concentration camp (supposedly the Plaszow camp outside of Krakow, not far from Auschwitz), is standing shirtless on the balcony of his house with a hunting rifle over his bare shoulders. The rifle is equipped with a telescopic sight. In the movie, the house is located on a hill above the camp so that he can look down on the throngs of prisoners milling around in the compound below. He lifts the rifle to his shoulder and through the telescope begins casually scanning from one prisoner to another. The image through the telescope now fills the movie screen. The crosshairs of the scope stop on a randomly selected prisoner. He pulls the trigger and the prisoner drops to the ground, dead. The screen then cuts back to the Nazi commandant to show bored insouciance as he actuates the bolt of his rifle and casually raises it back to his shoulder. He fires again, and again a prisoner drops to the ground, dead. Bored with his “target practice,” he turns his attention to the beautiful, sexy, naked woman lying on a bed just inside the house from the balcony. The woman is purportedly one of his Jewish housemaids selected from the camp, who also apparently serves as his sex slave. His face expresses disdainful, though lackadaisical, cynicism.

The point of the shootings, as well as bringing in the naked housemaid (who just happens to be a Jew, what else?), is to show the Nazi officer as totally depraved, without conscience, morality, or empathy for other humans; in short, a psychopath. It is presumed, of course, that the murdered prisoners were all Jews. Two popular Jewish themes are combined here: Nazi evil and Jewish persecution.

This episode is entirely fictional, based on a novel by Thomas Keneally, an Australian, who only visited the concentration camps once in 1980 and who had no real knowledge of what went on there. No such actual event as described above has ever been recorded, yet the vast majority of movie goers swallow it whole and accept it as actual history.

The real Plaszow camp was located on the other side of a hill from the commandant’s house, and completely out of sight from the commandant’s balcony. It would have been impossible for him to shoot down into the compound as shown in the movie even if he had been inclined to do so, which is highly unlikely. The actual commandant of Plaszow, Amon Goeth, on which the character in the movie was based, lived in the house with his fiancé Ruth Kalder, with whom he had a child. Ruth said that they intended to marry but were unable to do so due to the chaos at the end of the war. She had her name and the child’s name changed to Goeth after the war with the help of Amon Goeth’s father. Amon Goeth was hanged after the war by the Polish government (the post war Polish government was all Jewish, incidentally) primarily for being a member of the Nazi party and a member of the Waffen-SS, not for shooting prisoners. Ruth described Amon Goeth as a cultured man who had a beautiful singing voice. Goeth did, indeed, have two Jewish housemaids selected from the camp while he was commandant, but they were not beautiful and sexy as depicted in the movie, and there is no information that he had untoward relations with them. That story was only included to add spice to the movie.

End of quote.

He gives many other illustrations. On the subject of Spielberg, I have come to view him as perhaps the greatest purveyor in film of these Jewish lies, deceit and propganda, and it is of no surprise to me that he was filmed directing the false flag Boston bombing event.

Bradberry also illustrates how the 19th century view of Germany “as a “cradle of law, virtue, and freedom,” and considered it a “distinction of the first rank” that the English belonged to the Germanic family of peoples”, suddenly changed:

This view of Germany was to change almost overnight with the outbreak of World War I. After the war began in 1914 a grotesque image of a rapacious, bloodthirsty and uniquely aggressive Germany quickly took form and became the stereotypical image of Germany in Europe and America. This new image of Germany was the direct result of a virulent anti-German propaganda campaign conducted by the British government and later joined by the United States government in which deliberate and systematic lies, distortions and false atrocity stories were disseminated to the British and American publics. The emotions of both the British and American publics were deliberately whipped up to a fever pitch of hatred for the “Hun.” A pathological hostility towards all things German, which later became such a familiar and integral part of Western thinking about Germany, had its birth in this skillful propaganda campaign.

End of quote.

Bradberry then goes on to explain the role played by the elite Jews after Germany’s December 1916 peace offer in bringing the United States into the war in exchange for the infamous Balfour Declaration. Simply put, Bradberry rips the covers off the Jewish hidden hand behind the unfolding of WWI, the 1917 Bolshevik revolution and WWII, and then documents it thoroughly, and with many sources that I myself have investigated and verified. He clearly illustrates that Communism is a Jewish creation, and all of its leaders in all of the countries from Russia and on through Eastern Europe between the wars and into Germany and Italy, were all Jewish and were responsible for horrific slaughter within those countries. As part of this, he elucidates how most European Jews are of Khazarian origin and not Middle Eastern. Indeed, his thoroughness extends to fingering those elite Jews that funded the French revolution:

This view of the Jews as perpetual troublemakers grew even stronger after the French Revolution of 1789 when the large Jewish role in bringing about that revolution became known. (The Jacobins who instigated the French Revolution were predominantly, if not entirely, Jewish. It was also the Jews who financed the French Revolution; men such as Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham Goldsmid, their partner Moses Mocatta and his nephew Moses Montifiore, all of London, along with Daniel Itsig and his son-in-law David Friedlander of Berlin, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace, among others.) The Czars were worried about the stability of the Russian Empire and worried about this Jewish tendency to foment revolution. The draconian restrictions on Jews were imposed in defense of Russia, not just to make life difficult for Jews.

End of quote.

The above paragraph encapsulates a truth that has been played out time and time again in Europe and elsewhere, yet is carefully hidden from the public. As I said, Bradberry rips the covers off this deceit. For example:

Two great blocks of Jewish bankers; the London and Paris based Rothschilds with their extensive network of banks, and the so-called German-American bankers, under the control of Jacob Schiff, cooperated together to finance the Russian Revolution. Schiff, a German born Jew, was an international banker of Wall Street, closely allied with other German and American Jewish bankers, including the (German born) Warburgs of New York and Hamburg, the Guggenheims, the Hanauers, the Kahns, and others. The Warburgs, both in Germany and in the U.S., were actually related to Jacob Schiff. One was his brother-in-law and the other a son-in-law. Other International Jewish financiers allied with Jacob Schiff and the Kuhn, Loeb Bank included, the Westphalian-Rheinland Syndicate in Germany; the Lazare brothers of Paris; the Ginzburgs of Petrograd (formerly St. Petersburg), Tokyo and Paris; Speyer and Company of London, New York and Frankfurt am Main; and, significantly, the Nya Banken of Stockholm, Sweden, under a Swedish Jew, Olof Aschberg. These banking blocks were “international” in the truest sense; owned and operated by international Jews who were loyal to no nation except International Jewry.

In their mission to bring down the Czar, the two banking groups jointly financed a propaganda campaign against Czarist Russia which had the effect – as intended – of creating world-wide hostility toward the Russian Empire. This anti-Czarist propaganda campaign was propagated through and trumpeted by all the major newspapers throughout Europe and America, as well as through all other information media, almost all of which was under Jewish control. (They were to conduct this same kind of propaganda campaign, except on a much larger scale, against Germany after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor.)

End of quote.

This is entirely consistent with my own analysis of the Bolshevik Revolution, though researched and documented in far more detail. Again, the dense detail that you see above is typical of Bradberry’s book.

Returning to the aftermath of WWI for a moment and, in particular, the Versailles peace conference:

The extent of Jewish influence at the Paris Peace Conference after the war is not very well known today, but, the fact is that Jews flocked there from all over the globe. They came from Russia, Eastern Europe, France, and particularly from the United States and Britain. From Britain came Lord Walter Rothschild, Lionel de Rothschilld, Chaim Weizmann, Lucien Wolfe, Moses Montefiore, Nachum Sokolove, Julius Kahn, Professor Sylvain Levi, and M. Bigar, among others.

From the United States came Rabbi Stephen Wise, Felix Frankfurter, Oscar Strauss, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Walter Lippman, the historian Simon Dubnow, Harry Friedenwald, Jacob de Haas, Mary Fels, Louis Robison, Bernard Flexner, and Judge Julian Mack of Philadelphia, among others. Ten additional Jews came as members of the American Jewish Congress, formed in 1918 specifically for the Paris Peace Conference.

From France came a group of Jews representing the Alliance Israelite Universelle, a Paris based international Jewish organization founded in 1860 to safeguard the human rights of Jews around the world.

Representing the American banking interests was the Jewish banker Paul Warburg, Chairman of the Federal Reserve. His brother Max Warburg, head of the German banking firm of Warburg and Company, was there, along with other German Jews, as a representative of German banking interests (but not representing Germany, per se, only Germany’s Jewish banking interests). These groups were joined by large numbers of Jews from Bolshevik Russia, Poland and Ukraine. Though they ostensibly represented several different countries, all the Jewish delegates congregated together as one group, first and foremost to secure the interests of International Jewry. The interests of the various countries they represented were only secondary, and of a much lower priority, if considered at all.

Astonishingly, each of the Allied leaders at the peace talks had a Jew as his primary adviser. President Wilson had Bernard Baruch. France’s Clemenceau’ had Georges Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild. Britain’s David Lloyd George had Sir Phillip Sassoon. Italy’s representative at the talks, Prime Minister Vittorio Emanuele Orlando, was himself half Jewish, and self identified as a Jew.

All of these Jews were comprehensively involved at every level in the numerous decisions which had to be made by the Conference, particularly those pertaining to their own interests. Jewish interests were given an inexplicably high priority in the final drafting of the peace settlement known as the Versailles Treaty. The Jews had a number of interests which they vigorously pursued, but they were especially determined to have the following three requirements included in the final treaty: (1) A League of Nations as the first step toward world government; (2) the recognition of Jewish “minority rights” in Eastern Europe and; (3) the creation of a British Mandate in Arab Palestine as the necessary first step toward an eventual Jewish state there. They accomplished all three.

It seems remarkable that Jewish interests could have so predominated at the conclusion of a war in which Jews had not participated as a separate corporate entity. And yet, there they were, at war’s end, having come from countries on both sides of the conflict, fully participating in the Peace Conference, and securing for themselves a major share of the spoils. Jewish power has never been more overtly demonstrated. They achieved everything they had set out to obtain.

End of quote.

Again, this turn of events is completely corroborated by the 1961 Washington speech of former Zionist insider Benjamin H Freedman, who was an attendee at the above conference.

Apart from the demonisation of Hitler, which I will touch on shortly, perhaps the greatest travesty of truth is the holohoax story of 6 million Jews slaughtered by Hitler, whereas the real slaughter has been that conducted by Jews against non-Jews throughout Europe and elsewhere. This is an example of the 180° reversal that Jeff Rense referred to and is classic Satanic practice. Let me give you some examples:

An unrestrained orgy of rape, torture, summary executions and murder all over Russia on an unheard of scale then ensued, carried out by the Cheka. Whole populations were liquidated, including independent farmers known as Kulaks, ethnic minorities, the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie, the landed gentry, senior military officers, intellectuals, artists, clergy, opposition members and anyone else who aroused the slightest suspicion. Bolshevik leaders openly proclaimed that the Red Terror was necessary for the extermination of entire social groups, especially the former “ruling classes,” in order to make way for the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The Jew, Martin Latsis, chief of the Ukrainian Cheka, explained in the newspaper, “Red Terror”: “We are engaged in exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class. Do not look in the file of incriminating evidence to see whether or not the accused rose up against the Soviets with arms or words. Ask him instead to which class he belongs, what is his background, his education, his profession. These are the questions that will determine the fate of the accused. That is the meaning and essence of the Red Terror.”

The Cheka grew rapidly and became a very large, very cruel state security organization. It’s organizational structure was changed several times over the following years, as was its name, from Cheka to GPU, to NKVD, and finally to KGB, but its mission remained essentially the same. Cheka offices were set up in every city and town. By 1921 a single branch of the Cheka called, “The troops for the internal Defense of the Republic,” numbering 200,000, was given the responsibility of policing and actually running the massive Gulag system of labor camps.

There is no way to know the precise number of deaths the Cheka was responsible for, but it surely ran into the scores of millions. This would include victims of forced collectivization, the forced famine, of which more later, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death in the Gulag…

…The same for the aristocracy. 200,000 members of the clergy — priests, monks and nuns — were systematically murdered in a horrific orgy of “bestial tortures.” They were reportedly scalped, strangled, drowned, crucified, and subjected to any other horrific death their murders could dream up. Czarist officers were forced aboard sealed barges by the hundreds, the barges were then towed out to sea and sunk with all aboard drowning. The Jews now controlled everything and were free to indulge their most cherished revenge fantasies against the hated, though now helpless, Russians. Local branches of the Cheka, comprised mainly of Jews, many of the lowest kind, and many of them violent, sadistic psychopaths, had total autonomy and were not required to report to anyone in carrying out this nightmare of torture and slaughter. Any Cheka member was completely free, without fear of censure or punishment, to kill, rape or torture anyone he chose (outside the government, that is), and he could do it in the most sadistic manner imaginable. They not only were not required to justify it, they were encouraged by the highest leaders, including Lenin himself, to show no mercy and to kill as many as possible. The Cheka was an incredibly brutal organization, with standing orders to execute at will.

What distinguished killings by the Cheka, according to one observer, was that they were “rage-fueled.” The Cheka agents didn’t just kill “class enemies,” they went at them in orgiastic frenzies, beating, stabbing, chopping and mutilated them — including men, women and children. An article in “Defender Magazine,” of October, 1933 describes their orgy of killing:

“Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their hands or by their feet and left hanging until they died of exhaustion… Others had hot lead poured in their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death… Pregnant women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies.”

During the second half of 1919, the Red Army was driven out of the Ukraine by the White Army. A number of investigations of the mass murders were then carried out by special commissions under the White Army’s occupation, one of which was the “Rohrbach Commission of Enquiry.” There were numerous places of public execution during the Red Army occupation. After the city of Kiev was taken by the White Army in August, 1919, Paul Rohrbach was sent by the British government to conduct an investigation. When the members of the Rohrbach Commission entered the execution hall of the Cheka of Kiev, they found:

“The whole cement floor was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches and had stopped flowing [coagulated]. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull with tufts of hair and other human remains. All of the walls were riddled with thousands of bullets and bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters [10 inches] wide by 25 centimeters deep [10 inches] and about 10 meters [33 ft.] long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.”

In his book, “The Secret Powers Behind Revolution,” French author Vicomte Leon de Poncins, published in the 1920s, wrote: “The Red Terror became so wide-spread that it is impossible to give here all the details of the principal means employed by the Cheka to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest, etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold-blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.”

End of quote. I could go on.

This illustrates the horrific slaughter these Jews conducted, yet we are taught to believe in the mythical slaughter of 6M Jews by Hitler’s Germany, when modern science amply demonstrates its falsity. To requote Jeff Rense, “We are all being lied to about what happened there, every single day” and we are.

I could spell out the truth of Hitler and how he was demonised, but I’ll let Bradberry tell you. His book deserves to be read by everyone.

Rather, I want to spend a moment looking at part of the reason why the Jewish elite has been shunned over history. If you believe the propaganda, it’s because the goyim are racist and we have been shamed into believing it by association with the holohoax. But there’s a bit more going on:

Jewish banks extend loans to Jewish businesses that a Gentile under similar circumstances would not be able to obtain, and then they back those Jewish businesses in difficult times to prevent failures. Jews throughout the “Diaspora” have access to international Jewish capital, which gives them a huge advantage in competing with their Gentile neighbors. Jews have a “collectivist” culture, whereas Christians are individualistic. Jews work together for the benefit of all Jews, at the exclusion of non-Jews. The Christian Gentile is the “lone” hunter, while Jews tend to “pack hunt.” They gang up to put the lone Gentile out of business by the use of cooperative commercial strategies. Jews thereby tend to achieve monopolies in their fields of endeavor, pushing the Gentiles out. Even the Jewish holy book of laws, the Talmud, does not forbid Jews from taking unfair advantage of Gentiles. The Talmud does require Jews, however, to treat other Jews fairly.

By these methods, Jews have always achieved a dominant position within the traditional societies they happen to live in, and they have shown no qualms about using their elite positions to exploit the host populations. A constant charge against them is that their loyalty to the host country they happen to live in is always secondary to their loyalty to other Jews and to the International Nation of Israel. German Jews, at the time of the Russian Revolution, were accused of being more loyal to Russian Jews than to the nation of Germany in which they lived. That pattern has always been the same. American Jews today are accused of being more loyal to Israel than to America.

End of quote.

If you look, it is not hard to find examples of this all over the world and when the pressure comes on, this complete lack of loyalty to their host country and people becomes visible and is usually what has triggered programs in the past (though these are usually widely exaggerated, as Henry Ford illustrated in 1920). Now, this is the heart of the matter, and it is considered completely anti-Semitic to mention it. But, as I’ve illustrated before, even this term is part of the Jewish elite’s weaponry, since most Jews are not Semites (from the Middle East) and most Semites are not Jews (they’re Arabs). The term anti-Semitic is pure, weaponised propaganda.

And so, as I said at the beginning, I want to point out how the elite Jews have transformed Europe in particular and the world in general during the 20th century, primarily using the events outlined in these two books. Let me make a partial list:

  • 1913 – the establishment of the US Federal Reserve
  • 1914 – 1918 WWI was used to undertake fundamental restructuring of Europe and beyond, including the following:
    • the destruction of what remained of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
    • the destruction of the Ottoman Empire, driven by the Jewish so-called “young Turks”
    • the gutting of Germany and the planting of the seeds for the emergence of Hitler or somebody like him
    • the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which committed to the creation of Israel in Palestine
    • the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement to completely destroy the structure of the Middle East in preparation for the wars and disputes that have plagued the area from then to the present day, including the current war in Syria, not to mention creating an unstable environment into which to plant Israel.
    • the genocide of 1 million Armenians
    • the mortal wounding of the British Pound as the global reserve currency in favour of the US dollar
  • 1917 – the Russian Bolshevik revolution and all that flowed from it
  • the interwar period:
    • the establishment of the Exchange Stabilisation Fund using the American public’s confiscated gold
    • the creation of the IMF and the World Bank (these, along with the ESF, were all the handiwork of Harry Dexter White (Weise), the Jewish undersecretary of Treasury, who reported to the infamous Jewish Henry Morgenthau Jr., as was the infamous post WWII plan for Germany’s return to an agrarian culture, known as the Morgenthau Plan but was actually the handiwork of Weise)
  • 1939 – 45 WWII
    • another round of restructuring of Europe
    • completion of the transfer of the global operational financial centre of the world to the United States and New York in particular
    • for all intents and purposes, the destruction of Germany and all it represented
    • the establishment of the holohoax as a propaganda tool which remains powerfully in play today
    • the context established for the creation of Israel
    • the establishment of nuclear weapons as a tool of global fear, amongst other purposes
    • the context for the Cold War (purely a propaganda tool of fear, since the elite Jews controlled both the United States and Russia)
    • the emergence of mind control techniques, both for individual and population level control
    • the sophisticated use of propaganda
    • the establishment of security organisations (CIA, Mossad, MI6, etc.), ostensibly serving their host countries but in reality serving the global elite

I could go on but I think you get the picture.

One thing that Bradberry misses is the control of all of the so-called Allies of WWII by the elite Jews. Although he sees the very clear influence upon Churchill and Roosevelt, he had not (yet) figured out that all of Russia, Britain, the United States and France were completely under the control of the elite Jews. This is, perhaps, most credibly described by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay in his extraordinary 1952 book “The Nameless War”. Indeed, even today very few understand this. When you do, the events of WWII and how the 20th century unfolded look very different.

December 26, 2016

There are two countries/continents I want to add to the picture:

Africa – although his exploitation began in the 19th century, Cecil Rhodes acted as an agent of the Rothschilds in his endeavours. Remember, Britain was controlled by the elite Jews from the time of the execution of Charles I at the hand of Oliver Cromwell, who was on the payroll of elite European Jews, so serving the so-called British Empire was actually serving the elite Jews. This was explained by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay in his extraordinary 1952 book “The Nameless War”. Nathan Rothschild outfoxed his fellow Jews to take control of the Bank of England at the time of the Battle of Waterloo.

China – It is not well understood that Mao Zedong was a henchman for these same interests. The following images make this clear.

Merry Christmas.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

 

Is a global economic collapse on our doorstep and, if so, how will it play out?

I have been writing about the emergence of an impending economic collapse for some time, and nothing has occurred to dissuade me from that view.

Perhaps the best and most credible book on this is the recently released book by Jim Rickards called The Road to Ruin: The Global Elites’ Secret Plan for the Next Financial Crisis.

I’m currently reading this and I find Rickards a colourful, expressive and cogent advocate for what is unfolding.

And Rickards has the credentials:

Rickards graduated from Lower Cape May Regional High School in Cape May, New Jersey, in 1969.[1] He graduated from The Johns Hopkins University in 1973 with a B.A. degree with honors and in 1974, from the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C. with an M.A.[2] in international economics. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and an LL.M in taxation from New York University School of Law.[3]

As general counsel for the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM),[4][5] he was the principal negotiator in the 1998 bailout of LTCM[6] by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Rickards worked on Wall Street for 35 years.[7] Rickards was the senior managing director for market intelligence at Omnis, Inc.,[6] a consulting firm.[3] On March 24, 2009, Rickards presented his view at a symposium at Johns Hopkins, that the U.S. dollar was facing imminent hyperinflation and was vulnerable to attack from foreign governments through the accumulation of gold and the establishment of a new global currency.[8]

On September 10, 2009, Rickards testified before the U.S. House of Representatives about the risks of financial modeling, VaR, and the 2008 financial crisis.[9]

End of quote.

He was also at the table when the resolution to the 2008 GFC was negotiated.

And to quote Rickards: For a decade at the start of my career, I was international tax counsel to Citibank, then the world’s most powerful private bank.

End of quote.

Few have the credentials, the intellect, the pragmatism, the compassion and the theoretical understanding of markets this man has.

And Rickards says, without question, a serious global financial and economic disruption is coming. I thoroughly recommend his book, so you understand what’s going on and why, and plan now to protect yourself because when it happens, it’s too late. This recent interview with Richie Allen is a great place to start to come to grips with Rickards and his counsel.

In this recent interview released two days ago, Brandon Smith expresses a very similar view, though Smith has a much broader social view of the drivers and consequences and I agree with pretty much everything he says.

This is not just about money, it’s about your very survival and it’s about an attempt by the global elite to take far greater control over the lives and the survival prospects of most of us, and the more that are awake to this fact, the better chance we have of defeating them.

If you agree, spread this far and wide. Let’s wake up the world before it’s too late.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com