Search results for Ursula Haverbeck

Ursula Haverbeck – The Hooton, Kaufman, B’nai B’rith Plans & the Migrant Crisis

I have written about Ursula Haverbeck in the past, most notably about her imprisonment in November last year:

87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck has been sentenced to imprisonment in Germany for doubting that people were “exterminated” by “gassing” in the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz.

End of quote.

I understand she has since been given a further term in jail.

And you can understand why they want her there.

Although this video by her was only posted on this blog yesterday with English subtitles, I believe it was originally recorded in September 2015, before she was jailed.

Ursula Haverbeck tells it like it is. She lays out the game of the elite Jews, beginning at a convention 1889, which marked the centenary of the French Revolution, which they also drove. I encourage you to watch this video. She really calls it as it is.

And she spots three dates:

1789 – the French Revolution

1889 – the Jewish planning conference, setting out their plans for the coming century

1989 – the Berlin wall came down

Again, no doubt just coincidence.

And she also explains where 9/11 fits in these plans.

What will it take to wake people up?

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Video of Ursula Haverbeck in court and being interviewed

As Michael Hoffman says:

This video is in German. Those who do not understand the language will profit nevertheless from watching this footage. Ursula Haverbeck’s powerful moral force and spirit of truth shine through, even across the language barrier.

As long as there are Germans evincing her high level of decency, eloquence and fearlessness, there is hope!

End of quote.

No-one can watch this and fail to see the decency, honour, integrity and peace in this 87 year old woman, and the similar qualities of her supporters.

Just to remind you, under German law, if you question the Holocaust, you have two choices:

  1. Plead guilty and place yourself in the hands of the court.
  2. Plead insanity.

You are cannot mount a proper legal defence, calling forth witnesses, etc. That’s what caught them out in the trials of Ernst Zundel in Canada. He was allowed to mount a defence, and did so.

Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil by Gerard Menuhin

I have begun to read Gerard Menuhin’s book on the holohoax entitled Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil: Recognize the True Enemy and Join to Fight Him. Seldom if ever have I been drawn to write about a book before I have finished reading it, and in this case I have barely started. But Menuhin’s clarity and directness communicate the picture of the truth of this massive global psyop so unequivocally that I want to encourage you to read it for yourself.

Firstly, if you have not read my post Is the Holocaust a hoax?, I encourage you to do so before reading this.

Secondly, I am drawn to repeat my oft written clarification that I am not anti-Jewish. In my opinion, the average Jew is even more a victim of the psyop run by the elite Khazarians (adopted Jews) than we goyim, and I have many Jewish friends that I treasure.

And Menuhin himself is Jewish. The son of well-known violinist Yehudi Menuhin, he is one of the smallish but growing number of Jews who have deconstructed the psyop and want to see it brought to an end.

Perhaps the place to start with Menuhin’s book is the cover.

The message it conveys is unmistakeable.

And his dedication:

For Germany.

For Germans who still want to be German.

For Humanity.

And let me share his Preface:

This book spans the time between 600 BC and the present day, and yet is also a personal journey. By re-interpreting some of the defining moments of history, it tells a terrible story of deception and self-deception; of absurd claims substantiated and pretensions realized, and of worthless beings which have succeeded in dominating the planet through their control of an intrinsically worthless medium of exchange: money.

Read this book, and all the pieces of the puzzle will fall into place.

In earlier times, there existed a people’s movement. It was, on the one hand, a political, on the other hand, a völkisch (ethnic), populist movement. Today, there are no longer any people’s movements, mainly because there are hardly any cohesive peoples left. There exists only the system. The foundation of this system rests on post-1945 re-education, whose symbol is a kind of hologram, that is to say, a projection. According to this projection, Germany and the Germans were guilty of a particular crime against these beings. The system demands, among other things, that all people without exception acknowledge this crime as without comparison and pay tribute to it, by humbling themselves constantly before innumerable shrines to its commemoration, and that Germany must eternally pay compensation in various ways, sometimes to the survivors of the crime, of which there seems to be an inexhaustible supply, and sometimes by giving U-boats to Israel.

Whoever rebels against this coercion is punished, imprisoned. He is accused of having denied the projection. Although the accusation of denial is nonsense, as one cannot deny what one does not hold for truth, the concept of “denial” has been upheld.

So it’s about a Belief, just as in the 16th century Protestants were persecuted by Catholics. It’s the modern world-embracing, universally-adhesive religion. Projection-deniers must be punished in order to maintain the system.

Those who reasonably ask for an explanation are rejected on the grounds that the projection cannot be judged, as it has already been judged. Its notoriety (“common knowledge”) has been declared, otherwise Germany is innocent. To propose putting the projection on trial, in whatever way, is a step back towards National Socialism; it would be against the concept of the Federal Republic of Germany, because it places the existing order in the dock. After all, the projection could be discovered to be an invention, if it is put on trial, it could be a lie. Or rather it would be considered to be unproven, until its actuality is proved.

But if the projection is declared to be null and void, what becomes of the system?

This is the purest logic. As re-education has undermined all the foundations of National Socialism, the possibility that the principles of this re-education could be fraudulent implies that the system could be guilty and that the era of National Socialism was not as bad as it is incessantly represented to be. So the system’s “justice” requires imprisonment instead of a just procedure; the system could not afford to allow the tenets of re-education to be called into question.

So, since the Nuremberg Trials the principal enemy of truth has mutated and evolved to the extent that the German State itself has been compelled for its own sake for 70 years to maintain a hypocritical system, whose exposure would call into question, not only the legitimacy of the entity called “The Federal Republic of Germany,” but also its entire administrative structure as well.

Nearly all Western countries are caught in the same predicament. Even if they are not responsible for this alleged capital crime, they have paid lip service to it since 1945 and may therefore not free themselves from it.

The Author, February 2016

End of quote.

Menuhin sees the game with great clarity and is calling it out.

And, for me, there is something both special and important when a Jew breaks the illusion and seeks to alert the world, like Benjamin Freedman, Shlomo Sand, Gilad Atzmon, Henry Makow and others have done before him, though I do not wish to downplay the contribution of others such as Ernst Zundel, Ursula Haverbeck and Robert Faurisson.

As soon as Chapter 1, Menuhin shares his childhood realisation that the German children he was at school with bore no relationship whatsoever to the monsters depicted in the stories of WWII, and that immediately after the war, the story of the holohoax did not exist:

Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.

Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war. (Robert Faurisson, “The Detail (the alleged Nazi gas chambers),” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 2), pp. 19-20)

End of quote.

Today, this seems as incongruous as suggesting that the Bolshevik Revolution was a Rothschild funded Jewish takeover of Russia, yet that is exactly what it was.

And he quickly hones in on that 6 million number:

The 6-million figure, in connection with the claimed suffering of European Jews, appeared regularly in North American newspapers of record at least since 1915 (The Sun, June 6, 1915), presumably to prepare the ground among emotionally labile readers for the time when testimony to support such a claim could confidently be manufactured. The use of “holocaust” in this context was introduced as early as 1903 (New York Times, “More Details of the Kishineff Massacre,” May 16, 1903; similar on May 20, 1903, “How This Country Should Regard Russia”).

End of quote.

He goes on to give many examples of its use prior to 1945. As Nicholas Kollerstrom illustrated, there were at least 166 examples of 6 million reportedly suffering Jews in the global press prior to 1945, reaching back to the 1890s.

I have long wondered where this 6M number came from. Does it have significance? And as often happens for me, the explanation presented itself from several sources within a matter of days. Here is Menuhin with part of the puzzle:

The Bible is full of “burnt sacrifices,” which evidently pleased God (e.g., Leviticus 1:14-17 details all the mumbo-jumbo pertaining to burnt sacrifices). Apparently, Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million Jews must vanish before the state of Israel can be formed: “You shall return minus 6 million.” Those 6 million had to disappear in “burning ovens.” So 6 million Jews had to be gassed and end up in burning ovens to fulfill the prophecies and satisfy the Talmud Torah dogmatists—a necessary adjunct to the financial entrepreneurs—of Israel’s legitimacy, according to their covenant with their God.

There have been—and indeed continue to be—many efforts to memorialize the Jews murdered in the Holocaust, but this effort of the surviving Hassidic masters stands out. The Zohar records that there are 600,000 letters in the Torah. Truth be told, our scrolls have far fewer letters—304,805 to be exact. Thus the number 600,000 cannot refer merely to a different text of the Bible, for the discrepancy is too great. The number 600,000 could therefore be considered a symbolic number.

One of the later mystics, Rabbi Natan Nata Shapiro of Krakow (Megaleh Amukot, 1585-1633) wrote that this number corresponds to the 600,000 Jewish souls that exist. Sure there are more people than that, but each soul can mystically animate more than one person. Moreover, the Hebrew name for Israel—Yisrael—is an acronym for Yesh Shishim Ribbuy Otiyot Latorah, there are 600,000 letters in the Torah. (Jerusalem Post, June 1, 2012; author’s italics)

End of quote.

Then there was this diagram that came my way:

Which shows how the 600,000 becomes 6M. And this 10 states or emanations of God was further clarified by a Jewish friend as:

So, we now can see where this 6M number came from and why it was so important for those who created Israel. And when you see this, it is easier to recognise that it was only ever a psyop; though with all good psyops, they have multiple purposes.

Menuhin has gone after the way the satanic elite Khazarian “Jews” have manipulated our reality for their own purposes and I can’t wait to see where he goes with this picture. I encourage you to get your own copy and find out. It makes an excellent companion for Benton Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy.

It’s critical humanity wakes up to how our world is run and change it.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Germany: Since 1945 a Vassal State to Israel

Dr. Ingrid Zundel is a brave woman who acts fearlessly to bring forth the truth about Germany and what really happened during WWII and thereafter. I share this article by her in full:

An 87-year-old lady of high intelligence and spotless reputation, Frau Ursula Haverbeck of Vlotho, Germany, has recently been sentenced to 10 months in prison for speaking out against incessant German-bashing. What did she say? Demanding proof about alleged atrocities in Auschwitz,  as so repeatedly and vociferously claimed. She says no such proof can be found.

Sheer heresy!

Specifically, Ms. Haverbeck insists that Auschwitz was a work camp, not a death camp. That’s good news – isn’t it? She agreed that there were casualties – as there will be in any war – but no deaths due to gassings. There never was a Führer plan to kill the Jews of Europe in government-sponsored, industrial-type fashion.

She said all this, and more, on an hour-long national television show called Panorama, similar to America’s Sixty Minutes.

Frau Haverbeck (right) is certainly no skinhead. She comes across as poised, articulate, and very well-informed. For her heretical assertions, she is expected to be incarcerated for almost an entire year. For her principled stand on behalf of historical truth, she earned herself the leftist slur “Nazi-Oma,” repeated with palpable relish on just about every European network and print syndication.

Off with her head!

As Ian Greenlaugh, a VT colleague of mine, noted this morning:

What sort of nation throws 87-year-old women into jail for speaking the truth? Certainly not one that can consider itself to be a functioning free and fair democracy.

A “free and fair democracy?” Well, that’s exactly what Germany is not . We’re talking faux “democracy.”  The Bundesrepublik, as a truncated post-war Germany has been rechristened, is still a vassal state, a fossil of a war lost by the German military more than seven decades ago, as we are never allowed to forget.

Here’s what’s not widely understood. Germany is an Allied -occupied colony and has been for more than 70+ years, despite a threadbare democratic façade. A conqueror’s ceasefire was declared in 1945 when the military arm of the Third Reich surrendered.  A pro forma ceasefire came into effect on the 8th of May 1945 as part of the military alliance called NATO. But there was never a peace treaty. Ever.

A genuine peace treaty was never allowed to be born.

It is my firm contention that World War II didn’t end.  In Germany, there is a bitter saying that the Bundesrepublik has been installed “… to keep the Americans in, the Russians out, and the Germans down.” That folkish wisdom fits the situation.

In 1998 in an interview taped five years before Ernst Zundel was politically kidnapped in broad daylight on American soil, he explained to an Israeli reporter exactly what this means: https://youtu.be/tEvrw37p5uw

Germany’s political enemies currently in charge of that chunk of real estate, called “Germany” in the vernacular, have succeeded in inducing guilt complexes into an entire unsuspecting population leading to the classic symptoms of the massive national psychosis that we can see today. A jokester once observed that there are more televisions in Germany than there are bathtubs, which means that brains gets scrubbed more often and more thoroughly than backsides.

After seventy+ years after the Third Reich surrendered, Germany is still an occupied country, a fact kept from the German people, “re-educated” to the hilt. Your average German has not the faintest clue.

“Induced insanity”, as Dr. Rigolf Hennig, a noted German psychiatrist, has stated, “has little to do with intelligence but a great deal to do with suspension of logical thought brought about by pseudo-religious indoctrination.”

Let me try to explain that to you. As the Catholic Church relies on Infallibility, politically beholden  judges in the German courts rely on “Manifest Obviousness” or Offenkundigkeit – roughly akin to the Anglo-Saxon concept of “Judicial Notice” – meaning “… what exists need not be proven.” Tuesday follows Monday. The sun sets in the West. The moon shines bright at night. Moscow is the capital of Russia. Guilt on the German character is fixed for all eternity. They gassed six million Jews.

Disbarred attorney Horst Mahler, who was sentenced to more than 10 years for his politically incorrect statements

What do you call a country in the very heart of Europe that does not have its own elected government? A USA protectorate? An Israeli colony? A trial run for the New World Order? Twistspeak in the Orwellian mode?

Here is the seamy tale. Legally, the Bundesrepublik is not the legitimate successor to the Reich. Even Germany’s own highest Constitutional Court affirmed it. It cannot be the legitimate successor because, under international law, the “Reich” is still the legitimate state and two states cannot legally govern the same geographic area at the same time.  Just as Russia didn’t disappear after the Soviet regime collapsed, the German Reich continues to exist, regardless of politically motivated claims to the contrary.

Offenkundigkeit exists to enforce political dogma and punish heresy. It means that if you are unlucky enough to end up with a legitimate question – for instance, Did Six Million Really Die? – before a judge who toes the expected political line, the fix is in for you before the trial even begins. A defense on the merits of your case is strictly precluded by law. You are not allowed to argue what you suspect to be true, or what you know to be true, or what you can prove to be true. Offenkundigkeit stands in the courtroom like the golem that it is – and you better stand at attention!

You are forbidden by law to bolster your assertion or even your opinion with evidence such as forensic facts – and if an attorney is foolish enough to insist, he or she is “guilty” of the same “crime” as his or her defendant – “guilty by mere association and intent.

Think of it this way: A man of impeccable repute is falsely accused of being a thief. Since most defendants are unschooled on details of the law, he may assume that he must prove his innocence. Not so! According to law and convention, the state must prove he stole.

He claims he didn’t steal. He argues there’s no evidence he stole. He gets himself a lawyer. The lawyer argues that the accusation can’t be true – where is the evidence? The judge replies: “It’s obvious. Offenkundig. Are you a thief yourself? Shut up – or else, I’ll sentence you for stealing.”

Offenkundigkeit has, thus, become the Holy Cow of German jurisprudence regarding so-called “war crimes” – and, lately, hate speech crimes. It gives beholden judges court jester license.

How can a defense attorney then offer a solid rebuttal, if the law not only forbids it but endangers the attorney himself? The short answer is that he can’t. The long answer is written on the wind.

Ernst Zundel (left) with his long-term German attorney, Jürgen Rieger, who died  mysteriously after his client’s trial of a sudden heart attack

The German “war crimes” trials and now their modern version, “hate crimes” trials, are a farce. They are the bull horns of a military occupation that likes to dress itself in democratic finery but is, in fact, an autocratic instrument enforcing a false history. The simple truth is that the German Reich was not obliterated when the German Wehrmacht surrendered. It was kept feeble on purpose by the victorious Allies so it could be ruled by a malicious cabal that took over as a provisional government whose function  to this day is to ensure endless “reparation” for a “crime” forensic science disproved decades ago!

The Bundesrepublik – it’s acronym is BRD – was meant to be a temporary measure, but you know what happens when unwelcome guests invade your house, rob you of your property title, dig in their heels and stay put. If they have the power that you no longer have, you’re stuck with unwelcome intruders that write the rules for you!

The Bundesrepublik was never meant to last. It was put in its place because there was a vacuu
m – until such time as the ill-fated Germans, held to be pathologically addicted to authoritarian rule of grandiose design, were sufficiently “matured politically” to vote themselves a government more suitable to Allied tastes. This, sadly, never happened. From the Allies’ point of view, the occupation was a noble interim – on paper. Until desirable maturity in the German populace had taken root, the powers-that-be would rule the besieged, bloodied, starving, decimated Germans for their own good in their own ruins, and “re-educate” them thoroughly for as long as it took until they came to their senses.

Zundel Lead Attorney Sylvia Stolz was bodily carried out of the courtroom for insisting that her client had the right to submit exculpatory evidence. Subsequently, Stolz was sentenced to more than three years in prison, two-thirds of which she served.

Ceasefire, yes – but no peace treaty.

That ceasefire exists to this day. That means any minute new guns could start firing again!

The pity is that the Germans were never told of this provisional arrangement that would have given them their freedom as soon as they showed proper remorse and paid enough restitution for crimes alleged to have happened. The facts of the matter were quietly swept under the rug.

Thus was created a bottomless pit. A thoroughly “re-educated” German can never show enough remorse. Not as long as there is still a nickel to be filched or a submarine to be delivered as a gesture of “good will” to the State of Israel.

Three post-war generations came and went. The usurpers of Germany’s sovereignty stayed on because they liked their cozy nests. They made the Germans pay for their own occupation through an arrangement called Stationierungskosten paid out of the BRD treasury, defended by the Allies’ guilt cudgel called Offenkundigkeit. Nobody knew what to ask – until Ernst Zundel’s Mannheim trial brought that red herring to the fore.

Judge Meinerzhagen, who sentenced Ernst Zundel to five years’ in prison and who told him during sentencing:  “ … Even a bird will refuse to fly over your grave!”

Time-tested Old-Testament hatred!

Today, most Germans fancy themselves to be benevolently ruled by a smug entity dressed up in democratic finery that still remains, in fact and law, a provisional administration kept carefully controlled. It still serves an alien agenda.

What alien agenda, you ask? The New World Order, waiting in the wings, that’s what.

End of quote.

In my opinion, it is not only Germany. It is most if not all countries. For example, the United States saw the final nail in its coffin with the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, which established it as the global “piggy bank” for the Rothschilds et al to fund and resource their global hegemony. In my opinion, it is no accident that their success in 1913 was promptly followed by WWI in 1914 and the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

Not that this lessens what has been done to Germany. Thank you, Ingrid, for your courage.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

A good day for the thought police

Today we witnessed two events which illustrate the cast iron grip that the Jewish “mafia” has on our world.

Actually, this one was yesterday:

87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck has been sentenced to imprisonment in Germany for doubting that people were “exterminated” by “gassing” in the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz.

The defendant, in good spirits, reiterated her doubts in the courtroom. She arrived without a lawyer, and defended herself. Some fifty of her supporters crowded the courtroom and the hall outside.

She was accused of giving an interview to the German magazine Panorama in which she stated that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp but a labor camp. The mass murder of Jews had not taken place, she said.

Haverbeck, former chairwoman of the now-banned freethought association, “Collegium Humanum,” told the judge, “Here, I stand.”

Turning to the prosecutor she asked, “How do you as a lawyer prove the accusation that Auschwitz was an extermination camp?” Her request for a revisionist historian to give evidence that at Auschwitz no one had been gassed, was rejected by Judge Jönsson who stated: “It is futile to argue with people who do not accept the facts.”

The German government prosecutor maintained that the defendant’s “fanatical delusion” had not abated and that, despite her advanced age, Ursula Haverbeck must be sentenced to 10 months in prison without parole. The judge agreed and the sentence was imposed.

In 2009, Haverbeck was fined thousands of dollars in the District Court of Bad Oeynhausen, for having given offense to Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Central Council of Jews.

End of quote.

I have presented the evidence on this in the past, and it is simply irrefutable. There were not 6M Jews gassed to death at Auschwitz and elsewhere. And if you want a simple, single piece of evidence, watch this video made 20 years ago by David Cole. Back then, David was a young, smart Jewish American who simply wanted to experience the location of the murder of so many Jews – Auschwitz. But David is as smart as a whip and has a mind like a steel trap, and he realised that what he was witnessing at Auschwitz simply could not have been used to gas Jews or anyone else. Watch David’s video. You cannot do so and not draw the same conclusions David did. As a result of David exposing the lie, he was threatened and had a price put on his head by the ADL. He paid them off and “disappeared” for almost 20 years, actually living very publicly in Hollywood as David Stein. Until an ex-girlfriend, whose habits he decided to stop funding, outed him in 2013.

But what was truly special about David was he was willing to examine the evidence in front of him and discard the beliefs about Auschwitz that had been inculcated into him as he grew up. THAT fact alone makes him a most unusual human being. Not many are willing to do so, in my experience. Most people don’t even realise how stuck inside their beliefs they are, let alone be willing to consider evidence that is contrary to them. Most people are simply blind to such evidence.

And so, Ursula Haverbeck  is being sent to jail for questioning a bald faced lie. But it’s against the law to do so in Germany. I wonder why? I honour her courage.

As James Perloff wrote today, “Question the Holocaust, go to prison. But question Armenian genocide, Ukraine’s Holodomor, Cambodia, or any OTHER genocide, NOTHING HAPPENS.”

Actually, I don’t wonder why. It’s self-evident.

And the other great success for the thought police was the conviction of Arthur Topham in Canada for a hate crime:

The 12-member jury found Arthur Topham guilty of one count of wilful promotion of hatred, and not guilty of the second count of promoting hatred.

End of quote.

I discussed this case recently.

As Henry Makow wrote: “The truth is “hate” for those who hate the truth.”

And although this is a few months old, I’m drawn to share this article with you entitled Roi Tov…Missing…and Perhaps Silenced:

Roi Tov, author of The Cross of Bethlehem and a columnist for Veterans Today, is missing, and some are speculating that he may have been permanently silenced by Israel.

Tov formerly served as an officer in the Israeli military, but unable to stomach the day-to-day horrors of occupation, he converted to Christianity and began to speak out publicly on the Jewish state’s massive record of human rights violations. His actions led to a terminus of his Israeli citizenship and a flight from the country. Eventually he settled in Bolivia, where he was initially given refugee status, but Tov, in a number of blog posts, expressed the view that Bolivia and the government of Evo Morales had in essence made a Faustian bargain with Israel to turn his life into a living hell. He soon found himself stalked on the streets of La Paz and at times physically assaulted (see second article below).

Tov’s experiences are related in his two books, The Cross of Bethlehem, published in 2009, and The Cross of Bethlehem II, released in 2012.

In his last blog posts he expressed the view that he had been targeted for assassination. His very last post, in late August of 2014, ends with the words, “Thank you for having read me in recent years.”

End of quote.

I commend the rest of the article to you.

I’m drawn to finish with this brief video from Brother Nathaniel posted today on Netanyahu and the future of Jerusalem. The connection to the above is self-evident and needs no embellishment from me.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com