Search results for blaylock

“Your Aging Brain” – Dr Russell Blaylock – Essential knowledge for us all

I have shared presentations by Dr. Blaylock in the past. He was a neurosurgeon for some 24 years before becoming a champion of helping people to understand what processed food is doing to us, and how often lies and deceit have been used to get a food or an ingredient into the food chain. And if you think the food you are consuming is safe for you and your children – unless you are extremely careful – think again. Many things we are persuaded are safe for us to eat, simply are not.

If you haven’t understood that there is a detailed plan to poison us, watch this video. Watch it and make up your own mind.

I never ask you to believe anything I write about. I ask you to make up your own mind – but not dismiss what I share with you based upon your existing beliefs. Beliefs blind us all.

Dr Russell Blaylock – What Chemtrails do to the Brain

I have previously shared the work of Dr Russell Blaylock. In this interview, he begins by explaining how aluminium enters the brain via the nose, contributing to if not causing Alzheimer’s disease. He then goes on to discuss the plans to reduce the human population dramatically.

More critical information on the role of nagalase blocking the action of GcMAF and hence shutting down our immune systems

Yesterday (July 29th), Mike Adams posted an article entitled Cancer industry profits ‘locked in’ by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines… spurs tumor growth… explains aggressive vaccine push. Its focus is self-evident:

One of the world’s most lucrative industries, spending on cancer drugs reached an all-time high last year, as it was valued at more than $100 billion. Spending on cancer drugs increased 6.5 percent annually over the past five years and is expected to continue growing at a rate of 8 percent each year through 2018, according to figures provided by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.
That spending is highly concentrated, as the US and five of Europe’s largest countries account for nearly two-thirds of the entire market.
This means that billions and billions of dollars are secured by Americans being diagnosed with cancer.
That’s one profitable industry; however, it could all be completely dismantled by one thing: a cure.

End of quote.

But what really interested me was a later comment:

In an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Dr. Ted Broer, an internationally recognized health and nutrition expert also based in Florida, describes how cutting edge Dr. Bradstreet’s work was, as well as a discovery he made that very well may have placed him in great danger and could have been the motive for his suspected murder.
The alternative doctors who went missing and/or were killed, were reportedly “interlocked” through Dr. Bradstreet and Dr. Gonzalez’s extensive research on autism, and what’s causing autism, according to Dr. Broer.
Dr. Gonzalez, a renown holistic cancer treatment pioneer who helped thousands overcome the disease through alternative medicine, died of an apparent heart attack just one month after Dr. Bradstreet’s body was discovered floating in a river.

End of quote.

In listening to this interview, I felt it made a powerful contribution to our understanding of what happened to these doctors and what they were onto. I also understand the protection that comes to people such as Dr. Broer when their information is in the public domain – the reason for eliminating them has gone.

I have posted an edited version of the recording here (essentially removing the first 28 minutes).

I have also transcribed the section of the recording on nagalase and GcMAF. Here are a few quotes:

Apparently, since these guys are dead and I can’t talk to them; they had found that the nagalase enzyme/protein that was made by cancer cells and viruses, which causes immunodeficiency, is being added through the immunizations, either through viruses or through the immunization itself being given nagalase.

This is such incredibly damning information for the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and those folks that are producing immunizations that, apparently, they didn’t want these guys around. Now, I’m not saying what happened to these guys, I’m just saying they’re not on this planet anymore.

So, what ends up happening is this: the Gc protein cannot attach itself to vitamin D because of the nagalase. When that happens, the nagalase becomes the agent that causes the cancer.

Now, let’s talk about nagalase for a second. We know that nagalase is being found in super high concentrations in autistic children, and what they’re saying is that the nagalase protein, this viral protein was not in these children at childbirth, but it’s being introduced, somehow, into these children, they felt during the immunization process…

…As an extremely sensitive marker for all cancer, nagalase provides a powerful system for early detection. Serial nagalase testing provides a reliable and accurate method for tracking the results of any therapeutic regime for cancer, AIDS, or other chronic infections. This is an article from a book from Dr. Tim Smith M.D. He goes on to say – now, this is super important, guys, listen to me on this – he says that nagalase is like a stealth bomber. The nagalase enzyme synthesized in and released from cancer cells or a virus particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes – this is part of your immune system – and simply wipes them out with an incredibly precise “bomb” is what he says. How precise? He says, “let me put it this way: nagalase locates and attacks one specific 2-electron bond located at and only at the 420th amino acid position on a huge protein molecule, one of tens of thousands of proteins, each containing millions of electrons. This is like selectively taking out a park bench in a major city from 6,000 miles away. More astonishing, if that is possible, nagalase never misses its target. There is no collateral damage…

…These doctors apparently felt that this nagalase was being introduced via immunization, either viral or through nagalase itself being directly injected into the children who were developing autism, who had very high nagalase at the very beginning of the autistic cycle, immediately after the immunizations. So, what they’re saying is, there’s a smoking gun here with nagalase and the compromised immune system…

…Now, one of the conditions that Dr. Russell Blaylock talks about that occurs immediately after immunization, especially with the DPT shot, is what’s called in an encephalitic scream, and what happens with that, Doug, is you give this little baby like at 18 months its second or third round booster shots, and what happens is this cytokine storm hits the body, because it can’t use vitamin D anymore, and it causes the brain to swell, and this little child starts screaming for hours and hours and hours, with its back arched in its bed. It happens all the time, and when you call most doctors that give these children these shots, they say, “Oh, that’s normal, that will go away tomorrow.”

That’s called an encephalitic scream from swelling of the brain and the brain is pressing against the skull. Now, this is crazy. I mean, this is absolutely crazy that this is actually going on. And so, what she’s saying is, when you increase the vitamin D levels, that all of these different symptoms end up going away. Also, when you inhibit vitamin D from attaching itself to the macrophage, you cause what’s called a cytokine production and phosphatase, which massively increases inflammation in the cardiovascular system, leading to cardiovascular disease and atherosclerotic plaquing.

So, what I’m saying is that when you give this chemical into your body, this nagalase, it causes atherosclerotic plaquing, heart disease and diabetes, and it causes you to die from these diseases much younger than you normally would.

End of quotes.

You can download the transcript from here. And if you find some typos, let me know…

Now, what we are still waiting for is some analyses of current vaccines which show us if and how this is being done – using viral triggering or directly via nagalase. Given the focus this now has, we’ll know soon enough.

Vaccines, Depression and Neurodegeneration After Age 50

Much of the conversation about vaccination tends to focus on the horrific effects on children, including autism. However there are also a set of issues for the elderly.

Dr. Russell Blaylock discusses this in this article. I quote:

Previously, it was thought that major depression was secondary to a deficiency in certain neurotransmitters in the brain, particularly the monoamines, which include serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine. While alterations in these important mood-related neurotransmitters is found with major depression, growing evidence indicates that the primary culprit is low-grade, chronic brain inflammation.

In addition, we now know that inflammatory cytokines can lower serotonin significantly and for long periods by a number of different mechanisms.

MSG and Depression

Researchers have also discovered that most people with major depressive disease (MDD) have higher levels of the neurotransmitter glutamate in their spinal fluid (CSF) and blood plasma. This is the same glutamate found as a food additive-for example, MSG (monosodium glutamate), hydrolyzed proteins, calcium or sodium casienate, soy protein isolate, vegetable protein concentrate or isolate, etc.

Much of the free glutamate in the brain of depressed people comes from within, that is it escapes from special cells within the brain itself (microglia and astrocytes). Free glutamate, that is, existing outside the neurons, is very toxic to brain connections and brain cells themselves — mainly by a process called excitotoxicity.

This connection between high brain glutamate levels and major depression was discovered quite by accident, when researchers observed that the anesthetic drug ketamine could relieve depression for a prolonged period. Ketamine is a powerful blocking drug for a class of glutamate receptors (NMDA receptors)…

…A great number of studies have shown that when you vaccinate an animal, the body‘s inflammatory cytokines not only increase dramatically, but so do the brain‘s inflammatory chemicals. The brain has its own immune system that is intimately connected to the body‘s immune system. The main immune cell in the brain is called a microglia. Normally, these brain cells are lying throughout the brain in a resting state (called ramified).

Once activated, they can move around, traveling between brain cells like amoeba (called amoeboid microglia).

In the resting state, they release chemicals that support the growth and protection of brain cells and their connections (dendrites and synapses). But when activated, they secrete a number of very harmful chemicals, including inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, complement, free radicals, lipid peroxidation products, and two excitotoxins — glutamate and quinolinic acid

…There is also another immune phenomenon that plays a major role in vaccine-related brain injury. Researchers discovered that when you vaccinate an animal, the brain microglia immune cells turn on partially (called priming), that is, they are in a state of high readiness. If the immune system is activated again soon after (days, weeks to months), these microglia explode into action secreting levels of their destructive chemicals far higher than normal. This overreaction can be very destructive and make you feel very depressed.

Stimulating your immune system with a vaccine is far different than contracting an infectious illness naturally. Vaccines are made of two components — the agent you wish to vaccinate against — for example, the measles virus; and an immune system booster called an immune adjuvant.

These adjuvants are composed of such things as aluminum compounds, MSG, lipid compounds and even mercury. Their job is to make the immune system react as intensely as possible and for as long as possible.

Studies have shown that these adjuvants, from a single vaccine, can cause immune overactivation for as long as two years. This means that the brain microglia remain active as well, continuously pouring out destructive chemicals. In fact, one study found that a single injection of an immune activating substance could cause brain immune overactivation for over a year. This is very destructive.

End of quote.

I commend the entire article to you, along with  Dr. Blaylock’s work at his website.

A powerful, factual presentation on how the modern diet destroys health

Dr. Russell Blaylock was a neurosurgeon for 24 years, before retiring and becoming a powerful advocate for explaining how the modern diet and vaccination is the cause of so many illnesses and apparently modern social maladies, including ADD, reduced IQ, increased violence and criminal behaviour.

In this presentation, Blaylock shares with us some extraordinary facts about the brain and the documented evidence for the effects of vaccination and modern diet on our health.

I commend it to you.

The Great Cholesterol Myth and why it has been promoted

 

In late October (2013), Australia’s Government-owned broadcaster, the ABC, broadcast two episodes of its Catalyst science programme, conducting a thorough examination of the role of cholesterol in heart disease, and the prescription of statins in particular to lower this “risky” cholesterol (thank you, Christopher).

The first on 24 October 2013 was called Heart of the Matter Part 1 – Dietary Villains

The second on 31 October 2013 was called Heart of the Matter Part 2 – Cholesterol Drug War

In my view, these were very well researched, and the evidence was overwhelming:

The evidence does not support the notion that cholesterol is a causal factor in heart disease.

Quite independently the following article entitled The Great Cholesterol Myth by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick came across my desk yesterday. Dr. Kendrick has written a book entitled The Great Cholesterol Con.

I quote from this article:

The cholesterol hypothesis can be likened to a cathedral built on a bog. Rather than admit they made a horrible mistake and let it sink, the builders decided to try and keep the cathedral afloat at all costs. Each time a crack appeared, a new buttress was built. Then further buttresses were built to support the original buttresses.

Although direct contradictions to the cholesterol hypothesis repeatedly appear, nobody dares to say ‘okay, this isn’t working, time to build again from scratch’. That decision has become just too painful, especially
now that massive industries, Nobel prizes, and glittering scientific careers, have grown on the back of the cholesterol hypothesis. The statin market alone is worth more than US$14 billion each year.

In reality, cracks in the hypothesis appeared right from the very start. The first of these was the stark observation by Prof. Ancel Keys that cholesterol in the diet has no effect on cholesterol levels in the bloodstream: “There’s no connection whatsoever between cholesterol in food and cholesterol in blood. And we’ve known that all along. Cholesterol in the diet doesn’t matter at all unless you happen to be a chicken or a rabbit.”1

A bit of a blow to a cholesterol hypothesis, you might think, to find that dietary cholesterol has no effect on blood cholesterol levels. However, as everyone was by then fully convinced that something rich and ‘fatty’ in the diet was the primary cause of heart disease, nobody was willing to let go.

So the hypothesis quietly altered, from cholesterol in the diet to saturated fat in the diet – or a bit of both. As if cholesterol and saturated fat are similar things. In reality, this could hardly be further from the truth. Saturated fat and cholesterol have completely different functions in the body, and they have very different chemical structures.

As chemist Joseph Black warned over 200 years ago: “A nice adaptation of conditions will make almost any hypothesis agree with the phenomena. This will please the imagination, but does not advance our knowledge.”2

Unfortunately, this adaptation did not work. It is true that Ancel Keys appeared to have proven the link between saturated fat consumption and heart disease, but when it came to the major interventional trials, confirmation proved elusive.

The MR-FIT trial in the USA was the most determined effort to prove the case. This was a massive study in which over 350,000 men at high risk of heart disease were recruited. In one set of participants, cholesterol consumption was cut by 42 percent, saturated fat consumption by 28 percent and total calories by 21 percent. This should have made a noticeable dent in heart disease rates.

But nothing happened. The originators of the MR-FIT trials refer to the results as “disappointing,” and say in their conclusions: “The overall results do not show a beneficial effect on Coronary Heart Disease or total mortality from this multifactor intervention.”

In fact, no clinical trial on reducing saturated fat intake has ever shown a reduction in heart disease. Some have shown the exact opposite:

“As multiple interventions against risk factors for coronary heart disease in middle aged men at only moderate risk seem to have failed to reduce both morbidity and mortality such interventions become increasingly difficult to justify. This runs counter to the recommendations of many national and international advisory bodies which must now take the recent findings from Finland into consideration. Not to do so may be ethically unacceptable.”3

This quote followed a disturbing trial involving Finnish businessmen. In a 10-year follow-up to the original five-year trial, it was found that those men who continued to follow a low saturated fat diet were twice as likely to die of heart disease as those who didn’t.

It is not as if this was one negative to set against a whole series of positive trials. In 1998, the Danish doctor Uffe Ravnskov looked at a broader selection of trials: “The crucial test is the controlled, randomised trial. Eight such trials using diet as the only treatment has been performed but neither the number of fatal or non-fatal heart attacks was reduced.” As Ravnskov makes clear, no trial has ever demonstrated benefits from reducing dietary saturated fat. At this point most people might think it was time to pull the plug.

Far from it. In 1988, the surgeon general’s office in the USA decided to silence the nay sayers by putting together the definitive report proving a causal link. Eleven years later the project was abandoned. In a circulated letter, it was stated that the office “did not anticipate fully the magnitude of the additional external expertise and staff resources that would be needed.”

Bill Harlan, a member of the oversight committee and associate director of the Office of Disease Prevention at the US National Institute of Health, says: “The report was initiated with a preconceived opinion of the conclusions, but the science behind those opinions was not holding up. Clearly the thoughts of yesterday were not going to serve us very well.”

The sound of a sinking cathedral fills the air with a great sucking slurpy noise. But still nobody let go. Instead, more buttresses were desperately thrown at a rapidly disappearing pile of rocks.

Variations on a theme emerged. It is not saturated fat per se that causes heart disease. It’s the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat that is critical. Or is it the consumption of monounsaturated fats, or a lack of omega-3 fatty acids, or an excess of omega-6? Take your pick. These, and a host of other add-on hypotheses, have their proponents.

As of today nobody can – or will – tell you which type of fat, in what proportions, added to what type of anti-oxidant, vegetable, monounsaturated fat or omega-3 is the true culprit. Hugely complicated explanations are formulated, but they all fall apart under scrutiny.

This may all seem incredible, such has been the level of anti-fat propaganda, but it is true. With the exception of the Ancel Keys’ flawed Seven Countries Study (he pre-selected the seven countries for his study in order to prove his hypothesis), there is not one scrap of direct evidence.

But, of course, there are two parts to the cholesterol hypothesis. The diet part, and the raised cholesterol level part. Leaving diet behind, surely it has been proven beyond doubt that a raised cholesterol level is the most important cause of heart disease?

End of quote.

 All in all, a pretty damning picture of a well-orchestrated train smash in human health.

And to make it even more entertaining, we have the ABC’s own health specialist Dr Norman Swan that the Catalyst report could cause death. At least The Age newspaper that carried this story had the decency to place the article under their entertainment section.

I encourage you to watch the two Catalyst episodes or read the transcripts provided, and as you do so, I encourage you to examine how this con came to be put in place, because it is so evident if you focus on it, and it points to the hand behind it. In simple terms, the path for Ancel Keys to be able to sell his deceptive story was cleared. Articles were published in major magazines to laud his “great work”. Keys was placed in a position where he could influence the acceptance of his scant evidence. US political posturing was used to reinforce the adoption of statin drugs. Then of course we have the Nobel prizes and the wonderfully successful careers for those who play the game… And so it goes.

We even now have those arguing statins should be put in the water supply. Sound familiar?

As I said earlier, for me the case is pretty clear:

·    Cholesterol is not a causal factor in heart disease

·    We have been sold down the drain on what is the best diet for us

 I quote from the first Catalyst episode:

Dr Stephen Sinatra
Well, the inflammatory theory of heart disease I think is accepted more and more now. I think the general
cardiovascular community is still focusing on cholesterol. They need to focus more on inflammation, and that’s where, you know, emotional stress…

But sugar. Sugar is really the fall when it comes to cardiovascular disease. You see, we’ve placed all this emphasis on cholesterol, we’ve taken it off sugar, and that’s the problem. Then you’re getting more insulin responses, and we know that insulin is the number one indicator for inducing what we call inflammation of blood vessels.

Dr Jonny Bowden
Sugar is far more damaging to the heart than fat ever was, and we’re beginning to see this now. So, this focus on cholesterol has been incredibly destructive because we haven’t looked at these real promoters of heart disease – inflammation, oxidative damage, sugar in the diet, and number one with a bullet – stress.

We have been steered away from healthy saturated fats to unhealthy unsaturated fats:

Dr Jonny Bowden
Margarine is the perfect example of the stupidest nutritional swap-out in history. We had this trans fat-laden crappy manufactured product that we were eating because we were so phobic about saturated fat and cholesterol.

Dr Stephen Sinatra
To switch to polyunsaturated fats with the vegetable oils, that’s horrific advice. The polyunsaturated fats, the vegetable oils, these omega-6 oils, are inflammatory because they’re very prone to oxidation.

Dr Maryanne Demasi
Have we been given the wrong advice?

Dr Michael Eades
We’ve absolutely been given the wrong advice. People became afraid of saturated fat, so they said, ‘OK, we’ve got to do something to replace the saturated fats, and so let’s do it with vegetable oils.’ Well, vegetable oils don’t have the same cooking qualities that saturated fats do. Polyunsaturated fats have a lot of double bonds in them, and double bonds are prone to free radical attack.

It becomes a rancid fat, and it becomes really bad for you. Saturated fats, on the other hand, have no double bonds. That’s why they’re incredibly stable. That’s why they’re great for cooking. That’s why they’re great for frying. And that’s why they don’t really perpetuate free radical cascades in the body, because they’re inert fats.

Which has been used to justify a so-called food pyramid (created of course primarily by the food industry and other vested interests) which focusses on a high carbohydrate diet:

NARRATION

Dr Sullivan does concede that an aspect of the food pyramid was a mistake. He says replacing fats with carbohydrates didn’t help the rising obesity problem.

Dr David Sullivan
If you replace fat with carbohydrate, you will probably be a little bit more inclined to be hungry; your insulin
levels will be a bit higher, you’ll have high levels of triglyceride, higher levels of glucose and less of your good cholesterol to avert problems. We certainly probably gave some advice which was a good way to avert one pathway, but people then tracked down another pathway, and that’s what’s led to the revision of dietary guidelines.

 If you watched the presentations by Dr. Russell Blaylock that I shared with you yesterday, you will appreciate what a massive understatement by Dr. Sullivan this is.

So one could look at all of this and consider it to be a medical error or misunderstanding. Perhaps it is, but to me it has the stench of the eugenicists (such an unfashionable term) at work. A perfect two-pronged attack. Make people fearful of what is actually good for them, and then sell them a raft of expensive drugs to address the non-existent but perceived problem, destroying essential body cholesterols in the process.

This change in diet encourages us to be unaware of the impact that a high carb diet has on the human body (carbs are the real source of the excess body fat and the epidemic in type 2 diabetes we see in the Us in particular but growing elsewhere), and it puts us all directly in the path of the GMO freight train coming our way.

All of this is completely consistent with the picture painted for us by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan in his 1991 recordings. This was such a gift to us in understanding how deeply our experience is being manipulated. Listening to these recollections will leave you shocked to your core about what is being done to us.

So let us return to the diet that supported our ancestors (especially if they were Italian) – whole foods with low sugar, high in Omega 3 and saturated fats, and low in grains. Start cooking with butter again. Or
(heaven forbid) lard. And in doing so, help to cut one of the arms off that thousand-armed octopus that is manipulating the human experience so deeply.

The impact of nutrition on behaviour – the agenda to impact us through what we eat and drink

In these posts I have referred a number of times to the apparent agenda behind the introduction of GMO products to negatively impact human health and function, and I have often referred to the agenda expressed on the Georgia Guidestones to reduce the human population to 0.5BN people.

Now, some of you who read this might be drawn to labelling me a conspiracy theorist – to which I would add that this term was created by the CIA after the assassination of JFK to discredit those who were questioning the conclusions of the Warren commission. So I welcome the label.

Today in particular it has become clear to me that GMO is just the tip of the iceberg. I came across the work of Dr. Russell Blaylock, a retired neurosurgeon who has made it his business to examine the scientifically demonstrated impact of the modern diet and other inputs on human behaviour in detail, and is an eloquent and extremely well-informed advocate of this impact. This is no better illustrated than this video, which is an extraordinary expose on this subject.

Now that you have warmed up to this man, I also commend this interview with Dr. Blaylock in which, amongst other things, he lays to rest the myth that fluoridating our water has some benefit in preventing tooth decay, the devastating impact upon the immune system of a child from vaccination – particularly the brain’s immune system, which is separate from the body’s immune system, and opens the door to reveal the driving force behind perhaps all of these activities – the Rockefeller Foundation and similar organisations, beginning in the early years of the 20th century; though even here we are at least one layer from the heart of the matter, as I have described previously.

And let me finish off this picture with that fellow conspiracy theorist, David Icke and his take on it.

Do you wonder why our diet looks the way it does, with so many sugar-laden drinks and pre-prepared stimulant ridden foods? It is no accident, as is well explained in this recording.

Unless humanity on a broader basis begins to awaken to what is going on here, the future for most of us – let alone our children – is grim indeed.

Neurologist Warns of Neurodegenerative Disease Surge Due to Chemtrail

The knowledge that substantial quantities of tiny particles of chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere has been expressed for quite a long time on the Internet, and to my knowledge it has never been discussed on the mainstream media.  For me, there’s a red flag right there. To quote this article:  http://www.nationofchange.org/neurologist-warns-neurodegenerative-disease-surge-due-chemtrail-spraying-1378712902 .

Meanwhile, the governments of NATO nations (namely the US and Canada, but also France, New Zealand and other countries) continue to spray aerosol aluminium, barium, and strontium in our skies, that then pour down on us no differently than flakes of snow. Sceptics often include people from the medical profession, scientists and, of course, the government’s hired public relations people.

One neurologist, however, Russell L.Blaylock, M.D., is supporting the claims of these watch dog groups by stating that:

“There is evidence that they are spraying tons of nano-sized aluminium compounds. It has been demonstrated in the scientific and medical literature that nano-sized particles are infinitely more reactive and induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues. Of special concern is the effect of these nanoparticles on the brain and spinal cord, as a growing list of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) are strongly related to exposure to environmental aluminium.” 

What is going on here?  

Firstly, I commend the article to you. Secondly, you may want to watch What in the World Are They Spraying? I anticipate that you will come away concerned; yet this is being done under the radar. 

The “official” reason seems to be to combat global warming – yet if you have done your homework on that subject, you will realise that the global warming conversation  is complete nonsense (I guess I should cover that…).  

The impact of these compounds upon human health is unmistakable. So why is this happening? In my view, it comes back to the first “commandment” on those Georgia GuidestonesMaintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 

If you don’t think these goons have many layers of plans to achieve this, think again. For me, it’s just another of those thousand tentacles on that octopus. It takes serious planning to rid the planet of an “excess” 6.5BN people and prevent them from being quickly replaced. 

Ohh… and whilst I’m mentioning those Georgia Guidestones yet once again, go to that site and reflect on the intent behind the other nine “commandments” written there. Do they make the hair on the back of your neck stand up? Some seem innocuous enough, but reflect on them together. 

Kind Regards,

Richard

 

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
RSS
Follow by Email