Search results for temperature, climate

More Climate Fraud From The Canberra Times And Gavin Schmidt

This one for my Aussie friends.

You may have noticed the reports in the press that NASA’s Dr Gavin Schmidt had “set Senator Malcolm Roberts straight” about the reality of global warming. Except it has been shown that Schmidt was lying:

Gavin claims in the Canberra Times that he has not removed the 1940’s warmth in the Arctic

“You appear to hold a number of misconceptions which I am happy to clarify at this time,” Dr Schmidt told Senator Roberts in letters and emails obtained by Fairfax Media. “The claim that GISS has ‘removed the 1940s warmth’ in the Arctic is not correct.”

NASA chief slaps down climate sceptic senator Malcolm Roberts: ‘You hold a number of misconceptions’

Gavin told lots of lies in this article, but none bigger than this one. He has in fact removed the 1940’s warmth at every single Iceland station active during the 1940’s

The average for all stations is 0.65C cooling via Gavin’s data tampering.

Climategate E-mails show that Gavin’s friends in fact colluded to remove the 1940’s warmth.

End of quote.

I’ll let you read the rest.

This fudging of historical temperature data is well established in the global warming fraud.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Why has the global temperature not increased for almost 19 years up to October 2015?

I have written much about the horrific lie of anthropogenic global warming over the last few years, but I have been quiet about it for some time. So, here’s an update.

If you listen to the MSM, you’d have every reason to be fearful of man’s impact on global climate and its consequences. But is this accurate?

So, let’s cut to the chase with this graph:

No global warming for 18 years

I took this from one of the many excellent videos by James Corbett on this. Let me quote him:

“This is the least squares linear regression trend on the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset from February 1997 to October 2015, aka the period during which one third of all anthropogenic forcings have occurred in the last 265 years, and it shows a trend of 0.00 degrees Celsius.  No warming whatsoever.” (My emphasis).

End of quote.

And if you don’t know what the RSS dataset is, you’re right up there with David Suzuki who spruiks continuously about the dangers of global warming. Talk about getting shown to be ignorant on the subject.

As I said, James Corbett has done some of the best analysis of the global warming subject. For example:

What Is The Average Global Temperature? Demonstrates very clearly, again quoting key sources that are actually deciding what the global Surface Air Temperature (SAT) is, that the measurement of the SAT is far from certain and highly approximate, making attempts to measure movements of fractions of a degree highly suspect.

Lies, Damned Lies, and Global Warming Statistics fleshes this picture out in great detail.

Also, The Global Warming Pause Explained adds to the picture.

Then James begins to take the gloves off (if he ever had them on) in Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience. And if you think Corbett is alone in claiming it’s pseudoscience, perhaps the view of Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prize-winner for Physics might be more convincing for you. Listen to him explain why “Global Warming is Pseudoscience”.

So what is this myth all about?

Again, I have written a lot about Agenda 21 (most people still have no idea what that is when I ask them), now The 2030 Agenda since late last year. Perhaps you might take more heed of the words of Patrick Wood as he explains how all of this “plays into the technocrats’ plan to control the world’s resources and implement genocidal eugenics-based austerity” – The 2030 Agenda by any other name.

We are, yet once more, being lied to and led up the elite’s carefully constructed garden path.

And the fact that there are those in the US considering making it illegal to disagree with the official position on global warming (so-called global warming sceptics) might be enough of a clue to all of this deceit.

 

Richard

 

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

COP 21: UN Plan to Make Legally Binding Climate Change Laws

COP 21 or the 2015 Paris Climate Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris on November 30, 2015, will be unlike other UN climate summits or climate conferences in the past. COP 21 has a scarily grandiose objective: in their own words “to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate … for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations.” If they achieve their aim, we would be faced with the horrifying prospect that the mythology of AGW (anthropogenic global warming or manmade global warming) would become entrenched in law, thus solidifying it as fact in the minds of many. It would be a giant step towards Global Governance or a One World Government with a worldwide carbon tax, for so long now the wet dream of the New World Order manipulators.

COP 21: Trying to Make the AGW Fallacy Into Law

The objective sought at COP 21 has been a long time coming. Obama revealed how important this was to some factions of the NWO when he stated that his “definition of leadership would be leading on climate change, an international accord that potentially we’ll get in Paris“, in response to the assertion put forth by the interviewer that Putin was challenging Obama’s leadership. If worldwide climate change laws are just as important to the NWO as controlling Syria, it gives you some idea of what is at stake here. Some have also suggested that the upcoming COP 21 was the reason former Aussie PM Tony Abbott lost leadership of his party (Abbot was strongly opposed to the idea of AGW) and replaced with pro-AGW and Goldman Sachs man, Malcolm Turnbull.

Normally, the annual COP (Conference of Parties) meets to review the implementation of the “Rio Convention”, drawn up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. It includes the UNFCCC (UN Framework on Climate Change) which entered into force in 1994 and has 195 signatory parties. This time, COP 21 will be going all out with extra gusto to create a new set of planetary laws to ensure every nation must combat climate change, with the purported aim “of keeping global warming below 2°C“.

Unfortunately for the global governance enthusiasts, who seek universal “consensus” among all nations and parts of the Earth, there are many factions that are not cooperating – include a couple of massive areas of ice, and a continent. Very recent data reports from multiple sources (NASA and AGU/BAS [American Geophysical Union and British Antarctic Survey]) are suggesting that not only is Antarctica not succumbing to global warming, but just the reverse – it is freezing over. Here are some quotes from the studies; this first one is from the NASA study:

“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers … According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.”

The net gain may have slowed, but that is still a gigantic amount of ice to gain. This next one is from the joint AGU/BAS study:

“Since the record is 300 years long, we can see that the amount of snow that has been accumulating in this region since the 1990s is the highest we have seen in the last 300 years … Annual snow accumulation increased in the early 20th century, rising 30 percent between 1900 and 2010.”

Meanwhile, around the North Pole, the same thing seems to be happening. Tony Heller of Steven Goddard reports that “Ice growth in Greenland continues at record levels this fall. The surface of Greenland has gained 200 billion tons of snow and ice in the last eight weeks. This has been accompanied by record cold weather approaching -60C” and also that “Arctic sea ice extent is at a ten year high for the date, after record growth“.

Maybe the NWO controllers should have made anthropogenic global cooling their crusade, and fooled people into some other kind of tax based on plummeting temperatures … oh, wait a minute, they did (see image above)! I guess it’s too late to reverse course now … although with the vague term climate change anything is possible.

End of quote.

Never let the facts interfere with a good story.

Will enough people wake up in time to this nonsense we are fed to stop this ongoing transformation of life as we know it – via Agenda 21, now The 2030 Agenda – in its tracks?

I’m not holding my breath. Almost no-one I ask has ever heard of it. Get the picture? This transformation is happening outside of the public’s awareness.

Dr Don Easterbrook Shares Real Climate Change Data

Thank you, Donna.

This is one of the most comprehensive presentations I have seen on the underlying data related to climate change.

I have mentioned previously how the raw temperature and other data has been manipulated to support the global warming story, and Dr Easterbrook presents the actual data, before fudging.

As I’ve shown many times before, global warming is a hoax. Dr. Easterbrook avoids answering the question as to why this data has been manipulated, but it is the platform that justifies Agenda 21, currently morphing into the 2030 Agenda.

But who can pull the rug on it when those promoting the lie own the media, the UN, created the IPCC and own most of the world’s governments and assets?

This is a well worked pattern in human history – a monstrous lie to justify a significant change in the path of humanity. This is just another example.

If you want to understand the real data, I commend this presentation to you.

Judges plan to outlaw climate change ‘denial’

A semi-secret, international conference of top judges proposed to make illegal any opinion that contradicted climate change.

Poles apart: in 2013, the year scientists had forecast that the Arctic would be ‘ice free’, its thickness increased by a third  Photo: Alamy

We might think that a semi-secret, international conference of top judges, held in the highest courtroom in Britain, to propose that it should be made illegal for anyone to question the scientific evidence for man-made global warming, was odd enough to be worthy of front-page coverage.

Last week I mentioned that the Prince of Wales had sent a message to this conference calling for the UN’s forthcoming climate meeting in Paris to agree on “a Magna Carta for the Earth”. But only a series of startling posts by a sharp-eyed Canadian blogger, Donna Laframboise (on Nofrakkingconsensus), have alerted us to what a bizarre event this judicial gathering turned out to be (the organisers even refused to give her the names of those who attended).

Including senior judges and lawyers from across the world, the three-day conference on “Climate Change and the Law” was staged in London’s Supreme Court. It was funded, inter alia, by the Supreme Court itself, the UK government and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

As one of the two UN sponsors of its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UNEP has been one of the main drivers of alarm over global warming for 40 years. The organiser and chairman of the conference was the Supreme Court judge Lord Carnwath, a fervent believer in man-made climate change, who has worked with the Prince of Wales for more than 20 years, and with UNEP since 2002.

The purpose of this strange get-together was outlined in a keynote speech (visible on YouTube) by Philippe Sands, a QC from Cherie Blair’s Matrix Chambers and professor of law at University College, London. Since it is now unlikely that the world will agree in Paris to a legally binding treaty to limit the rise in global temperatures to no more than 2 degrees C from pre-industrial levels, his theme was that it is now time for the courts to step in, to enforce this as worldwide law.

End of quote.

I have to say, I was not expecting this but, on reflection, it fits.

The same people driving this at the highest level are the very same people who have made it illegal to question the Holocaust in many countries and sold us that story. Now, I have made my views clear on both of these issues, with no shortage of evidence but, regardless of this, we should all defend the right to disagree, to hold an alternative point of view.

Not if these judges and Prince Charles get their way, along with those who set their agenda but you never see.

Exxon knew of climate change in 1981 funded deniers for 27 more years

I quote from this article:

ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.

The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time.

“Exxon first got interested in climate change in 1981 because it was seeking to develop the Natuna gas field off Indonesia,” Lenny Bernstein, a 30-year industry veteran and Exxon’s former in-house climate expert, wrote in the email. “This is an immense reserve of natural gas, but it is 70% CO2,” or carbon dioxide, the main driver of climate change.

However, Exxon’s public position was marked by continued refusal to acknowledge the dangers of climate change, even in response to appeals from the Rockefellers, its founding family, and its continued financial support for climate denial. Over the years, Exxon spent more than $30m on think tanks and researchers that promoted climate denial, according to Greenpeace.

End of quote.

It is this kind of so-called evidence that the believers in anthropogenic global warming froth at the mouth about with a great sense of victory. Game over.

“See, we’ve been saying for years that it’s these big global sources of pollution that have been promoting the global warming denial. Therefore it has to be true.”

Or so the logic goes.

There are 3 issues here that I see:

  1. Of course the big sources of pollution want to deny it. Their business is driven by being polluters.
  2. Those who run our world have long funded both sides of every significant argument. It lets them control the debate and fashion the nature of the opposition.
  3. There is simply NO correlation between CO2 levels and global warming since man began to contribute to CO2 levels. See the following graph.

CO2 vs. Temp feb2009_fig1

The historical data in this graph is Vladivostok ice core data from Antarctica, with more recent data added.

This shows you that there was a historical correlation between temperature and CO2, but this has clearly broken badly since humanity began to generate CO2.

We are also told that the historical data says CO2 is causal. Actually, closer examination shows us that the CO2 rise LAGS temperature by about 800 years, thought to be because there is CO2 release form the oceans as they warm, which takes a lot longer than warming the atmosphere.

You can also see that Antarctica has been a lot warmer in the past than it is now. This is not the only data to show the our planet has been much warmer in the past.

For me, the important thing about the above article is that it is perfect reinforcement for those who believe in anthropogenic global warming; yet another reason to not look below the surface and see how we are being manipulated on this critical subject, for the specific objective of justifying Agenda 21, a subject NEVER mentioned in the mainstream press, yet it is a major, global, UN-driven programme, justified by this lie.

And just to remind you, I am NOT advocating that we should not behave more responsibly regarding our planet. We should. And this is how global warming deniers are discredited by warming supporters as a simple knee-jerk reaction, when the two issues are not connected. But they have been connected in the public’s mind. It’s like saying because you don’t accept the Holocaust myth based upon the undeniable scientific evidence, you are anti-Semitic. Excuse me?

Indeed, had the work of Nikola Tesla not been foreshortened by JP Morgan, we would have no need for the carbon economy or the planet covered with electricity grids we’ve suffered for the last 100 years or so.

Until enough people recognise that most of what we are told is true on almost every subject is in fact a lie and they need to do some real work to find the truth, then things will not change in this current consciousness. I know there are some wonderful, dedicated people who disagree with me, and I support their efforts to prove me wrong.

When Will Climate Scientists Say They Were Wrong?

I quote from this article:

Day after day, year after year, the hole that climate scientists have buried themselves in gets deeper and deeper. The longer that they wait to admit their overheated forecasts were wrong, the more they are going to harm all of science.

The story is told in a simple graph, the same one that University of Alabama’s John Christy presented to the House Committee on Natural Resources on May 15.

 

The picture shows the remarkable disconnect between predicted global warming and the real world.

The red line is the 5-year running average temperature change forecast, beginning in 1979, predicted by the UN’s latest family of climate models, many of which are the handiwork of our own federal science establishment. The forecasts are for the average temperature change in the lower atmosphere, away from the confounding effects of cities, forestry, and agriculture.

The blue circles are the average lower-atmospheric temperature changes from four different analyses of global weather balloon data, and the green squares are the average of the two widely accepted analyses of satellite-sensed temperature. Both of these are thought to be pretty solid because they come from calibrated instruments.

If you look at data through 1995 the forecast appears to be doing quite well. That’s because the computer models appear to have, at least in essence, captured two periods of slight cooling.

The key word is “appear.” The computer models are tuned to account for big volcanoes that are known to induce temporary cooling in the lower atmosphere. These would be the 1982 eruption of El Chichon in Mexico, and 1992’s spectacular Mt. Pinatubo, the biggest natural explosion on earth since Alaska’s Katmai in 1912.

Since Pinatubo, the earth has been pretty quiescent, so that warming from increasing carbon dioxide should proceed unimpeded. Obviously, the spread between forecast and observed temperatures grows pretty much every year, and is now a yawning chasm.

It’s impossible, as a scientist, to look at this graph and not rage at the destruction of science that is being wreaked by the inability of climatologists to look us in the eye and say perhaps the three most important words in life: we were wrong.

End of quote.

There are many threads to this global scam, one of which I discussed recently regarding Maurice Strong; but the key focus has been to create the context for Agenda 21. It’s called “Problem, Reaction Solution”, otherwise known as the Hegelian Dialectic, and we have it used upon us regularly, including with every false flag event. That’s why they are conducted. And global warming has been given such a shove, it’s hard to doubt it and few still do. It is so, so similar to the lies told around The Holocaust to justify the creation of Israel. The average person experiences similar disbelief to the notion that they are scams in both of these cases – just as was intended.

And whilst we are discussing the global warming scam, you may like to review this video, which discusses the recent arguments surrounding the growing ice extent in the Antarctic, including the area showing thinning due to an undersea volcano.

Australian PM’s adviser says climate change is UN-led hoax to create ‘new world order’

The Australian prime minister’s chief business adviser says that climate change is a ruse led by the United Nations to create a new world order under the agency’s control. The statement coincided with a visit from the UN’s top climate negotiator.

Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.

“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he wrote in an opinion piece published in The Australian newspaper on Friday, without providing evidence. (though there is plenty… Richard)

“The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, adding that the UN is against capitalism and freedom and wants to create a “new world order.”

End of quote.

Well, what he says is true (see Agenda 21), but why is he saying it?

Is it one of those cases of putting the truth out there in some way, as those running the game behind the game do?

I find it intriguing.

Evidence that the sun is important in climate change

Whilst the IPCC labours away with a budget of an obscene $4BN per annum to find evidence of anthropogenic global warming – their terms of reference EXCLUDE considering the sun – (this spending originally kicked off by George HW Bush, when he was President, with an allocation of $2BN), evidence is emerging – surprise, surprise – that THE SUN is important in climate change!!! (Hold the fanfare and the dancing girls…)

I quote:

In a new study published in the scientific journal Geology, researchers from institutions including Aarhus University in Denmark show that, during the last 4,000 years, there appears to have been a close correlation between solar activity and the sea surface temperature in summer in the North Atlantic. This correlation is not seen in the preceding period.

Since the end of the Last Ice Age about 12,000 years ago, the Earth has generally experienced a warm climate. However, the climate has not been stable during this period, when temperatures have varied for long periods. We have generally had a slightly cooler climate during the last 4,000 years, and the ocean currents in the North Atlantic have been weaker.

“We know that the Sun is very important for our climate, but the impact is not clear. Climate change appears to be either strengthened or weakened by solar activity. The extent of the Sun’s influence over time is thus not constant, but we can now conclude that the climate system is more receptive to the impact of the Sun during cold periods – at least in the North Atlantic region,” says Professor Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz, Aarhus University, who is one of the Danish researchers in the international team behind the study…

…The detailed study makes it possible to draw comparisons with records of fluctuations of solar energy bursts in the same period, and the results show a clear correlation between climate change in the North Atlantic and variations in solar activity during the last 4,000 years, both on a large time scale over periods of hundreds of years and right down to fluctuations over periods of 10-20 years. (My emphasis)

End of quote.

You can find the study here.

There is abundant evidence elsewhere of the impact of sunspot activity on global temperature, the best known being the Maunder Minimum, so-called because a husband and wife team conducted very detailed tracking of the sunspot activity during this time and showed it correlated with that cool period, displaying an apparent “shyness” to release solar flares when the sunspots were Earth-facing, just as we’ve seen in the current period.

And it is so bleeding obvious that the sun should be a major factor in our climate. Yet good ol’ propaganda can convince us that black is white. And it does.

I’m drawn to share with you, once more, this graph of temperature vs. CO2 levels, the basis for the “Inconvenient Truth” video.

CO2 vs. Temp feb2009_fig1

 

This Antarctic ice core data (updated with more recent direct measurements) shows a very close correlation between temperature and CO2 up until about the time when humanity began to add to the CO2 levels. Then it breaks completely. CO2 levels are not driving global temperature. Al Gore’s pitch conveniently stopped short of the recent data.

But what’s interesting to me is that, if the data is examined more closely, it turns out the CO2 level is actually LAGGING temperature by about 800 years. That is, the rising temperature has caused the CO2 increase, not the other way around, as Al Gore would have us believe. Well, he made a damned good paid shill for a while.

Note, also, that the current high, which appears to have peaked according to this graph, is lower than the previous 3, which occurred roughly every 100-120,000 years.

And as I’ve said before, just as the Holocaust lies were set up over the prior 50 years about 6 million Jews being persecuted and the lies of Auschwitz gas chambers to justify the setting up of Israel and to make the goyim feel guilty for their anti-Semitic behaviour, so it has been that the anthropogenic global warming myth has been created to justify Agenda 21, by the same global elite in both cases. If you have a successful, working model, why change it? And don’t think these are the only examples, because they’re not.

‘Breathtaking’ adjustments to Arctic temperature record

An important article on the fudging of temperature data. I quote:

Burton’s key point is this: where Cowtan claims that all NOAA’s adjustments have done is increased warming by a modest 3 per cent, in actuality they have increased it by 35 per cent. So, far from Cowtan’s assessment that these adjustments are “inconsequentially tiny”, they are in fact quite massively distorting.

Might it be that they reached such wildly different conclusions by using different data? Er, no. Burton reached his conclusions by creating a spreadsheet with decadal data digitized from the exact graph used in Cowtan’s video.

Now I appreciate that in the context of the broader climate debate this might seem a trivial dispute. But I’ve been at this game long enough to be able to assure you that these faux rebuttals like the one offered by Cowtan are absolutely integral to the ongoing survival of the alarmist ‘consensus.’…

…Professor Gordon Hughes, one of the statisticians who reviewed and confirmed Lewis’s findings has commented thus:

“The statistical methods used in the [Marotzke] paper are so bad as to merit use in a class on how not to do applied statistics. All this paper demonstrates is that climate scientists should take some basic courses in statistics and Nature should get some competent referees.”

Damning indeed.

But here’s a prediction. The rebuttal won’t receive nearly the coverage that Marotzke’s original inept paper did.

Then this recent article from The Telegraph:

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

And this history lesson on the IPCC makes interesting reading, illustrating how the fraud has been perpetrated.

As I’ve said before, the key reason for this fraud is to justify Agenda 21, a formula for transforming life on our planet and a formula which, when I ask people face to face, almost no-one has heard of. And it is well advanced. I recommend you watch Rosa Koire’s presentation and take appropriate action.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com