Recent Posts

Postings by date

March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

Meta

As I’ve said many times, I ask no-one to believe anything I say or write. It’s not my purpose for my blog – or my life.

What I do seek to do is to be a catalyst to have people reflect upon what they have taken to be true and look at the evidence for themselves. Just THAT step is huge for most people when we get into controversial subjects since, in doing so, it threatens the entire belief edifice upon which we have built our lives, and most people simply do not want to threaten that edifice in ANY manner. It’s a key plank that those who run our world rely upon.

Which brings me back to the Holocaust. There’s no doubt it’s a story that is reinforced powerfully in our world, and it is done so for many reasons and purposes.

But is it true?

Some think they have personal evidence or have helped people who suffered as a result of WWII – PTSD, etc. But name me one war where the survivors, both civilian and military, in large measure do not suffer from PTSD. Of course they do, so its presence is no evidence ipso facto of the Holocaust – i.e.  6M Jews killed primarily in gas chambers in Germany.

In fact, there are now several books that document IRREFUTABLE evidence that the Holocaust did not happen. The science simply does not support it. End of conversation.

I have previously referred to Nicholas Kollerstrom’s book “Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality”, which provides, as I said, irrefutable scientific evidence.

And I want to share with you another, this one from Germar Rudolf, who has been jailed for his insolence in questioning the official narrative. Rudolf has written several books around the subject, and the one I’m referring to is ‘Dissecting The Holocaust’, which you can download as a free pdf from here. And if you don’t like reading books in pdf format, Kindle has a downloadable tool to upload pdfs and convert them to Kindle format.

Here is an introduction to Rudolf and his work:

An increasing number of scholars and lay people clearly see that something is not right with Elie Wiesel and the current Holocaust narrative. The writings of Germar Rudolf and others simply confirm what they already suspect. They may care little for chemical traces in the brickwork at Auschwitz or topological evidence of mass graves, but they have seen other historical events substantially revised and they are suspicious of the outrage and scorn heaped upon those who question the uniqueness and scope of this particular event, especially when it is used to persecute Palestinians and promote endless war in the Middle East.

That Jews suffered greatly during the Third Reich is not in question, but the notion of a premeditated, planned and industrial extermination of Europe’s Jews with its iconic gas chambers and immutable six million are all used to make the Holocaust not only special but also sacred. We are faced with a new, secular religion with astonishing power to command worship. And, like Christianity with its Immaculate Conception, Crucifixion, and Resurrection, the Holocaust has key and sacred elements – the exterminationist imperative, the gas chambers, and the sacred six million. It is these that comprise the holy Holocaust which Jews, Zionists, and others worship and which Germar Rudolf and other revisionists question.

Nor is this a small matter. If it were, why the fuss? Why the witch-hunt? Why the demonization and imprisonment of David Irving, Ernst Zündel and Germar Rudolf? And it is not just these infidels. What may well be a massive lie is being used to oppress whole nations. The German and Austrian people are blamed for conceiving and perpetrating the slaughter; the Russian, Polish, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Rumanian, and Hungarian people are blamed for hosting, assisting, and cheering on the slaughter; the Americans, the British, the French, the Dutch, the Belgians, the Italians, and even Diaspora Jews are blamed for not doing enough to stop the slaughter; the Swiss are blamed for profiting from it; the entire Christian world is blamed for its faith-traditions and ideologies that allowed the slaughter to take place; and more recently the Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim people are blamed for wanting to perpetuate the slaughter by delegitimizing Israel. To many the current version of the Holocaust oppresses the entire non-Jewish world and indeed much of the Jewish world as well.

Germar Rudolf is a Holocaust revisionist and a dedicated researcher of historical evidence. For him “Holocaust denier” is simply a term of abuse to be hurled as “witch” might have been hurled in the Middle Ages. But for me, “Holocaust denier” is a label with which I have been smeared for merely trying to define the term. Although I have never denied any of the three tenets of the orthodox Holocaust narrative, the mere fact that I am interested in revisionism and have actually met contemporary revisionists has caused the more cowardly of my colleagues to smear me and denigrate my reputation at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.

I first met Germar in April 2010. He had recently been released from prison in Germany and was staying in England until he could get a visa to return to his wife and child in the United States. We spent several days together along with our UK Director of Deir Yassin Remembered Paul Eisen, Henry Herskovitz from Ann Arbor, and Francis Clark-Lowes, an activist from Brighton.

Germar spoke of many aspects of the Holocaust and Holocaust revisionism that were completely new to us. We were fascinated with his struggle. He spoke about his erstwhile Catholic faith, about Germany and Germans then and now, the Third Reich and Hitler, his own present state and relationships, his hopes and fears for the future, and many other topics. Speaking fully and fluently in English and with an astonishing grasp of facts and interpretations, the hours turned into days and yet never, not once did he repeat himself.

End of quote.

I keep coming back to the Holocaust because the evidence is now so clear-cut and because it’s such a powerful and important thread in the story of life that we have been sold. And once you pull one thread, you are more likely to pull others. In my experience, those walking any kind of spiritual path are more likely to question the official narrative, since they have experiences on some level that do not fit with the official narrative. Again, once you tug on one thread, you are more likely to pull others.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Next Post

Study Linking GMOs and Tumors Vindicated Yet Again...MSM Stays Silent

Sun Dec 6 , 2015
If you follow the mainstream media, you’ll probably only know the Seralini 2012 rat feeding study as “that GMO cancer study that got retracted.” You […]
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
RSS
Follow by Email