Another challenging post from Jon. I share it below in full:
“The Reality Manufacturing Company enjoys creating and selling components that are invisible, that aren’t there at all.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
There are things people say they know for certain. No error is possible.
When medical officials say they have discovered a new disease caused by a germ, or they have discovered a new outbreak of a known disease…
Almost everyone climbs on board.
Almost everyone automatically assumes that the disease is, in fact, what officials say it is…
And more importantly, almost everyone assumes this disease MUST BE caused by the germ that officials claim is the cause.
Four months ago, I sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC.
I have heard nothing back. No data, no email, no acknowledgment of my request. Nada. Zilch. Zero.
I’m not surprised or shocked.
After all, I was questioning the whole CDC premise of the Ebola “epidemic.” I was challenging it.
But it’s instructive to realize the CDC feels no need or responsibility to offer evidence for its claims. The CDC is too big to fail. It’s too criminal to be prosecuted.
It’s too dedicated to false science to know what actual science is.
My FOIA request was simple: I wanted to see proof that the CDC had ever isolated the Ebola virus from a human being.
“Isolated” means “discovered.” It means “looked at directly via electron microscope.”
It means “real” as opposed to “guessed at” or “loosely inferred.”
Here is my FOIA request verbatim:
“This is a request for published records, data, studies, electron microscope photographs, work notes, and internal correspondence relating to and describing, in detail, the direct isolation of the Ebola virus from human beings.
“Note: My request does not seek information on this subject which is derived from antibody tests, PCR tests, or virus cultured and grown outside the human body. Nor does it seek electron microscope photographs which are, in fact, simulations or the result of computer models.
“I am, however, seeking electron microscope photos of diseased human tissue.”
That’s it.
The CDC has not replied. So until I see otherwise, I’ll assume they have no evidence to offer. They can’t prove they’ve ever isolated the Ebola virus from a human.
That would mean they can’t prove “Ebola” is in any way connected to what they’re calling the Ebola virus.
Disease hoaxes start at square one, where the fundamental assumptions are made. And one of the first assumptions is: humans who are labeled with a germ-caused disease house that germ in their bodies.
This seems like a truism. But it isn’t, because there are cases in which an “outbreak” is promoted, and yet the virus which is said to be at the root of the outbreak can’t be found.
It can’t be found in the body. Or it can’t be found in sufficient quantity to cause disease.
Its presence and influence can only be inferred through faulty and/or deceptive means.
That’s why, in email correspondence with me, David Rasnick, PhD, announced this shocking finding:
“I have examined in detail the literature on isolation and Ems [EM: electron microscope pictures] of both Ebola and Marburg viruses. I have not found any convincing evidence that Ebola virus (and for that matter Marburg) has been isolated from humans. There is certainly no confirmatory evidence of human isolation.”
Rasnick obtained his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and spent 25 years working with proteases (a class of enzymes) and protease inhibitors. He is the author of the book, The Chromosomal Imbalance Theory of Cancer. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.
Unless and until I see convincing evidence to the contrary, Rasnick’s statement is a knockout punch.
That means the whole Ebola “epidemic” was and is a hoax.
As my readers know, I’ve gone over the Ebola situation carefully, from many angles, in past articles. I’ve shown that every symptom and effect that has been attributed to the Ebola virus (including bleeding) can be accounted for and explained in other ways.
No virus necessary. None.
There are two prominent tests which are supposed to diagnosis the Ebola virus in patients. The antibody and the PCR (polymerase chain reaction).
But the antibody test often registers falsely positive for the presence of a virus, because the test is actually is reacting to a number of non-viral factors. And even when the test is accurate, it merely shows the patient has come in contact with the virus in question. It doesn’t imply past, present, or future illness. Until 1984, when the science was turned on its head for no good reason, a positive antibody test was generally taken to mean the patient’s immune system had successfully warded off the virus.
The PCR test takes a tiny, tiny fleck of genetic material assumed to come from a virus and amplifies it to the point where it can be observed. The test is prone to many errors. Even when it is done accurately, it doesn’t imply the patient will ever become ill. Why? Because illness only occurs when there are huge numbers of virus in the body—and the PCR test is a completely unreliable indicator of number. Also, why bother to use the PCR at all, since if the patient actually has a great deal of virus in his body, there are easier and more direct means of isolating it.
Both widely used tests for Ebola virus are irrelevant and useless.
I stand behind my prior articles: no convincing evidence has been presented to show the so-called “Ebola outbreak” stems from the Ebola virus.
Therefore, one should look for other causes of the illness and death labeled “Ebola.”
The causes are there; they are non-viral; and they can be corrected and eliminated by non-medical means.
But they don’t produce profits. They don’t scare the public into complying with government demands. They don’t scare the public into wanting a vaccine.
The real reasons for the “Ebola outbreak” include, but are not limited to: industrial pollution; organophosphate pesticides (causes bleeding}; vast overuse of antibiotics (causes bleeding); severe and debilitating nutritional deficiencies (which can cause bleeding); starvation; drastic electrolyte loss; chronic diarrhea; grinding poverty; war; stolen farm land; vaccination campaigns (in people whose immune systems are compromised, vaccines can easily wipe out their last shreds of health).
Doctors and nurses in West Africa were working in very high temperatures, in clinic rooms likely sprayed with extremely toxic organophosphate pesticides. These workers were sealed into hazmat suits, where temperatures rose even higher, causing the loss of up to five liters of body fluid during a one-hour shift. Then, recovering, they would need IV rehydration, and they would be doused with disinfectant chemicals. They would go back into the suits for another round of duty. One doctor reported that, inside his suit, there was (toxic) chlorine. These factors alone could cause dangerous illness and even death, and, of course, the basic symptoms of “Ebola.”
People diagnosed with Ebola outside West Africa? Again, the diagnostic tests are completely irrelevant and unreliable. Illness, if any, could come from a variety of causes. The “Ebola symptoms” are similar, for example, to the flu.
Repackaging a set of common symptoms under different disease labels is a standard practice of the medical cartel.
During the dreaded SARS epidemic (hoax) of 2003, a Canadian microbiologist named Frank Plummer, working for the World Health Organization, inadvertently blew the whistle on the whole con by admitting to the press that labs were finding fewer and fewer SARS patients that had the SARS virus in their bodies.
That’s an absurd contradiction. That’s saying, “The SARS illness caused by the SARS virus can’t be caused by the SARS virus because the SARS virus isn’t even there, but we’ll keep saying SARS is SARS, even though it can’t be.”
Total gibberish.
My FOIA request to the CDC about Ebola continues to go unanswered.
Jon Rappoport
Recent Comments