This morning I received the following email from William Engdahl, a man whose work I have followed and written about for many years. His email is a sign of the times we live in. This kind of censorship is widespread, now, targeting those who speak out about aspects of the (mostly) invisible tyranny under which we live. Censorship on YouTube, Twitter, Google and Amazon is now widespread, and others such as Apple at times fall in line, not necessarily with the same agenda but perhaps as they follow political correctness. Here is William’s email.
I am writing this as a request for those of you who value my writings and books, asking you to consider a special contribution to support the possibility that I can continue to offer my research and analyses free of charge through my website. As most of you are aware, today we live in a world where far from being the once-unique platform for exercise of free opinion and analyses, where the only censor was the sovereign reader, now the huge private corporations who dominate social media and online book offerings have subtly put themselves as the self-appointed censor of what we are allowed to think and what not. Had someone said even five years ago that Amazon, Facebook, Google or Twitter ought to be given the right to ban or shadow ban any content, the outcry would have stopped it cold. Now however, something ominous has developed and with remarkable absence of widespread protest.
For years I have, as many like me, used Twitter and Facebook to promote my articles and books. Through this added exposure I was able to gain an income stream from my work that allowed me to continue offering free content. Now in recent months my social media visibility has been dramatically reduced without justification. Moreover, more than one of my books have been arbitrarily removed by Amazon, my main sales platform, for non-specified bogus reasons, costing me significant sales and time.
At this critical juncture in our world events, therefore I want to ask you to consider a special contribution of support via the PayPal button at the top of my homepage, to enable me to continue to publish free content.
In this recent presentation, Ben makes it very clear that the climate science conclusions are completely false, since they ignore major environmental climate factors and hence attribute their effects to human ones.
However, it is worth restating, as shown by the graph below, taken from this paper, that we have had no global warming for about 20 years.
Not what the MSM would have you believe.
And Ben’s presentation illustrates how egregiously distorted the usage of data has been in the climate modelling. I encourage you to watch it. IMO, it’s outstanding science, as Ben’s material is.
And few understand that the entire reason for this false climate picture is to justify Agenda 21, now called The 2030 Agenda, the hidden plan to herd people out of the countryside and into the cities.
James Corbett, in his usual thorough way, has explained all of this very well. This video is a good place to start, and I refer more broadly to his work on this in these articles.
These articles also include a discussion of the life of Maurice Strong, whose mission it was, as tasked by the global elite he served, to create the Agenda 21 scenario. Strong not only founded the IPCC, with its terms of reference to only consider human factors in global warming (and they find – what???), he also organised and opened the UN conference that began the Agenda 21 journey in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
And despite demonization by the global warming believers and apologists, Aussie Geology Professor Ian Plimer has written an excellent book and presented very eloquently showing global warming to be the nonsense it truly is.
So, thank you, Ben, for your outstanding presentation on the complete distortion of the underlying data used for climate modelling.
If you believe the mainstream media, Global Warming (oops, it’s now called Climate Change because the warming story has been debunked by the evidence – our planet stopped warming 20 years ago) is a huge threat to us all, and “the science is settled”…
I reproduce the following article in full:
The following is a letter to the American Physical Society released to the public by Professor Emiritus of physics Harold ‘Hal’ Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara. From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa BarbaraTo: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society Dear Curt:
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence — it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be? How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society. It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist. So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example: 1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate 2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake. 3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work. 4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open. 5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council. 6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition. APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization? I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question. I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends. Hal End of quote. This is simply how it is. But few ask why this scam was initiated by those who run our world. It’s called Agenda 21, now the 2030 Agenda. Check it out. It’s hidden from public gaze but its being rolled out everywhere. It’s about herding us out of the countryside into cities, where we can be managed better…
You can find out about it on my blog if you wish. Use the search field.
In my experience, most Americans cannot conceive of the idea that their country has been a puppet of the Rothschilds and their minions for centuries. Henry Ford’s writings of 1920-2 opened the window on this for me, perhaps most notably through his revealing the complete control that Bernard Baruch wielded over all US supply, military allied and domestic, for the term of WWI. He had a similar though less hands on role in WWII. On one level or another, they want to believe that one side of the US political system or the other carries the true answer. And it could be Republican or Democrat. Indeed, few people can stand back and grasp the agenda that unfolded during the 20th century, which was telegraphed well enough in “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, which Henry Ford strongly argued were real and which Ronald Bernard, the high level Dutch banker who jumped ship from his elite banking role, has recently confirmed as true. And so, this discussion between James Corbett and Richard Grove discussing the book “Phillip Dru: Administrator” written by Edward Mandell House, the controller of Woodrow Wilson and others is so affirming. They understand the true history of things, and they unfold its obviousness, whilst explaining the roles of some of the players. And we still live with the consequences of the planning and manipulation unfolded in the early part of the 20th century. As they say, WWI set the stage for what has unfolded, not just WWII but today. And perhaps this has been best encapsulated by Henry Makow. This conversation is a wonderful window into this history, that we need to understand if we are to change our future. Richard Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com
In this video, Ronald Bernard, the Dutch former top banker who chose to not participate in the abuse and sacrifice of children to progress his career, explains how people need to opt out of the elite’s banking and political systems. Richard
There are many threads in this video that illustrate the world we are in and signs it might be changing. I have been tracking most of these threads for years. If you think any of this is false, I suggest you look at how your beliefs have you entrapped. I do not align with the Christian flavour, for clarity. Richard
Michael McKibben and his researchers at Americans for Innovation expose the dangerous alliance of the Tavistock Institute and Facebook… …Richard Allan and his partner Ana Padilla Jargstorf and their evil plan to use Tavistock and Facebook to mind control YOU.End of quote. If you are unaware of the Tavistock Institute, I have written about it here. Tavistock is the home of mind control, MK Ultra, created the practices of psychology and psychiatry and many other things sinister in our world. It is my view that Sigmund Freud was their creation. He was richly rewarded with a gentlemanly house when he moved to Britain, and the fruit of the tree is illustration enough. There is strong evidence Sir Clement Freud, Sigmund’s grandson, and a former UK politician and broadcaster, was a pedophile and a satanic sacrificer of children. De riguer for those who run our world.The connection between Facebook and Tavistock is of no surprise. The exposure of it is what interests me. Richard Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com
As Aussies know, and perhaps others, there has been a so-called Royal Commission into the banking industry, here, and many skeletons have come out of the closet, leading to a tightening of lending practices. This is being blamed for the recent decline in real estate prices, most notably in Sydney and Melbourne, the two largest cities (about 4M each).Except this is the tip of the iceberg… The scale of fraud and carefully planned and orchestrated deceit of the consumer is almost beyond belief.
Watch this video. Denise Bailey, founder of the Banking and Finance Consumer Support Association (BFSCA), spills the beans in a very big way.
Australia has experienced continuous economic growth, without a recession, for some 26 or 27 years, supported by the mining boom and by the growth in real estate prices. Except those real estate prices are now patently ridiculous by global standards when compared with household incomes, and the household debt levels are amongst the highest in the world. The following graph illustrates it well.
Of course, it’s unsustainable, but those participating in a bubble such as the well known historical tulip bulb frenzy and the more recent Bitcoin bubble believe it will go on forever. This time it’s different… Except it never is.
The role of an investment allowance encouraging home owners to leverage their existing property asset(s) into investment properties is well known. But the scale of the systemic fraud inside the banking system isn’t.
How about a loan application system that automatically works out what somebody’s income needs to be to support the loan and then inserts that into the form? Or children deleted from the family automatically, so the outgoings can be made to line up? Or the ship deckhand who became a captain on his form, so his false income could make sense? And this is hidden from the mortgagee because mortgage brokers fill out all of the forms…
I recently saw a report saying that Australians are now the richest per capita of any country in the world. This is entirely based upon false real estate valuations.
I have been saying for at least two years, maybe longer, that Aussie real estate prices could fall by 50%. I now think that’s conservative.
Australia has been set up to go the way of Argentina, Chile, Brazil and other South American countries. The great harvesting of Australian assets by the global elite has been set up. Well, they already own the mining companies, so they have cornered most of the revenue streams, as they have done around the world. They conduct this “haircut” of the general population every few years (it’s called a recession), though it can be more extreme, as it was in 1929-39, when they really clean up. I think we are looking at one of those in the next few years globally, and it has already begun.
Most people are asleep at the wheel and and none more so than the average Australian.
Australia’s economic growth has been supported by two things – mining exports (there’s still farm exports) and building construction, fuelled by the real estate price boom. China’s economy is slowing and this will accelerate, and when this loan zoo begins to unravel…
Generally, real estate prices are a lagging economic indicator. In Australia, they are falling before the general downturn has begun to be visible elsewhere (apart form the recent falls in stock market prices). This, in itself, telegraphs what is about to happen to Aussie real estate prices.
It might be 6 months before the true panic selling of Aussie real estate begins. The swag of interest only loans are only just beginning to hit the dates when they need to be converted to interest and principal – at higher interest rates on declining valuations… It will be a bloodbath. And the dividends and the stock prices of the 4 Aussie banks underpin the superannuation industry that ostensibly underpins the retirement of most Australians…
And unbeknown to most Aussies, bail-in legislation was introduced on February 14 this year, as it has been around the world for these coming times. If you have funds in the bank, expect to lose a fair swag of them.
I’ll say it again. Australia is headed down the same path as Argentina, Chile and Brazil before us. But this process is global. The United States is already a third world country. They just don’t understand it, yet. But they will very soon…
If you have not prepared for what’s unfolding, please do so.
The DOW has broken its 200 day moving average, a key indicator that it’s now a bear market. It was down 800 points on Tuesday and another 800 on Thursday before it recovered. There is an inverted yield curve in US Treasuries, an almost 100% reliable indicator of a coming downturn. But this is no average downturn.
And what’s going on in the banks here is all planned. You think they are independent of the global elite? If so, then I have this exquisite piece of beachfront for you. In Antarctica. Not to be missed…
I have explained at length how our world is controlled via satanic practices of paedophilia and child sacrifice. If you’re not across this, use the search field on my blog.
And in amongst this, I am very optimistic. These arseholes think they are going to finally control all of us on a very deep level (and the encryption banning legislation passed overnight in Australia, buried in the morass of party bickering, as is usually the case, is a key part of this effort), but it is my well informed view that they will fail in their attempt. May it be so…