Search results for engdahl

Is the Fed Preparing to Topple US Dollar? – F. William Engdahl

Another excellent article by F. William Engdahl:

Unusual remarks and actions by the outgoing head of the Bank of England and other central banking insiders strongly suggest that there is a very ugly scenario in the works to end the role of the US dollar as world reserve currency. In the process, this would involve that the Fed deliberately triggers a dramatic economic depression. If this scenario is actually deployed in coming months, Donald Trump will go down in history books as the second Hebert Hoover, and the world economy will be pushed into the worst collapse since the 1930s. Here are some elements worth considering. 

Bank of England speech

The about-to-retire head of the very special Bank of England, Mark Carney, delivered a remarkable speech at the recent annual meeting of central bankers and finance elites at Jackson Hole Wyoming on August 23. The 23-page address to fellow central bankers and financial insiders is clearly a major signal of where the Powers That Be who run world central banks plan to take the world. 

Carney addresses obvious flaws with the post-1944 dollar reserve system, noting that, “…a destabilising asymmetry at the heart of the IMFS (International Monetary and Financial System) is growing. While the world economy is being reordered, the US dollar remains as important as when Bretton Woods collapsed.” He states bluntly, “…In the longer term, we need to change the game…Risks are building, and they are structural.” What he then goes on to outline is a remarkably detailed blueprint for global central bank transformation of the dollar order, a revolutionary shift.

Carney discusses the fact that China as the world leading trading nation is the obvious candidate to replace the dollar as leading reserve, however, he notes, “…for the Renminbi to become a truly global currency, much more is required. Moreover, history teaches that the transition to a new global reserve currency may not proceed smoothly.” He indicates that means it often needs wars or depressions, as he cites the role of World War I forcing out sterling in favor of the US dollar. What Carney finds more immediate is a new IMF-based monetary system to replace the dominant role of the dollar. Carney declares, “While the rise of the Renminbi may over time provide a second best solution to the current problems with the IMFS, first best would be to build a multipolar system. The main advantage of a multipolar IMFS is diversification… “ He adds, “… When change comes, it shouldn’t be to swap one currency hegemon for another. Any unipolar system is unsuited to a multi-polar world… In other words he says, “Sorry, Beijing, you must wait.”

The Bank of England Governor proposes in effect that the IMF, with its multi-currency Special Drawing Rights (SDR), a basket of five currencies—dollar, Pound, Yen, Euro and now Renminbi—should play the central role creating a new monetary system: “The IMF should play a central role in informing both domestic and cross border policies. … Pooling resources at the IMF, and thereby distributing the costs across all 189 member countries…” For that to work he proposes raising the IMF SDR funds triple to $3 trillions as the core of a new monetary system.

Then Carney proposes that the IMF oversee creation of a new payments infrastructure based on an international “stablecoin.” Referring to the private Libra, he clearly states a “new Synthetic Hegemonic Currency (SHC) would be best provided by the public sector, perhaps through a network of central bank digital currencies.” Note that Carney, a former Goldman Sachs banker, is mentioned as a leading candidate to replace Christine Lagarde as IMF head. Is his speech open admission of what is being planned by the world’s leading central bankers as the next step to a world currency and global economic control? Let’s look further.

Lagarde to ECB

The Carney speech, when deciphered from its central bank language, gives us for the first time a clear roadmap where the powers that control world central banking would like to take us. The world reserve role of the US dollar must end; it must be replaced by some form of IMF SDRs as basis for a multi-currency reserve. That in turn would ultimately be based on digital money, so-called block chain currencies. Such currencies, make no mistake, would be completely controlled by central bank authorities and the IMF. That would require their often-proposed elimination of all cash in favor of digital money where every cent we spend can be monitored by the state. This cashless society would also set the stage for the next great financial crisis and the confiscation by governments of ordinary citizens’ bank deposits under new “bank bail-in” laws now on the books since 2014 in every major industrial country including the EU and USA. 

The IMF is fully behind the turn to global blockchain digital currencies and use of SDR to replace the dominant US dollar. In a little-noticed speech in November 14, 2018, IMF chief Lagarde strongly indicated that the IMF was behind central bank digital currencies as well as cashless societies. She noted very carefully, “I believe we should consider the possibility to issue digital currency. There may be a role for the state to supply money to the digital economy.” She added, “A new wind is blowing, that of digitalization…What role will remain for cash in this digital world? … demand for cash is decreasing—as shown in recent IMF work. And in ten, twenty, thirty years, who will still be exchanging pieces of paper?”

Dudley Remarks

The introduction of this central bankers’ new digital currency world will require, as Carney suggests, dramatic upheavals of the status quo, upheavals that would lead to the end of the dominant role of the US dollar since the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement. As that dollar reserve currency role is a pillar of American power in the world, for that to happen would require nothing short of catastrophe. Is this in fact what the Federal Reserve is quietly planning with its money policies? 

A remarkable hint of what might be in the works came in an OpEd by the person who until 2018 was the very important President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Bill Dudley, who like Mark Carney is a senior Goldman Sachs alumnus. Dudley is no minor actor in the central bankers’ world. Until last year he also was a member of the Bank for International Settlements Board of Directors and chaired the BIS Committee on Payment Settlement Systems and the Committee on the Global Financial System. 

Dudley, pointing to the Trump trade war policies and economic dangers of same, then issues the following rare undiplomatic declaration: “Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy, to the Fed’s independence and its ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives. If the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, then Fed officials should consider how their decisions will affect the political outcome in 2020.” While it shocked many, Dudley is merely making public what the Fed has done since its creation in 1913 — influence the course of world and US politics stealthily behind the cover of “neutral” monetary policies. Dudley suggests not “Russian interference” but rather Fed interference.

The Fed could easily tip the US into crisis. The debt levels of the US economy are at record high levels for private households, Federal government, and US corporate debt. Most US corporations have used growing debt, well over $9 trillion, to make stock buybacks rather than invest in new plant and equipment, fueling an unprecedented bubble in the S&P stocks. The rising stocks are not a sign of economic health but of a dangerous speculative bubble vulnerable to collapse. 

Were the Fed now to resume rate rises and continue its less-publicized Quantitative Tightening into 2020, a domino-style series of debt defaults, corporate bankruptcies, home mortgage foreclosures, default on car loans and student loans could quickly make a second Trump Presidency in 2020 more than doubtful. However that would be no grounds for the rest of the world opposed to Trump policies to cheer. It would also trigger collapse in major emerging market countries who have borrowed hundreds of billions denominated in US dollars, including Chinese state companies, Turkey, Argentina, Brazil to name a few. EU banks from Italy to Germany to France would fail.

If this Dudley scenario comes to pass in 2020 or not, only the key central bank actors know for sure. It is clear that, after almost eleven years since the 2008 global financial meltdown, the unprecedented central bank zero interest rate policies in the EU and until recently the US, have fueled creation of what some call an “everything bubble”, not only in stocks, in corporate and public bonds, in home prices. Is a new Fed intervention to raise rates and tighten credit the event– the deliberate central bank rupturing of this inflated bubble using the excuse of the Trump danger to the world economy– that Carney has in mind when he says, “transition to a new global reserve currency may not proceed smoothly,”? Let us hope not. The coming months will tell.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

A personal appeal from William Engdahl

This morning I received the following email from William Engdahl, a man whose work I have followed and written about for many years.
His email is a sign of the times we live in. 
This kind of censorship is widespread, now, targeting those who speak out about aspects of the (mostly) invisible tyranny under which we live.
Censorship on YouTube, Twitter, Google and Amazon is now widespread, and others such as Apple at times fall in line, not necessarily with the same agenda but perhaps as they follow political correctness.
Here is William’s email.

Dear reader,

I am writing this as a request for those of you who value my writings and books, asking you to consider a special contribution to support the possibility that I can continue to offer my research and analyses free of charge through my website. As most of you are aware, today we live in a world where far from being the once-unique platform for exercise of free opinion and analyses, where the only censor was the sovereign reader, now the huge private corporations who dominate social media and online book offerings have subtly put themselves as the self-appointed censor of what we are allowed to think and what not. Had someone said even five years ago that Amazon, Facebook, Google or Twitter ought to be given the right to ban or shadow ban any content, the outcry would have stopped it cold. Now however, something ominous has developed and with remarkable absence of widespread protest.

For years I have, as many like me, used Twitter and Facebook to promote my articles and books. Through this added exposure I was able to gain an income stream from my work that allowed me to continue offering free content. Now in recent months my social media visibility has been dramatically reduced without justification. Moreover, more than one of my books have been arbitrarily removed by Amazon, my main sales platform, for non-specified bogus reasons, costing me significant sales and time. 

At this critical juncture in our world events, therefore I want to ask you to consider a special contribution of support via the PayPal button at the top of my homepage, to enable me to continue to publish free content. 

I thank you again for your support,

William 
www.williamengdahl.com

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com   

How I came to Realize I was Wrong About Peak Oil – F. William Engdahl

In my opinion, William Engdahl is one of the great thinkers and researchers of our time. What follows is his most recent newsletter.

In it, Engdahl traces his journey from a believer in Peak Oil to one who understood our planet was continuously creating oil and gas and we could NEVER use it up. The recent understandings of Mehran Keshe suggest the mechanisms of its creation may differ from those outlined below, but both agree it does not arise from the decay of organic, previously surface material, demonstrating the lie behind this example of the false scarcity paradigm we are subjected to on many, many levels every day by those who control our world. Indeed, in my opinion, we live in the time when this scarcity paradigm will be destroyed forever in human consciousness and the knowledge being shared with us by Mehran Keshe is key in that transition.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Dear Reader,

For this edition of my free newsletter I have decided to share with you some personal intellectual history. Namely, how I realized that I was completely wrong about accepting the idea that hydrocarbons–oil, gas and even coal–were a depleting, finite resource that was at or near its “peak” in production worldwide.

I want to give here a personal account of the change in my own belief about the genesis of hydrocarbons as I feel it will become increasingly important in the near future to grasp precisely what the Oil Game of the Big Four Anglo-American oil giants–ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and BP–is truly about. It’s about creating myths, lies and ultimately oil wars based on those myths and lies.

It was during the period in late 2002 as it became clear that the Bush-Cheney US Administration was determined to destroy Iraq and depose Saddam Hussein. How a US government could risk a potential break with its European and other major allies for any real or imagined threat from Iraq at that point puzzled me greatly. There must be a deeper ground, I told myself.

Then a friend sent me an article from a now-defunct website, From The Wilderness, founded by the late Mike Ruppert. The article laid out a major argument as to how the volume of oil in the ground was finite and disappearing rapidly. It argued that the single largest oil field in history, Ghawar in Saudi Arabia, was so depleted that it needed water injection of millions of barrels daily to get an ever declining output of crude oil. They argued that Russia was past the “peak” in its oil. They illustrated their notion with the famous Gaussian bell curve graph. The world, after more than a Century in the hydrocarbon era, had consumed so much oil that we were near to “absolute peak.” Or so they claimed.

Absolute Peak?

I dug deeper, found other articles on the peak oil theme. It seemed to offer an explanation for the mad Iraq War. After all, Iraq according to estimates had the world’s second largest undeveloped reserves of oil after Saudi Arabia. If oil was in such short supply, it would offer an explanation.

I decided I should go deeper on such a pivotal question as the future of world oil and its potential impact on the very questions of war and peace, world prosperity or famine.

I went to the annual conference of something calling itself the Association for Study of Peak Oil (ASPO), held in May 2004 in Berlin. There I met the gurus of Peak Oil–Colin Campbell, a retired Texaco geologist whose research on well production had given the peak oil movement a seeming scientific foundation; Matt Simmons, a Texas oil banker who had writen a book titled Twilight in the Desert claiming Ghawar was well past peak. Mike Ruppert was also there as was peak oil author Richard Heinberg.

Far from being treated to a high level scientific demonstration of the geophysics behind peak oil, however, I was gravely disappointed to be witness to bitter, acrimonious verbal battles between peak oil critics such as an energy expert from the Paris International Energy Agency and various peak oil advocates  who managed to lob mere ad hominem attacks on the Paris speaker rather than lay out serious science.

I decided to make a meeting with the then-President of ASPO International, Swedish atomic physicist, Kjell Aleklett, a few weeks later, at his University in Uppsala, Sweden, in an attempt to get a deeper scientific argument for Peak Oil. There Aleklett treated me to his latest slide show. He argued that, as oil was a fossil fuel, we knew, through study of plate tectonics, where all major oil deposits were to be found. Then, citing depletion of production in the North Sea, in Ghawar, Texas and a few other spots, Aleklett claimed, “voila! The case is proven.” For me it was anything but proven.

An alternative view

At that point, presented by Aleklett with what could only be described as a slide show loaded with unproven assertions, I began to question my earlier conviction about peak oil. Months before, a German researcher friend had sent me a paper by a group of Russian geophysicists on something they called “abiotic origins” of hydrocarbons. I had filed it for future reading. Now I opened it and read. I was impressed, to put it mildly.

As I searched more translations of the Russian scientific abiotic papers, I dug deeper. I learned of the highly-classified Soviet era research begun in the 1950s at onset of the Cold War. Stalin had given a mandate to the leading Soviet geo-scientists to, simply put, insure that the USSR was entirely self-sufficient in oil and gas. They should not repeat the fatal error that had contributed to Germany’s losing two world wars–lack of oil self-sufficiency.

Being serious scientists, they took nothing for granted. They began their work with an exhaustive search of  world scientific literature for rigorous proof of the genesis of hydrocarbons, beginning with the accepted fossil fuel theory. To their shock, the found not one serious scientific proof in the entire literature.

I then read of the cross-disciplinary researches by academics such as Professor V.A. Krayushkin, head of the Department of Petroleum Exploration in the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences in Kiev, one of the leading abiotic scientists.

Krayushkin presented a paper following the end of the Cold War to a 1994 Santa Fe, New Mexico conference of DOSECC (Drilling, Observation and Sampling of the Earth’s Continental Crust). There Krayushkin presented his researches of the Dnieper-Donets region of Ukraine. Traditional mainstream geology would have argued that that region would be barren of oil or gas. Traditionally-trained geologists had argued it senseless to drill for oil or gas there because of the complete absence of any “source rock” — the special geological formations which, according to Western geological theory, were the unique rocks from which hydrocarbons were generated or were capable of being generated – presumably, the only places where oil could be found, hence the term “source.”

What Krayushkin presented to the disbelieving audience of American geologists and geo-scientists went against their entire oil genesis training. Krayushkin argued that the oil and gas discoveries in the Ukraine basin came from what geologists called ‘crystalline basement,’ deep rocks where Western geological theory claimed oil and gas (which they termed ‘fossil fuels,’) could not be found. No dinosaur fossils nor tree remains could have been buried so deep, the Western theory went.

Yet the Russians had found oil and gas there, something tantamount to Galileo Galilei telling the Holy Inquisition that the Sun — and not the Earth — was the center of our system. According to one participant, the audience was not at all amused by the implications of Russian geophysics.

The speaker from Kiev went on to tell the scientists at Santa Fe, New Mexico that the Ukrainian team’s efforts to look for oil where conventional theory insisted no oil could be found had, in fact, yielded a bonanza in commercial oil and gas fields.

He described in detail the scientific tests they had conducted on the discovered petroleum to evaluate their theory that oil and gas originated not near the surface – as conventional fossil fuel theory assumes – but rather at great depth in the Earth, some two hundred kilometers deep. The tests confirmed that the oil and gas had indeed originated from great depth.

The speaker clearly explained that the Russian and Ukrainian scientists’ understanding of the origin of oil and gas was as different from what the Western geologists had been taught as was day from night.

More shocking to the audience was Krayushkin’s report that during the first five years of exploration of the northern part of the Dneiper-Donets Basin in the early 1990’s, a total of 61 wells had been drilled, of which 37 were commercially productive, a success rate of more than 60%. For an oil industry where a 30% success rate was typical, 60% was an impressive result. He described, well-by-well, the depths, oil flows and other details. [1]

Several of the wells were at a depth of more than four kilometers, a depth of roughly 13,000 feet into the Earth and some produced as much as 2600 barrels of crude oil a day, worth almost $3 million per day at 2011 oil prices.

Following such reading, I came into personal contact with one of the leading Russian abiotic scientists, Vladimir Kutcherov, then a professor at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden’s ETH or MIT. We met several times and he tutored me in the confirmed deep earth origins of all hydrocarbons. Not from dead dinosauer detritis and biological remains. Rather oil is being constantly generated from deep in the core of the Earth in the giant nuclear oven we call the core. Under enormous temperature and pressure, the primal methane gas is forced to the surface through what they term migration channels in the Earth’s mantle. [2] Indeed, Kutcherov demonstrated that existing “depleted” oil wells, left capped for several years, had been proven to “refill” with new oil from deep under. Depending on the elements the methane migrates through on its upwards journey, it remains gas, becomes crude oil, tar or coal.

The implications of the deep Earth genesis of hydrocarbons were profound and forced me to change my previously-accepted belief. I read further the fascinating geophysical theories of the brilliant German scientist, Alfred Wegener, the true discoverer of what in the 1960s was dubbed Plate Tectonics. I came to realize that our world is, as the Dutch oil economist, Peter O’dell famously put it, “not running out of oil, but running into oil.” Everywhere, from offshore Brazil to Russia, to China, to the Middle East. I wrote what became one of my most read online articles, “Confessions of an Ex-Peak Oil Believer,” in 2007. [3]

Indeed I realized that the entire foundations of Western petroleum geology  was a kind of religion. Rather than accept the Divine Birth, Peak Oil “church-goers” accepted the Divine Fossil Origins. No proof needed, only belief. To this day there exists not a single serious scientific paper proving the fossil genesis of hydrocarbons. It was posited in the 1760’s as an untested hypothesis, by Russian scientist Mikhail Lomonosov. It has served the American oil industry, especially of the family Rockefeller, to build an immense fortune based on a myth of oil scarcity.

Today, clearly the new US Administration under a President Trump, with his ExxonMobil Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, is returning to the era of Big Oil after eight years of Obama and alternative strategies. If our world is to avoid yet more carnage and unnecessary wars over bountiful oil, it would be important to study the true history of our Age of Oil. In 2012 I published a book based on this work titled Myths, Lies and Oil Wars. For those interested, I’m convinced you will find it a useful alternative.

 

endnotes:

 

[1] F. William Engdahl, Myths, Lies & Oil Wars, edition.engdahl, Wiesbaden, 2012, pp. 150-151.

 

[2] Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas Swedish Researchers Find, http://www.viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html

http://www.viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html.

 

[3] F. William Engdahl, Confessions of an “Ex-Peak Oil” Believer, September 14, 2007, http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Peak_Oil___Russia/peak_oil___russia.html.

F. William Engdahl discusses the global hegemony

When F. William Engdahl shows up to share his latest take on things, I listen.

I commend this latest interview to you if you have any interest in understanding how the world really works, including current US Presidential puppet show.

William Engdahl comments on the state of play in Ukraine

Bill Engdahl’s perspective on the world is always worth hearing, and here he shares his perspective on the current state of play in Ukraine.

Bill Engdahl reveals the grisly detail of the Odessa massacre by right wing forces

There is strong evidence that viruses – of any type – simply do not exist

It is highly likely that you find the above headline impossible to accept: viruses do not exist.

There is an adage that if you start from the viewpoint that everything you have been taught and told is a lie then, in my experience and assessment, you are standing close to the truth.

Also, when the same message comes to me from multiple sources in close time proximity, as this has, I see it as a prompt to look at it more closely.

The first was this article about 2 weeks ago by William Engdahl Toxicology vs Virology: The Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud. I quote:

One of the outcomes of the alleged new SARS Covid virus that publicly emerged in 2019 is that the medical specialization of virology has been raised to a stature almost Godlike in the media. Few understand the origins of virology and its elevation into a leading role in today’s medicine practice. For this we need to look at the origins and politics of America’s first medical research institute, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, today Rockefeller University, and their work on what they claimed was a polio virus.

In 1907 an outbreak of a sickness in New York City gave the director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, MD, a golden opportunity to lay claim to discovery of an invisible “virus” caused by what was arbitrarily called poliomyelitis. The word poliomyelitis simply means inflammation of the spinal cord’s grey matter. There were some 2,500 New Yorkers, mostly children, designated with some form of poliomyelitis, including paralysis and even death, that year.

Flexner’s Fraud

The most striking aspect of the entire polio saga in the USA during the first half of the 20th Century was the fact that every key phase of the business was controlled by people tied to what became the Rockefeller medical cabal. This fraud started with claims by the Director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, that he and his colleague, Paul A. Lewis, had “isolated” a pathogen, invisible to the eye, smaller even than bacteria, which they claimed caused the paralyzing sickness in a series of outbreaks in the US. How did they come to this idea?

In a paper published in 1909 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Flexner claimed he and Lewis had isolated the poliomyelitis virus responsible. He reported they had successfully “passaged” poliomyelitis through several monkeys, from monkey to monkey. They began by injecting diseased human spinal cord tissue of a young boy who had died, presumably from the virus, into the brains of monkeys. After a monkey fell ill, a suspension of its diseased spinal cord tissue was injected into the brains of other monkeys who also fell ill.

They proclaimed that the Rockefeller Institute doctors had thus proven poliomyelitis virus causality for the mysterious disease. They hadn’t done anything of the sort. Flexner and Lewis even admitted that:

“We failed utterly to discover bacteria, either in film preparations or in cultures, that could account for the disease; and, since among our long series of propagations of the virus in monkeys not one animal showed, in the lesions, the cocci described by some previous investigators, and we had failed to obtain any such bacteria from the human material studied by us, we felt that they could be excluded from consideration.”

What they then did was to make a bizarre supposition, a leap of faith, not a scientific claim. They took their hypothesis of viral exogenous agency and made it fact, with no proof whatever. They asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.“ Therefore?

Simon Flexner simply asserted it “must” be a polio virus killing the monkeys, because they could find no other explanation. In fact he did not look for another source of the illnesses. This was not scientific isolation. It was wild speculation: “…not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.” They admitted this in a December 18, 1909 follow up in JAMA, titled, THE NATURE OF THE VIRUS OF EPIDEMIC POLIOMYELITIS.

The so-called “virus” they were injecting into monkeys was hardly pure. It also contained an undetermined amount of contaminants. It included “pureed spinal cord, brain, fecal matter, even flies were ground up and injected into monkeys to induce paralysis.” Until Jonas Salk won approval from the US Government in April 1955 for a polio vaccine, no scientific proof of existence of a virus causing poliomyelitis, or infantile paralysis as it was commonly known, had been proven. That is the case to this day. The medical world all took Flexner’s word that it “must” be a virus.

End of quote.

Engdahl goes on to document the incestuous relationship between the Rockefeller Institute, Flexner and the American Medical Association, including the emergence of “virology”:

“Virology, a reductionist medical fraud, was a creation of the Rockefeller medical cabal. That highly important fact is buried in the annals of medicine today. Diseases such as smallpox or measles or poliomyelitis were declared caused by invisible pathogens called specific viruses. If scientists could “isolate” the invisible virus, theoretically they could find vaccines to protect people from harm. So their theory went. It was a huge boon for the Rockefeller cartel of pharmaceutical companies, which at the time included American Home Products which falsely promoted drugs with no proof of effect, such as Preparation H for Hemorrhoids, or Advil for pain relief; Sterling Drug, which took over the US assets including Aspirin of German Bayer AG after World War I; Winthrop Chemical; American Cyanamid and its subsidiary Lederle Laboratories; Squibb and Monsanto.

Soon virus researchers at the Rockefeller Institute, in addition to claiming discovery of the poliomyelitis virus, claimed to discover the viruses that caused smallpox, mumps, measles and yellow fever. Then they announced “discovery” of preventive vaccines for pneumonia and yellow fever. All of these “discoveries” announced by the Institute proved false. With the control of the research in the new area of virology, the Rockefeller Institute, in collusion with Simmons at AMA and his equally corrupt successor, Morris Fishbein, could promote new patented vaccines or drug “remedies” in the influential AMA journal that went to every member doctor in America. Drug companies refusing to pay for ads in the AMA journal were blackballed by the AMA.”

I have no doubt many reading this – if you’ve got this far – will be guffawing in disbelief. Such is the nature of belief.

Engdahl understands this very personally. He has spent most of his life in a wheelchair, courtesy of a childhood polio jab.

However, the real powerhouse on this is Dr. Poornima Wagh. Wagh has 2 PhDs in virology and immunology and over 20 years’ practical experience in the lab. She lays it all out in this interview (backup at this link). She blows the entire world of virology, including SARS-COV-2, out of the water. Wagh explains how her lab was given 1,500 Covid positive samples and funded to isolate the SARS-COV-2 virus. Unlike most viral research, as she explains, she insisted on applying Koch’s postulates, which she describes as the gold standard for establishing a microorganism as the cause of a disease and which, she also says, the world of virology does not use because when you do, no virus can be shown to exist. Not one. Including SARS-COV-2. And this is what her lab’s testing of the 1,500 samples – 3 times over – demonstrated. No virus and no identifiable cause of any illness causing microorganism.

Unsurprisingly, 21 journals refused to publish the results. Moreover, she shares how many people around the world, including her own request for samples from the US CDC for her lab to test with, have yielded no known record of the virus.

Wagh also explains that the SARS-COV-2 “virus” was actually created by computer simulation. Again, I encourage you to watch this interview.

Are you still with me? No SARS-COV-2 virus. And no other kind of virus, just as Engdahl claimed. Wagh uses the term “Scamdemic”, as I have. However, she does not get to why this was perpetrated on humanity, as I have, at least on an introductory level, because it’s beyond the scope of her focus.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman made the point perhaps 2 years ago that the SARS-COV-2 “tests” did not meet Koch’s postulates; however, at the time I did not grasp that the entire world of virology skirts around them and claims a modified set of criteria is valid for viruses. Wagh blows that away.

Which leaves us with a long planned psyop to jab most of the global population, for the purposes I have explained at length on my blog. For now, the deaths from the jabs are being hidden. Will you realise before it is too late? Most will not. As I oft say, people die for their beliefs every day. It takes many forms…

Richard

The lockdown scenario we are living through is all planned

I have long been given the understanding that there will be a moment in time when the dark ones who run our world will grab for complete control. In my opinion, this is what we are living through.

Firstly, I do not believe the Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or COVID-19 is any random event. This is indicated by William Engdahl’s article on the fingerprints of Bill Gates https://journal-neo.org/2020/03/18/coronavirus-and-the-gates-foundation/ and pointed at by articles such as https://www.nairaland.com/5673558/us-behind-coronavirus-says-russia . Research has shown the Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV) contains elements from the AIDS virus as this article suggests. The US has been investing heavily in bioweapon R&D for at least 50 years.

Firstly, the current economic downturn was long overdue and has been turned into a financial atomic bomb by steps being taken in the name of public protection due to the virus. Millions are being thrown out of work, justifying the instant introduction of what is known as helicopter money (money raining down on the heads of the public from the apparent “largesse” of governments (choke…). Not so obvious is the rapid acquisition of major US companies through the so-called emergency bridging finance being provided by the Fed. 

The nature of our financial world is being transformed in days… Few see it.

The public is being transformed into being completely dependent on government handouts, and rapidly becoming the serf class of the “Hunger Games” scenario. And they welcome it…

And there’s another layer to this. 

It’s the rollout of the police state controls, begun in China, across the world.

Perhaps the most obvious illustration is India going into a 3-week lockdown when they have fewer cases of COVID-19 than Iceland… And it followed closely on an unexplained flying visit to India by Donald Trump.

However, if you look a little more closely, it’s all following a model laid out in a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, in particular the Lock Step scenario, beginning on Page 18. I encourage you to read it. You will recognise what is happening. In my opinion, this was planned for the swine flu virus event of 2012, but that missile misfired. Part of that scenario was the horrific, manipulative vaccination of, effectively, everyone but the fight put up by Rima Laibow and others turned the tide against this. The evidence is a similar but modernised version of this vaccination is planned on the basis of COVID-19 – to protect us…

The Rockefellers have played a huge role in fashioning the unfolding of our world since the beginning of the 20th Century, in particular. Few can accept that our allopathic medical system, which most so slavishly accept as the reference point for health in most of the world was the creation of John D Rockefeller about 100 years ago, for the initial purpose of selling pharmaceuticals. James Corbett’s video entitled Rockefeller Medicine is perhaps the best outline of this. Their control is so complete that almost no allopathic doctors globally are legally allowed to prescribe anything other than Big Pharma products and are completely paralysed by the idea that they might be able to save lives by doing so. In my opinion, the one-year residency, during which graduate doctors are submitted to sleep-depriving 24 hours shifts and inhumane work schedules is an exercise in low grade psychological abuse to lock in the allopathic medical training. I have read and written about mind control programming, and this fits the model. And it works…

So, the Rockefellers are very used to, along with their elitist brethren, directing the lives of the rest of us for their own ends.

However, there is one piece of this puzzle of my understanding that I have also long understood: that this grab for complete control will fail…

We truly live in interesting times. Are you one of those who is being directed, are you one of those who is unwittingly (or wittingly) helping implement their plans or are you one of those who is acting to deconstruct their horrific plans for humanity and our beautiful planet?

I know where I stand.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com 

Anti-vax Melbourne GP John Piesse faces suspension by medical regulator

There has been a furore in the local press over the last few days about a GP who is enabling parents to avoid vaccinating their children. Shock!!! Horror!!! And is likely to be disbarred because of it. However, what I was surprised and encouraged by was that his side of the story has been shared in the MSM:

A Melbourne GP facing suspension by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency has vowed to continue helping anti-vax parents sidestep “no jab, no play” laws until he is deregistered.

Dr John Piesse was advised by the regulator on Thursday afternoon that it was proposing to suspend his medical registration. He was given four days to provide a written response in his defence.

The GP, who has previously been reprimanded by the regulator, is unrepentant, saying he has been “deluged” by parents wanting to avoid getting their children immunised.

Dr Piesse, who works from the Natural Healing Centre in Mitcham and the Natural Institute of Integrative Medicine in Hawthorn, said he had seen about 450 children since late 2015 but did not provide a letter of exemption for everyone.

“I have tried to help,” he said.

He insists he is doing nothing illegal.

When asked if he would continue advising anti-vax parents, he replied: “I will … until they basically deregister me … unless I can be persuaded that what I am doing is wrong.

“This is a matter of principle. You have got a public health policy which is causing harm …”

Dr Piesse and his colleague, naturopath Nerida James, attended a screening of the controversial anti-vaccination film Vaxxed in Hawthorn this month, where he told participants there were ways in which parents could get vaccination exemptions and he knew of other doctors who were providing them.

“There are a few who are doing it as well, but they will get attacked as well,” he said.

“The system cannot tolerate doctors who don’t follow the government’s line.”

It is understood complaints are set to be lodged with the regulator over two other doctors in suburban practices who are also involved in promoting an anti-vaccination message.

Under “no jab, no play” legislation introduced in 2016, childcare services and kindergartens must first obtain evidence that a child is fully immunised for their age, or on a catch-up vaccination program, or is unable to be fully immunised for medical reasons, before enrolling them.

Many parents involved in the anti-vaccination movement fear a link between the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and autism. Such a link was first suggested in 1998 by UK researcher Andrew Wakefield.

His research, which was based on only 12 children, has since been disproved and retracted. (Bullshit!!! – Richard)

Victoria’s Health Department first raised concerns with the regulator over Dr Piesse after he wrote to the Health Minister in August 2016 to apply for exemptions.

Acting Health Minister Martin Foley said he was concerned the investigation into Dr Piesse was yet to be completed.

“It is deeply disappointing and concerning that after 12 months an investigation into Dr Piesse’s practice has not yet been concluded by AHPRA. It’s not good enough,” he said.

“By failing to vaccinate their children, parents are putting their kids and others in our community at risk of terrible diseases or death.

“Practitioners who pedal …  misinformation about immunisation are a menace and put the health and safety of children at great risk – they must be stopped.”

Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt said he was astonished to learn registered doctors would “stoop to the level of supporting the anti-vaccination movement”.

“Vaccination saves lives and it protects lives. It’s safe, as the Chief Medical Officer and all of the body of research points out, and if it is accurate that there are registered doctors who are advocating an anti-vaccination position then they will have the full force of the authorities come down on them,” he said.

“There will be no sympathy, none at all, from the government if the authorities take the strongest possible decisions.”

Medical Board of Australia chairman Dr Joanna Flynn, said the regulator could not comment on individuals but that all registered medical practitioners were held to account against the board’s code of conduct.

“The board expects registered doctors to practise the profession safely and ethically,” she said.

End of quote.

If you haven’t watched VAXXED (I give you access to instantly view a low quality version here, so there’s no excuse) or one of the many other documentaries on the impact of vaccination, or read my post referring to the article by William Engdahl of just a day or so ago on the undeniable correlation in China over the last 20 years between the introduction of Western vaccination practices and the emergence of autism, I urge you to do so.

And some have suggested to me this is a matter of changing diagnosis. I reject this argument. I accept that many excitable kids are being assessed as ADD or ADHD and being dosed up on Ritalin as a result, but autism is a very different matter. Do some homework and WAKE UP!!! This is all planned.

Wake up to the world you live in.

As Ronald Bernard, the Dutch insider now whistleblower said this week, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are real.

Wake and weep, then get into action. It’s the wilful ignorance and inaction of the capable public that allows this to persist.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Startling Emergence of Epidemic Autism in the New China

The connection between autism and vaccination is clearcut to those who are willing to step outside the official brainwashing sent our way which, sadly, does not include those in the allopathic medical world created by John D Rockefeller just a 100 or so short years ago.

Dr Rima Laibow is very clear about it, and is pushing for a 5 year Childhood Vaccination Moratorium in the United States. I wish Rima every success.

However, perhaps the most graphic illustration of this correlation arrived today from F William Engdahl, and it discusses the dramatic and undeniable correlation between the commencement of widespread vaccination in China and the explosion in cases of autism. Here is the article. Before vaccination began 20 years ago, autism was virtually unknown in China.

Read it and weep. And see if you can still deny this correlation. This data sweeps away the nonsense about genetics or older parenting that some cling desperately to in their efforts to deny the truth of vaccination being the cause of autism.

Although many will continue to deny it because to question this belief pulls the thread on the reality they take to be true and have built their lives upon. As I have often said, we are not our beliefs, but most still make that error because they know nothing else and when someone questions one of those beliefs, the individual feels threatened because they take it as a personal attack. Such a sad phenomenon and I witness it often.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
RSS
Follow by Email