Search results for temperature, climate

‘Breathtaking’ adjustments to Arctic temperature record

An important article on the fudging of temperature data. I quote:

Burton’s key point is this: where Cowtan claims that all NOAA’s adjustments have done is increased warming by a modest 3 per cent, in actuality they have increased it by 35 per cent. So, far from Cowtan’s assessment that these adjustments are “inconsequentially tiny”, they are in fact quite massively distorting.

Might it be that they reached such wildly different conclusions by using different data? Er, no. Burton reached his conclusions by creating a spreadsheet with decadal data digitized from the exact graph used in Cowtan’s video.

Now I appreciate that in the context of the broader climate debate this might seem a trivial dispute. But I’ve been at this game long enough to be able to assure you that these faux rebuttals like the one offered by Cowtan are absolutely integral to the ongoing survival of the alarmist ‘consensus.’…

…Professor Gordon Hughes, one of the statisticians who reviewed and confirmed Lewis’s findings has commented thus:

“The statistical methods used in the [Marotzke] paper are so bad as to merit use in a class on how not to do applied statistics. All this paper demonstrates is that climate scientists should take some basic courses in statistics and Nature should get some competent referees.”

Damning indeed.

But here’s a prediction. The rebuttal won’t receive nearly the coverage that Marotzke’s original inept paper did.

Then this recent article from The Telegraph:

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

And this history lesson on the IPCC makes interesting reading, illustrating how the fraud has been perpetrated.

As I’ve said before, the key reason for this fraud is to justify Agenda 21, a formula for transforming life on our planet and a formula which, when I ask people face to face, almost no-one has heard of. And it is well advanced. I recommend you watch Rosa Koire’s presentation and take appropriate action.

Environmental scientist blasts IPCC “climate consensus”

Another example of informed people waking up to the man-made global warming lies of the IPCC.

Until nearly the end of the 20th Century global temperatures had increased by about 0.6o C, overall, with a period of cooling in the 1960s and early 70s, followed by continuing warming. However temperatures began to level off just before the year 2000 holding a steady, on average, since then. Then came the Northern Hemisphere winter of 2013-14.

Followed by a cool 2014 summer and what is already shaping to be an even colder 2014-15 winter. One cold winter proves nothing, though we are all predisposed to thinking a few hot or cold days mean there is a more significant shift happening. But in reality, global warming peaked about 18 years ago.

But it was never about global warming. It was always a stalking horse for Agenda 21. It is the most profound change happening on the planet today and almost no-one I mention it to has heard of it. Just as it was planned.

“Climate Scientists: We’re Alarmed. Here’s Why You Should Be, Too” – Such Nonsense

This week, the world’s largest general scientific society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, has issued an uncharacteristically blunt call to action on climate change.

Climate change has become deeply entrenched as a view, promoted so continuously that the truth is completely lost, and to oppose it is seen to be blindly irresponsible. There are many things like this in our world, but most don’t see them.

I share with you once more this simple graph, primarily showing ice core data from Vostok in Antarctica, augmented with more recent data.

Human-generated CO2 is NOT driving climate change.

Although not shown on this graph, it is found the CO2 concentration LAGS temperature by about 800 years.

The current temperature peak, which has actually peaked, is lower than the last three.

There is much talk about the continuing melt in the Arctic, but not a whimper about the INCREASING ice in the Antarctic.

Though this is difficult to prove, it is my view that our dark friends who now have the tools to control our planetary weather have been driving warm air into the Arctic during the most recent winter, which is why the continental US has been so cold this winter. They want to sustain the melting, so they can drive Agenda 21.

Be awake to these games. They are blatant when you look.


The case for the Philippines typhoon being triggered to influence the current climate change conference

I suspect that you may have trouble accepting the links I have put in place pointing to typhoon Yolanda, which recently devastated the Philippines as being set to influence the current climate change talks in Poland.

So let me take this from the top and spell out the pieces.

Human activity is not responsible for global warming

This notion is so deeply entrenched that it is almost impossible to consider it to be otherwise. Indeed, it is widely stated that there is a consensus of scientists agreeing that it is so. In fact, it is not so. Yes, there are many apparent pointers to human activity causing global warming; however, it is important to recognise the fundamental impact of directed funding on the focus of research projects and their outcomes. In simple terms, scientists choose to undertake research that will be funded and bring forth outcomes that ensure they continue to be funded. I do not intend this to be a discussion of the scientific process, the nature of science and how it is manipulated, though I will probably do that as a separate posting.

To understand the views of some highly regarded climate scientists that do not get promoted in the mainstream media, watch this video. Their perspective is completely juxtaposed to the mainstream view of global warming.

For a complementary and separate perspective, read this previous post and follow the links in it. Apart from providing you with this graph:


showing there is no correlation with human CO2 generation and temperature, it shares with you careful research which completely discredits the original tree ring research pointing to global warming. Yes, we are in a period where temperatures are warmer, but this warming is not outside earlier ranges.

Unsurprisingly, the warming and cooling on planet Earth is primarily driven by the changing behaviour of the sun, and it is believed by some key climate scientists that we have begun a period of reduced sunspot activity, which may see our planet cool significantly in the next few years. This video covers this ground.

As I said, this truth is so deeply buried, it seems impossible for it to be true. Moreover, had the alternative energy paths been allowed to flourish from early last century, beginning with the work of Nikola Tesla, we would never have needed this century of fossil fuel consumption, nor the abomination of nuclear power.

In making this point about global warming, I am not advocating a disregard for how we treat the planet; quite the contrary.

Why are we told this lie about climate change?

This lie is perpetrated to bring forth Agenda 21 and to impose global taxes such as a carbon tax based upon global warming.

Was typhoon Yolanda man-made?

This conversation was not one I went looking for. The pieces literally landed in my lap – or more accurately in my Inbox.

The first suggestion of this from dutchsinse I shared more as a piece of speculation, as my post at the time showed. I was not convinced, but given he has been tracking this subject for some years, I felt it was of interest to share here. Those who sought to discredit his work triggered him to lay out the background to his claim. However, what interested me most was the completely independent evidence coming forth. Included in this material is video footage discussing the massive SBX-1 mobile phased array radar (i.e.  HAARP –based) platform.


Look at the scale of this beast. It is 28 stories high. The SBX-1 is discussed in detail in this article, along with evidence that it was deployed to the Philippines at the time of this typhoon.

I quote from the document Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, published in 1996:

In extreme cases, it might involve the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting scale.

So was the SBX-1 used in conjunction with land-based HAARP and other installations to trigger this typhoon?

I quote from this article:

A steerable US land-based X-Band Radar system (COBRA DANE phased array radar system) was already built in northern Japan by the United States military and has been operational since 2006 and a second COBRA DANE installation in central Japan came online just prior to super typhoon Haiyan – the strongest wind storm ever recorded – being formed at sea and steered into the Philippines using HAARP AMISR phased array radar beam triangulation.

Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) and satellite weather radar data from the Pacific region detected 2 stationary (land based) microwave hot spots and 1 slow moving hot spot at  sea  (The HAARP SBX-! is a slow moving sea-based X-Band phased array platform)  giving evidence that the U.S. military created and steered typhoon Haiyan using 3 HAARP systems.  The 2 land-based systems in Japan and the seafaring SBX-1. Using 3 phased array radar systems drastically improves the angular resolution of the emitted microwave – steers the microwave beam with pinpoint accuracy.  Another U.S. military controlled HAARP installation was available on Guam – the COBRA DANE installation pictured in this article.

End of quote.

So, the material I have shared with you provides evidence of the ability to create this typhoon and evidence from two sources that it was done.

Why would this typhoon be created, intentionally killing thousands of people?

Perhaps the biggest issue that confronts all of us when we contemplate such an act is that it profoundly challenges our sensibilities. How could anybody do that?

It’s important that we recognise what those who run the game on this planet are willing to do to get where they want to go – literally anything. How many have been killed in Iraq during and since the Iraqi war? Over a million by my reckoning. So, 10,000 people is nothing by comparison. Also, as I’ve said many times, if the target is 0.5BN people on the planet, as expressed on the Georgia Guidestones, what’s a few thousand to get your way?

If it was man-made, it had a purpose, and that purpose will be reflected in its timing. In my view, this typhoon was timed to influence the current conference on climate change in Warsaw, November 11-22. You cannot ignore the timing, and you cannot ignore that the typhoon is being used to influence the decision-making at that conference. See this video and this commentary. We are seeing mass rallies around the world calling for action on climate change. Who cares about the truth? It’s completely lost.

This is how it’s done, my friends, time and time again. The Hegelian Dialectic: create the problem (in this case a manufactured, false problem of man-made global warming); trigger the reaction (mass rallies calling for change, even a hunger strike); bring forth the solution (global carbon taxes, etc.)

It took us a while to figure out what had happened on 9/11. This one some of us are watching in real time and being considered crazy by many for calling it as it is. Remember, I never ask you to believe anything I say. Do your own homework, beginning with the links I have given you.

In my view, it will take a shift in human consciousness to end this horrible, unending manipulation that humanity is inside of. Nothing less. May it be on our doorstep.

Al Gore weighs into debate over links between bushfires and climate change

I have to admit that when Al Gore’s video “An Inconvenient Truth” was released, I was completely taken in by it. I guess I’ve moved on a little since 2006. Now he has again popped up to peddle the NWO bullshit about CO2 driving global warming.

As illustrated in this video, there was a wonderful correlation between temperature and CO2 concentration for a long segment of Earth history – but the correlation broke down with the onset of human production of CO2. There is currently NO correlation and the temperature peak we are currently experiencing is looking like it may be lower than the last couple, which occur every 120,000 years or so.

Time to share this truth with everyone you know, if you are willing. It is but a small stake to put in the NWO wheel and takes little commitment from you. Share a little truth.

Climate Panel Says Upper Limit on Emissions Is Nearing

Here’s an example of the rollout of their so-called report mentioned in the last video. You’ll see it in lots of places, as Ben suggested in his video. Be alert to their dark games.

This is Ben’s earlier video that I shared with you on the non-correlation of temperature with CO2. Also, if you look at the data Ben shares, the temperature spike we have experienced is within the range of previous peaks.  

Kind Regards,


Are the recent (and ongoing) fires in Australia manmade?

For many, this question is completely beyond comprehension. No-one could possibly do such a thing. This is the delusion that most people live inside. In truth, there is a global elite that has been controlling this planet for centuries if not millennia, including the two world wars of the last century. Again, this truth is beyond the comprehension of most people, but it is a subject about which I and many others have written extensively. You can simply use the search field on my blog to finding evidence for this.

But let us turn to the fires. As you may know, in the last two years, particularly, there have been highly destructive fires in California. In one case, in 2018 when the town of Paradise was destroyed, the evidence of it having been destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) was incontrovertible. Here is a link to my article covering this. In no other way would such clear-cut lines have been produced where houses were burnt and neighbouring items were not, including volatile eucalypts. I encourage you to look at this closely if this idea is foreign to you. I am discussing this because we are in a war that most of us have no knowledge of. That war is between the elite who control our planet and the rest of us, who simply wish to live an honest, caring and satisfying life.

What happened in Paradise is so clearcut that I doubt they will make such an obvious revelation again.

Further, the evidence that the US military, the CIA and others have been controlling the weather, in great detail, for some 50 years is very clear. Also, I have written extensively about the globalist agenda known as Agenda 21, now known as The 2030 Agenda. This involves moving most of the people on the planet out of the countryside and into small city apartments. It has used the false paradigm of global warming as its stalking horse; however, that agenda is at serious risk of coming unstuck as the planet cools. Please take note of the cold winter in the US last year and the even colder winter that is unfolding this year. Many areas broke their snowfall records before winter began.

In Australia, however, in the last month or so, we have seen unseasonably hot weather sweep the country. In my opinion, this has happened in part because Australia has been a recalcitrant in adopting the measures to offset the so-called man-made global warming, a fiction of the first order and one about which I have written extensively. In particular, there is evidence that fire accelerants have been sprayed or scattered in the atmosphere, to ensure these fires are extreme. Here is a link to a video (copied from Facebook), which claims to be showing the evidence of particulate matter that was dropped as a fire accelerant. I cannot say that this is accurate, but I am willing to consider it a possibility. However, I give you a tangible piece of evidence for this. In the recent fires in the Adelaide Hills, about one third of the vineyard areas were burnt to a cinder. The vignerons were unconcerned because green vineyards, in general, do not burn; however, these vineyards burned with a ferocity that was beyond their imagination.  Something caused those vineyards to be an inferno when under normal circumstances they would not. Simply the temperature? I doubt it.

As with anything that I write, do not ask that you accept my view. I simply ask that you consider it and do your own homework if you truly want to understand how our world works and what the global elite has planned for us all.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at  

The deceit of global warming and the agenda behind that deceit

If you listen to the MSM as your source of information, you could not help but believe that anthropogenic global warming is causing the planet to get hotter. Sadly, it’s a massive deceit and joins so many other things about our world that we are told are true but are not.

To most people the above words are simply heresy. How could it not be true? We are presented with the evidence almost daily.

Well, I used to be there, too!!! But then I began to pick the reality we are presented with apart.

Back in 2015, James Corbett produced the video The Global Warming Pause Explained, which shared the fact that “the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset shows a least-squares linear regression trend of 0.0C from February 1997 to October 2015.”


Yes. No mean warming for 18 years.

And this is not new news to those who really look at this, and I have written about this many times over recent years.

Ben Davidson, who runs the Suspicious Observers YouTube channel, has produced several debunking videos on this subject, the most recent entitled Fatal Flaw in Climate Change Science being perhaps the most powerful. And Aussie geology Professor Ian Plimer has demonstrated the deceit, and the classic discrediting technique has been applied to him. When I mention his name to people who have bought the bullshit, they almost inevitably label Plimer a crackpot. Yet not one that I have spoken to about Plimer and express this view have read his book Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science. I have. And I consider it to be one of the most thoroughly researched books that I have read. On any subject. This discrediting of contrary sources is a key practice of those who run our world.

And this recent article entitled Rewriting America’s History illustrates how historical data is massaged to fit the story. I quote: 

In 1998, NASA showed 1934 as the hottest year on record in the US, and declining temperatures for the rest of the century. They have since rewritten the data to eliminate the post 1930s cooling.  1998 used to be one degree Fahrenheit cooler than 1934, and now it is warmer.

End of quote. I have written about this kind of manipulation before.

The heart of the global warming deceit and why is encapsulated in the life focus of Maurice Strong. Strong was plucked from obscurity, trained and fostered by David Rockefeller and after a career of being parachuted into senior management roles in the Canadian oil industry was given the role to set up the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and also organised the initial UN conference on Agenda 21. This article of mine from 2015 spells out his journey in setting up the IPCC in 1972 and then Agenda 21 at the 1992 UN conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Agenda 21 is now known as The 2030 Agenda.

Simply put, the reason for the global warming is deceit is to create an excuse to herd people out of the country and into the cities, which they are doing at quite a pace. We are more manageable and more easily culled there. Heard about Agenda 21? Most people have not and it is being implemented all around us.

But I suspect those selling this spin are panicking because of the cooling that is resulting from the reduced sunspot activity and, more importantly, our impending entry into a new “solar minimum”. It’s impossible to deny what has happened this year in the US, with record snow and cold levels across the country and massive flooding that has eliminated more than half of the grain production in much of the US. And there are also many minor pointers, such as several snowfalls in the Sahara for the first time in 40 years last year, the first April snowfall in 2019 in south-western Western Australia for 40 years and the earliest ever recorded, amongst others.

So, if you are still convinced about anthropogenic global warming, please look beyond the MSM and do some of your own research. And once you have pulled on this thread, begin to ask; “What else have I been lied to about?

And your life and your perception will begin to change irrevocably.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel and Ian Plimer, Aussie Geology Professor, belt the global warming nonsense out of the park

There has been much brouhaha by the global political cut-outs since Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accord. Right on queue.
However, there are many climate experts who disagree with the official dogma; for example, John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, is uncompromising in How the Global Warming Scare Began. The YouTube listing says:
A great scientist named Roger Revelle had Al Gore in his class at Harvard and the Global Warming campaign was born. Revelle tried to calm things down years later, but Gore said Revelle was Senile and refused to debate. John Coleman documents the entire story and shows how our tax dollars are perpetuating the Global Warming alarmist campaign even though temperatures have not risen in years and years.
Then we have Ian Plimer, Aussie geology and mining professor, in his presentation to a UK Government Public meeting in 2011. I’m currently reading his book Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science. He writes as cogently and entertainingly as he speaks.
However, neither of them, for whatever reason, points out the game behind the game – the elite’s creation of this farce to justify Agenda 21, now renamed the 2030 Agenda. As I’ve said before, this agenda is carefully hidden from the public. To understand how this was all crafted, look no further than the life journey of Maurice Strong, cultivated and tasked with unfolding both the global warming myth and Agenda 21 on behalf of the global elite.
It’s only when you join the dots that the picture becomes clear.

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Chemistry Expert: Carbon Dioxide can’t cause Global Warming

I quote this article in full:

Scarcely a day goes by without us being warned of coastal inundation by rising seas due to global warming.

Why on earth do we attribute any heating of the oceans to carbon dioxide, when there is a far more obvious culprit, and when such a straightforward examination of the thermodynamics render it impossible.

Carbon dioxide, we are told, traps heat that has been irradiated by the oceans, and this warms the oceans and melts the polar ice caps. While this seems a plausible proposition at first glance, when one actually examines it closely a major flaw emerges.

In a nutshell, water takes a lot of energy to heat up, and air doesn’t contain much. In fact, on a volume/volume basis, the ratio of heat capacities is about 3300 to 1. This means that to heat 1 litre of water by 1˚C it would take 3300 litres of air that was 2˚C hotter, or 1 litre of air that was about 3300˚C hotter!

This shouldn’t surprise anyone. If you ran a cold bath and then tried to heat it by putting a dozen heaters in the room, does anyone believe that the water would ever get hot?

The problem gets even stickier when you consider the size of the ocean. Basically, there is too much water and not enough air.

The ocean contains a colossal 1,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 litres of water! To heat it, even by a small amount, takes a staggering amount of energy. To heat it by a mere 1˚C, for example, an astonishing 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules of energy are required.

Let’s put this amount of energy in perspective. If we all turned off all our appliances and went and lived in caves, and then devoted every coal, nuclear, gas, hydro, wind and solar power plant to just heating the ocean, it would take a breathtaking 32,000 years to heat the ocean by just this 1˚C!

In short, our influence on our climate, even if we really tried, is miniscule!

So it makes sense to ask the question – if the ocean were to be heated by ‘greenhouse warming’ of the atmosphere, how hot would the air have to get? If the entire ocean is heated by 1˚C, how much would the air have to be heated by to contain enough heat to do the job?

Well, unfortunately for every ton of water there is only a kilogram of air. Taking into account the relative heat capacities and absolute masses, we arrive at the astonishing figure of 4,000˚C.

That is, if we wanted to heat the entire ocean by 1˚C, and wanted to do it by heating the air above it, we’d have to heat the air to about 4,000˚C hotter than the water.

And another problem is that air sits on top of water – how would hot air heat deep into the ocean? Even if the surface warmed, the warm water would just sit on top of the cold water.

Thus, if the ocean were being heated by ‘greenhouse heating’ of the air, we would see a system with enormous thermal lag – for the ocean to be only slightly warmer, the land would have to be substantially warmer, and the air much, much warmer (to create the temperature gradient that would facilitate the transfer of heat from the air to the water).

Therefore any measurable warmth in the ocean would be accompanied by a huge and obvious anomaly in the air temperatures, and we would not have to bother looking at ocean temperatures at all.

So if the air doesn’t contain enough energy to heat the oceans or melt the ice caps, what does?

The earth is tilted on its axis, and this gives us our seasons. When the southern hemisphere is tilted towards the sun, we have more direct sunlight and more of it (longer days). When it is tilted away from the sun, we have less direct sunlight and less of it (shorter days).

The direct result of this is that in summer it is hot and in winter it is cold. In winter we run the heaters in our cars, and in summer the air conditioners. In winter the polar caps freeze over and in summer 60-70% of them melt (about ten million square kilometres). In summer the water is warmer and winter it is cooler (ask any surfer).

All of these changes are directly determined by the amount of sunlight that we get. When the clouds clear and bathe us in sunlight, we don’t take off our jumper because of ‘greenhouse heating’ of the atmosphere, but because of the direct heat caused by the sunlight on our body. The sun’s influence is direct, obvious, and instantaneous.

If the enormous influence of the sun on our climate is so obvious, then, by what act of madness do we look at a variation of a fraction of a percent in any of these variables, and not look to the sun as the cause?

Why on earth (pun intended) do we attribute any heating of the oceans to carbon dioxide, when there is a far more obvious culprit, and when such a straightforward examination of the thermodynamics render it impossible.

Dr. Mark Imisides

End of quote.

The trouble with Dr. Imisides is he wants to let the facts interfere with a good scam, one that is being used by the global elite to disenfranchise the little people – The 2030 Agenda which, it seems, has not yet reached his awareness.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email