But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”
While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.
“Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report. The new study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a non-profit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.
The comprehensive study in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.
In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre.
There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.
End of quote.
No… Really? A controlled demolition? Surely not…
I find it extraordinary how committed “experts” and the public are to believing the official version. Surely we’re not being lied to… As if we are ever not.
The paper referred to is a bit buried in the complete issue, so I separated it out and put it here.
Anyone who suspends their belief in the official story and trusts the basic physics in front of them knows that for the top of the building to fall at freefall speed, as all three buildings did that day, everything below it has to be removed first. Freefall requires zero resistance. Drop your car keys from head height to the floor to get a sense of this. That’s freefall speed.
Here is a recent video of a building being demolished. Remind you of anything?
And there has been scant publicity given to the glazed craters left when the debris was cleared, as shown here:
The official story is this was due to past glaciation… We are so gullible.
Evidence of a nuclear detonation, anyone?
And the term “ground zero” only meant one thing before 9/11 – “”the point on the ground above or below a nuclear detonation”. That is, until dictionary definitions were changed in retrospect as shown here:
Or we could listen to the view of the recently departed Major General Albert Stubblebine:
Or we could listen to Field McConnell, retired military and domestic pilot, who exposed the hidden remote control systems in place on all glass cockpit planes by the time of 9/11, which means the 9/11 planes could not have been hijacked. Not that real planes hit the buildings. You know what would happen if you squashed an empty aluminium drink can against a wall. An aeroplane is no different and it doesn’t matter how fast you do it. It would just flatten and slide down the side of the building.
Field also goes on to reveal that MH370 was tracked by several parties to its landing at Diego Garcia, again being able to be controlled remotely. So, the multi-year search for the remains of MH370 has been a sham from the get go. But I digress…
I could give you a hundred pieces of evidence on 9/11, but that’s enough for today.
And those who want to hold grimly to the official story of 9/11 because to do otherwise would cause them to question the entire basis upon which they’ve constructed their lives will probably deny the evidence for the rest of their lives. That’s how beliefs work and those who run our world rely upon it.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com