The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives.
“…14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition,” the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via Latino.FoxNews.com.
What’s especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized.
The vaccines were administered by the Mexican Social Security Institute, known as IMSS. The IMSS confirmed the deadly reactions occurred after children received injections of vaccines for tuberculosis, rotavirus and hepatitis B — the same viral strains targeted by vaccines routinely administered to children in the United States.
End of quote.
Of course, this is all pure chance and vaccination should be compulsory for everyone, just as it now is for children in Australia and, increasingly in the United States and other countries.
But sleep on. Nothing to worry about. Herd immunity is supposedly the target, even though there are apparently no scientific studies that demonstrate this notion has any basis. And if vaccination gives you immunity, why would you care if anyone else is vaccinated or not?
Oops… That was logical thinking. I’ll stop now before my brain overheats…
I suspect everyone will learn something from this presentation on how and why smartphones are tracked.
And, in my view, we all need to understand this.
The Australian prime minister’s chief business adviser says that climate change is a ruse led by the United Nations to create a new world order under the agency’s control. The statement coincided with a visit from the UN’s top climate negotiator.
Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.
“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he wrote in an opinion piece published in The Australian newspaper on Friday, without providing evidence. (though there is plenty… Richard)
“The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, adding that the UN is against capitalism and freedom and wants to create a “new world order.”
End of quote.
Well, what he says is true (see Agenda 21), but why is he saying it?
Is it one of those cases of putting the truth out there in some way, as those running the game behind the game do?
I find it intriguing.