Archive for Uncategorized

Australian Bushfires: A Smart City Conspiracy?

Thank you, Nods.

Just a few days ago, I wrote an article entitled Are the recent (and ongoing) fires in Australia manmade? Today, Nods, one of my readers, sent me an article entitled Australian Bushfires: A Smart City Conspiracy?

This article spells out a far more compelling and researched article supporting my hypothesis. I encourage you to read it. If you thought my article was far-fetched, perhaps this article may cause you to think again.

The more we are aware, the less we can be manipulated. 


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at  

Are the recent (and ongoing) fires in Australia manmade?

For many, this question is completely beyond comprehension. No-one could possibly do such a thing. This is the delusion that most people live inside. In truth, there is a global elite that has been controlling this planet for centuries if not millennia, including the two world wars of the last century. Again, this truth is beyond the comprehension of most people, but it is a subject about which I and many others have written extensively. You can simply use the search field on my blog to finding evidence for this.

But let us turn to the fires. As you may know, in the last two years, particularly, there have been highly destructive fires in California. In one case, in 2018 when the town of Paradise was destroyed, the evidence of it having been destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) was incontrovertible. Here is a link to my article covering this. In no other way would such clear-cut lines have been produced where houses were burnt and neighbouring items were not, including volatile eucalypts. I encourage you to look at this closely if this idea is foreign to you. I am discussing this because we are in a war that most of us have no knowledge of. That war is between the elite who control our planet and the rest of us, who simply wish to live an honest, caring and satisfying life.

What happened in Paradise is so clearcut that I doubt they will make such an obvious revelation again.

Further, the evidence that the US military, the CIA and others have been controlling the weather, in great detail, for some 50 years is very clear. Also, I have written extensively about the globalist agenda known as Agenda 21, now known as The 2030 Agenda. This involves moving most of the people on the planet out of the countryside and into small city apartments. It has used the false paradigm of global warming as its stalking horse; however, that agenda is at serious risk of coming unstuck as the planet cools. Please take note of the cold winter in the US last year and the even colder winter that is unfolding this year. Many areas broke their snowfall records before winter began.

In Australia, however, in the last month or so, we have seen unseasonably hot weather sweep the country. In my opinion, this has happened in part because Australia has been a recalcitrant in adopting the measures to offset the so-called man-made global warming, a fiction of the first order and one about which I have written extensively. In particular, there is evidence that fire accelerants have been sprayed or scattered in the atmosphere, to ensure these fires are extreme. Here is a link to a video (copied from Facebook), which claims to be showing the evidence of particulate matter that was dropped as a fire accelerant. I cannot say that this is accurate, but I am willing to consider it a possibility. However, I give you a tangible piece of evidence for this. In the recent fires in the Adelaide Hills, about one third of the vineyard areas were burnt to a cinder. The vignerons were unconcerned because green vineyards, in general, do not burn; however, these vineyards burned with a ferocity that was beyond their imagination.  Something caused those vineyards to be an inferno when under normal circumstances they would not. Simply the temperature? I doubt it.

As with anything that I write, do not ask that you accept my view. I simply ask that you consider it and do your own homework if you truly want to understand how our world works and what the global elite has planned for us all.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at  

Has the SDR been secretly pegged to Gold?

In a recent article, Jim Rickards, the author The Road to Ruin and the more recent book Aftermath: Seven Secrets of Wealth Preservation in the Coming Chaos, mentioned that someone appeared to be maintaining a peg between the IMF’s reserve currency the Special Drawing Right or SDR and gold. In Aftermath, he spells it out in much more detail. I quote:

Has a global monetary reset already happened? 

I was alerted to this possibility by a research report sent to my attention from a correspondent named D. H. Bauer based in Switzerland. An explanation of Bauer’s research begins with the dollar price of gold: $ 1,260 per ounce at the date of the report. Following the dollar price of gold, we consider that on a given day gold is “up” or “down” by, say $ 10 per ounce. When we make this observation, we effectively quote a cross rate between U.S. dollars (USD) and one ounce of gold (GOLD) or USD/ GOLD. 

Next, we observe the U.S. dollar value of the SDR. This cross rate, SDR/ USD, is calculated and published daily by the IMF. As of this writing, SDR1 = USD1.406570. That rate changes daily like any floating exchange rate. Bauer took the known rates of USD/ GOLD and SDR/ USD and applied the transitive law to calculate SDR/ GOLD, a price that is not actively followed on trading screens. He then graphed the time series of both prices with trend lines from December 31, 2014, to March 31, 2018. The graph includes a black vertical line corresponding to October 1, 2016. That is the date the Chinese yuan was officially included in the SDR basket of major currencies. The other currencies are sterling, yen, euro, and the dollar. The data and graph show that before China joined the SDR, the dollar price of gold and the SDR price of gold were volatile and highly correlated. After China joined the SDR, the dollar price of gold remained volatile, while the SDR price exhibited far less volatility. 

Importantly, the trend line of SDR/ GOLD is a nearly horizontal line. Gold denominated in SDRs has been trading in a narrow range of SDR850 to SDR950, an 11 percent band with fluctuations of 5.5 percent above and below the SDR900 central tendency. The price exhibits mean reversion. When gold rallies to SDR950, it quickly falls back toward SDR900. Likewise, when gold sinks to SDR850, it rallies back to SDR900. No prices appear outside the range after October 1, 2016. This price band narrowed in early 2017 and was contained in the SDR875 to SDR925 range, a 5.5 percent total band, 2.75 percent on either side of the target. This narrower band is indicative of a currency peg. A first approximation hints the SDR has been pegged to gold at a rate of SDR900 = 1 ounce of gold. This implies a new gold standard using not dollars, but the IMF’s world money. A global monetary reset may have occurred without a formal conference or declaration. SDR900 = 1 ounce of pure gold is the new monetary benchmark. 

The advent of low volatility in SDR/ GOLD (versus prior high volatility) occurred on October 1, 2016. The near straight-line trend of SDR/ GOLD after the Chinese yuan joined the SDR is practically impossible without an intervening factor or manipulation. The probability of this occurring randomly is infinitesimal. The SDR/ GOLD horizontal trend line after October 1, 2016, is an example of autoregression. This appears only if there’s a recursive function (a feedback loop) or manipulation. In the case of SDR/ GOLD, one can rule out a recursive function since gold trades in a relatively free market determined by supply and demand. One can also rule out randomness as statistically highly improbable. That leaves manipulation as the only explanation for the flat trend line in SDR/ GOLD. 

If the SDR price of gold falls below SDR900 (indicating a strong SDR and a weak gold price), the manipulator buys gold, sells dollars, and buys the non-dollar currencies behind the SDR. If the SDR price of gold rises above SDR900 (indicating a weak SDR and a strong gold price), the manipulator sells gold, buys dollars, and sells the non-dollar currencies behind the SDR. By monitoring markets and intervening continually with open-market operations in gold and currencies, the manipulator can maintain the peg. There are only four parties in the world with the resources to conduct this manipulation in an impactful way: the U.S. Treasury, the ECB, the Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), and the IMF. These are the only entities with enough gold and hard currency reserves (or SDRs) to conduct the large-scale open-market operations needed to peg the price. 

One can eliminate the U.S. Treasury and ECB as suspects. Both are relatively transparent about their total gold holdings, foreign exchange reserves, and the SDR component of their reserves. (For the ECB we look at the large members, including Germany and France, for this data.) If either the Treasury or ECB were conducting open-market operations of this kind, changes in holdings of gold and SDR component currencies would appear in official reports. No fluctuations of any magnitude appear. That leaves SAFE and the IMF. Both are non-transparent. China has about 2,000 tons of gold, probably more—they don’t disclose the excess. China has also acquired SDRs in the secondary market in addition to official allocations provided by the IMF to its members. The IMF owns 2,814.1 metric tonnes of gold and can print SDRs in unlimited quantities subject to executive board approval. The IMF makes loans and receives principal and interest in SDRs that are traded among IMF members through a secret trading desk. Gold is traded surreptitiously by major central banks through the Bank for International Settlements (which also traded Nazi gold in the Second World War). The BIS is furtive and controlled principally by the same nations who control the IMF. China can also conduct gold purchases and sales for yuan or dollars on the open market in Shanghai and London and separately buy or sell SDRs for dollars or yuan through the IMF. China can buy or sell the SDR basket currencies separately through bank foreign exchange trading desks. 

The targeted value of SDR900 per ounce of gold is intriguing, with dark implications for the future of the U.S. dollar. Currently a total of SDR204.2 billion are issued and held by IMF members. The IMF owns 2,814.1 metric tons of gold, equal to 90,475,284.87 troy ounces. If the IMF wished to make SDRs the sole global reserve currency backed by gold at a 40 percent ratio, the same gold cover as the U.S. dollar from 1913 to 1945, then the implied SDR price of gold would be equal to the quantity 0.40( 204,200,000,000/ 90,475,284.87), representing the amount of SDRs divided by the amount of IMF gold in troy ounces times 40 percent. This quantity equals SDR902.8 per ounce, almost exactly the pegged price of SDR900 per ounce.

There is no evidence the IMF is implementing an SDR/ GOLD peg. The IMF’s gold holdings have remained constant since 2010 and permission to launch the gold-peg operation is unlikely to have been granted by the United States or Germany. To the contrary, there is strong evidence to support the view that China is behind the peg. This is ironic; when the SDR was created in 1969 it was originally pegged to gold and defined as a weight in gold (SDR1 = 0.88867 grams of gold). That peg was soon abandoned even as the dollar peg (USD1 = 0.02857 ounces of gold) was also abandoned. Now the SDR/ GOLD peg has returned, albeit at a much higher price for gold. 

Since this SDR peg to gold is informal and unannounced it can be abandoned at will. The peg probably will be abandoned sooner than later because Chinese sponsors of the peg have ignored the lessons of 1925, when the United Kingdom returned sterling to the gold standard at a level that overvalued sterling. The result was a catastrophic deflation in the United Kingdom that presaged the Great Depression. Likewise, the Chinese peg of SDR900 per ounce of gold is too cheap to sustain, given the scarce supply of gold and the growing supply of SDRs. More to the point, the IMF will print trillions of SDRs in the next global financial crisis, which will prove highly inflationary unless the IMF conditions the distribution of SDRs on the receipt of gold. China would have to sell precious gold reserves to maintain an SDR900 price. This would reprise the U.S. depletion of its gold reserves by 11,000 tons from 1950 to 1970 to maintain the Bretton Woods gold peg to an overvalued dollar. Still, this is an historic development. Even if the peg is non-sustainable in the long run, it’s a clear short-run signal that China is betting on the SDR and gold, not the yuan or the dollar. An important pillar of a global monetary reset seems already in place.

End of quote.

Rickards is an extraordinary thinker and deeply entrenched in the US financial, business and government worlds. He brings extraordinary insight to his writing. I commend Aftermath to you.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

Is the Fed Preparing to Topple US Dollar? – F. William Engdahl

Another excellent article by F. William Engdahl:

Unusual remarks and actions by the outgoing head of the Bank of England and other central banking insiders strongly suggest that there is a very ugly scenario in the works to end the role of the US dollar as world reserve currency. In the process, this would involve that the Fed deliberately triggers a dramatic economic depression. If this scenario is actually deployed in coming months, Donald Trump will go down in history books as the second Hebert Hoover, and the world economy will be pushed into the worst collapse since the 1930s. Here are some elements worth considering. 

Bank of England speech

The about-to-retire head of the very special Bank of England, Mark Carney, delivered a remarkable speech at the recent annual meeting of central bankers and finance elites at Jackson Hole Wyoming on August 23. The 23-page address to fellow central bankers and financial insiders is clearly a major signal of where the Powers That Be who run world central banks plan to take the world. 

Carney addresses obvious flaws with the post-1944 dollar reserve system, noting that, “…a destabilising asymmetry at the heart of the IMFS (International Monetary and Financial System) is growing. While the world economy is being reordered, the US dollar remains as important as when Bretton Woods collapsed.” He states bluntly, “…In the longer term, we need to change the game…Risks are building, and they are structural.” What he then goes on to outline is a remarkably detailed blueprint for global central bank transformation of the dollar order, a revolutionary shift.

Carney discusses the fact that China as the world leading trading nation is the obvious candidate to replace the dollar as leading reserve, however, he notes, “…for the Renminbi to become a truly global currency, much more is required. Moreover, history teaches that the transition to a new global reserve currency may not proceed smoothly.” He indicates that means it often needs wars or depressions, as he cites the role of World War I forcing out sterling in favor of the US dollar. What Carney finds more immediate is a new IMF-based monetary system to replace the dominant role of the dollar. Carney declares, “While the rise of the Renminbi may over time provide a second best solution to the current problems with the IMFS, first best would be to build a multipolar system. The main advantage of a multipolar IMFS is diversification… “ He adds, “… When change comes, it shouldn’t be to swap one currency hegemon for another. Any unipolar system is unsuited to a multi-polar world… In other words he says, “Sorry, Beijing, you must wait.”

The Bank of England Governor proposes in effect that the IMF, with its multi-currency Special Drawing Rights (SDR), a basket of five currencies—dollar, Pound, Yen, Euro and now Renminbi—should play the central role creating a new monetary system: “The IMF should play a central role in informing both domestic and cross border policies. … Pooling resources at the IMF, and thereby distributing the costs across all 189 member countries…” For that to work he proposes raising the IMF SDR funds triple to $3 trillions as the core of a new monetary system.

Then Carney proposes that the IMF oversee creation of a new payments infrastructure based on an international “stablecoin.” Referring to the private Libra, he clearly states a “new Synthetic Hegemonic Currency (SHC) would be best provided by the public sector, perhaps through a network of central bank digital currencies.” Note that Carney, a former Goldman Sachs banker, is mentioned as a leading candidate to replace Christine Lagarde as IMF head. Is his speech open admission of what is being planned by the world’s leading central bankers as the next step to a world currency and global economic control? Let’s look further.

Lagarde to ECB

The Carney speech, when deciphered from its central bank language, gives us for the first time a clear roadmap where the powers that control world central banking would like to take us. The world reserve role of the US dollar must end; it must be replaced by some form of IMF SDRs as basis for a multi-currency reserve. That in turn would ultimately be based on digital money, so-called block chain currencies. Such currencies, make no mistake, would be completely controlled by central bank authorities and the IMF. That would require their often-proposed elimination of all cash in favor of digital money where every cent we spend can be monitored by the state. This cashless society would also set the stage for the next great financial crisis and the confiscation by governments of ordinary citizens’ bank deposits under new “bank bail-in” laws now on the books since 2014 in every major industrial country including the EU and USA. 

The IMF is fully behind the turn to global blockchain digital currencies and use of SDR to replace the dominant US dollar. In a little-noticed speech in November 14, 2018, IMF chief Lagarde strongly indicated that the IMF was behind central bank digital currencies as well as cashless societies. She noted very carefully, “I believe we should consider the possibility to issue digital currency. There may be a role for the state to supply money to the digital economy.” She added, “A new wind is blowing, that of digitalization…What role will remain for cash in this digital world? … demand for cash is decreasing—as shown in recent IMF work. And in ten, twenty, thirty years, who will still be exchanging pieces of paper?”

Dudley Remarks

The introduction of this central bankers’ new digital currency world will require, as Carney suggests, dramatic upheavals of the status quo, upheavals that would lead to the end of the dominant role of the US dollar since the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement. As that dollar reserve currency role is a pillar of American power in the world, for that to happen would require nothing short of catastrophe. Is this in fact what the Federal Reserve is quietly planning with its money policies? 

A remarkable hint of what might be in the works came in an OpEd by the person who until 2018 was the very important President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Bill Dudley, who like Mark Carney is a senior Goldman Sachs alumnus. Dudley is no minor actor in the central bankers’ world. Until last year he also was a member of the Bank for International Settlements Board of Directors and chaired the BIS Committee on Payment Settlement Systems and the Committee on the Global Financial System. 

Dudley, pointing to the Trump trade war policies and economic dangers of same, then issues the following rare undiplomatic declaration: “Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy, to the Fed’s independence and its ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives. If the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, then Fed officials should consider how their decisions will affect the political outcome in 2020.” While it shocked many, Dudley is merely making public what the Fed has done since its creation in 1913 — influence the course of world and US politics stealthily behind the cover of “neutral” monetary policies. Dudley suggests not “Russian interference” but rather Fed interference.

The Fed could easily tip the US into crisis. The debt levels of the US economy are at record high levels for private households, Federal government, and US corporate debt. Most US corporations have used growing debt, well over $9 trillion, to make stock buybacks rather than invest in new plant and equipment, fueling an unprecedented bubble in the S&P stocks. The rising stocks are not a sign of economic health but of a dangerous speculative bubble vulnerable to collapse. 

Were the Fed now to resume rate rises and continue its less-publicized Quantitative Tightening into 2020, a domino-style series of debt defaults, corporate bankruptcies, home mortgage foreclosures, default on car loans and student loans could quickly make a second Trump Presidency in 2020 more than doubtful. However that would be no grounds for the rest of the world opposed to Trump policies to cheer. It would also trigger collapse in major emerging market countries who have borrowed hundreds of billions denominated in US dollars, including Chinese state companies, Turkey, Argentina, Brazil to name a few. EU banks from Italy to Germany to France would fail.

If this Dudley scenario comes to pass in 2020 or not, only the key central bank actors know for sure. It is clear that, after almost eleven years since the 2008 global financial meltdown, the unprecedented central bank zero interest rate policies in the EU and until recently the US, have fueled creation of what some call an “everything bubble”, not only in stocks, in corporate and public bonds, in home prices. Is a new Fed intervention to raise rates and tighten credit the event– the deliberate central bank rupturing of this inflated bubble using the excuse of the Trump danger to the world economy– that Carney has in mind when he says, “transition to a new global reserve currency may not proceed smoothly,”? Let us hope not. The coming months will tell.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

Murdered for Speaking Out: Last Words of David Goldberg Warning of Mass Murder of Americans – Veterans Today

Thank you, Brian. 
If what is shared on this link is true, it is important to understand it. It fits perfectly with a lot of what I know and understand and it is important to expose and intercept these plans. This man is dead for a reason…
If you understand the plans that sit behind what unfolded in the 20th century, most notably the two world wars, the Russian Revolution and many other things, you will understand how such action is entirely consistent with it. In truth, the seeds of those plans are centuries old, not decades and I have written extensively about this on my blog. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is a good place to start. Even though a great deal was done to discredit this document, I am satisfied it is genuine, borne out by events that unfolded last century. Few have grasped that one of the key objectives of the two world wars was the creation of Israel, a nation state in the Middle East that houses mostly Khazarian (European) Jews who have no bloodline connection to the Semitic Hebrews of the region.
However, as David Goldberg has said, more and more people are waking up. It is time.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Benjamin Franklin Exposed: The truth you weren’t taught in school!

This video reveals the dark, satanic practices and connections of Benjamin Franklin, a man widely held as a key founding father of the United States. Whilst in Britain, he was an active member of the so-called “Hellfire Club”, which conducted satanic practice and sex magic in secret. Also, 1998 excavations under his former home in Britain unearthed the remains of at least 15 bodies, including children, and it is well known that he was a member of the “Nine Sisters” and “San Juan” Freemasonic lodges during his time in France. Freemasonry was overrun by Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati, founded in 1776, it appears in service to Mayer Amschel Rothschild, these compromised Freemasons being the apparent organisers behind the French Revolution.

All of this suggest to me that the United States has been under the control of the global elite since it very formation. Not that this is surprising. Indeed, evidence points to the “discovery” voyage of Christopher Columbus as being a Jewish planned and executed voyage, using “royal” Spanish funds, and that Columbus himself may have been Jewish.

And so it goes…


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

The hidden controllers of our world leave their footprints

I have written extensively about a carefully hidden and protected group, primarily of Khazarian origin who present themselves as Jewish but have no Semitic origin, who control our world. These people are satanic and use horrific practices, including child abuse and child sacrifice, to control those in power, in all elements of power, and through them the rest of humanity.

This is carefully occulted from the general public. However, the evidence of it is everywhere if you look.

I recently watched an interview with Wayne Jett, the author of “The Fruits of Graft”, and Jett spoke about the writings and influence of H G Wells. Most of us know of him for his science fiction writings; however, Wells also wrote Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought. Anticipations was, in essence, the blueprint of the elite’s plan for global domination. Jett explained that he had written the bulk of The Fruits of Graft before coming across Anticipations, and he subsequently added Chapter 17, which covers Wells’ book as well as material from the “transcript of the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, former ambassador to France from the Soviet Union, conducted by Joseph Stalin’s agent amidst purges which preceded Stalin’s assassination of Leon Trotsky”. Interestingly, I had previously read the first 16 chapters of Jett’s book, stopping short of… Chapter 17.

I quote: Sociopaths pursue their goals, not by declaring them openly, but through deceit. They use multi-layered deception (Keynesian economics, for example) to create “elaborate fallacies and misleading theories,” while concealing designs and motives…

…Wells and his sponsors realized that the “solutions” he described could not be admitted in public discourse, much less fully implemented, until the timing was right—when men of the new republic took full power. Why not use votes of “people of the abyss” to gain power before letting them in on the true social agenda? 

End of quote.

And a quote related to the Rakovsky testimony:

He asserted that New York financiers “are revolutionaries objectively and subjectively, quite consciously,” and “these people, the bankers, have the impulse towards full power … [s]uch power as Stalin has in the USSR but world-wide … absolute power.” He identified the Rothschilds as treasurers, or more likely chiefs, of the first Comintern, or cell of the Communist International in Europe. He said this Comintern relationship funded the Rothschild expansion as international bankers, and further identified Kuhn, Loeb & Co. as successor to the House of Rothschild. 

Notice Rakovsky’s references to “revolutionaries” and “impulse towards full power” are essentially identical with terms used by H. G. Wells during the Thirties in commenting on Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt and the Brain Trust. Rakovsky said “not one of ‘Them’ is a person who occupies a political position or a position in the World Bank.” Such positions are given only to “intermediaries.” He told how young Leon Trotsky, leader of the 1905 revolt in Petrograd against Czar Nicholas II, leapt ahead of older revolutionaries by marrying into a family partnered with the bankers Warburg. “They” accomplished “organized defeats” of Russian forces in World War I sufficient to inspire overthrow of the Czar by parliamentary officials led by Alexander Kerensky. Kerensky conspired with “Them” to hand over power to Trotsky led Bolsheviks as the Communist vanguard. The “October revolution” was financed by “Them” through Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other American and European banks, including a Swedish bank where Rakovsky “participated in the transmission of funds.”

Rakovsky explained the Versailles Treaty following World War I as “the most decisive pre- condition for the revolution.” Reparations payable by Germany to France far exceeded the value of all of France. Hyper-inflation followed by barriers to international trade produced hunger and unemployment and then financial aid from Allied nations—all orchestrated by “Them”—prepared Hitler-led Germany as the only nation situated to invade the Soviet Union so Stalin (the “bonapartist”) could be toppled in favor of Trotsky (“Their” agent). 

Rakovsky attributed to “Them” an objective to provoke war by Western democracies to topple Hitler in Germany because Hitler “removed … private and international capital [and] took over … the privilege of manufacturing money and put it to work for the benefit of the State.” (My emphasis) Although Germany had almost no gold reserves, Hitler produced jobs and prosperity for seven million workers by means of economies achieved through direct issuance of currency. Though Hitler’s objective was rearmament, similar strides were possible in commercial production using the same financial methods. “They” saw this as “hidden danger … very serious …” in its implications for their control of other nations. Pressed to name names, Rakovsky said he did not have direct knowledge of who was a part of “Them,” but had assurances from Trotsky, who must have known, that Walter Rathenau was one. He was confident that Lionel Rothschild was, also. Others he concluded from “work and personality” as under control of “Them” included the Wall Street bank Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and its families Schiff, Warburg, Loeb and Kuhn. Further, Rakovsky named “Baruch, Frankfurter, Altschul, Cohen, Benjamin, Strauss, Steinhardt, Blom, Rosenman, Lippmann, Lehman, Dreifus, Lamont, Rothschild, Lord, Mandel, Morgenthau, Ezekiel, Lasky…. Most of them in the United States.” He said he was uncertain whether any one person named was actually one of “Them,” but even so each one named could present a proposition to “Them” through indirect channels by expressing thoughts or hypothesis. No direct answer to such a proposition is ever received; only “facts” and events may be observed by waiting and watching.

Were it not for Franklin Roosevelt’s actions to deepen and prolong the Great Depression, one could argue that assertions made against the U.S. president by a condemned man under interrogation by the Soviet NKVD should not be repeated. But three points overcome this position. 

The first is that any claim Franklin Roosevelt might make to a presumption of good intentions is undercut by the content of this book. Second, Dr. Landowsky’s transcript of Rakovsky’s testimony was first published in Madrid years ago as Chapter XL called “Sinfonio en Rojo Mayor” of an 800-page book entitled La Lucha por el Poder Mundial by publisher Senor Don Mauricio Carlavilla. Senor Carlavilla validated authenticity of the material as prepared under his supervision by translation of copybooks found on Landowskys body by a Spanish volunteer at the Petrograd front of World War II. And, third, the American people have not been exposed to this information so as to evaluate it fully. Therefore, we proceed to what follows.

Rakovsky was told by his inquisitor that “proofs” of his truthfulness must be validated within days; otherwise, his time might run out before all aspects could be checked out. Under this Sword of Damocles, Rakovsky asked whether the new U.S. ambassador Joseph Davis were present in Moscow. He commented that his “exceptional situation gives me the right, as I see it, against the rules, to make use of an official intermediary.” The context of the comment signaled to the NKVD inquisitor that the U.S. ambassador was an intermediary of “Them” capable of providing “proofs” helpful to Rakovsky’s cause. When asked whether the U.S. government was “behind all this,” Rakovsky answered it was “under all this,” implying “They” controlled the American government.

Rakovsky then explained that October 24, 1929, the first day of the Great Crash, was the beginning of the “real revolution” and more important than the seizure of power by the Bolsheviki in Russia in October, 1917. In February, 1929, Trotsky left Russia, the financing of Hitler was agreed in July (recall that Baruch was then vacationing in Europe and Scotland), and the Great Crash occurred in October. He said Hoover’s term of office was used to prepare for seizing power in the U.S. by “financial revolution” and in the USSR (replacing Stalin with Trotsky) through war and defeat. He continued: “[E]xecution of the plan on such a scale requires a special man, who can direct the executive power in the United States, who has been predetermined to be the organizing and deciding force. That man was Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.”(Emphasis added.) He then referred to Eleanor as “this two-sexed being” included in the definition of “special man” because Franklin “had to avoid any Delilah.”

When asked specifically if Roosevelt was one of “Them,” Rakovsky answered: “I do not know if he is one of ‘Them,’ or is only subject to ‘Them,’ I think that he was conscious of his mission, but cannot assert whether he obeyed under duress of blackmail or he was one of those who rule; it is true that he carried out his mission, realized all the actions which had been assigned to him accurately.”

In other parts of his testimony, Rakovsky advised regarding the nature of threats to Stalin presented by “Them” in preparing Hitler’s Germany for invasion of the USSR, and he prescribed intricate countermeasures. Almost certainly, neither Stalin’s intellect and knowledge nor those of his advisors were on par with Rakovsky. Leon Trotsky was assassinated by Stalin’s agent in Mexico on August 20, 1940. Hitler’s forces invaded the 

USSR in June, 1941. Some report Rakovsky was executed at that time; others say he lived well into the 1950s under a changed name.

Thanks to Landowsky and Knupffer reporting Rakovsky’s testimony, the depth of the U.S. crisis in 2008-2010 can be better estimated. America’s affliction was not merely rampant financial criminals assisted by government to strip capital from middle class investors, though this reality itself was gigantic in its consequences. America’s exposure included near- term bankruptcy and fall of constitutional government. This risk was a predictable probability based on known facts, partly because it was an interim objective of the vast, aggressive power which exerted dominant influence in writing laws and molding thought. Rakovsky asserted the eventual demise of Communism and installation of “state capitalism” in Russia to be “Their” plan, as was the destruction of nationalism in Germany, Russia and the U.S. The ultimate objective, or “end of history,” in “Their” minds was absolute power in the U.S. and worldwide—far from the rise of republican democracy as Francis Fukuyama mused was the future after the fall of the Soviet Union. 

End of quote.

For me, none of this is knew but it is valuable to find these confirmations.

And in the face of the huge global propaganda that demonizes Hitler, note the above acknowledgement that Hitler took Germany from a basket case to the powerhouse of Europe in 4 years!!! He did this by eliminating the Khazarian Mafia’s central banking system in Germany (though he retained a Jewish head of the nationalised bank). No wonder they were out to destroy him and totally discredit him. There are also periods in US history where there was no central bank and similar explosive growth was experienced.

I encourage you to read The Fruits of Graft. However, I feel his Chapter 17 is so important to understand, I have placed it in a pdf that you can download from this link.

Where is the evidence of this today?

In truth, the evidence is everywhere, if you look. Almost everything we accept as being true has been fashioned by this elite, though most people cannot comprehend this could be true. Perhaps the clearest illustration is from 100 years ago when, in 1920, Henry Ford bought his own newspaper, the Dearborn Chronicle, to write about this control system and its impact on the United States. He knew no editor would publish what he wanted to write, because already the press was either owned or effectively controlled by this elite. The series of articles that Ford wrote from 1920-2 were subsequently published as “The International Jew”. It makes powerful reading. This is 100 years ago!!! And today??? Did you know Rupert Murdoch is Jewish? Most people don’t, nor that he has direct business interests with the Rothschilds.

However, I want to illustrate their modus operandi by some events occurring in my home country of Australia. As a precursor, I will mention the well-recognised practice of distraction and acting when people are distracted. The 1913 legislation to create the US Federal Reserve, introduced when most people, including most politicians were preparing for Christmas, is one of many examples.

Back to Australia. Most Australians have no idea that banking bail-in legislation has been introduced in Australia. It was introduced on Valentine’s Day (February 14) 2018, with no press publicity. This was then followed by legislation in the last session of parliament for 2018 demanding companies provide a backdoor to their software, ostensibly to protect us from “terrorism”, another elite created paradigm.

Then, last week, again with no publicity, legislation was introduced, on a Friday afternoon, to ban cash transactions in Australia for amounts over $10,000. 

So, we are distracted by the day to day bickering of politics whilst the key steps to advance the global agenda that Jett and Wells both wrote about in their own ways are moved forward in the shadows.

However, I remain optimistic, for many reasons, that we live in the time when this hidden satanic control will be removed from our world. The impact will be huge and most people will be in shock for some time.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Libre Not Libra: Facebook’s Blockchain Project

This video by Andreas Antonopoulos provides a very interesting view of Facebook’s Libra announcement. Andreas sees it as Silicon Valley taking on banking, though that is but the tip of the iceberg. 

I agree that this is a major shift in the cryptocurrency world and potentially in global finance. In my opinion, his views are worth understanding and factoring into how we protect ourselves going forward.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology 

The deceit of global warming and the agenda behind that deceit

If you listen to the MSM as your source of information, you could not help but believe that anthropogenic global warming is causing the planet to get hotter. Sadly, it’s a massive deceit and joins so many other things about our world that we are told are true but are not.

To most people the above words are simply heresy. How could it not be true? We are presented with the evidence almost daily.

Well, I used to be there, too!!! But then I began to pick the reality we are presented with apart.

Back in 2015, James Corbett produced the video The Global Warming Pause Explained, which shared the fact that “the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset shows a least-squares linear regression trend of 0.0C from February 1997 to October 2015.”


Yes. No mean warming for 18 years.

And this is not new news to those who really look at this, and I have written about this many times over recent years.

Ben Davidson, who runs the Suspicious Observers YouTube channel, has produced several debunking videos on this subject, the most recent entitled Fatal Flaw in Climate Change Science being perhaps the most powerful. And Aussie geology Professor Ian Plimer has demonstrated the deceit, and the classic discrediting technique has been applied to him. When I mention his name to people who have bought the bullshit, they almost inevitably label Plimer a crackpot. Yet not one that I have spoken to about Plimer and express this view have read his book Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science. I have. And I consider it to be one of the most thoroughly researched books that I have read. On any subject. This discrediting of contrary sources is a key practice of those who run our world.

And this recent article entitled Rewriting America’s History illustrates how historical data is massaged to fit the story. I quote: 

In 1998, NASA showed 1934 as the hottest year on record in the US, and declining temperatures for the rest of the century. They have since rewritten the data to eliminate the post 1930s cooling.  1998 used to be one degree Fahrenheit cooler than 1934, and now it is warmer.

End of quote. I have written about this kind of manipulation before.

The heart of the global warming deceit and why is encapsulated in the life focus of Maurice Strong. Strong was plucked from obscurity, trained and fostered by David Rockefeller and after a career of being parachuted into senior management roles in the Canadian oil industry was given the role to set up the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and also organised the initial UN conference on Agenda 21. This article of mine from 2015 spells out his journey in setting up the IPCC in 1972 and then Agenda 21 at the 1992 UN conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Agenda 21 is now known as The 2030 Agenda.

Simply put, the reason for the global warming is deceit is to create an excuse to herd people out of the country and into the cities, which they are doing at quite a pace. We are more manageable and more easily culled there. Heard about Agenda 21? Most people have not and it is being implemented all around us.

But I suspect those selling this spin are panicking because of the cooling that is resulting from the reduced sunspot activity and, more importantly, our impending entry into a new “solar minimum”. It’s impossible to deny what has happened this year in the US, with record snow and cold levels across the country and massive flooding that has eliminated more than half of the grain production in much of the US. And there are also many minor pointers, such as several snowfalls in the Sahara for the first time in 40 years last year, the first April snowfall in 2019 in south-western Western Australia for 40 years and the earliest ever recorded, amongst others.

So, if you are still convinced about anthropogenic global warming, please look beyond the MSM and do some of your own research. And once you have pulled on this thread, begin to ask; “What else have I been lied to about?

And your life and your perception will begin to change irrevocably.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

Devastating Crop Losses Are Literally Happening All Over The Globe

This issue is not being reported widely in the MSM; however, it is very real and the consequences should not be ignored. I quote:

Let me warn you right up front – the information in this article might freak you out.  If what some experts are telling us is true, a global food crisis appears to be inevitable.  Even during good years we have a really difficult time feeding everyone on the planet, and now a major climate shift appears to be happening.  Our sun has become exceedingly quiet, and many experts believe that this is a sign that a solar minimum is now upon us.  Of course we have seen solar minimums happen quite regularly in the past, and if this is just a normal solar minimum then conditions should begin to return to normal after a couple of years.  Unfortunately, evidence continues to mount that we have entered what is known as a “grand solar minimum”.  In fact, Professor Valentina Zharkova says that what we are facing is a “super grand solar minimum”, and if that is true we are going to be facing climate chaos like we have never seen before.  During previous “grand solar minimums” the globe was gripped by devastating famines and vast numbers of people died.  Could a similar scenario potentially be in our future?

Ice Age Farmer has compiled a “Grand Solar Minimum Crop Loss Map” which you can view right here, and I appreciate our friends at ANP for pointing it out to us.  Ice Age Farmer’s map shows that there are literally dozens of locations all over the globe right now that are reporting significant crop losses, and this is really unlike anything we have ever seen before.  Some parts of our planet are dealing with horrific drought, but in the middle of the United States it just won’t stop raining.  In some areas of the world it is too cold, while others are experiencing record heat.  Everywhere we look we see extremes, and the behavior of our sun is the primary reason this is happening.

Last November I warned that we could be facing one of the coldest winters in modern times, and that is precisely what happened.  Back then top scientists were warning us that a solar minimum had arrived, and since that time the behavior of the sun has continued to confirm that hypothesis

End of quote.

DABOO77 has been talking about it in the US, primarily, for months, reporting up to a 60% reduction in US grain crops.

Whilst I agree that the evidence supports the planet moving into a cooler period (despite what the MSM works hard to have you believe, and about which I have written much), I cannot say this is because of our entering this cooling period. And whilst initiatives are underway to improve natural crop production and yields, these processes will take years to unfold and the issues arising will impact food pricing globally within months.

We live in interesting times…


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology  

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By