Archive for Richard Presser

The Persecution of David Noakes & Lyn Thyer for introducing GcMAF to the world

Thank you, Mark.

I have written extensively in the past about GcMAF and the fact that it cures 100% of Stage IV tumour based cancer, many cases of autism and many other conditions.

This latest video shares the current situation in which David Noakes who brought, along with his partner Lyn Thyer, GcMAF to the world, has spent 5 months in jail in the UK for manufacturing GcMAF without a licence. And if the authorities get their way, he and Lyn will be locked away and bankrupted for the rest of their lives.

I encourage you to watch this video and understand how focussed Big Pharma is on protecting its profits and its right to kill people with chemotherapy, and make as many people you know as possible aware of this abuse, as well as how current cancer treatments are enshrined in law in the UK, dating back to 1939!!!

As I have said before, the allopathic medical system was created by JD Rockefeller in the early part of the 20thcentury to flog pharmaceuticals. The video by James Corbett entitled Rockefeller Medicine spells it out better than I could.

Perhaps this GcMAF horror will be the trigger to awaken the world to this abuse.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology  


This video by Sacha Stone deserves an hour of your time to watch.
We are told that 5G is just the next logical step in providing high speed wifi and phone services to our video consuming lives.
The truth is quite different.
This is weapons grade technology being rolled out into our world with no health assessment and with no rights of local authorities to intervene. It is Agenda 21 on steroids. 
If this video is accurate, and given those who have contributed, I accept it as accurate, this technology enables the active monitoring of and interference with every one of us on the planet where this technology is deployed, and its health consequences look to be horrific, potentially with its greatest impact several generations beyond this one.
Will you be silent as this is rolled out?
I’m clear about my own actions to stop this and many other destructive elements emerging in our world. 
Where do you stand and how will you act? Or not…
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

New Zealand: The Unravelling of an Israeli Mass Murder?

Thank you, Gordon.

As usual, Duff peels the onion of the NZ mass murder to reveal the detailed intelligence story behind it, confirming an Israeli shooter, almost certainly Mossad. It’s their stock in trade.

This video shares a similar story, albeit with the less thoroughly informed view that Gordon brings.

As I said a few days ago, this is clearly NZ’s Port Arthur moment. Even the press has used these words.

I was chatting with a friend about this yesterday, and he swung the conversation to a discussion about gun removal from the public.

There are diverse views on this subject. I mentioned that Switzerland has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world and a very low rate of homicide using guns. So, there is no correlation in truth between the two.

But the real point, for me, is those who run our world set up these events, package the story emotionally in the press along with the words of the politicians, and it’s all over. And who better to push it through than a woman PM who is a young mother, carefully packaged up in tears and an unwavering commitment to new gun controls.

Simple. It’s how it’s done, and it’s the same game that gets countries to go to war with each other. Over and over and over again. And who guides all of this. I’ll let you guess, though you could start by reading “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology 

The New Zealand mass shooting event a Mossad hit job?

It is early days, but I have a strong sense that this is the NZ equivalent of Australia’s 1996 Port Arthur massacre  pinned on a guy who did not have the IQ to contemplate such an event, and the evidence is abundant of multiple shooters and a set-up.
It was all it took to get the guns out of the hands of Australians. You need a much more dedicated and detailed plan in the US, as we are seeing.
So, expect to see the legislation roll out and the demands that the average Joe/Jill in NZ hand in his/her guns.
And my view is supported by the editor’s line on this VT article – This event has ‘Mossad hit team’ written all over it rather than the usual lone shooter scenario of the official theory. Ian
Little in our world is as it seems on the surface.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Is there a Catastrophe Cycle on Earth of about 12,000 years?

There is abundant evidence of an advanced civilization on Earth that disappeared around 13,000 years ago. Looking at the evidence in Canada and following it across Europe and into the Middle East, there is strong evidence of a comet or large meteor crashing into the Earth, triggering a huge shift.

But is that all of the picture?

There is growing evidence that there is a cycle of catastrophe on Earth with a periodicity of about 12,000 years. The evidence points to the release of the Earth’s crust, which then slips around the mantle, swinging the current polar regions into an equatorial location. This apparently happens almost instantly. The consequences are obvious. Most life on Earth would not survive.

The fossil record and other data support this notion, including the shapes and patterns carved into the rocks by our forefathers.

I’m not saying this is true. I don’t know. But there are many credible scientists and others who are expressing such an idea, including a detailed book on the phenomenon, which was suppressed by the CIA and released recently in a sanitised form. And now, some keen sleuths have found the original, unsanitised version.

The suggestion is there is a series of coordinated events, including a planetary magnetic reversal, with the entire series of events being triggered by the solar system crossing a plasmatic field boundary between the outbound plasma from the centre of the galaxy and entering a field of the opposite polarity, ie inbound. Interestingly, Mehran Keshe describes exactly such a model of the gravitational and magnetic fields, spiralling into and out of galactic centre.

If you want to investigate these ideas for yourself, Ben Davidson has been assembling a series of videos discussing this. Here is his latest one and it has links to the rest of the series below it.

Ohhh… The planet’s magnetic field is currently weakening and in the process of switching polarity, and the rapid acceleration of this in recent years indicates it will complete within the next few decades, if not sooner.

Food for thought…


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

A shudder in the stateroom of the Titanic

Thank you, Nods.
I find article below very interesting. It is clear to me that the Aussie real estate market is in the process of imploding, and it has major consequences for the local banking industry and perhaps the Aussie economy and way of life. The following graph tells the story, but there are additional factors in play to exacerbate things:

A shudder in the stateroom of the Titanic

This release is taken from the editorial of the 6 March 2019 issue of the CEC’s Australian Alert Service magazine.

“What was that?” Great disasters start with that question. It’s being asked now about Suncorp’s unexpected 5 March announcement that repayments are in doubt on a $120 million mortgage bond.

Mortgage bonds, a.k.a. mortgage-backed securities, are based on thousands of mortgages that banks lend and then bundle up together to on-sell to investors. The borrower continues to repay the bank, but the bank passes on the repayments to the bondholders.

Suncorp announced that for the bond in question, the proportion of borrowers in arrears on their payments by 60 days or more has risen to 3 per cent, which is three times the rate of arrears of Suncorp’s broader mortgage portfolio. This 3 per cent threshold triggers an automatic switch in how the bondholders are paid, with all investors receiving their interest payments, but principal repayments being prioritised to those investors holding the most secure, AAA-rated tranche of the bond.

A nervous Australian Financial Review rushed out an article headlined “Suncorp mortgage bond trigger not concerning”, which emphasised that no Australian mortgage bond has ever defaulted, but that is precisely the point—is this announcement the first sign of something unexpected? Expert banking analysts have told the Australian Alert Service that it is “material” to Suncorp and the financial system.

Suncorp’s announcement is reminiscent of the very first sign of the US sub-prime mortgage crisis that triggered the global banking meltdown in 2008. On 8 February 2007, the giant British bank HSBC rocked the markets by announcing a large loss on its US sub-prime mortgage portfolio, caused by rising delinquencies on mortgage repayments. Again, it was unexpected. “This is a material negative surprise for HSBC”, a Merrill Lynch analyst told Market Watch that day. It was the beginning of the losses from borrowers falling into arrears on their mortgage repayments that became the fuse that detonated the global financial system.

Most curious about Suncorp’s announcement is that it regards a bond issued in 2010, which means that the borrowers have been able to meet their repayments for close to a decade. So why have arrears spiked to 3 per cent now? It coincides with the fall in house prices, which has already trapped more than 400,000 households in negative equity and unable to refinance their loans. It also coincides with other signs of economic decline, including a significant fall in new car sales in February, which Sean Wright in the 5 March Sydney Morning Herald called “the canary in the caryard”.

If this is happening to people who borrowed at much lower house prices in 2010, what about the more recent borrowers, including the wave of interest-only borrowers from 2012 to 2016? In her March 2018 submission to the banking royal commission, Denise Brailey of the Banking and Finance Consumers Support Association (BFCSA) exposed the tricks banks use to ensure that borrowers, who otherwise can’t afford their loans, are able to initially make repayments that go to the bondholders of securitised mortgages. These tricks involve giving the borrowers additional “buffers” for the first five years, including credit cards with $25,000 to $100,000 limits, buffer loans and top-ups, additional lines of credit, and refinancing. “If the applicant runs out of money to pay payments during the first five-year period, the top-ups keep rolling, increasing original debt by an average $150,000”, Brailey revealed.

That is an extra $150,000 debt on average for people who couldn’t afford the original debt in the first place, all to create a false sense of security for the bondholders who have bought the securitised mortgages. There is a critical mass of these fraudulent loans in the system from 2012 onwards that were made for one purpose—to prop up the housing bubble. If and when defaults rise in those mortgages, expect a chain-reaction meltdown.

Bondholders might be surprised, but the CEC isn’t. The international authorities have prepared for this eventuality by developing their policy of “bail-in”, to save the financial system by seizing the deposits of bank customers. We must defeat bail-in and instead force through solutions that fundamentally reform the banks to protect the public, including:

End of quote.
There is abundant evidence of the parlous state of the global economy, which I’ve written about, this article being an example.
It is not clear what the snowflake will be that will trigger the avalanche of global economic and financial destruction. Will it be the Aussie real estate bubble? It’s certainly one candidate. As Jim Rickards eloquently describes,  we never know ahead of time.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at  

A personal appeal from William Engdahl

This morning I received the following email from William Engdahl, a man whose work I have followed and written about for many years.
His email is a sign of the times we live in. 
This kind of censorship is widespread, now, targeting those who speak out about aspects of the (mostly) invisible tyranny under which we live.
Censorship on YouTube, Twitter, Google and Amazon is now widespread, and others such as Apple at times fall in line, not necessarily with the same agenda but perhaps as they follow political correctness.
Here is William’s email.

Dear reader,

I am writing this as a request for those of you who value my writings and books, asking you to consider a special contribution to support the possibility that I can continue to offer my research and analyses free of charge through my website. As most of you are aware, today we live in a world where far from being the once-unique platform for exercise of free opinion and analyses, where the only censor was the sovereign reader, now the huge private corporations who dominate social media and online book offerings have subtly put themselves as the self-appointed censor of what we are allowed to think and what not. Had someone said even five years ago that Amazon, Facebook, Google or Twitter ought to be given the right to ban or shadow ban any content, the outcry would have stopped it cold. Now however, something ominous has developed and with remarkable absence of widespread protest.

For years I have, as many like me, used Twitter and Facebook to promote my articles and books. Through this added exposure I was able to gain an income stream from my work that allowed me to continue offering free content. Now in recent months my social media visibility has been dramatically reduced without justification. Moreover, more than one of my books have been arbitrarily removed by Amazon, my main sales platform, for non-specified bogus reasons, costing me significant sales and time. 

At this critical juncture in our world events, therefore I want to ask you to consider a special contribution of support via the PayPal button at the top of my homepage, to enable me to continue to publish free content. 

I thank you again for your support,



Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at   

Fatal Flaw In Climate Change Science

The excellent video of the above title by Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers prompted me to write this.

In this recent presentation, Ben makes it very clear that the climate science conclusions are completely false, since they ignore major environmental climate factors and hence attribute their effects to human ones.

However, it is worth restating, as shown by the graph below, taken from this paper, that we have had no global warming for about 20 years.


Not what the MSM would have you believe.

And Ben’s presentation illustrates how egregiously distorted the usage of data has been in the climate modelling. I encourage you to watch it. IMO, it’s outstanding science, as Ben’s material is.

And few understand that the entire reason for this false climate picture is to justify Agenda 21, now called The 2030 Agenda, the hidden plan to herd people out of the countryside and into the cities.

James Corbett, in his usual thorough way, has explained all of this very well. This video is a good place to start, and I refer more broadly to his work on this in these articles.

These articles also include a discussion of the life of Maurice Strong, whose mission it was, as tasked by the global elite he served, to create the Agenda 21 scenario. Strong not only founded the IPCC, with its terms of reference to only consider human factors in global warming (and they find – what???), he also organised and opened the UN conference that began the Agenda 21 journey in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

And despite demonization by the global warming believers and apologists, Aussie Geology Professor Ian Plimer has written an excellent book and presented very eloquently showing global warming to be the nonsense it truly is.

So, thank you, Ben, for your outstanding presentation on the complete distortion of the underlying data used for climate modelling.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at 

Top scientist resigns: ‘global warming is a $trillions scam — it has corrupted many scientists’

If you believe the mainstream media, Global Warming (oops, it’s now called Climate Change because the warming story has been debunked by the evidence – our planet stopped warming 20 years ago) is a huge threat to us all, and “the science is settled”…

I reproduce the following article in full:

The following is a letter to the American Physical Society released to the public by Professor Emiritus of physics Harold ‘Hal’ Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara.
From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa BarbaraTo: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society
Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence — it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists.
As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time.
We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere.
In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?
How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs.
For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.
It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.
Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.)
I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.
For example:
1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses.
In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate
2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it.
One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety.
(They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.)
In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original.
The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is.
This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.
3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.
4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation.
I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.
5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment.
You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.)
There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.)
The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.
6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.
APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?
I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it.
Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club.
Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise.
As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.
I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.
End of quote. This is simply how it is. But few ask why this scam was initiated by those who run our world. It’s called Agenda 21, now the 2030 Agenda. Check it out. It’s hidden from public gaze but its being rolled out everywhere. It’s about herding us out of the countryside into cities, where we can be managed better…

You can find out about it on my blog if you wish. Use the search field.

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Inside the Mind of Edward Mandell House, Administrator

In my experience, most Americans cannot conceive of the idea that their country has been a puppet of the Rothschilds and their minions for centuries. Henry Ford’s writings of 1920-2 opened the window on this for me, perhaps most notably through his revealing the complete control that Bernard Baruch wielded over all US supply, military allied and domestic, for the term of WWI. He had a similar though less hands on role in WWII.
On one level or another, they want to believe that one side of the US political system or the other carries the true answer. And it could be Republican or Democrat. 
Indeed, few people can stand back and grasp the agenda that unfolded during the 20th century, which was telegraphed well enough in “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, which Henry Ford strongly argued were real and which Ronald Bernard, the high level Dutch banker who jumped ship from his elite banking role, has recently confirmed as true.
And so, this discussion between James Corbett and Richard Grove  discussing the book “Phillip Dru: Administrator” written by Edward Mandell House, the controller of Woodrow Wilson and others is so affirming. They understand the true history of things, and they unfold its obviousness, whilst explaining the roles of some of the players.
And we still live with the consequences of the planning and manipulation unfolded in the early part of the 20th century. As they say, WWI set the stage for what has unfolded, not just WWII but today.
And perhaps this has been best encapsulated by Henry Makow.
This conversation is a wonderful window into this history, that we need to understand if we are to change our future.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

WP Facebook Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By