Archive for June 2017

The careful planning of the fire bombing of Germany and who did the planning

Another enlightening post from the Irish Savant:

It was late 1943 and Churchill was pissed off. The Yanks had nixed his pet project Operation Thunderclap, the one that aimed to kill 275,000 Berliners in one single 2,000-plane raid. As a consolation he asked Roosevelt for a supply of anthrax bombs that would be used to wipe out the population of Germany’s six biggest major cities. Again Roosevelt demurred. But he offered a glittering alternative: The Dugway villages.
Excerpt: Dugway was a high-security testing facility for chemical and biological weapons. The purpose of the replicas of German homes, which were repeatedly rebuilt after being intentionally burned down, was to perfect tactics in the fire bombing of German residential areas during. In order to build a facility that was an authentic reproduction, studies were conducted to determine which materials and furnishings available in the U.S would closely match those in use in Germany. A group of German-American architects including prominent Jewish architects Eric Mendelsohn and Konrad Wachsmann, were employed to design the facility. To ensure that the fires spread as realistically as possible, typical German home-interiors were included, and the wood was periodically doused to simulate conditions in the more humid German climate.
Churchill was delighted as was his Chief Scientific Adviser Frederick Lindemann. A German Jew described by Anthony Eden as ‘bad, and quite possibly mad’ his main purpose in life according to a colleague was ‘to destroy every building in Germany, ideally burying his erstwhile fellow citizens under the rubble’. Lindeman insisted that “the bombing must be directed essentially against working-class houses. Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs.”  Nice chap.
According to the official document no effort was spared. The “German” architects used their knowledge of their former country to design the buildings and contents in such detail that even children’s toys were included.  The houses had to be built, burnt, built and burnt, again and again. Oy vey, the frustration! But it was vital that kids not escape lest they grow up to be Nazis. At last the happy day arrived and the go-ahead was given to drop the bombs on the by now virtually undefended cities. The net result was that within a year more than 40% of German housing stock had been destroyed and up to half a million defenceless men, women and children slaughtered.
Can you just imagine going to work in that facility? You asked yourself practical questions like ‘how do we get the fire to spread spread quickly enough so that a mother doesn’t have time to reach her baby in the cot?’ Can such people be truly human or were they some form of demon from another universe? Either way they all went on to enjoy fame and fortune. And why not, were they not the Good Guys? Meanwhile the Bad Guys such as Julius Streicher was hanged after the war, essentially for saying nasty things about the Jews.
And people still say the truth always comes out….

End of quote.

The Jewish fingerprints are all over what happens in the world, albeit hidden, but they show up as soon as you look a little more deeply. This is one of, perhaps, hundreds of thousands of examples, including the two world wars of the last century. Today, the war is being waged primarily on the mind, and economically, though the latter has always been in play.

I find it fascinating that their agenda is to destroy their host from within, yet if they succeed, they, too, must perish. Fascinatingly (to me, at least) this mirrors perfectly what has been happening across all of Creation, as I came to understand in some of my spiritual work.

When will enough people wake up to this, along with all of the Jews who do not support it, of which there are many?

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

BREAKING: Damning Podesta PizzaGate Evidence Unsealed

Thank you, Molly.

David Zublick pulls no punches in pointing the finger at John Podesta, his role in PizzaGate, which he rightly identifies as a global network reaching to the highest levels, Podesta’s possible role in the disappearance of Madelaine McCann, his potential role in the murder of Seth Rich, apparently the conduit for the damning Podesta and Clinton emails sent to WikiLeaks in 2016, and on and on and on…

Perhaps the best overview of the pieces in play that I’ve seen. TPTB and the MSM want this to all just go away, branded as “Fake News”. Well, it doesn’t appear to be.

And Zublick claims that Sigmund Freud, the feted (false) father of modern psychology and psychiatry, both products of the Tavistock institute in Britain, was himself a known paedophile. These things, including the control system, run in families and his political grandson Clement certainly was.

I suspect a lot more will need to be revealed before it finally breaks cover globally. I still wonder if this is a key thread that will, when it is pulled, expose the satanic global control system that is used to control our world, revealing the satanic Khazarian Jewish elite behind it all.

I live in hope.

Actually, I believe it will break in several different ways at once, making it impossible to contain, and the “man behind the curtain” will be revealed and swept away.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Facebook, the CIA, and the Clintons by Jon Rappoport

This article recounts key events along a time line that stretches from 1986 to the present. Follow the bouncing ball.

Since Facebook went public with an IPO (Initial Public Offering) of stock in 2012, I’ve been following the trail of its stock price.

In 2012, I wrote:

“But now the Facebook stock has tanked. On Friday, August 17 [2012], it weighed in at half its initial IPO price. For the first time since the IPO, venture-capital backers were legally permitted to sell off their shares, and some did, at a loss.”

“Articles have begun appearing that question Zuckerberg’s ability to manage his company. ‘Experts’ are saying he should import a professional team to run the business side of things and step away.”

“This has the earmarks of classic shakeout and squeeze play… First, [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize public investors, who sell their shares…As the stock continues to tank, the insiders quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot it up all the way to new highs and win big.”

In 2013, I followed up and wrote: “Facebook launched its IPO and went public on May 18, 2012. The opening stock price was 42 dollars a share.”

“In September 2012, the collapsing stock hit a low of 17.55.”

“On October 17, 2013, a year later, after a long climb, the stock reached an all-time high: 52.21.”

“So…Facebook, a company with CIA-front connections, a company that encourages people to offer up surveillance data on themselves [and censors politically incorrect news], goes through a financial transformation. Its IPO price collapses like ice in a heat wave. It keeps trading at its new low prices, scaring lots of investors.”

“They sell their shares. Insiders buy up those shares at delicious discounts.”

“Then, when the insiders have scooped up enough, they begin to move the price. Up. The long climb begins.”

Now, in June of 2017, it’s time to check in again. What’s happened to Facebook’s stock price since the high of $54 a share in 2013?

From October 2016 to December 2016, there was another shakeout that convinced many shareholders to dump their stocks—and of course, insiders gobbled up those shares for themselves. The shakeout took the stock price down from an all-time high of $127.88 a share to $115.05.

Then, once again, the relentless climb resumed. On June 2nd of this year, the stock reached a new all-time high of $153.61.

All in all, quite a ride. From the IPO price of $42, down to $17…and now $150.

Are some of the insiders who have been engineering Facebook’s long-term stock-rise front-men for the CIA?

I ask that question because of Facebook’s CIA connections:

The big infusion of cash that sent Mark Zuckerberg and his fledgling college enterprise on their way came from Accel Partners, in 2004.

Jim Breyer, head of Accel, attached a $13 million rocket to Facebook, and nothing has ever been the same.

Earlier that same year, a man named Gilman Louie joined the board of the National Venture Capital Association of America (NVCA). The chairman of NVCA? Jim Breyer. Gilman Louie happened to be the first CEO of the important CIA start-up, In-Q-Tel.

In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999, with the express purpose of funding companies that could develop technology the CIA would use to “gather data.”

That’s not the only connection between Facebook funder Jim Breyer and the CIA’s man, Gilman Louie. In 2004, Louie went to work for BBN Technologies, headed up by Breyer. Dr. Anita Jones also joined BBN at that time. Jones had worked for In-Q-Tel and was an adviser to DARPA, the Pentagon’s technology department that helped develop the Internet.

With these CIA/DARPA connections, it’s no surprise that Jim Breyer’s jackpot investment in Facebook is not part of the popular mythology of Mark Zuckerberg. Better to omit it. Who can fail to realize that Facebook, with its endless stream of personal data, and its tracking capability, is an ideal CIA asset?

From the time Mark Zuckerberg was a child and attended the summer camp for “exceptional children,” CTY (Center for Talented Youth), run by Johns Hopkins University, he, like other CTY students, Sergey Brin (co-founder of Google), and Lady Gaga, have been easy to track.

CTY and similar camps filter applications and pick the best and brightest for their accelerated learning programs. Tracing the later progress of these children in school and life would be a walk in the park for agencies like the CIA.

When Zuckerberg founded an interesting little social network at Harvard, and then sought to turn it into a business, the data-mining possibilities were obvious to CIA personnel. Through their cutouts, as described above, they stepped in and lent a helping hand.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Facebook/CIA presented an anti-Trump stance, which meant a pro-Hillary stance. Is that a pro-CIA stance? Let’s look at a fascinating piece of history involving the CIA and the other Clinton: Bill.

The source here is the explosive 1995 book, Compromised, by Terry Reed and John Cummings.

According to the authors, Bill Clinton, way back in the 1980s, was involved with the CIA in some very dirty dealings in Arkansas—and I’m not just talking about the cocaine flights landing at the Mena airport.

It seems Bill had agreed to set up CIA weapons-making factories in his home state, under the radar. But because Arkansas, when it comes to money, is all cronies all the time, everybody and his brother found out about the operation and wanted in. Also, Bill was looking for a bigger cut of the action.

This security breach infuriated the CIA, and a meeting was held to dress down Bill and make him see the error of his ways. His CIA handlers told him they were going to shut down the whole weapons operation, because Bill had screwed up royally. A screaming match ensued—but the CIA people backed off a bit and told Bill HE WAS STILL THEIR MAN FOR AN EVENTUAL RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY.

Of course, there are people who think Reed and Cumming’s book contains fiction, but John Cummings was a top-notch reporter for Newsday. He co-authored the 1990 book, Goombata, about the rise and fall of John Gotti. He exposed US operations to destroy Cuban agriculture with bio-weapons. It’s highly doubtful he would have put his name on Compromised without a deep conviction he was correctly adding up the facts.

Here, from Compromised, is an account of the extraordinary meeting, in Arkansas, between Bill Clinton and his CIA handlers, in March of 1986, six years before Clinton would run for the Presidency. Author Terry Reed, himself a CIA asset at the time, was there. So was Oliver North, and a man named “Robert Johnson,” who was representing CIA head Bill Casey.

Johnson said to Bill Clinton:

“Calm down and listen….We are all in this together. We all have our personal agendas…but let’s not forget, both the Vice President and Mr. Casey want this operation to be a success. We need to get these assets and resources in place and get them self-sustaining and prospering on their own while we have the chance. This is a golden opportunity. The timing is right. We have communists taking over a country in this hemisphere. We must all pull together and play as a team. This is no time for lone wolves…

“I’m not here to threaten you [Bill Clinton]. But there have been mistakes. The Mena operation survived undetected and unexposed only because Mr. [Barry] Seal carried with him a falsely created, high-level profile of a drug runner. All the cops in the country were trying to investigate a drug operation. That put the police in a position where we could control them. We fed them what we wanted to feed them, when we wanted to feed them; it was our restaurant and our menu…now we have to shut it down….

“Bill, you are Mr. Casey’s fair-haired boy. But you do have competition for the job you seek. We would never put all eggs in one basket. You and your state have been our greatest asset. The beauty of this, as you know, is that you’re a Democrat, and with our ability to influence both parties, this country can get beyond partisan gridlock. Mr. Casey wanted me to pass on to you that unless you fuck up and do something stupid, you’re No. 1 on the short list for a shot at the job you’ve always wanted.

“That’s pretty heady stuff, Bill. So why don’t you help us keep a lid on this and we’ll all be promoted together. You and guys like us are the fathers of the new government. Hell, we are the new covenant.”

By this account, Bill Clinton was the CIA’s boy back in 1986, long before he launched himself into his first 1992 Presidential campaign.

That speaks of major planning. In 1992, an obscure governor from a rather obscure state suddenly gains national prominence and vaults to the head of the line in the race for the White House.

Now, consider the role of the CIA-connected Facebook in the 2016 presidential election. Did Facebook’s strategy of cutting off pro-Trump postings/information and instead supporting ANOTHER CLINTON, HILLARY, signal the continuation of a long-running covert CIA op to put and keep the Clintons in power?

Since 1986, have the Clintons been a package deal for the CIA?

Was the most recent incarnation of that deal the Facebook op to put Hillary in the White House?

Most people have a problem looking at log-term ops. They conceive of covert actions taking place along severely limited time lines. That’s exactly what major operatives count on. They can plan in the dark for two or three decades ahead (or longer) and feel they’re in the clear.

And when a little social networking company comes along and needs an infusion of cash, they can step in, help, and, seeing the possibilities, they can help push the stock to new highs and accomplish elite surveillance and censor true information and support their favored presidential candidate—all during the same dozen years.

It’s an easy program.

All sorts of cards can be played from the bottom of the deck.

End of quote.

And we’re still at least one layer below the REAL controllers, maybe more. The CIA, Mossad, MI6 and similar organisations, at least within the “five eyes” countries, serve the global controllers, otherwise known as the satanic Khazarian Jews, not the countries they purportedly serve.

I love to watch how life unfolds. Today a man came to see me who lives “off the grid” as much as possible. I had never met him before. It became clear he understood pretty well everything I write about. Top to bottom. However, his choice is to remain invisible, unknown to the global control system as much as possible. I respect his choice, though I choose differently because my focus is different from his.

It is seldom I meet someone who has done the research and understands so thoroughly how the world is run and by whom and for what purpose.

I honour his choice and it was no accident he showed up as a completely independent confirmation of all that I have come to understand about how the world works and why.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Real Big Power: Revelations by insider Ronald Bernard-part 2

Thank you, Molly.

Here is Part 2 of the powerful though not surprising revelations from Ronald Bernard, the former elite-level Dutch banker, who drew the line when the next step was to participate in a child sacrifice. In this segment, he explains how the banking system is structured; run by, in his estimate, 8-8,500 people, who are hidden and protected. Bernard explains our debt-based monetary system and how interest and inflation are tools for harvesting the public, enslaving us in more and more debt. He goes on to explain how the politicians are just puppets, performing under the direction of the global elite and that vaccination and the false pandemics are just tools to bring money to Big Pharma and their shareholders. Actually, in my opinion, there’s another layer to this, but that’s not for today.

No surprises; however, it’s priceless to have this from someone who’s been on the inside and chose himself over power.

You can find Part 1 here, which I also recommend.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel and Ian Plimer, Aussie Geology Professor, belt the global warming nonsense out of the park

There has been much brouhaha by the global political cut-outs since Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accord. Right on queue.
However, there are many climate experts who disagree with the official dogma; for example, John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, is uncompromising in How the Global Warming Scare Began. The YouTube listing says:
A great scientist named Roger Revelle had Al Gore in his class at Harvard and the Global Warming campaign was born. Revelle tried to calm things down years later, but Gore said Revelle was Senile and refused to debate. John Coleman documents the entire story and shows how our tax dollars are perpetuating the Global Warming alarmist campaign even though temperatures have not risen in years and years.
Then we have Ian Plimer, Aussie geology and mining professor, in his presentation to a UK Government Public meeting in 2011. I’m currently reading his book Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science. He writes as cogently and entertainingly as he speaks.
However, neither of them, for whatever reason, points out the game behind the game – the elite’s creation of this farce to justify Agenda 21, now renamed the 2030 Agenda. As I’ve said before, this agenda is carefully hidden from the public. To understand how this was all crafted, look no further than the life journey of Maurice Strong, cultivated and tasked with unfolding both the global warming myth and Agenda 21 on behalf of the global elite.
It’s only when you join the dots that the picture becomes clear.
Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Weaponization of Information in the War of Terror

James Corbett, once more, calls it as it is:
If terrorist incidents are always tied back to shadowy groups linked to Al Qaeda or ISIS, an online, independent media might connect those dots to show how Al Qaeda and ISIS were literally created, fostered, funded, trained and equipped by the UK government, the US government and their allies across the world as a tool in their quest of dominance of the Middle East and control of their domestic population. But such a story can only be told on a free and open internet, where independent voices continue to reach the masses and inform them of the truth about these terror groups.
End of quote.
Worth watching.
The severe restriction of the Internet and backdoored encryption is on our doorstep.
Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The Betrayal of India: A Close Look at the 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks

As we watch the terrorism meme be ramped up across the Western world in particular, it is worthwhile remembering the same tactics are applied globally. It’s also useful to take a breath and acknowledge those who tirelessly strive to expose the truth of these events, despite the limited airplay this truth receives. An example is the detailed analysis of the November 2008 terror attacks. Here is part of a review of “The Betrayal of India: Revisiting the 26/11 Evidence” by Elias Davidsson:

By Graeme MacQueen, Global Research

These days we rush from one media story to another, trying to keep up with the latest terrorist attack. Yesterday Paris; today London; tomorrow, who knows? These attacks are tragic enough when they are acts of violence by religious extremists who have outsmarted our police and intelligence agencies. But, of course, many of them are actually violent acts facilitated by our police and intelligence agencies, directly or indirectly. The tragedy in such cases lies not only in the immediate human suffering but in the way our civil society and elected representatives are betrayed, intimidated, disciplined and stripped of their power by our own security agencies. The War on Terror, which goes by different names in different countries but continues as a global framework for violent conflict, thrives on this fraud.

But if the very agencies that should be investigating and preventing these attacks are involved in perpetrating them, what is civil society to do to protect itself? Who will step in to study the evidence and sort out what really happened? And who will investigate the official investigators? Over the years, civilians from different walks of life have stepped forward–forming groups, sharing information and methods, creating a tradition of civilian investigation.

One such investigator is Elias Davidsson (above). Some readers will be familiar with his meticulous book, Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11 or his more recent work, Psychologische Kriegsführung und gesellschaftliche Leugnung. Davidsson has now produced a book on the 2008 attacks that occurred in Mumbai, India. The book is entitled, The Betrayal of India: Revisiting the 26/11 Evidence (New Delhi: Pharos, 2017).

To remind ourselves of these attacks–that is, of the official story of these attacks as narrated by the Indian government–we can do no better than to consult Wikipedia, which seldom strays from government intelligence narratives:

“The 2008 Mumbai attacks were a series of attacks that took place in November 2008, when 10 members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, an Islamic militant organization based in Pakistan, carried out a series of 12 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks lasting four days across Mumbai. The attacks, which drew widespread global condemnation, began on Wednesday, 26 November and lasted until Saturday, 29 November 2008, killing 164 people and wounding at least 308.”

This description, however faulty, serves to make clear why the events were widely portrayed as a huge crime—India’s 9/11. When we bear in mind that both India and Pakistan are armed with nuclear weapons, and when we consider that these events were widely characterized in India as an act of war supported by Pakistan (Davidsson, 72-74; 511 ff.; 731 ff.), we will understand how dangerous the event was for over a billion and a half people in south Asia.

We will also understand how easy it was, on the basis of such a narrative, to get a bonanza of funds and equipment for the Mumbai police (735-736) and why it was possible, given the framing of the event as an act of war, for India’s armed forces to get an immediate 21% hike in military spending with promises of continuing increases in subsequent years (739 ff.).

Wikipedia’s paragraph tells a straightforward story, but the straightforwardness is the result of much snipping and smoothing. Both Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba denied responsibility for the attacks (65; 513) and, Davidsson argues, they did so for good reason.

In his Conclusions at the end of the book Davidsson encourages us to assess separately the actual attacks and the Indian state’s investigation of the attacks (865 ff.) It is “highly plausible,” he says, “that major institutional actors in India, the United States and possibly Israel, were complicit in conceiving, planning, directing and executing the attacks of 26/11” (873); but the evidence of a deceptive investigation is even stronger:

“The first definite conclusion of this book is that India’s major institutions, including the Central government, parliament, bureaucracy, armed forces, Mumbai police, intelligence services, judiciary and media, have deliberately suppressed the truth regarding 26/11 and continue to do so. I could discover no hint of a desire among the aforementioned parties to establish the truth on these deadly events (865).”

This distinction is useful for civil society investigators. We will frequently find it easier to prove that an investigation is deceptive, and that it is obscuring rather than illuminating the path to the perpetrators, than to directly prove the event itself to have been fraudulent. And there are two good reasons to pay attention to evidence of a cover-up. First, to cover up a crime is itself a crime. Second, those covering up a crime implicate themselves in the original crime. If they were not directly involved in the commission of the crime, they are at least accessories after the fact. To begin by exposing the fraudulent investigation, therefore, will often be wise. When this has been done we shall often find that we can begin to discern the path to the attack itself.

End of quote.

I commend the rest of the article to you.

The patterns are clear, but the MSM will never expose them and hence the public is oblivious to them, reacting in fear and blindly accepting the next step in their eliminated freedom – “for their own protection”.

And so it goes…

It seems the restricting of the Internet is a near term target, which may see the end of my posted ramblings, along with many, many others who do far more than I do to expose this ever-tightening noose.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

My Warning to You: They Are Using Staged Events to Strip Your Freedoms

Dahboo7 calls it out as Theresa Amy flags regulation of the Internet after the Manchester false flag event:

Below is the statement released by May. You can see that they are trying to go after your internet freedoms by using this latest event as an excuse! Wake up People!!
New international agreements should be introduced to regulate the internet in the light of the London Bridge terror attack, Theresa May has said.
The Prime Minister said introducing new rules for cyberspace would “deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online” and that technology firms were not currently doing enough.
The Prime Minister made the comments outside Downing Street on Sunday morning in the aftermath of the van and knife attack that saw seven people killed and dozens injured.

End of quote.

And the noose continues to tighten.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

George Webb “I’ve Further Evidence Linking Hillary To The Murder Of Seth Rich.”

I’ve written previously about the research of George Webb into the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s activities. George posts on YouTube several times/day and I find it impossible to track that level of detail. So, when he spends time giving a summary to Richie Allen, for example, I listen.

This is breathtaking stuff, and it includes naming the murderer of Seth Rich, not to mention the trail of organ harvesting and so much more.

In my opinion, George Webb represents the bleeding edge of this new model of private investigative journalism, something that has died in the MSM. George is the mouthpiece for a vast array of people at home with a computer and their favourite search engine, building on what has gone before, every day. They’re also doing the detective work that none of the police or FBI will do, since they’re compromised.

Worth a listen.

And towards the end, Richie goes right to where I see this all leads – the deeply buried global satanic control system.

Will George’s work expose it?

Although just released today, this interview was recorded 10 days ago and I saw a reference yesterday suggesting that George was being targeted in Washington. I’m not surprised and I hope he survived it to complete this exposure.

It is time.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com