As we observe this year’s anniversary of 9/11, I am drawn to add a little to the conversation about what happened on that fateful day.

The Rockefellers have been the main American front men for the global power elite for three generations, and it is this global power elite which holds the true power in the world. As I’ve said before, the so-called democratically elected leaders are just the shadow puppets that Joe Public gets to argue over, and whenever they make the mistake of actually thinking they have real power as JFK and Abe Lincoln did before him, they don’t survive their mistake.

In my view, in order to understand the 9/11 event, we need to look behind the scenes. Yes, there is abundant evidence that those in the current mainstream political and financial structure had much to gain from 9/11, including the rapid implementation of the draconian Patriot Act, but was this ultimately planned at an even higher level?

Firstly, it is clear from this interview segment with Aaron Russo just before his death that Nick Rockefeller was well aware of the plans for 9/11 and the subsequent war on terror, including the plan to supposedly chase bin Laden through caves in Afghanistan well before it happened. So at the very least, the Rockefeller family was aware of the plan.

Secondly, it is also clear that the destruction of the buildings at 9/11 was a nuclear event. In this article, Gordon Duff discusses the extensively covered up trail of radiation poisoning that resulted from 9/11. This is further illustrated by the fact that, prior to 9/11, the term Ground Zero only meant the point on the ground above or below a nuclear event, and this was subsequently disguised by retrospective changes to dictionaries as documented by Dimitri Khalezov (p93 & p559). For me, the only question is: what kind of device was responsible?

Some argue that there were mini-nukes used; however, the level of ground shaking and the swaying of buildings reported (p171 of Khalezov’s book) was consistent with a much more powerful explosion. Moreover, the large craters left at Ground Zero are consistent with a massive underground explosion (this article claims it was glacial damage, rather than the result of nuclear melting…). Here is a closer view of the glazed, previously molten rock surfaces.

For me, the trump card is the knowledge shared by Khalezov from his time in the Soviet military that there were nuclear devices placed under the these buildings for its pre-approved demolition plan (skyscrapers in Manhattan and perhaps all major American cities require a plan for their demolition before they are built). I quote from p58 of his book:

“I indeed knew from the time of my former military service mentioned above about the existence of a so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in the city of New York, in the United States of America; and I knew about the existence of this so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in New York City during not less than ten years prior to the eleventh day of September, year 2001 (two thousand one) A.D.”

Bizarre though this sounds, these were not the only buildings where this demolition strategy was deployed.

So were these the devices that were used to blow up the WTC buildings? In my opinion, yes, based on the extensive evidence and technical analysis provided by Khalezov. The craters left behind, the size of the seismic shockwave, the pulverizing of the buildings and those unpulverized segments, including at WTC-7 are all consistent with the use of 150 kiloton devices, not mini-nukes.

I was aware that David and Nelson Rockefeller had combined their efforts to see these towers built and I began to wonder, given the presence of these nukes under the buildings from their original construction, whether 9/11 was planned when these buildings were built. These people plan in centuries, so such an idea is not as far-fetched as we might think. But I had no evidence.

Then I tripped over this extraordinary video. Firstly, it shows how the story of 9/11 is foretold in the 1996 modified American banknotes. Secondly, it provides some fascinating evidence to support the notion that, indeed, this event was planned from the get go. I will let Betsy McGee tell her own story.

You may also like to watch her video which shows how 9/11 showed up in many movies and TV shows in the years leading up to 9/11. It is EXACTLY what these people do…

For me, some dots have just been joined.