Search results for "JFK assassination"

How involved was GHW Bush with the JFK assassination?

There has been a great deal revealed about those responsible for the JFK assassination, which I have written several articles about, most notably this article, and some of which confirms the involvement of the CIA, including Bush Sr. However, this video provides new evidence linking GHW Bush to the JFK assassination on behalf of his elite masters.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Noam Chomsky’s position on 9/11 and the JFK assassination are indefensible

I have long been aware of Noam Chomsky’s support for the official view of 9/11, but I was unaware he had adopted a similar position on the assassination of JFK. It is clear that this man is not what he presents himself to be. This article by Professor Jim Fetzer spells this out in stark detail. It is one of the games that gets played – an individual builds a profile that appears to support a particular stance, except when it comes to the core issues, and then they seek to lead their supporters away from the truth. Clearly Chomsky is one such individual.

Hollywood writer goes on the road with JFK assassination evidence

From Jon Rappoport.

This is about a relentless film. A film that doesn’t care what happens when false reality is ripped away. A film that actually does what every person who knows the truth wants to do.

This is a film you should see. It’s called Water Time, and if you go to, you can watch it for free, by signing up on Allan Weisbecker’s email list.

Allan is the director and the star of Water Time. He made a good living writing for Hollywood into the mid-90s (Miami Vice, Crime Story), when he quit the scene to live a different kind of life.

A much, much different kind of life….that culminated in going on the road to see what had happened to America. Driving his truck, with his dog Honey, with his surfboard, with his laptop, on which he’d stashed compelling evidence that key events in modern American history had resulted in a shadow takeover of the country. A coup d’etat.

That’s one of the subjects of the film.

It’s about a man who knows the truth and wants to talk about it with average Americans on camera, before your eyes. It’s about a man who makes his own frontier, who mourns the loss of his childhood friend who died in Vietnam, a war made into a horror through the assassination of JFK.

This film forgets all about the smooth kind of Hollywood that, when all is said and done, ruffles no feathers. Water Time barrels into the present American malaise and explodes the barriers and the veils and membranes between vital information, life-changing information, and American people who are just “living their lives.”

Weisbecker sits down with them, opens his laptop, and shows them evidence that the JFK hit was a conspiracy. He shows them a few of the very strange things that happened on 9/11. He doesn’t back down. He pushes forward with uncompromising logic.

Water Time is a record of what happens when a truthteller puts that logic in people’s faces. You see the reactions, the denial, the insanity.

You also see water and waves and surfing. You see a man out there on his own, with his beloved dog, having a hell of a time, a man on a relentless pilgrimage. You see the Open Road of America, created again, by a filmmaker who doesn’t shrink away from what he finds out there beyond the digital universe.

Water Time. Real Time. A diary on film unlike any you’ve ever known.

This is what the news would be, if you could scrape away the cosmetics and the lies and coverups of the major television networks. This is the unedited version. This is what the news would be if you could also watch the reactions of the audience as they’re hit between the eyes with the truth.

Most of all, this is a film about one man who has crossed the illusory threshold, a knight errant with a surfboard who’s thrown false comfort and false security overboard and is willing to be himself and shove in all his chips on the cosmic bet anyone of us can make. With enough courage, with enough outrage, with enough savage joy, with enough intelligence, with enough soul.

Get rid of all your preconceptions about Hollywood-type movies and take a gander at the real thing. I wish we had a thousand different versions of Water Time, made by a thousand men and women in their own way. Then we would have a real revolution. But we have one version, for which we should be grateful. Water Time. A different kind of time. Raw and disturbing, and as you move deeper into it, very beautiful.

Jon Rappoport

Oliver Stone on 50th Anniversary of JFK Assassination

Oliver Stone discusses the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination on November 22, which was chronicled in his blockbuster film, “JFK.” A Vietnam War veteran, Stone has made around two dozen acclaimed Hollywood films, including “Platoon,” “Salvador,” “Born on the Fourth of July,” “Nixon,” “South of the Border” and “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps.” A commemorative edition of “JFK” comes out next week.

The JFK assassination

JFK’s assassination has held my interest for a long time, and many have written or spoken about it. 50 years on, those directly involved have also passed on, and the very tight cover over those involved has leaked in many ways.

It has become clear that there were many interests who wanted him dead – the mafia, the CIA and its recently fired boss Allen Dulles, the Texan oil bosses, LBJ, the military industrial complex, the global bankers, J Edgar Hoover… It is a long list, and perhaps all of them had a hand in it in some way, based upon the evidence.

Let me share with you what I have found to be the most powerful pieces of evidence that this was a carefully planned and executed conspiracy that in ways continues to this day. Let me begin with some statistics regarding the death rate of the witnesses to the event. It is clear from this data that anyone who knew too much was likely to not survive that knowing. Roger Craig was one, and tells his story here – before he was shot.

Next the clear evidence that the US Government was responsible for falsifying how he died. Those who saw the body and took the original x-rays etc. spoke of a massive wound to the back of the head. The official report was of a massive wound to the front of the head. This shows he was shot through the front of the head with at least one shot, and it was important to those involved that this be covered up. More on this shortly.

This episode from the History channel which was never shown due to the action of interests associated with LBJ provides powerful evidence of his involvement, along with the legal and oil interests of Texas.

E. Howard Hunt is perhaps best known for his involvement in the Watergate scandal. Not long before his death, he confessed his involvement and that of the CIA in the assassination of JFK to his son, Saint John Hunt, which he shares in great detail in this excellent recent interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett. You can download an mp3 version of this interview from here. Saint John Hunt also fingers LBJ as the instigator of the assassination. The background to the CIA’s primary on-the-ground hatred for JFK related his perceived failure over the “Bay of Pigs” invasion, and the background to the truth of this is explained in the Colonel Prouty interview I recently shared with you. Despite his denials, George Bush Sr. was working for the CIA at that time, was involved in the Bay of Pigs project and was also present in Dallas on that fateful day, and his fingerprints are all over what has unfolded in America since that time.

Returning to buried evidence that JFK was shot in the head from the front, I find this analysis that Texan Governor John Connally, seated in front of JFK and a close associate of LBJ may have shot JFK at point blank range, to have greater credibility.

And the global finance interest? This article discusses how JFK had moved to free the US from the grip of the global bankers by allowing the US Treasury to issue its own currency, rather than paying interest to the owners of the Federal Reserve for the privilege. I do not see any direct evidence of their involvement; however in my view you need look no further than the CIA and their ultimate agenda. From its inception under Dulles, the CIA was deeply involved through Operation Paperclip in bringing those German scientists involved in advanced scientific projects such as rocketry but also all of the scientists and doctors involved in mind control, torture and eugenics into the United States to continue their work – as well as protecting the interests of the wealthy Americans who funded Hitler and worked on joint projects with the Nazis before and during WWII. So the CIA, in my view, has strongly served those global banking interests, headed up by the Rothschilds, from its very inception. The protection of these individuals and their immigration to the United States reveals that dark, hidden agenda that sees these projects continue on, wherever they can best be pursued. Perhaps this soon-to-released documentary will shed more light on all of this, and perhaps JFK understood all of this very well.

Then we get to the Lee Harvey Oswald story, the patsy in the assassination. Arguably the best source on Oswald is Judyth Vary Baker, the author of Me and Lee, who was Oswald’s lover in New Orleans in the time leading up to the assassination. Judyth was a science prodigy, who found a way to trigger cancer in sterile mice in a week, whilst she was still in her teens, and this made her of great interest to those working on virus and cancer research in New Orleans, and also interested in finding a way to infect Castro with cancer. She shares her story with Susan Lindauer in great detail in this recent radio interview. There is also a recent very brief video interview with Judyth. Judyth also shares her views on YouTube. Her credibility is strengthened by the fact that her academic records have been deleted and she has had to flee to Europe for her own safety. Several of these sources make it clear that Oswald was employed by the CIA and had above top secret security clearances at a very young age, before he supposedly defected to Russia. Dr. Mary’s Monkey also provides some fascinating background to Oswald and what was going on in New Orleans at that time.

Finally, perhaps this 4 minute video summarises all of this in short order, beautifully illustrating the ludicrous nature of the official story.

For me, there is no doubt the forces that came together to see JFK assassinated are alive and well in the United States, and are stronger than ever.

Many Historical Atrocities… Were Rituals – James Perloff

James Perloff is, in my opinion, one of the key people who undertake deep and thorough research on how our world works and the truth behind the major events of our world of the last century or so. I have written about his work in the past, including his most recent book, “Truth is a Lonely Warrior”.

In this interview, he provides the evidence that many of the major global destructive events such as the atomic bombings in Japan in 1945, 9/11 and others had satanic, ritualistic human sacrifice as a component in them. He also shares some of the undeniable evidence that 9/11 was primarily nuclear in nature, though is open to other tools being used, as I am.

He also brings out the hidden role of Israel in events such as 9/11 and the JFK assassination, and the role of the satanic Rothschilds in all of this unfolding, including the Russian Revolution of 1917. Anyone who has been reading my blog for some time will know these are themes I keep coming back to from my own research.

This is powerful material and I commend this interview to you.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology

Is Leftist Shill Noam Chomsky Preparing Us For A False Flag Terrorist Attack

Jeff Berwick of Dollar Vigilante shares my view of what Noam Chomsky is; an apparent leftist, independent academic who is really a tool of the global elite to discredit those who seek to expose their most important acts, such as 9/11 and the JFK assassination. A good Jew playing his role in the elite’s game.

This brief video spells this out and why Berwick thinks Chomsky might be preparing us for a major false flag on Trump’s watch.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Kennedy, De Niro post $100,000 reward to expose mercury in vaccines

An important chink in the wall of silence surrounding the link between vaccines and autism has been opened:

As promised, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman of the World Mercury Project (WMP), announced a $100,000 payout to anyone who can find a credible scientific study proving Thimerosal is safe to inject into children at the concentrations currently administered in today’s vaccines.

End of quote.

You can watch the video of this conference, at this link.

Did you notice the widespread coverage of this news conference in the mainstream media? Me neither.

Interestingly, the video begins with the call by Dr Bernardine Healy, former head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for a study into the potential link between vaccines and autism. That call was made in 2008. By 2011 she was dead, at 67, from a brain tumour. Pure coincidence, I’m sure. After all, there’s no way the work that Judyth Vary Baker participated in in 1963 in New Orleans, leading up to the JFK assassination was ever continued… No-one questions death by cancer. People die of it all the time. Nothing to see here.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Boom: thousands of medical studies found to be useless – Jon Rappoport

I’m talking about little defenders of consensus science, bloggers who love and adore every official pronouncement that comes down the pipeline from medical journals and illustrious doctors.

Dear Bloggers: Thousands of published studies you cite and praise are wrong, useless, irrelevant, deceptive—and the medical journals know it, and they’re doing nothing useful about it.

The issue? Cell lines. These cells are crucial for lab research on the toxicity of medical drugs, and the production of proteins. Knowing exactly which cell lines are being studied is absolutely necessary.

And therein lies the gigantic problem. has the bombshell story (July 21, 2016):

“Recent estimates suggest that between 20 percent and 36 percent of cell lines scientists use are contaminated or misidentified — passing off as human tissue cells that in fact come from pigs, rats, or mice, or in which the desired human cell is tainted with unknown others. But despite knowing about the issue for at least 35 years, the vast majority of journals have yet to put any kind of disclaimer on the thousands of studies affected.”

“One cell line involved are the so-called HeLa cells. These cancerous cervical cells — named for Henrietta Lacks, from whom they were first cultured in the early 1950s — are ubiquitous in labs, proliferate wildly — and, it turns out, contaminate all manner of cells with which they come into contact. Two other lines in particular, HEp-2 and INT 407, are now known to have been contaminated with HeLa cells, meaning scientists who thought they were working on HEp-2 and INT 407 were in fact likely experimenting on HeLa cells.”

“Christopher Korch, a geneticist at the University of Colorado, has studied the issue. According to Korch, nearly 5,800 articles in 1,182 journals may have confused HeLa for HEp-2; another 1,336 articles in 271 journals may have mixed up HeLa with INT 407. Together, the 7,000-plus papers have been cited roughly 214,000 times, Science reported last year.”

“And that’s just two cell lines. All told, more than 400 cell lines either lack evidence of origin or have become cross-contaminated with human or other animal cells at some point in their laboratory lineage. Cell lines are often chosen for their ability to reproduce and be bred for long periods of time, so they’re hardy buggers that can move around a lab if they end up on a researcher’s gloves, for example. ‘It’s astonishingly easy for cell lines to become contaminated,’ wrote Amanda Capes-Davis, chair of the International Cell Line Authentication Committee, in a guest post for Retraction Watch. ‘When cells are first placed into culture, they usually pass through a period of time when there is little or no growth, before a cell line emerges. A single cell introduced from elsewhere during that time can outgrow the original culture without anyone being aware of the change in identity’.”

Getting the picture?

HUGE numbers of published studies are based on knowing which cells are being used and tested. And much of the time, the researchers don’t know. They pretend they do, but they don’t.

Their work is completely unreliable.

Everyone involved (for decades) looks the other way.

It’s the secret no one wants to talk about.

Thousands and thousands and thousands of medical studies are useless, and their conclusions are unfounded, and turn out to be random.

This is like saying, “Well, we built all those buildings in the city, but the concrete we used was probably cardboard. Let’s not talk about it. Let’s just wait and see what happens.”

Millions of patients who are taking drugs are guinea pigs. Researchers originally tested the toxicity of drugs on cells they assumed were relevant, but they were wrong. They said the drugs were safe, but they were working with cells that had no bearing on safety.

This is one reason why, on July 26, 2000, Dr. Barbara Starfield, a highly respected public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, could conclude, in the Journal of the American Association, that FDA approved medical drugs kill 106,000 Americans every year—which becomes a MILLION deaths per decade.

The original researchers on those drugs pretended they knew what they were doing.


Everything I’m describing and citing in this article?

The FDA knows about it.

The CDC knows about it.

The World Health Organization knows.

National health departments all over the world know.

Medical schools know.

Many doctors know.

Many, many researchers know.

Many hospital executives know.

All pharmaceutical executives know.

Many mainstream medical reporters know.

All medical journals know.

But they continue to promote life-destroying fake news.

Blog that.

End of quote.

As I read this, I’m reminded of the bombshell I found when I was researching the JFK assassination, which had fundamental connections to New Orleans and the research work of Dr. Alton Ochsner, who was involved with the early vaccine work. This revealed to me that it was well recognised that the early polio vaccine was contaminated with the SV40 virus. I quote:

The development of the first vaccine for polio back in the 1950s is still glorified in the mainstream media as one of the most important public health breakthroughs in recorded history. But a little-known documentary which aired on the Canadian news network CBC back in 1997 tells a much different story about the polio vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, including its known tainting with a monkey virus linked to causing cancer and death.

The risk of an epidemic of soft tissue cancer arising from the Salk vaccine in particular was well understood by those on the inside, such as Dr. Alton Ochsner, who was working very hard in secret to address it (and was part of the putsch that saw JFK assassinated, but that is another story…). This information comes out in both Dr. Mary’s Monkey and Me & Lee. (BTW, Ochsner insisted on vaccinating two of his grandchildren. One died within 48 hours, the other contracted polio…)

Of course Joe Public was never to know such things. The skeletons were well hidden even back then. Ever wondered why we have such a dramatic increase in the rate of soft tissue cancers in our world in the last 50 or so years, with no seeming answers?

End of quote.

And there are some interesting links in this article that open doors to the background of vaccination that we are not meant to look behind. And if you support vaccination, take the time to look. Things like the evidence that the decline in disease rates occurred BEFORE vaccination and Dr Tenet’s extraordinary video on viruses, vaccine and cancer history. And if you resist, the following meme may well apply to you.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

“Who does control the world?” – Noam Chomsky – BBC interview 2003

Whilst this interview dates from 2003, from what I can see, it summarises Noam Chomsky’s currently expressed view of the world.

Chomsky is seen by most as a deeply considered, intellectually principled leftist figure who sees the United States as the world bully and seeks to hold them to account.

But is he?

There are two key issues about Chomsky’s expressed view of the world that trouble me:

  1. That 9/11 went according to the official story (Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorists blew up two buildings with hijacked aeroplanes)
  2. That the JFK assassination went according to the official story (he was killed by the lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald)


This is well spelled out by Jim Fetzer, here and also here, and Chomsky’s views about 9/11 were still being expressed as recently as late 2013, when he responded to a question  about the destruction of Building 7, the collapse of which, unsurprisingly, is not acknowledged in the recently opened 9/11 memorial in New York. Now, you might argue that there is some professional bias in Fetzer’s views on Chomsky, given their competing views on the nature and origins of language (neither of which, as I understand it, give any credence to the nature and the existence of consciousness beyond the temporal domain and hence, in my view, are both flawed), in my view, Fetzer’s comments about Chomsky’s position on 9/11 and the JFK assassination stand alone.

Now, it does not take a great intellect to understand that the only conditions under which buildings fall down at freefall speed into their own footprint is when they have been demolished. And you can’t demolish them by flying an aeroplane into them high up. You have to remove each floor below the one above for each to fall freely; that is, demolish it from the bottom. If Chomsky has researched this as thoroughly as he claims, how can he miss this? He simply can’t. You may not agree with Chomsky, but you cannot deny the man has intellectual horsepower.

So, why does this highly intelligent man deny these two fundamental lies in the history of the United States?

For me, this is the fundamental question. Not once, but twice does he deny the obvious, when the man makes arguments of great subtlety in other areas. There is no way that this is chance. The man has chosen this position.

And in my opinion, to understand why, we need to look deeper.

It seems to me, Chomsky is a protector of the darkest secrets. The world at large believes that the United States  is the world’s great aggressor, and practically this is true.

But who controls the United States?

There is a growing chorus of voices pointing to the influence of Israel on the United States, which I agree with, but even that misses the point. There are arguments made that there has been Jewish control of the United States back to the time when Columbus made his voyage, as Henry Ford did in his 1920-1 articles. Even if this is not the case, that control was well and truly sealed with the creation of the US Federal Reserve in 1913 under the guidance of Zionist Paul Warburg, a banking representative of the Rothschilds. And in case you are in any doubt, read how Zionist Bernard Baruch controlled the entire US supply system during WWI (as well as beginning to prepare the American military for war as early as 1915, well before any official plans were in place), an act he repeated during WWII. This is not someone’s opinion; it is demonstrated by Baruch’s own testimony before a US Senate inquiry into his role in WWI. Baruch did not try to hide it.

So, if you look, the evidence that the United States was hijacked at the very least 100 years ago and likely more by the Zionist bankers is abundant and unequivocal, yet this is never mentioned in any mainstream discussion of the unfolding of world events, including the two World Wars of last century. The Zionist bankers, as the ultimate victors,  have written themselves out of history.

So where does Chomsky fit?

In my view, Chomsky’s role is to protect this carefully buried truth. On the one hand, he postures as the great intellect of the left, brandishing fire at the demonic United States, but all the while protecting the hidden hand of the Zionist bankers. For me, it is the only way to reconcile Chomsky’s defence of these two very dark events in American history, both of which carry the fingerprints of the Zionist banking interests that not only control the United States but, in essence, the entire world. Yes, they have many willing helpers, either because they, themselves carry the same satanic predisposition (e.g.  the Du Pont family) or they are co-opted through their desire for power and are willing to pay the price (eg Skull & Bones members).

Until and unless those who rail at the state of our world begin to recognise this, including the many Jews who have been hoodwinked by the propaganda of the few and take articles such as this as an attack on them and their kin when it is not, we will make little progress in picking this game apart.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email