Search results for nameless war

A highly informative discussion of The Nameless War by Captain Archibald Henry Maule Ramsay

I have referred previously to Captain Ramsay’s extraordinary 1952 book “The Nameless War”:

Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 – thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.

From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard.

In 1931 he was elected a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.

Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there until the end of that Parliament in 1945.

End of quote, taken from the beginning of the book. Clearly Ramsay was a man who knew too much.

Recently, a recording was posted of a radio show hosted by Daryl Bradford Smith with Muhammad Rafeeq from October 2007 in which they discuss Ramsay’s book in quite a deal of detail, bringing forth how thoroughly Ramsay revealed the modus operandi of the Jewish elite in destroying the leadership and governance of one country after another, beginning with Oliver Cromwell and his – in effect – beheading of Charles I in 1649, down through the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution and into our current time, with the model essentially unchanged. Smith and Rafeeq provide a wonderful overview of Ramsay’s work, alloyed with their own in this exposure, and it represents a great introduction to Ramsay’s book which, in my opinion, is essential reading if you want to understand how our world works and why. You can find Ramsay’s book here.

Sadly, Smith spoke of the battle to expose these people before they shut down those speaking out against them, which I noted earlier this year has happened to Smith as a result of the recent clampdown on free speech in France.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

When the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission exposed its own secret – Jon Rappoport

Now and then, I republish an explosive interview with two Rockefeller Trilateral Commission members, highlighting how much political power can be controlled in a few hands.

People often misunderstand how the game works. In the area of US foreign policy, for example, they focus on the long-standing rats’ nest called the State Department.

Well, they should. But that bureaucracy implements policy. It doesn’t really formulate the basics. The basics come from higher on the food chain.

The Globalist movement—within which the Trilateral Commission is a leading force—dictates a “one-world” theme. Separate nations and their power should be melted down and folded into one planet-wide management system.

This system would ultimately determine worldwide production quotas for goods and services, and their distribution. Energy, in particular, is a prime target. How much will be created? Who will benefit? Who will suffer?

The US federal government and other governments around the world are currently trying to bring us closer to that “utopian day.”

Who sits in the shadows pulling their strings?

Here is another question that has the same answer: who is in charge of undermining free markets and thus taking down economies?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.

It’s called the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.”

In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example: Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
James Jones, National Security Advisor;
Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).

The conversation was public knowledge at the time.

Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy (which includes trade treaties) were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.

The 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.

US economic and political policy—run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission.

When Jimmy Carter won the presidential election in 1976, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.

How does a shadowy group like the TC accomplish its goal? One basic strategy is: destabilize nations; ruin their economies; send millions and millions of manufacturing jobs off to places where virtual slave labor does the work; adding insult to injury, export the cheap products of those slave-factories back to the nations who lost the jobs and undercut their domestic competitors, forcing them to close their doors and fire still more employees.

And then solve that economic chaos by bringing order.

What kind of order?

Eventually, one planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, “to restore stability,” “for the good of all, for lasting harmony.”

“I pledge allegiance to the Trilateral Commission, and to the domination for which it stands, one planet, indivisible, with tyranny and poverty and top-down order for all…”

End of quote.

As I’ve explained before, there are layers of the satanic Khazarian Jewish elite behind this.

Perhaps the most explosive understanding about this for me came from the 1952 book, “The Nameless War” by Captain Archibald Henry Maule Ramsay, which I discuss here, in which he explains that Oliver Cromwell, who was responsible for the beheading of Charles I of England in 1649, was paid by the elite Jews of Amsterdam… The Jews were expelled from Britain in the 12th century. Cromwell let them back in.

So, the great British power, so-called, was actually Khazarian Jewish controlled. It makes you look at history very differently. You begin to realise that the rise and fall of various nations as great trading powers – Portugal, Spain, Holland, then Britain, all reflected the movement of the controlling Jews from one country to the next…

And so, the Trilateral Commission is a bit of a late play in the game when seen from that perspective…

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Update on How the Jewish elite reconstructed the world in the 20th century and why you should care

I recently read two excellent, recently published books that discuss different aspects of the activities of the elite Jews in our world during the 20th century. The first was Alison Weir’s Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel and the second was Benton Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy. As I finished Weir’s book, I felt it was important to discuss it before I got too far into Bradberry’s book; but then I realised they are two contrasting views of overlapping events and, as such, they deserved to be discussed together.

If there is one thing they have in common (besides the obvious), it is the extent and quality of the research. They are both outstanding in this regard.

Weir describes her journey to write her book as being accidental:

What is now known as the “Second Intifada” (Palestinian uprising) was in the news (she’s talking about 2000 – Richard), and I grew curious about it. I decided to follow the news coverage to learn what this conflict was all about, and I fairly quickly noticed how one-sided the coverage was. My background was in journalism (I was at that time the editor of a very small weekly community newspaper), so I was aware that reporters are supposed to give the full picture in a more complete way than I felt was going on.

Because the Internet was available, making information on remote daily events far more accessible than previously, I began to research the news further. In doing so I discovered a far more drastic pattern of Israeli violence against Palestinians than mainstream U.S. news organizations were revealing.

For example, I discovered that large numbers of Palestinian children were being killed by Israeli forces, many of them through gunfire to the head – and that they had been killed before the far smaller number of Israeli children who eventually began also to be tragically killed. Similarly, I found that over 140 Palestinians of all ages had been killed before any Israelis in Israel, even though the media consistently were referring to Israeli violence as retaliatory.

After a few months of looking into this issue, becoming more and more disturbed by what I was finding in the region – and what began to appear to me to be a cover-up in the American media – I finally decided I needed to see for myself what was going on. I quit my job and went to the region as a freelance reporter, traveling independently throughout Gaza and the West Bank during the height of the uprising.

When I returned, I began an organization called “If Americans Knew.” The purpose was to create a nonpartisan, journalistic organization that would provide the facts on this extremely important issue to the American public, and on our connection to it.

End of quote.

None of this is any surprise to anyone with their eyes and ears open and their nose out of the television set. And these experiences sent Weir on a mission:

The Israel Lobby in the U.S. is just the tip of an older and far larger iceberg known as “political Zionism,” an international movement that began in the late 1800s with the goal of creating a Jewish state somewhere in the world. In 1897 this movement, led by a European journalist named Theodor Herzl[4], coalesced in the First Zionist Congress, held in Basel, Switzerland, which established the World Zionist Organization, representing 117 groups the first year; 900 the next.[5]

While Zionists considered such places as Argentina, Uganda, the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, and Texas,[6]they eventually settled on Palestine for the location of their proposed Jewish State, even though Palestine was already inhabited by a population that was 93-96 percent non-Jewish. The best analysis says the population was 96 percent Muslims and Christians,[7] who owned 99 percent of the land.[8]

After the Zionist Congress, Vienna’s rabbis sent two of their number to explore Palestine as a possible Jewish state. These rabbis recognized the obstacle that Palestinians presented to the plan, writing home: “The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man.”[9] Still, Zionists ultimately pushed forward. Numerous Zionist diary entries, letters, and other documents show that they decided to push out these non-Jews – financially, if possible; violently if necessary.[10]

End of quote.

As you can see, Weir quickly gets to a critical understanding – there is a global game in play. And she rapidly fingers the key US on the ground figure:

In 1912 prominent Jewish American attorney Louis Brandeis, who was to go on to become a Supreme Court Justice, became a Zionist.[27] Within two years he became head of the international Zionist Central Office, newly moved to America from Germany.[28]

While Brandeis is an unusually well known Supreme Court Justice, most Americans are unaware of the significant role he played in World War I and of his connection to Palestine.

Some of this work was done with Felix Frankfurter, who became a Supreme Court Justice two decades later.

Perhaps the aspect of Brandeis that is least known to the general public – and often even to academics – is the extent of his zealotry and the degree to which he used covert methods to achieve his aims. (Absolutely classic elite Jewish behaviour – Richard).

While today Brandeis is held in extremely high esteem by almost all Americans, there was significant opposition at the time to his appointment to the Supreme Court, largely centered on widespread accusations of unethical behavior. A typical example was the view that Brandeis was “a man who has certain high ideals in his imagination, but who is utterly unscrupulous, in method in reaching them.”[29]

While today such criticisms of Brandeis are either ignored or attributed to political differences and/or “anti-Semitism,”[30] there is evidence suggesting that such views may have been more accurate than Brandeis partisans would like.

In 1982 historian Bruce Allen Murphy, in a book that won a Certificate of Merit from the American Bar Association, reported that Brandeis and Frankfurter had secretly collaborated over many years on numerous covert political activities. Zionism was one of them.[31]

“[I]n one of the most unique arrangements in the Court’s history,  Brandeis enlisted Frankfurter, then a professor at Harvard Law School, as his paid political lobbyist and lieutenant,” writes Murphy, in his book The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices. “Working together over a period of 25 years, they placed a network of disciples in positions of influence, and labored diligently for the enactment of their desired programs.”[32]

“This adroit use of the politically skillful Frankfurter as an intermediary enabled Brandeis to keep his considerable political endeavors hidden from the public,” continues Murphy.[33]

End of quote.

Weir makes it pretty clear what game is being played and it’s a game that’s played globally and has been for centuries. She then reveals Brandeis’ involvement in The Parushim:

Even more surprising to this author – and even less well-known both to the public and to academics – is Brandeis’s membership in a secret society that covertly pushed Zionism both in the U.S. and internationally.[41]

Israeli professor Dr. Sarah Schmidt first reported this information in an article about the society published in 1978 in the American Jewish Historical Quarterly. She also devoted a chapter to the society in a 1995 book. Author and former New York Times editor Peter Grose, sympathetic to Zionism,[42]also reported on it in both a book and several subsequent articles. [43]

According to Grose, a highly regarded author, Brandeis was a leader of “an elitist secret society called the Parushim, the Hebrew word for ‘Pharisees’ and ‘separate,’ which grew out of Harvard’s Menorah Society.”[44]

Schmidt writes:  “The image that emerges of the Parushim is that of a secret underground guerilla force determined to influence the course of events in a quiet, anonymous way.”

Grose writes that Brandeis used the Parushim “as a private intellectual cadre, a pool of manpower for various assignments.”[45] Brandeis recruited ambitious young men, often from Harvard, to work on the Zionist cause – and further their careers in the process.

“As the Harvard men spread out across the land in their professional pursuits,” Grose reports, “their interests in Zionism were kept alive by secretive exchanges and the trappings of a fraternal order. Each invited initiate underwent a solemn ceremony, swearing the oath ‘to guard and to obey and to keep secret the laws and the labor of the fellowship, its existence and its aims.’”[46]

At the secret initiation ceremony, new members were told:

“You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation.”[47]

End of quote.

Weir then maps the evolution of Zionism and how this “flowering” (perhaps more accurately described as rotting) was covertly aided and abetted by Jewish interests in the US:

A number of groups operated in the U.S. to support Zionist paramilitary groups in Palestine. These often employed clandestine methods and deceptive names. The general American public had little idea about the true nature of these groups and what they were supporting.

 

  1. Irgun Delegation: Hillel Kook as “Peter Bergson“

A covert Irgun delegation operated in the U.S. from the late 1930s through 1948 under a half dozen front organizations, including the “Emergency Committee to Save European Jewry“ and “American Friends of a Jewish Palestine.”[252]

The main leader was Hillel Kook, the senior Irgun officer working outside Palestine. Upon coming to the U.S. he assumed the alias “Peter Bergson,” and the group is often called the “Bergson Boys.”

The other leader was Yitzhak Ben-Ami (father of Jeremy Ben-Ami, founder of today’s lobbying organization J-Street). Also closely involved was Eri Jabotinski, son of right-wing Zionist leader Vladimir “Ze’ev” Jabotinsky.[253] Also associated with the group was Meir Kahane, who twenty years later founded the violent Jewish Defense League (JDL).[254]

Though historians have documented that their purpose in coming to the U.S. was to raise money for Irgun activities in Palestine, this was unknown to the multitude of high-level supporters the group eventually acquired. These supporters included Eleanor Roosevelt,[255] Harry Truman, Dorothy Parker, Herbert Hoover, Will Rogers, Jr., Labor leader William Green, U.S. Solicitor General Fowler Harper, and U.S. Interior Secretary Harold Ickes.[256]

The FBI, however, suspected this illegal fundraising. It investigated the front groups several times, but largely bungled the investigations and failed to produce evidence. As author Rafael Medoff divulges: “In fact, according to Bergson lobbyist Baruch Rabinowitz, funds raised by the Bergsonites in the United States were indeed secretly transferred to the Irgun; the methods of transfer were simply so well concealed that the FBI could not uncover them.”[257]

End of quote.

I think you get the picture. Weir has done an outstanding job of mapping this complex, secretive web in the US that championed and fostered Zionism and the creation and funding of Israel. I commend Weir’s book to you if you want to get a handle on this relationship.

However, in my opinion, there’s a huge gap. Although she traces the history of Zionism, as I show above, she does not explore or even recognise the broader context within which Zionism arises – the behind the scenes global control of our world by the elite Jews, led by the Rothschilds. Indeed, the only mention of them is within the body of the Balfour Declaration. I find it fascinating that so few ask why Lord Balfour addressed this Declaration of November, 1917 to Lord Rothschild!!! Duh!!!

Until you see this and acknowledge it, what she writes so cogently and thoroughly about lacks context. With the context in place, it makes perfect sense. To me, it’s critical that we understand that Zionism is but one element of their activities in the world during the 20th century; indeed, all alternate systems, including communism, socialism, fascism and even capitalism as they allow it to be practised by we lesser mortals are creations of this elite Satanic Jewish control group, and they roll them out and draw them back at their whim, like shadow puppets in a pantomime. However, as Jim Rickards elucidates in his recent book The Road to Ruin, the socialist model, where the public owns little and the elite own all of the world’s assets, is their preferred and planned long-term model:

Schumpeter wrote at a critical juncture between the end of the Great Depression and the start of the Second World War. Capitalism was on trial and socialism was in vogue, including in the United States, where it had failed to take root during previous socialist cycles in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration, 1933–45, was filled with socialist reformers and endeavors from the massive Tennessee Valley Authority power project to agricultural communes like the federal farm camp at Marysville, California.

End of quote.

Rickards goes on to explain that the management of this preferred model is through fascism, which we witness being rolled out more and more every day using global terrorism as the excuse – David Icke’s Totalitarian Tiptoe.

Turning now to Benton Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy, we find a very different take on things. If Weir’s book is thoroughly and painstakingly researched, Bradberry’s book is a tour de force. Those of you who have been reading my scribblings for a while will know I’ve done not a small amount of research into these areas myself, and Bradberry is across all of the things I have looked into, including the original source material, but goes way, way beyond that. Not only that, he writes with a mastery and ease that makes the truth he shares eminently accessible to anyone with an open mind and a willingness to look. Bradberry documents the truth of what happened to Germany in the first half of the 20th century and by whom in a manner and on a level that, in my experience, no one else has approached.

A quick Internet search will show many interviews with Bradberry since his book release in 2015. In my opinion, this interview with Jeff Rense is a good place to start. In fact, I recommend you listen to it as a great introduction to and context for Bradberry’s book. Rense says the book is “about incredible lies about Germany and WWI and II. One of the greatest, worst myths in living memory; in history; modern history, at least. What actually happened is almost 180 degrees the opposite of the official story, it’s that bad and, in many cases, is demonstrably exactly the fact. We are all being lied to about what happened there, every single day”. I couldn’t agree more.

Bradberry is no career journalist or author. A retired military veteran of the cold war era, he is 78 years old, still works full time and “owns a couple of businesses”. It took him 3 ½ years to write.

Bradberry begins by illustrating the myth that we have all been fed as the truth about Germany, and one of his first illustrations is the movie Schindler’s List. I have discussed this movie with people and found, as Bradberry describes, that they take this to be a true story:

Consider the movie, “Schindler’s List,” by the Jewish director, Stephen Spielberg, for example. The Nazi commandant of the concentration camp (supposedly the Plaszow camp outside of Krakow, not far from Auschwitz), is standing shirtless on the balcony of his house with a hunting rifle over his bare shoulders. The rifle is equipped with a telescopic sight. In the movie, the house is located on a hill above the camp so that he can look down on the throngs of prisoners milling around in the compound below. He lifts the rifle to his shoulder and through the telescope begins casually scanning from one prisoner to another. The image through the telescope now fills the movie screen. The crosshairs of the scope stop on a randomly selected prisoner. He pulls the trigger and the prisoner drops to the ground, dead. The screen then cuts back to the Nazi commandant to show bored insouciance as he actuates the bolt of his rifle and casually raises it back to his shoulder. He fires again, and again a prisoner drops to the ground, dead. Bored with his “target practice,” he turns his attention to the beautiful, sexy, naked woman lying on a bed just inside the house from the balcony. The woman is purportedly one of his Jewish housemaids selected from the camp, who also apparently serves as his sex slave. His face expresses disdainful, though lackadaisical, cynicism.

The point of the shootings, as well as bringing in the naked housemaid (who just happens to be a Jew, what else?), is to show the Nazi officer as totally depraved, without conscience, morality, or empathy for other humans; in short, a psychopath. It is presumed, of course, that the murdered prisoners were all Jews. Two popular Jewish themes are combined here: Nazi evil and Jewish persecution.

This episode is entirely fictional, based on a novel by Thomas Keneally, an Australian, who only visited the concentration camps once in 1980 and who had no real knowledge of what went on there. No such actual event as described above has ever been recorded, yet the vast majority of movie goers swallow it whole and accept it as actual history.

The real Plaszow camp was located on the other side of a hill from the commandant’s house, and completely out of sight from the commandant’s balcony. It would have been impossible for him to shoot down into the compound as shown in the movie even if he had been inclined to do so, which is highly unlikely. The actual commandant of Plaszow, Amon Goeth, on which the character in the movie was based, lived in the house with his fiancé Ruth Kalder, with whom he had a child. Ruth said that they intended to marry but were unable to do so due to the chaos at the end of the war. She had her name and the child’s name changed to Goeth after the war with the help of Amon Goeth’s father. Amon Goeth was hanged after the war by the Polish government (the post war Polish government was all Jewish, incidentally) primarily for being a member of the Nazi party and a member of the Waffen-SS, not for shooting prisoners. Ruth described Amon Goeth as a cultured man who had a beautiful singing voice. Goeth did, indeed, have two Jewish housemaids selected from the camp while he was commandant, but they were not beautiful and sexy as depicted in the movie, and there is no information that he had untoward relations with them. That story was only included to add spice to the movie.

End of quote.

He gives many other illustrations. On the subject of Spielberg, I have come to view him as perhaps the greatest purveyor in film of these Jewish lies, deceit and propganda, and it is of no surprise to me that he was filmed directing the false flag Boston bombing event.

Bradberry also illustrates how the 19th century view of Germany “as a “cradle of law, virtue, and freedom,” and considered it a “distinction of the first rank” that the English belonged to the Germanic family of peoples”, suddenly changed:

This view of Germany was to change almost overnight with the outbreak of World War I. After the war began in 1914 a grotesque image of a rapacious, bloodthirsty and uniquely aggressive Germany quickly took form and became the stereotypical image of Germany in Europe and America. This new image of Germany was the direct result of a virulent anti-German propaganda campaign conducted by the British government and later joined by the United States government in which deliberate and systematic lies, distortions and false atrocity stories were disseminated to the British and American publics. The emotions of both the British and American publics were deliberately whipped up to a fever pitch of hatred for the “Hun.” A pathological hostility towards all things German, which later became such a familiar and integral part of Western thinking about Germany, had its birth in this skillful propaganda campaign.

End of quote.

Bradberry then goes on to explain the role played by the elite Jews after Germany’s December 1916 peace offer in bringing the United States into the war in exchange for the infamous Balfour Declaration. Simply put, Bradberry rips the covers off the Jewish hidden hand behind the unfolding of WWI, the 1917 Bolshevik revolution and WWII, and then documents it thoroughly, and with many sources that I myself have investigated and verified. He clearly illustrates that Communism is a Jewish creation, and all of its leaders in all of the countries from Russia and on through Eastern Europe between the wars and into Germany and Italy, were all Jewish and were responsible for horrific slaughter within those countries. As part of this, he elucidates how most European Jews are of Khazarian origin and not Middle Eastern. Indeed, his thoroughness extends to fingering those elite Jews that funded the French revolution:

This view of the Jews as perpetual troublemakers grew even stronger after the French Revolution of 1789 when the large Jewish role in bringing about that revolution became known. (The Jacobins who instigated the French Revolution were predominantly, if not entirely, Jewish. It was also the Jews who financed the French Revolution; men such as Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham Goldsmid, their partner Moses Mocatta and his nephew Moses Montifiore, all of London, along with Daniel Itsig and his son-in-law David Friedlander of Berlin, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace, among others.) The Czars were worried about the stability of the Russian Empire and worried about this Jewish tendency to foment revolution. The draconian restrictions on Jews were imposed in defense of Russia, not just to make life difficult for Jews.

End of quote.

The above paragraph encapsulates a truth that has been played out time and time again in Europe and elsewhere, yet is carefully hidden from the public. As I said, Bradberry rips the covers off this deceit. For example:

Two great blocks of Jewish bankers; the London and Paris based Rothschilds with their extensive network of banks, and the so-called German-American bankers, under the control of Jacob Schiff, cooperated together to finance the Russian Revolution. Schiff, a German born Jew, was an international banker of Wall Street, closely allied with other German and American Jewish bankers, including the (German born) Warburgs of New York and Hamburg, the Guggenheims, the Hanauers, the Kahns, and others. The Warburgs, both in Germany and in the U.S., were actually related to Jacob Schiff. One was his brother-in-law and the other a son-in-law. Other International Jewish financiers allied with Jacob Schiff and the Kuhn, Loeb Bank included, the Westphalian-Rheinland Syndicate in Germany; the Lazare brothers of Paris; the Ginzburgs of Petrograd (formerly St. Petersburg), Tokyo and Paris; Speyer and Company of London, New York and Frankfurt am Main; and, significantly, the Nya Banken of Stockholm, Sweden, under a Swedish Jew, Olof Aschberg. These banking blocks were “international” in the truest sense; owned and operated by international Jews who were loyal to no nation except International Jewry.

In their mission to bring down the Czar, the two banking groups jointly financed a propaganda campaign against Czarist Russia which had the effect – as intended – of creating world-wide hostility toward the Russian Empire. This anti-Czarist propaganda campaign was propagated through and trumpeted by all the major newspapers throughout Europe and America, as well as through all other information media, almost all of which was under Jewish control. (They were to conduct this same kind of propaganda campaign, except on a much larger scale, against Germany after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor.)

End of quote.

This is entirely consistent with my own analysis of the Bolshevik Revolution, though researched and documented in far more detail. Again, the dense detail that you see above is typical of Bradberry’s book.

Returning to the aftermath of WWI for a moment and, in particular, the Versailles peace conference:

The extent of Jewish influence at the Paris Peace Conference after the war is not very well known today, but, the fact is that Jews flocked there from all over the globe. They came from Russia, Eastern Europe, France, and particularly from the United States and Britain. From Britain came Lord Walter Rothschild, Lionel de Rothschilld, Chaim Weizmann, Lucien Wolfe, Moses Montefiore, Nachum Sokolove, Julius Kahn, Professor Sylvain Levi, and M. Bigar, among others.

From the United States came Rabbi Stephen Wise, Felix Frankfurter, Oscar Strauss, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Walter Lippman, the historian Simon Dubnow, Harry Friedenwald, Jacob de Haas, Mary Fels, Louis Robison, Bernard Flexner, and Judge Julian Mack of Philadelphia, among others. Ten additional Jews came as members of the American Jewish Congress, formed in 1918 specifically for the Paris Peace Conference.

From France came a group of Jews representing the Alliance Israelite Universelle, a Paris based international Jewish organization founded in 1860 to safeguard the human rights of Jews around the world.

Representing the American banking interests was the Jewish banker Paul Warburg, Chairman of the Federal Reserve. His brother Max Warburg, head of the German banking firm of Warburg and Company, was there, along with other German Jews, as a representative of German banking interests (but not representing Germany, per se, only Germany’s Jewish banking interests). These groups were joined by large numbers of Jews from Bolshevik Russia, Poland and Ukraine. Though they ostensibly represented several different countries, all the Jewish delegates congregated together as one group, first and foremost to secure the interests of International Jewry. The interests of the various countries they represented were only secondary, and of a much lower priority, if considered at all.

Astonishingly, each of the Allied leaders at the peace talks had a Jew as his primary adviser. President Wilson had Bernard Baruch. France’s Clemenceau’ had Georges Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild. Britain’s David Lloyd George had Sir Phillip Sassoon. Italy’s representative at the talks, Prime Minister Vittorio Emanuele Orlando, was himself half Jewish, and self identified as a Jew.

All of these Jews were comprehensively involved at every level in the numerous decisions which had to be made by the Conference, particularly those pertaining to their own interests. Jewish interests were given an inexplicably high priority in the final drafting of the peace settlement known as the Versailles Treaty. The Jews had a number of interests which they vigorously pursued, but they were especially determined to have the following three requirements included in the final treaty: (1) A League of Nations as the first step toward world government; (2) the recognition of Jewish “minority rights” in Eastern Europe and; (3) the creation of a British Mandate in Arab Palestine as the necessary first step toward an eventual Jewish state there. They accomplished all three.

It seems remarkable that Jewish interests could have so predominated at the conclusion of a war in which Jews had not participated as a separate corporate entity. And yet, there they were, at war’s end, having come from countries on both sides of the conflict, fully participating in the Peace Conference, and securing for themselves a major share of the spoils. Jewish power has never been more overtly demonstrated. They achieved everything they had set out to obtain.

End of quote.

Again, this turn of events is completely corroborated by the 1961 Washington speech of former Zionist insider Benjamin H Freedman, who was an attendee at the above conference.

Apart from the demonisation of Hitler, which I will touch on shortly, perhaps the greatest travesty of truth is the holohoax story of 6 million Jews slaughtered by Hitler, whereas the real slaughter has been that conducted by Jews against non-Jews throughout Europe and elsewhere. This is an example of the 180° reversal that Jeff Rense referred to and is classic Satanic practice. Let me give you some examples:

An unrestrained orgy of rape, torture, summary executions and murder all over Russia on an unheard of scale then ensued, carried out by the Cheka. Whole populations were liquidated, including independent farmers known as Kulaks, ethnic minorities, the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie, the landed gentry, senior military officers, intellectuals, artists, clergy, opposition members and anyone else who aroused the slightest suspicion. Bolshevik leaders openly proclaimed that the Red Terror was necessary for the extermination of entire social groups, especially the former “ruling classes,” in order to make way for the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The Jew, Martin Latsis, chief of the Ukrainian Cheka, explained in the newspaper, “Red Terror”: “We are engaged in exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class. Do not look in the file of incriminating evidence to see whether or not the accused rose up against the Soviets with arms or words. Ask him instead to which class he belongs, what is his background, his education, his profession. These are the questions that will determine the fate of the accused. That is the meaning and essence of the Red Terror.”

The Cheka grew rapidly and became a very large, very cruel state security organization. It’s organizational structure was changed several times over the following years, as was its name, from Cheka to GPU, to NKVD, and finally to KGB, but its mission remained essentially the same. Cheka offices were set up in every city and town. By 1921 a single branch of the Cheka called, “The troops for the internal Defense of the Republic,” numbering 200,000, was given the responsibility of policing and actually running the massive Gulag system of labor camps.

There is no way to know the precise number of deaths the Cheka was responsible for, but it surely ran into the scores of millions. This would include victims of forced collectivization, the forced famine, of which more later, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death in the Gulag…

…The same for the aristocracy. 200,000 members of the clergy — priests, monks and nuns — were systematically murdered in a horrific orgy of “bestial tortures.” They were reportedly scalped, strangled, drowned, crucified, and subjected to any other horrific death their murders could dream up. Czarist officers were forced aboard sealed barges by the hundreds, the barges were then towed out to sea and sunk with all aboard drowning. The Jews now controlled everything and were free to indulge their most cherished revenge fantasies against the hated, though now helpless, Russians. Local branches of the Cheka, comprised mainly of Jews, many of the lowest kind, and many of them violent, sadistic psychopaths, had total autonomy and were not required to report to anyone in carrying out this nightmare of torture and slaughter. Any Cheka member was completely free, without fear of censure or punishment, to kill, rape or torture anyone he chose (outside the government, that is), and he could do it in the most sadistic manner imaginable. They not only were not required to justify it, they were encouraged by the highest leaders, including Lenin himself, to show no mercy and to kill as many as possible. The Cheka was an incredibly brutal organization, with standing orders to execute at will.

What distinguished killings by the Cheka, according to one observer, was that they were “rage-fueled.” The Cheka agents didn’t just kill “class enemies,” they went at them in orgiastic frenzies, beating, stabbing, chopping and mutilated them — including men, women and children. An article in “Defender Magazine,” of October, 1933 describes their orgy of killing:

“Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their hands or by their feet and left hanging until they died of exhaustion… Others had hot lead poured in their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death… Pregnant women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies.”

During the second half of 1919, the Red Army was driven out of the Ukraine by the White Army. A number of investigations of the mass murders were then carried out by special commissions under the White Army’s occupation, one of which was the “Rohrbach Commission of Enquiry.” There were numerous places of public execution during the Red Army occupation. After the city of Kiev was taken by the White Army in August, 1919, Paul Rohrbach was sent by the British government to conduct an investigation. When the members of the Rohrbach Commission entered the execution hall of the Cheka of Kiev, they found:

“The whole cement floor was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches and had stopped flowing [coagulated]. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull with tufts of hair and other human remains. All of the walls were riddled with thousands of bullets and bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters [10 inches] wide by 25 centimeters deep [10 inches] and about 10 meters [33 ft.] long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.”

In his book, “The Secret Powers Behind Revolution,” French author Vicomte Leon de Poncins, published in the 1920s, wrote: “The Red Terror became so wide-spread that it is impossible to give here all the details of the principal means employed by the Cheka to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest, etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold-blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.”

End of quote. I could go on.

This illustrates the horrific slaughter these Jews conducted, yet we are taught to believe in the mythical slaughter of 6M Jews by Hitler’s Germany, when modern science amply demonstrates its falsity. To requote Jeff Rense, “We are all being lied to about what happened there, every single day” and we are.

I could spell out the truth of Hitler and how he was demonised, but I’ll let Bradberry tell you. His book deserves to be read by everyone.

Rather, I want to spend a moment looking at part of the reason why the Jewish elite has been shunned over history. If you believe the propaganda, it’s because the goyim are racist and we have been shamed into believing it by association with the holohoax. But there’s a bit more going on:

Jewish banks extend loans to Jewish businesses that a Gentile under similar circumstances would not be able to obtain, and then they back those Jewish businesses in difficult times to prevent failures. Jews throughout the “Diaspora” have access to international Jewish capital, which gives them a huge advantage in competing with their Gentile neighbors. Jews have a “collectivist” culture, whereas Christians are individualistic. Jews work together for the benefit of all Jews, at the exclusion of non-Jews. The Christian Gentile is the “lone” hunter, while Jews tend to “pack hunt.” They gang up to put the lone Gentile out of business by the use of cooperative commercial strategies. Jews thereby tend to achieve monopolies in their fields of endeavor, pushing the Gentiles out. Even the Jewish holy book of laws, the Talmud, does not forbid Jews from taking unfair advantage of Gentiles. The Talmud does require Jews, however, to treat other Jews fairly.

By these methods, Jews have always achieved a dominant position within the traditional societies they happen to live in, and they have shown no qualms about using their elite positions to exploit the host populations. A constant charge against them is that their loyalty to the host country they happen to live in is always secondary to their loyalty to other Jews and to the International Nation of Israel. German Jews, at the time of the Russian Revolution, were accused of being more loyal to Russian Jews than to the nation of Germany in which they lived. That pattern has always been the same. American Jews today are accused of being more loyal to Israel than to America.

End of quote.

If you look, it is not hard to find examples of this all over the world and when the pressure comes on, this complete lack of loyalty to their host country and people becomes visible and is usually what has triggered programs in the past (though these are usually widely exaggerated, as Henry Ford illustrated in 1920). Now, this is the heart of the matter, and it is considered completely anti-Semitic to mention it. But, as I’ve illustrated before, even this term is part of the Jewish elite’s weaponry, since most Jews are not Semites (from the Middle East) and most Semites are not Jews (they’re Arabs). The term anti-Semitic is pure, weaponised propaganda.

And so, as I said at the beginning, I want to point out how the elite Jews have transformed Europe in particular and the world in general during the 20th century, primarily using the events outlined in these two books. Let me make a partial list:

  • 1913 – the establishment of the US Federal Reserve
  • 1914 – 1918 WWI was used to undertake fundamental restructuring of Europe and beyond, including the following:
    • the destruction of what remained of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
    • the destruction of the Ottoman Empire, driven by the Jewish so-called “young Turks”
    • the gutting of Germany and the planting of the seeds for the emergence of Hitler or somebody like him
    • the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which committed to the creation of Israel in Palestine
    • the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement to completely destroy the structure of the Middle East in preparation for the wars and disputes that have plagued the area from then to the present day, including the current war in Syria, not to mention creating an unstable environment into which to plant Israel.
    • the genocide of 1 million Armenians
    • the mortal wounding of the British Pound as the global reserve currency in favour of the US dollar
  • 1917 – the Russian Bolshevik revolution and all that flowed from it
  • the interwar period:
    • the establishment of the Exchange Stabilisation Fund using the American public’s confiscated gold
    • the creation of the IMF and the World Bank (these, along with the ESF, were all the handiwork of Harry Dexter White (Weise), the Jewish undersecretary of Treasury, who reported to the infamous Jewish Henry Morgenthau Jr., as was the infamous post WWII plan for Germany’s return to an agrarian culture, known as the Morgenthau Plan but was actually the handiwork of Weise)
  • 1939 – 45 WWII
    • another round of restructuring of Europe
    • completion of the transfer of the global operational financial centre of the world to the United States and New York in particular
    • for all intents and purposes, the destruction of Germany and all it represented
    • the establishment of the holohoax as a propaganda tool which remains powerfully in play today
    • the context established for the creation of Israel
    • the establishment of nuclear weapons as a tool of global fear, amongst other purposes
    • the context for the Cold War (purely a propaganda tool of fear, since the elite Jews controlled both the United States and Russia)
    • the emergence of mind control techniques, both for individual and population level control
    • the sophisticated use of propaganda
    • the establishment of security organisations (CIA, Mossad, MI6, etc.), ostensibly serving their host countries but in reality serving the global elite

I could go on but I think you get the picture.

One thing that Bradberry misses is the control of all of the so-called Allies of WWII by the elite Jews. Although he sees the very clear influence upon Churchill and Roosevelt, he had not (yet) figured out that all of Russia, Britain, the United States and France were completely under the control of the elite Jews. This is, perhaps, most credibly described by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay in his extraordinary 1952 book “The Nameless War”. Indeed, even today very few understand this. When you do, the events of WWII and how the 20th century unfolded look very different.

December 26, 2016

There are two countries/continents I want to add to the picture:

Africa – although his exploitation began in the 19th century, Cecil Rhodes acted as an agent of the Rothschilds in his endeavours. Remember, Britain was controlled by the elite Jews from the time of the execution of Charles I at the hand of Oliver Cromwell, who was on the payroll of elite European Jews, so serving the so-called British Empire was actually serving the elite Jews. This was explained by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay in his extraordinary 1952 book “The Nameless War”. Nathan Rothschild outfoxed his fellow Jews to take control of the Bank of England at the time of the Battle of Waterloo.

China – It is not well understood that Mao Zedong was a henchman for these same interests. The following images make this clear.

Merry Christmas.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

 

Ancient Syrian site discovered and destroyed – part of a much bigger plan

This article by Ian Greenhalgh highlights what, in my opinion, is a much broader phenomenon: the destruction of everyone and everything that does not fit inside the model of life, humanity and the world that the global elite are imposing upon us. This process is hundreds if not thousands of years old. Ian’s article says the following:

We have been aware for some time that there has been a organised and concerted effort to locate and steal or destroy ancient artifacts throughout the areas of Syria and Iraq under IS control, this is just the latest example of that. Furthermore, this ‘seek and destroy’ operation stretches back to the looting of the Baghdad museum after the fall of Saddam in 2003. On that occasion, the locals broke in and cleared the shelves, most of what was looted was soon recovered from local market places and shops. However, the night before, a German team went to the museum with a shopping list, they broke into the basement levels and took a large number of items that had never been shown to the public.

So why is someone sponsoring this wholesale looting and destruction? Of course, there is profit to be made and artifacts looted by IS have indeed turned up in the antique markets of Europe, however, there is a far deeper and far more sinister reason.

Note that one of the items that is mentioned as being found and destroyed are cuneiform clay tablets. These are among the very oldest writings known and examples of them form a large part of the basis of knowledge about the oldest civilisations of the middle east – Sumer and their religion which was based around two gods Enki and Enlil – the Annunaki. It is said that the three Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all based on the religion of ancient Sumer and this is a secret that has to be kept.

End of quote.

Actually, I think it goes deeper than just the origins of the mainstream religions. It sits behind the centuries old and continuing slaughter of indigenous peoples across the globe. It sits behind the imposition of the slavish teaching of Darwin’s model of evolution to explain life, a claim Darwin himself would never have made. It sits behind the scientific worldview doctrine, again slavishly taught and embodying the Darwin model, that implicitly carries the notion that the only thing that exists is what is in the temporal domain that we by default experience, with the sleight of hand that everything inside that scientific worldview got there through the application of the scientific method and that, by extrapolation, anything proven by the application of the scientific method is inside the scientific worldview – a complete fiction on both counts.

And there is a parallel thread in this post that I will return to for other reasons, which is quoting from A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties (aka the Yinon Plan):

“The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible.”

End of quote.

The global elite’s strategy for Israel is implicitly entangled in all of this.

Until and unless we begin to more broadly grasp the depth and breadth of this strategy, a large part of which is detailed in Captain Archibald H. Maule Ramsay’s The Nameless War, we have little chance against them and their horrific plans.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

The hidden hand behind the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement

May 16th marks the centenary of the Sykes-Picot Agreement which officially saw Britain and France divide the Middle East between them, and there have been a number of articles discussing it. This one from Time and this one from the New Statesman trot out the usual historical perspective of this seemingly ham fisted approach by Britain, France and, somehow, Ireland.

But all of this is discussed in the false reality that these countries were independent powers at that time when they were not.

I recently read “The Nameless War” (1952) by Captain Archibald H. Maule Ramsay. I take the following from the beginning of the book:

Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 – thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.

From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard.

In 1931 he was elected a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.

Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there until the end of that Parliament in 1945.

End of quote.

Quite an interesting profile and it was this profile above all else that had me read his book. Why on Earth would a British MP be imprisoned for the bulk of the Second World War without charge or trial?

It turns out that Ramsay had recognised for some years that there was some hidden international interference in the affairs of Britain and he had worked long and hard to expose it. A close colleague of former Prime Minister Chamberlain, he had finally understood that this hidden hand was Jewish, and his book makes clear that he was imprisoned to prevent him from revealing this hand and the true forces behind the Second World War. In a way, his imprisonment gives credibility to what Ramsay writes that his words would otherwise not have.

And so, let me share with you some of the understandings that Ramsay came to and shared in his book.

Oliver Cromwell was funded and rewarded by international Jewish interests:

How well the Jews succeeded in this campaign in Britain may be judged from the fact that one of the earliest acts of ‘their creature and hireling’ Oliver Cromwell, after executing the King according to plan, was to allow the Jews free access to England once more [11].

I’m going to share with you a long quote because, without its completeness, you are unlikely to believe this piece of British and hence word history (much of it documented by the Jew Isaac Disraeli, father of British PM Benjamin Disraeli), and in it you see the first application of a template that was subsequently used in France and Russia, amongst others, along with the unfolding of global Reserve banking, as this now well-hidden global takeover proceeded:

THE BRITISH REVOLUTION

“It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet finished.”

With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I published in 1851. A work of astonishing detail and insight, much information for which, he states, was obtained from the records of one Melchior de Salom, French envoy in England during that period.

The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous rumblings of Calvinism.

Calvin, who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt Cauin, (At a B’nai B’rith meeting in Paris reported in Catholic Gazette in Feb. 1936 he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.) possibly a French effort to spell Cohen, organized great numbers of revolutionary orators, not a few of whom were inflicted upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork for revolution under a cloak of religious fervour.

On both sides of the Tweed these demagogues contracted all religion into rigid observance of the “Sabbath.” To use the words of Isaac Disraeli, “the nation was artfully divided into Sabbatarians and Sabbath breakers.” “Calvin,” states Disraeli, “deemed the Sabbath to have been a Jewish ordinance, limited to the sacred people.” He goes on to say that when these Calvinists held the country in their power, “it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of Sabbatarian rigours; and that a British senate had been transformed [12] into a company of Hebrew Rabbins”: and later “In 1650, after the execution of the King, an Act was passed inflicting penalties for a breach of the Sabbath.”

Buckingham, Strafford and Laud are the three chief figures round the King in these early stages: Men on whose loyalty to himself, the nation, and the ancient tradition Charles can rely.

Buckingham, the trusted friend of King James I, and of those who had saved his life at the time of the Gowrie Conspiracy (of ominous cabalistic associations) was assassinated in the early years of King Charles’ reign under mysterious circumstances.

Strafford, who had been in his early days inclined to follow the opposite faction, later left them; and became a staunch and devoted adherent of the King.

This opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles and by the time that they were led by Pym and decided to impeach Strafford. “The King,” writes Disraeli, “regarded this faction as his enemies”; and he states that the head of this faction was the Earl of Bedford. Walsh, the eminent Catholic historian, states that a Jew wine merchant named Roussel was the founder of this family in Tudor times.

With the impeachment and execution of Strafford, the powers behind the rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy began to reveal themselves, and their focus, the City of London.

At this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed mobs of “Operatives” (the medieval equivalent for “workers” no doubt). Let me quote Disraeli: “They were said to amount to ten thousand … with war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all seasons, and might be depended upon for any work of destruction at the cheapest rate … as these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city) the inference is obvious that this [13] train of explosion must have been long laid.”

It must indeed ; and we must recollect here, that at this time Strafford was still unexecuted, and civil war in the minds of none but of those behind the scenes, who evidently had long since resolved upon and planned it.

These armed mobs of “workers” intimidated all and sundry, including both Houses of Parliament and the Palace at critical moments, exactly on the model employed later by the “Sacred Bands” and the “Marseillais” in the French Revolution.

Isaac Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between this and the French Revolution: Notably in his passages on the Press, “no longer under restraint,” and the deluge of revolutionary pamphlets and leaflets. “From 1640 to 1660,” he writes, “about 30,000 appear to have started up.” And later, “the collection of French revolutionary pamphlets now stands by the side of the French tracts of the age of Charles I, as abundant in number and as fierce in passion.”

He goes on, “Whose hand behind the curtain played the strings … could post up a correct list of 59 commoners, branding them with the odious title of ‘Straffordians or betrayers of their country’.”

Whose hand indeed? But Disraeli who knew so much, now discreetly draws a veil over that iron curtain; and it is left to us to complete the revelation.

To do so we must turn to such other works as the Jewish Encyclopedia, Sombart’s work, The Jews and Modern Capitalism, and others. From these we learn that Cromwell, the chief figure of the revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew financiers in Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben Israel; whilst Fernandez Carvajal, “The Great Jew” as he was called, was the chief contractor of the New Model Army.

In The Jews in England we read:

“1643 brought a large [14] contingent of Jews to England, their rallying point was the house of the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew). Prominent among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a great financier and army contractor.”

In January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five members had set in violent motion the armed gangs of “Operatives” already mentioned, from the city. Revolutionary pamphlets were broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli tells us: “Bearing the ominous insurrectionary cry of ‘To your tents, O Israel’.” Shortly after this the King and the Royal Family left the Palace of Whitehall. The five members with armed mobs and banners accompanying them, were given a triumphal return to Westminster. The stage was now set for the advent of Carvajal and his Jews and the rise of their creature Cromwell.

The scene now changes. The Civil War has taken its course. The year is 1647: Naseby has been won and lost. The King is virtually a prisoner, while treated as an honoured guest at Holmby House.

According to a letter published in Plain English (A weekly review published by the North British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd September, 1921: “The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they have perhaps suspected. My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter containing two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which they are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has recently come into Mr. van Valckert’s possession. It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter received:

16th June, 1647.

From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.

In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living. [15]

Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.

In reply was dispatched the following:

12th July, 1647.

To O.C. by E. Pratt.

Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted.

Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.”

With this information now at our disposal, the subsequent moves on the part of the regicides stand out with a new clearness. On 4th June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on secret orders from Cromwell himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to General-in-Chief Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked revolutionary troopers, and seized the King. According to Disraeli,

“The plan was arranged on May 30th at a secret meeting held at Cromwell’s house, though later Cromwell pretending that it was without his concurrence.”

This move coincided with a sudden development in the army; the rise of the “Levelers” and “Rationalists”. Their doctrines were those of the French revolutionaries; in fact, what we know today as Communism. These were the regicides, who four times “purged” Parliament, till there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like themselves, known later as the Rump.

To return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June, 1647, and its cunning suggestion that attempted escape should be used as a pretext for execution. Just such an event took place, on 12th November of that year. Hollis and Ludlow consider the flight as a stratagem of Cromwell’s. Isaac Disraeli states:

“Contemporary historians have decided that the King from the day of his deportation from [16] Holmby to his escape to the Isle of Wight was throughout the dupe of Cromwell.”

Little more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the orders from the Synagogue, and now it only remained to stage the mock trial.

Maneuvering for position continued for some time. And it became apparent that the House of Commons, even in their partially “purged” condition, were in favour of coming to an agreement with the King. On 5th December, 1648, the House sat all night; and finally carried the question, “That the King’s concessions were satisfactory to a settlement.”

Should such agreement have been reached, of course, Cromwell would not have received the large sums of money which he was hoping to get from the Jews. He struck again. On the night of December 6th, Colonel Pryde, on his instructions, carried out the last and most famous “purge” of the House of Commons, known as “Pryde’s Purge.” On 4th January, the Communist remnant of 50 members, the Rump, invested themselves with “the supreme authority.”

On 9th January “a High Court of Justice” to try the King was proclaimed.

Two-thirds of its members were Levelers from the Army.

Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell: “First, the King can be tried by no court. Second, no man can be tried by this court.” So writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his Charles and Cromwell; and he adds a finishing touch to the effect that “no English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge, which was eventually entrusted to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus.”

Needless to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of alien as Carvajal and Manasseh Ben Israel and the other financiers who paid the “Protector” his blood money.

The Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in spite of strong protests by the sub-committee of the Council of State, which declared that they would be a [17] grave menace to the State and the Christian religion.

Perhaps it is due to their protests that the actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed.

“The English Revolution under Charles I,” writes Isaac Disraeli, “was unlike any preceding one … From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution.” There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read this remarkable sentence: “Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands.”[Protocol No.3, 14.]

The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,

“Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands.”

The difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was still however unsolved. Scotland was Royalist before everything else; and she had proclaimed Charles II King. Cromwell’s armies marched round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers, dispensing Judaic barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and slowly but steadily the feeling in England began to come round to the Scottish point of view. Finally upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the King’s restoration to the throne of England.

In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ’s Church, [18] the next attack would develop. The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within.

Charles evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or plans, or the menace they held for his peoples. The wisdom and experience of Edward I had become lost in the centuries of segregation from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of the danger to the Crown in placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a “Popish Plot” cry he did retain.

With James II’s accession, the crisis could not be long delayed. The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. This country was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and considerable comings and goings took place during these years.

Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against himself was actually under way.

The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew Solomon Medina.

The real objective of the “Glorious Revolution” was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the “Bank of England” and the institution of the National Debt. This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans [19] on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously obtain.

From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.

The political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for the “National Debt.” The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was that the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this state of affairs.

To provide against this, therefore, the party system was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule ; using their newly-established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.

Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.

The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become millionaires; those who own [20] and work the land, the Englishman and the Scotsman, must be ruined.

The process has continued inexorably till now, when it is nearly completed.

It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.

End of quote.

Remember, this man was imprisoned without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. Ramsay knew too much.

He goes on to document the French and Russian takeovers in a similar manner, along with others that followed.

And so, what has this to do with the Sykes-Picot agreement?

Simply, everything. Britain and France were both controlled by the Jewish elite at the time of this agreement.

Unless we understand this, and it is well and truly hidden and never written about or discussed in the mainstream media, we do not understand that the hidden hand behind the Sykes-Picot agreement is that of the elite international Jewish fraternity that run our world. Further, if you understand the history of the creation of Israel, which in truth got underway in earnest with the Balfour Declaration of 1917, then you realise that the Sykes-Picot agreement was really a mechanism for breaking up the traditional boundaries of the Middle East prior to the creation of Israel after World War II.

Remember, the so-called Young Turks that drove the breakup of the Ottoman Empire were Jewish.

And so, as we mark the centenary of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, it is useful to strip away the bullshit and recognise the true intent of that agreement.

This article gets a little closer to the reality of things as it reflects upon the consequences of this agreement on the ground today, and this cartoon gets it very well.

Again, it is important to recognise that Israel is simply a tool of the Jewish elite, and most of the Jews that have moved there as a result of the horrific deception known as the Holocaust are simply pawns in the global game of this elite, as were their forebears who were jockeyed in a not dissimilar manner to emigrate to the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century. This manipulation is very old and goes largely unrecognised today, as these Jewish pawns are told that it’s really the goyim who are the threat – remember the Holocaust…

May a few more take this centenary to wake up.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com