Archive for January 2016

Hillary emails confirm US and NATO destroyed Libya over gold-backed currency

Newly disclosed emails show that Libya’s plan to create a gold-backed currency to compete with the euro and dollar was a motive for NATO’s intervention.

The New Year’s Eve release of over 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the “who gets to ride with Hillary” selection process set up by her staff, and how a “cute” Hillary photo fared on Facebook.

But historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in the new emails: admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, Al Qaeda embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil, the nefarious origins of the absurd Viagra mass rape claim, and concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves threatening European currency.

Hillary’s Death Squads

A March 27, 2011, intelligence brief on Libya, sent by long time close adviser to the Clintons and Hillary’s unofficial intelligence gatherer, Sidney Blumenthal, contains clear evidence of war crimes on the  part of NATO-backed rebels. Citing a rebel commander source “speaking in strict confidence” Blumenthal reports to Hillary [emphasis mine]:

Under attack from allied Air and Naval forces, the Libyan Army troops have begun to desert to the rebel side in increasing numbers. The rebels are making an effort to greet these troops as fellow Libyans, in an effort to encourage additional defections.

(Source Comment: Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting…).

While the illegality of extra-judicial killings is easy to recognize (groups engaged in such are conventionally termed “death squads”), the sinister reality behind the “foreign mercenaries” reference might not be as immediately evident to most…

The Threat of Libya’s Oil and Gold to French Interests

Though the French-proposed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 claimed the no-fly zone implemented over Libya was to protect civilians, an April 2011 email sent to Hillary with the subject line “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold” tells of less noble ambitions.

The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind: to obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozy’s reputation domestically, assert French military power, and to prevent Gaddafi’s influence in what is considered “Francophone Africa.”

Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency. In place of the noble sounding “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) doctrine fed to the public, there is this “confidential” explanation of what was really driving the war [emphasis mine]:

This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).

(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.)

Though this internal email aims to summarize the motivating factors driving France’s (and by implication NATO’s) intervention in Libya, it is interesting to note that saving civilian lives is conspicuously absent from the briefing.

Instead, the great fear reported is that Libya might lead North Africa into a high degree of economic independence with a new pan-African currency.

French intelligence “discovered” a Libyan initiative to freely compete with European currency through a local alternative, and this had to be subverted through military aggression.

End of quote.

I also find it interesting that the intelligence source for Clinton was Sidney Blumenthal. A pointer to the background control system?

Probably just coincidence… They have been renowned for their Intel networks for time immemorial. Probably why the material I can find says there was only one Israeli killed in the WTC collapse and he was there on business. That is, he was not on the list to forewarned. Two others were reportedly killed on the planes, but more than likely, they were actually perpetrators. I quote from David Duke’s “Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question”, because he’s a very thorough researcher:

It is, of course, extremely difficult to prove the precise role of a secretive, foreign intelligence organization, such as the Mossad, in a terrorist act; they are in fact a super-secret spy organization. But, powerful evidence shows that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the September 11th attack on America. And, if indeed they had foreknowledge of these murderous acts of terrorism – and then had the cold-blooded mentality not to warn the United States and avert the disaster — because they saw a horrendous massacre of thousands of Americans as good for Israel – it follows that they would have felt no moral restraint from actually instigating and covertly aiding this terrorist plan through their own agent provocateurs. Let’s look at the hard evidence indicating the Mossad had foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks.

The day after the attack on the World Trade Center, The Jerusalem Post, the most respected and famous Israeli newspaper in the world, reported that 4,000 Israelis were missing after the attack on the WTC. The Foreign Ministry compiled the number from Israeli relatives, who, in the first few hours after the attack, contacted the Israeli Foreign Ministry and gave the names of Israeli friends and relatives who worked in the WTC or who had business scheduled in it or its adjacent structures.

Even without seeing the article in The Jerusalem Post, logic alone would tell one that there would be many hundreds, if not thousands of Israelis in the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks. The international Jewish domination of banking, finance and Trade is legendary. Executives in many firms in the Trade Towers regularly commute back and forth to Israel. As an example of the Israeli presence at the World Trade Center, even the co-owner of the WTC, Frank Lowry, is an Israeli citizen. New York is the center of worldwide Jewish financial power, and the World Trade Center is at its epicenter. One would naturally expect the Israeli death toll to be catastrophic. The Jerusalem Post certainly thought so on September 12, 2001. Here is the beginning of its article:

 Thousands of Israelis Missing Near WTC

The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack. (The headline and first sentence of the Jerusalem Post article)[525]

When George Bush made his speech before Congress, it turns out that he made a significant numerical error in addition to making the absurd allegation that the WTC attackers did it because they “hated freedom.” Bush made it a point to say that in addition to thousands of Americans, 130 Israelis died in the WTC. The implication was to say that Israel shared in our suffering, and that we and Israel are in this thing together. Upon hearing the number of 130 Israeli dead, it seemed suspiciously low to me. If 4,000 Israelis were at the WTC, and the WTC death toll was about 2,800 (about 10 percent of the 28,000 people normally in the buildings at that time), the Israeli toll should have statistically been around 400 and not 130.

Searching through hundreds of articles, trying to track down the true Israeli death toll, I finally found a New York Times piece that clarified the precise number of Israelis who died in the World Trade Center attack. It turned out that of the 130 Israelis President Bush claimed had died in the World Trade Center, all but one of them were still alive! (Later, most memorials reduced it to 0.) When I learned this, I was incredulous. “Good God,” I said to myself, “only one Israeli!” Here is the amazing excerpt I found in the NY Times:

But interviews with many consulate officials Friday suggested that the lists of people they were collecting varied widely in their usefulness. For example, the city had somehow received reports of many Israelis feared missing at the site, and President Bush in his address to the country on Thursday night mentioned that about 130 Israelis had died in the attacks.

But Friday, Alon Pinkas, Israel’s consul general here, said that lists of the missing included reports from people who had called in because, for instance, relatives in New York had not returned their phone calls from Israel. There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried. (New York Times, Sept. 22) [526]

End of quote.

Does anyone still want to argue that Israel was not involved in 9/11 up to its armpits?

Just good legendary Jewish intelligence? I think not.

At the point of writing, Duke was still accepting that 9/11 was done by Arabs flying planes into the buildings. Perhaps he looks at this more deeply later in his book.


France uses Charlie Hebdo false flag to suppress free speech

This article by Glenn Greenwald discusses how France has used the clearly demonstrated Charlie Hebdo false flag to suppress free speech:

It’s been almost one year since millions of people — led by the world’s most repressive tyrants — marched in Paris ostensibly in favor of free speech. Since then, the French government — which led the way trumpeting the vital importance of free speech in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo killings — has repeatedly prosecuted people for the political views they expressed, and otherwise exploited terrorism fears to crush civil liberties generally. It has done so with barely a peep of protest from most of those throughout the West who waved free speech flags in support of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists.

That’s because, as I argued at the time, many of these newfound free speech crusaders exploiting the Hebdo killings were not authentic, consistent believers in free speech. Instead, they invoke that principle only in the easiest and most self-serving instances: namely, defense of the ideas they support. But when people are punished for expressing ideas they hate, they are silent or supportive of that suppression: the very opposite of genuine free speech advocacy.

French comic Dieudonné M’bala M’bala speaks to the media during a press conference in a theater in Paris, Jan. 11, 2014.  Photo: Michel Euler/AP

Days after the Paris march, the French government arrested the comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala “for being an ‘apologist for terrorism’ after suggesting on Facebook that he sympathized with one of the Paris gunmen.” Two months later, he was convicted, receiving a suspended two-month jail sentence. In November, on separate charges, he was convicted by a Belgian court “for racist and anti-Semitic comments he made during a show in Belgium” and was given a two month prison term. There were no #JeSuisDieudonné hashtags trending, and it’s almost impossible to find the loudest post-Hebdo Free Speech crusaders denouncing the French and Belgian governments for this attack on free expression.

In the weeks after the Free Speech march, dozens of people in France “were arrested for hate speech or other acts insulting religious faiths, or for cheering the men who carried out the attacks.” The government “ordered prosecutors around the country to crack down on hate speech, anti-Semitism and glorifying terrorism.” There were no marches in defense of their free speech rights.

In October, France’s highest court upheld the criminal conviction of activists who advocate boycotts and sanctions against Israel as a means of ending the occupation. What did these criminals do? They “arrived at the supermarket wearing shirts emblazoned with the words: ‘Long live Palestine, boycott Israel’” and “also handed out fliers that said that ‘buying Israeli products means legitimizing crimes in Gaza.’” Because boycotts against Israel were deemed “anti-semitic” by the French court, it was a crime to advocate it. Where were all the post-Hebdo crusaders when these 12 individuals were criminally convicted for expressing their political views critical of Israel? Nowhere to be found.

More generally, the French government seized “emergency powers” in the wake of the Paris attack that they originally said would last twelve days. It was then extended to three months, and there is now talk, as the deadline approaches, of extending those powers indefinitely or permanently. Those powers have been used exactly as one would suspect: to barge into places without warrants where French Muslims gather, shut mosques and coffee shops, detain people with no charges, and otherwise abolish basic liberties. They’ve also now been used beyond the Muslim community, against climate activists. If that sort of classic, creeping repression does not anger and upset you, then you may be many things, but a genuine advocate of free expression in France is not one of them.

End of quote.

Entirely to be expected, as I documented at the time. It’s wonderful to see Greenwald spelling it out.

In case you have not recognised it, the above cartoon could apply to a thousand examples in our world. As Voltaire said:Voltaire - who rules over you2

Putin: Human Evolution Under Threat By Big Pharma, GMO, Vaccines

A report prepared by the Security Council (SCRF) circulating in the Kremlin today states that President Putin has issued orders that his people must be protected from GMO “food” and Western pharmaceuticals “at all costs.”

The report says that President Putin believes the next stage of human evolution is currently in “grave risk” and that Western and global powers are “intentionally decelerating the process for their personal gain.”

“We as a species have the choice to continue to develop our bodies and brains in a healthy upward trajectory, or we can follow the Western example of recent decades and intentionally poison our population with genetically altered food, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, and fast food that should be classified as a dangerous, addictive drug.”

“We must fight this.  A physically and intellectually disabled population is not in our interests,” the report states.

Describing the average government-controlled Westerner as an “intensively vaccinated borderline autistic fat man slumped in front of a screen battling a high-fructose corn syrup comedown,” the report states that such tactics used by governments to subjugate their citizens are not only “dark/evil” but “counter-productive in the medium to long term.”

Russia under President Putin has been giving away land for free in the past few years to people willing to farm organically and sustainably.  The goal is to become the world’s “leading exporter” of non-GMO foods that are based on “ecologically clean” production.

The Security Council report comes just months after the Kremlin announced a stop to the production of all GMO-containing foods, which was seen by the international community as a major step in the fight against multinationals like Monsanto.  Russia continues to lead the way in the realm of natural, organic farming.

End of quote.

May this report be accurate, and the description of the average Westerner be a wake-up call.

When Israel Is Mighty

Israeli citizen Yossi Gurvitz, a former Talmud (yeshiva) student reveals the racism, homicide and child molestation-advocacy in the Babylonian Talmud and subsequent authoritative rabbinic legal texts authored by Rabbi Moses Maimonides and Rabbi Joseph Karo (“Shulchan Aruch”). He reveals Judaism’s sympathy for Islam and its undying hatred for Christianity.

As one comment says: It’s not often a Jew will admit what some of us in the West already know, but which the majority of the West is in denial about.

If you understand this, you can begin to make much more sense of our world.

David Noakes: “Governments & Big Pharma Are Colluding To Keep Gc-MAF A Secret!”

I have previously written extensively about GcMAF, its role in the body’s immune system in activating macrophages or white blood cells of our immune system, and how cancer cells and some viruses generate an enzyme called nagalase, which acts to completely block the production of GcMAF in the body, thus shutting down the body’s immune system.

For me, the most powerful and informative discussion on this was the interview of David Noakes, the British advocate and former manufacturer of GcMAF by Dr. Rima Laibow, which I would still recommend as one of the best introductions to this subject.

The events that brought this to my attention was the very clear evidence at the time that perhaps 10 or so alternative medicine doctors in the US who were connected with the use of GcMAF had mysteriously “suicided”, the most notable being Dr. Jeff Bradstreet.

Here is a brief quote from a previous post:

David has been behind the manufacture of GcMAF, the naturally occurring human (and other) protein, which is blocked by Nagalase. GcMAF is a fundamental trigger in the activation of the human immune system, and the reinstating of GcMAF within the human body has profound consequences for recovery from a wide range of illnesses and diseases. For example, David claims that with their improved version of GcMAF and refined treatment protocols, the recovery rates from autism have climbed to over 80%, and the chances of recovering from a Stage IV cancer tumour is close to 100%. It also allows the body to recover from a very broad range of other diseases, including Parkinson’s Disease and other seemingly incurable conditions.

But guess what? Authorities acted to shut down the companies that David Noakes was associated with that undertook the manufacture of and treatment using GcMAF, and confiscated all of their funds. As David says, he did not even have the money to buy a cup of coffee.

End of quote.

Since I wrote those articles, there has been a deathly silence on this subject, so I was excited to see Richie Allen post an interview with David Noakes late last week.

I was encouraged to find that, despite the actions of the authorities in the UK and Guernsey, David is still finding ways to move our understanding of the best clinical practice for administering GcMAF forward and to improve the packaging of GcMAF for easier administration. As David says, “GcMAF was discovered in 1990 and the medical industry has been concealing it from us for 25 years”. He goes on to say, “We have supplied GcMAF to 10,000 people over 5 years”. David referred to the documented fraud of the MHRA in shutting his British operation down at this site, which at the time of writing was unavailable.

Sadly, David said that the number of doctors “now murdered by the FDA” has increased to 21.

For me, one of the key questions is whether the pharmaceutical industry has intentionally placed nagalase in vaccines to shut down our immune systems, so they can sell us drugs to compensate. Richie asks David this question here. David says, “nagalase will kill you in 5 years, because if you don’t have GcMAF for 5 years, you’re dead.” He goes on to say, “the very fact that they put viruses into vaccines means that those viruses will create nagalase. So, the end result is you’re going to get nagalase, one way or the other, anyway.”

David also says that, besides cancers, there are some 50 known diseases that use nagalase creation to suppress the immune system. He also says, “the documented failure rate of chemotherapy is over 97%”. But a wonderfully profitable business.

In her interview with David Noakes, Dr. Rima Laibow announced that she had vaccine samples in the hands of several laboratories to analyse them for the presence of nagalase. Dr. Laibow has been deathly silent on this subject since, but perhaps, given that it was this trail that is considered by some to have led to many of the holistic doctors’ deaths, it may simply be a matter of self-preservation. My questions to her on this have gone unanswered.

David Noakes is a most articulate man and I commend this interview to you. It is perhaps the clearest example of the corruption and the true intention of our western medical establishment. It is populated, largely, with well-meaning people who have never examined how and for what purpose this context in which they have placed themselves was created. One of many such examples.

The Big Short is a timely warning for 2016

The recently released movie “The Big Short” came highly recommended from several sources, so I was keen to view it – and it did not disappoint. It tells the story of a few people who recognised that the 2007 housing bubble in the US had been massively exacerbated by packaging housing mortgages together as a tradeable instrument (Mortgage Backed Securities or Mortgage Bonds) and on sold. And as the game accelerated, the worst of the mortgages, including many that didn’t actually exist, were packaged up as Collateralised Debt Obligation (CDO). Rated as AAA by the credit agencies, they were very often not, and when interest rate clauses on the loans kicked in in 2007, it was only a matter of time. But this then got amplified through the creation of Synthetic CDOs, effectively a bet on a bet, or a derivative instrument. The film claims the Synthetic CDO market was 40 times the underlying CDO market. The 2008 global GFC owes its genesis to this scam. If this subject interests you, I highly recommend the movie for its insights. Jon Schwarz says:

What sets The Big Short apart and makes it truly great is that it portrays this worldwide, straight-faced fraud accurately; that is, as not just dangerous and enraging, but also extremely funny. It calls to mind Monty Python’s famous dead parrot sketch about a pet store salesman who defrauds his customer and then offers an endless stream of preposterous, contradictory obfuscations to conceal the obvious reality. The Big Short demonstrates that we’re now all living in that pet store.

End of quote.

It’s also interesting for what it doesn’t say, which is the abundant evidence that this bubble was orchestrated, generating yet another harvesting of assets from the public into the hands of the banks and their owners. It also does not discuss how the GFC was used to sweep all remaining government level reserves into the hands of the banksters via “too big to fail” bailouts.

The movie does mention that no banks or major bank principals were prosecuted, that one of those who shorted this market (Michael Burry) who tried to tell the US government about how he knew there was an issue was treated with FBI and IRS attention (the usual treatment of whistleblowers) and that similar instruments began to be sold in 2015 called a “bespoke tranche opportunity” – a CDO by any other name.

For me, the real value is in alerting us to what we are about to witness, in my opinion. The derivatives market in general is absolutely huge and the underlying market is falling apart. I have shared many underlying indicators with you of the state of the global economy. In many ways, it’s worse than 2008 and there are no governmental reserves left to steal. Many countries now have “bail in” legislation in place, which means the banks’ depositors become a low ranked, unprotected creditor, meaning they’ll be taking your savings this time.

It seems that falls in the Chinese stockmarket are driving falls elsewhere. However, the following chart shows you this is a loaded gun.

This tells us that the Chinese market would have to fall by about 70% to approach the valuations of the major global markets, which are themselves falsely elevated. If you are looking for a loaded gun, this is it.

It’s as if the global economy has been hollowed out underneath the stockmarket, leaving it as the only indicator that things are OK…

I have said before that I consider that when this comes apart, it will make 2008 look like a Sunday school picnic. I have seen nothing to change my view.

The Big Short tells its story well, and it shares some insights we can all learn from; and you may like to read the rest of Jon Schwarz’s article.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email