iOS 8 transforms Apple’s iPhone security

I must admit that I was resigned to the notion that there was simply no way any of us could keep our personal information private. But perhaps I was a little hasty. It seems that Apple was working very hard on this and kept it under wraps until iOS 8 was actually launched.

The first sign of this was when Apple announced Apple Pay with the iPhone 6. In simple terms, they are simply not gathering any transaction details. They are simply enabling secure payment. This means they have no knowledge of what we buy.

Then there was this interview with Tim Cook outlining Apple’s approach to security and privacy.

And yesterday, we had this message from Tim Cook, this statement on privacy and this detailed pdf on iOS security. I read this to mean they see competitive advantage in this and that Google and others will not follow them, because their (e.g.  Google, Amazon, etc.) business models rely on exploiting our personal information, whereas Apple’s does not.

And I suggest the way to protect your information on an iPhone is to change from using a 4-digit PIN to a more complex password (you can do this on an iPhone since iOS 7, but not an iPad) and then use the fingerprint ID (for iPhone 5S or 6) to gain access to your iPhone. There are communications access issues this does not address, but it’s a big step forward. I tried it on an iPhone 5 and it’s just too much of a hassle typing in a long password every time you want to use  your phone. The fingerprint ID makes it workable.

And if you’re an Apple follower, you may like to hear Tim Cook talk about Steve Job’s legacy at Apple.

Polar Ice Levels Defy the Manmade Global Warming Story

I recently commented that the Antarctic ice levels are setting new records in the satellite era, and that the Arctic ice sheet has recovered some 50% or so this year compared with its 2012 low, but I did not share the graphs with you showing this.

This is the Antarctic graph:

And this is the Arctic graph:

 

You can access these from http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/, where they are updated daily.

This article says:

The speech by former US Vice-President Al Gore was apocalyptic. ‘The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff,’ he said. ‘It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.

Those comments came in 2007 as Mr Gore accepted the Nobel Peace Prize for his campaigning on climate change.

But seven years after his warning, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, far from vanishing, the Arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in succession – with a surge, depending on how you measure it, of between 43 and 63 per cent since 2012.

Now, I anticipate most of you who read this will not be able to accept this data.

Why not?

It is all about belief. Almost everyone in the world that follows the mainstream media believes the manmade global warming myth. And when beliefs kick in, the evidence to the contrary is simply ignored. It takes skill and practice to learn to suspend your beliefs and look at the evidence. Few have mastered this, in my experience. Those who run our planet rely on this and use it against us every day. Every day. And the day will soon come when they will abandon this position on global warming in the face of the overwhelming evidence. But, you see, they don’t care. They’ve already secured what they wanted, and most people don’t have a clue about it. Most people haven’t even begun to contemplate it. The reason this ruse was set up was to provide a basis for putting Agenda 21 in place. Pure and simple. And it’s as obvious as the nose on your face when you look. But most are too busy worrying about manmade global warming, and decrying those who dispute it. A fascinating pointer to this is that the SAME MAN was used to set up the IPCC Terms of Reference as was used to set the Agenda 21 criteria – Maurice Strong.

Wake up, my friends, to the world in which you live. If you don’t, your children and grandchildren will pay an unimaginable price.

 

 

Powerful evidence that the Ebola epidemic and the virus responsible are man-made

Unless you have been hiding under a rock somewhere, you will know there is a serious Ebola outbreak in West Africa, and it’s looking to be far worse than those which preceded it. The Mathematics of Ebola Trigger Stark Warnings gives an indication of how this could progress.

Firstly, let’s look at the historical behaviour of the Ebola virus via this article:

ALL the strains of Ebola, and Marburg viruses are very, very contagious through membrane transmission- i.e.: through direct contact with liquid particles (blood, mucous, semen, sweat, urine) onto mucous membranes or through open wounds.  This means that if you physically come into contact with liquid particles infected with an Ebola virus through your mouth, eyes, nose, genitalia or an open wound, then you have a very large probability of being infected with the virus.   Hence: it is highly contagious though PHYSICAL contact with the infected bodily liquids of someone who has the virus.  i.e.: though touching the body/body fluids, contact with the sheets, bandages, needles, medical instruments etc. of an infected person.

BUT….. the virus doesn’t not live very long outside of a human or animal host.   ALL Haemorrhagic fever viruses (all strains of Ebola, Marburg etc…) are actually very fragile virus particles that need a very specific environment to survive for even a short time.  THIS is why all cases of Ebola always happen in the same place, in Central/West African jungles:  HOT, HOT, HOT and WET, WET, WET.  ALL Haemorrhagic viruses require extreme heat and humidity to survive, and as I said above, they literally die very quickly when they are exposed to air conditioning.

These are two of the main reasons that “they” were not able to weaponize Ebola before: because it requires direct contact with infected bodily fluids AND it dies very quickly when it comes in contact with drier, cooler air.

One of the other reasons that they were not able to weaponize Ebola is because it kills too quickly and the gestational period is too short for it to spread very far.  Ebola Zaire has the highest mortality rate- close to 90% of those infected die from the virus, but it also has the shortest gestational period and it can be symptomatic as quickly as 2-6 days after contamination.  As the onset of symptoms is so severe immediately, infected people are not likely to be boarding airplanes, going to night clubs or partaking in unprotected sex.

So, it is clear that what is on the loose in West Africa is a very different beast from previous forms of the Ebola virus. For example, airborne transmission now seems to now be part of its profile.

Where did Ebola come from?

The official story – always to be viewed with great scepticism – is that it has jumped across from the “bush tucker” that is regularly consumed in West Africa. Or a stray bat. But if you follow the trail, it takes you back to the AIDS story, and I found this to be a very good perspective from which to look at Ebola.

So, where did AIDS come from?

As you will likely know, the official story is that AIDS jumped across to humans from the green monkey in Africa, and early on was claimed to be a disease of homosexuals, was a sexually transmitted disease and using a condom could protect you.

Well, if you follow the threads, they lead you to The Strecker Memorandum by Dr. Robert Strecker. And it is likely to shake your view of the origin and nature of AIDS. Here are some salient points from this video:

  • The morphology of the AIDS virus closely matches viruses found in sheep and cows, not any found in primates.
  • WHO put out a request that such a viral agent be created before AIDS appeared
  • Its initial infection pattern in N.Y., San Francisco (amongst homosexuals initially) and Africa mirrored EXACTLY vaccination programmes that had been deployed.
  • AIDS is NOT a sexually transmitted disease, though it can be transmitted during sex, as can the common cold.
  • THE AIDS virus will easily pass though the natural micro holes in a condom, so its use is a complete waste of time for protection from AIDS
  • The evidence that Strecker provides in this video powerfully indicates that AIDS was man-made, most likely at Fort Detrick in Maryland.

I recommend that you take the time to watch this video.

This article discusses the Fort Detrick interest in Ebola-type viruses and acknowledges the facility’s now-defunct offensive bioweapons program that was operational in the ‘50’s. Does anyone believe it’s now-defunct?

A far more candid and detailed perspective from Strecker is provided in the 1996  book by Len Horowitz entitled EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS & EBOLA: Nature, Accident or Intentional? Whilst this book primarily focuses on the AIDS story and primarily on its creation, it illustrates how the history of AIDS and Ebola are intimately intertwined. For example, this quote from the Horowitz interview of Strecker in the mid-90’s in his book:

StreckerWell they’ve got another building that’s contaminated now; that they can’t get into because of Ebola. You know they’ve got a whole bunch of problems. There’s a bunch of people in Frederick [Maryland] that believe everything we talk about.

We’ve quite a few supporters there, because they’ve had a lot of problems with strange illnesses. And so they’re not entirely unsuspicious.

So is Ebola man-made, or at least weaponised in its current incarnation?

Firstly, there are claims that the current Ebola outbreak had its origins at a US bioweapons lab in Sierra Leone, funded at least in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and George Soros. The lab has apparently since been shut down.

An American patent has been issued related to an Ebola species.

A Russian Health Official says The current epidemic of Ebola may be due to the use of biological weapons. This is further elucidated in this article.

What are US Biological Warfare Researchers Doing in the Ebola Zone? by Jon Rappoport.

Dr. Charles Arntzen, head of The Biodesign Institute for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology at Arizona State University, and reportedly responsible for at least one of the experimental Ebola treatments, did not exactly do himself any favours in this video profile, joking about creating a virus to wipe out 25% of the global population. His funding sources include the Rockefeller Foundation…

Dr Cyril Broderick, a Liberian Professor of Plant Pathology, claims that Ebola is man-made and Africans are being used as guinea pigs.

Is this proof?

I think it falls short of absolute proof that the Ebola virus was originally man-made, as AIDS clearly was, but the evidence of it having been weaponised and let loose on West Africa is very strong.

Why?

In my view, the threads of this go back to that first message from the Georgia Guidestones: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. There are those who wish to rid the planet of 6.5BN people, give or take, and those that drive this agenda have targeted the genocide of non-Europeans for centuries.

And as is so often the case, it could also be about resources. This map shows an interesting correlation between the occurrence of the Ebola outbreak and known oil and gas reserves…

It’s no surprise to me that both AIDS and Ebola have targeted Africans, though these are only two of what, to me, are several active methods currently deployed to dramatically reduce the human population.

Extent of Antarctic sea ice reaches record levels, scientists say

Wow!!! A public, mainstream press admission that the Antarctic ice is setting record levels!!! Of course, they found a way to say that it’s really caused by warming… What I find amusing is that it follows this article, also from Australia’s ABC, Warm water likely to accelerate Antarctic ice melt and sea level rises, Australian scientists find, and follows an attempt, again on the ABC and elsewhere, to discredit the surprising observation by Rupert Murdoch that the Antarctic ice was increasing.

Mind you, I’ve yet to see any mainstream acknowledgement that the Arctic ice minimum this year (2014) is 50% greater than it’s low of 2012.

This follows Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology getting caught changing data to show warming trends when the original data showed cooling trends.

Despite what you might think from watching the mainstream press, global warming peaked about 18 years ago.

Anyone who’s been involved with setting up review panels or committees knows that the key way to get the outcome you want is to set up the terms of reference at the beginning, knowing that those reading the report(s) are likely to either not understand this or be too busy or too lazy to look into those terms of reference. This is what was done with the Warren Commission into the death of JFK, the 9/11 Commission and the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). With the IPCC, the criteria was to ONLY look at the impact of human activity on climate change. Guess what they found? And guess what the truth is? It’s that funny yellow ball that rises in the east every day. What a surprise!!! But since the IPCC is mandated to not consider the sun, it will NEVER show up in their reports or conclusions.

In particular, it’s the level of sunspot activity during solar maximum, which occurs every 11 years or so. And the current VERY low level of activity at solar max has the serious global scientists worried we are entering a major period of cooling, perhaps comparable to the Maunder Minimum or greater. I am drawn to share with you once more this graph of temperature and CO2 levels, derived primarily from Antarctic ice core data.

Take a few moments to look at it. It shows the warming has already peaked, at a lower level than the three previous peaks. It also shows the correlation between temperature and CO2 has been completely destroyed in the era of human CO2 generation. And this graph ends in 2007, which means the discrepancy today is even more stark, since there has been no warming in that time, further confirming that the warming has already peaked.

What is not evident in this graph, but is evident in a more detailed analysis is that the historical CO2 level LAGS temperature by about 800 years, which is thought to reflect the time it takes for the global sea temperature to change in response to the warming, causing the sea to release CO2. So, historically temperature was driving CO2, not the other way around. Whoops… This means that the notion that CO2 levels are driving global warming is a COMPLETE LIE. It has never been true. But the people driving this have never been ones to let the facts interfere with a good story when it helps to take them where they want to go (e.g.  Agenda 21).

Meanwhile we continue to have the scientific nonsense coming forth in the mainstream press, such as this article quoting “broadcaster and physicist, Dr Brian Cox”, trotting out that old party line: Climate scientists are 95% certain that humans are the main cause of the current global warming the world is experiencing. But Cox said this level of accuracy had been manipulated by “nonsensical”, politically-motivated climate sceptics.

And what are Brian’s qualifications in the field? Cox, a physicist who works on the Large Hadron Collider where the Higgs boson was discovered

And if you are a believer in global warming, you will not look at who this man is and whether he is qualified to comment, as was the case with the journalist Amy McQuire @amymcquire whose tweet brought this to my attention (and Amy, in her defence, is a wonderful advocate for Aboriginal rights in Australia).

In my experience, when you expose the global warming lie to those who believe in it totally, you are made to feel like an Ebola carrier set loose on the public. They simply cannot hear you. Beliefs are such powerful things. People die for them every day. Truth and considered reason do not get a look-in. More on this another time.

Was David Rockefeller behind 9/11?

As we observe this year’s anniversary of 9/11, I am drawn to add a little to the conversation about what happened on that fateful day.

The Rockefellers have been the main American front men for the global power elite for three generations, and it is this global power elite which holds the true power in the world. As I’ve said before, the so-called democratically elected leaders are just the shadow puppets that Joe Public gets to argue over, and whenever they make the mistake of actually thinking they have real power as JFK and Abe Lincoln did before him, they don’t survive their mistake.

In my view, in order to understand the 9/11 event, we need to look behind the scenes. Yes, there is abundant evidence that those in the current mainstream political and financial structure had much to gain from 9/11, including the rapid implementation of the draconian Patriot Act, but was this ultimately planned at an even higher level?

Firstly, it is clear from this interview segment with Aaron Russo just before his death that Nick Rockefeller was well aware of the plans for 9/11 and the subsequent war on terror, including the plan to supposedly chase bin Laden through caves in Afghanistan well before it happened. So at the very least, the Rockefeller family was aware of the plan.

Secondly, it is also clear that the destruction of the buildings at 9/11 was a nuclear event. In this article, Gordon Duff discusses the extensively covered up trail of radiation poisoning that resulted from 9/11. This is further illustrated by the fact that, prior to 9/11, the term Ground Zero only meant the point on the ground above or below a nuclear event, and this was subsequently disguised by retrospective changes to dictionaries as documented by Dimitri Khalezov (p93 & p559). For me, the only question is: what kind of device was responsible?

Some argue that there were mini-nukes used; however, the level of ground shaking and the swaying of buildings reported (p171 of Khalezov’s book) was consistent with a much more powerful explosion. Moreover, the large craters left at Ground Zero are consistent with a massive underground explosion (this article claims it was glacial damage, rather than the result of nuclear melting…). Here is a closer view of the glazed, previously molten rock surfaces.

For me, the trump card is the knowledge shared by Khalezov from his time in the Soviet military that there were nuclear devices placed under the these buildings for its pre-approved demolition plan (skyscrapers in Manhattan and perhaps all major American cities require a plan for their demolition before they are built). I quote from p58 of his book:

“I indeed knew from the time of my former military service mentioned above about the existence of a so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in the city of New York, in the United States of America; and I knew about the existence of this so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in New York City during not less than ten years prior to the eleventh day of September, year 2001 (two thousand one) A.D.”

Bizarre though this sounds, these were not the only buildings where this demolition strategy was deployed.

So were these the devices that were used to blow up the WTC buildings? In my opinion, yes, based on the extensive evidence and technical analysis provided by Khalezov. The craters left behind, the size of the seismic shockwave, the pulverizing of the buildings and those unpulverized segments, including at WTC-7 are all consistent with the use of 150 kiloton devices, not mini-nukes.

I was aware that David and Nelson Rockefeller had combined their efforts to see these towers built and I began to wonder, given the presence of these nukes under the buildings from their original construction, whether 9/11 was planned when these buildings were built. These people plan in centuries, so such an idea is not as far-fetched as we might think. But I had no evidence.

Then I tripped over this extraordinary video. Firstly, it shows how the story of 9/11 is foretold in the 1996 modified American banknotes. Secondly, it provides some fascinating evidence to support the notion that, indeed, this event was planned from the get go. I will let Betsy McGee tell her own story.

You may also like to watch her video which shows how 9/11 showed up in many movies and TV shows in the years leading up to 9/11. It is EXACTLY what these people do…

For me, some dots have just been joined.

Breaking the last taboo – Gaza and the threat of world war

Another excellent article by John Pilger. John brings forth some truths of the situation in Gaza and how the mainstream press is complicit in the genocide by Israel.

However, in my view, John has not broken the last taboo. The last taboo is how the Rothschilds and their cohorts created Israel and so much more in the world we live in, but no-one in the mainstream media will dare mention it. As John says, journalists get dismissed for speaking the truth about Gaza and other matters. Death is a more likely result from mentioning the unmentionable real last taboo. To begin with, the Rothschilds have owned Reuters since the late 19th century and AP for not much less time. Owning the press helps to keep your name out of it, and helps you steer the stories you want told, establish the memes you want to set up, like terrorism, the Cold War, man-made global warming as a stalking horse for the ne’er mentioned Agenda 21, the UN as a joint force for the common good of mankind, etc. Murdoch is but a mouthpiece for these people, as is the US Government. The real power is hidden. Will John go after the REAL power one day? I truly hope so. He is one of the few independent journalists with the possible freedom and the chutzpah to do it.

U.S. INTERNET & POWER OUTAGE 9/11 2014 – Planned Nationwide Outages & Emergency Drills

The following notes accompany this video:

“On 9/11/2014, all across our nation, ISPs and PSPs (phone service providers) are implementing ‘planned outages’. The most common excuse is ‘for maintenance’. That’s right – on the anniversary of the worst attack against the US in living memory, when we’ll all be compelled to reach out to friends and family, and on the very day that high level sources are warning that we should expect another terrorist attack, there seems to be a coordinated effort to prevent communication. As a former telecoms professional, I know that such a high number of simultaneous outages is extraordinary; but anyone can see that this anomaly occurring on 9/11 is not only bizarre but also incredibly troubling.

“Some of these outages, like the one at UC San Diego, will last all day, from 6AM – 5PM. I found that a high number of universities, including the University of Iowa as well as Michigan State, will be without internet that day, regardless of the fact that it’s a work day and a school day for our nation’s tuition-indebted students. I’ve included links and screen captures, but you really can’t even begin to grasp the scope of this thing until you search for it yourself. internet power outage nationwide isp psp planning maintenance 9/11 “united states” u.s. usa america family warning attack communication “social media” telecommunications university “broadband internet” school student search 2014 drill exercise “9/11 2014″ “september 11″ phone “cell phone” anniversary police disaster training survival police entertainment news media trending viral success war “world war 3″ nyc chicago “las vegas” “new york city” defense “u.s. army” troops airline airplane “elite nwo agenda” alex jones infowars rant gerald celente david icke we are change anonymous russia ukraine mh370 nuke manhattan endgame islam obama speech syria israel coast to coast am lindsey williams george soros rothschild bankers dollar gold silver

“Don’t forget, the Daily Mail reported last week that terrorist forces in Libya have acquired 11 commercial airliners after taking control of the airport in Tripoli. The article also relayed that US Government officials were worried that the planes could be used in a second 9/11 attack this Thursday.

“So what compelled the Obama regime and the Department of Homeland Security to schedule so many training exercises for that day?

“With ISIS forces pledging to bring their war to America, why are We the People suddenly in such a precarious state of defenselessness?

“Perhaps those answers are somehow related to why Obama chose to provide weapons, armor, and funding to ISIS in the first place.
A multi-national terror drill is scheduled to take place in the coming months that supposedly aims to assess, test and validate vital infrastructure resources should they come under an unlikely cyberattack.

“According to the New York Times, “…thousands of utility workers, business executives, National Guard officers, F.B.I. antiterrorism experts and officials from government agencies in the United States, Canada and Mexico are preparing for an emergency drill in November that will simulate physical attacks and cyberattacks that could take down large sections of the power grid.”

“The various companies and organizations across North America set to take part in the drill will be able to do so from their workplaces, with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) in Washington “announcing successive failures.” Russia’s control of valuable domestic resources puts them in a unique strategic position against the United States. Amid tensions between the United States and Russia in recent months many international analysts have warned of consequences that may include everything from thermo-nuclear detonations to asymmetric warfare such as financial cyber attacks, weapons of mass destruction, or targeting of the national utility grid.’

Eyewitness reveals ritualistic child torture and sacrifice by Dutch royalty, George Soros and others

ITCCS continues to lift the lid on the dark practice of child sacrifice by the rich and powerful in our world. This interview is a key example:

Anne Marie van Blijenburgh, a key eyewitness to ritual child killings by Dutch royalty and other elites including George Soros, describe the murders that have occurred since 2004 in Belgium and Holland. This is part one of a four part statement she made before officers of the International Common Law Court of Justice this past summer, as part of its prosecution of Pope Francis and others for child trafficking and Ninth Circle ritual killings. The other parts of this interview are forthcoming. Recorded live on June 5, 2014 from Holland.

This is not the first testimony of the involvement of George Soros in these practices.

If you believe global warming is man-made, take just 8 minutes to watch this video

I have come to accept that most people believe global warming is due to man-made pollution. I used to be one of them. I bought Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” hook, line and sinker when it first came out. If you are one who still does, invest 8 minutes in watching information you’ll NEVER see in the mainstream media. Beliefs are powerful things. Many die for them every day. Unfortunately, most of us do not consciously analyse the facts to decide what we believe. It is done for us, yet few are aware of how this has been done.

For example, most people believe airplanes flew through the walls of the WTC buildings on 9/11 and the resultant jet fuel fire caused the steel beams to melt and the buildings to fall down. But when you ask someone what would happen to an aluminium can if you smashed it against a reinforced concrete wall, they immediately tell you it would be flattened. Then when you tell them a plane is also made of aluminium and the same thing would happen to it, a moment of shock registers. Then when I tell them that the jet fuel fire (estimated to likely be 750-800C in those circumstances) could not sufficiently weaken the structural steel beams to have the building fall down and certainly not enough to melt the steel (above 1300C) as was told to us all by a “random” commentator on the street that day, they begin to get very uncomfortable and usually reject what I’m saying, even though it is true.

Most of us reject information that does not fit with our beliefs. It’s how we protect our sense of what is true; our sanity. And those who create our beliefs rely on this every day as they create and reinforce those beliefs through the media, knowing that most will never do the work to check the facts for themselves. That scenario, too, is created.

And if Ben’s little vignette above begins to make you question your beliefs on man-made global warming, I encourage you to watch this longer, more comprehensive presentation by him. And if you think those who oppose the well sold meme about man-made global warming are advocating that we should therefore ignore what humanity is doing to the planet, know that this is, for most people, a complete lie and part of how the opposition to the man-made global warming story is discredited; how discrediting of that opposition has been weaponised.

Words, phrases and ideas can be and are weaponised. A classic is the term “conspiracy theory”. It was weaponised by the CIA in the early 60’s to discredit opposition to the conclusions of the Warren Commission on the death of JFK and now has wide use for exactly this discrediting purpose. Calling something a conspiracy theory today is still enough to discredit it. Nothing else is needed but those words.

An outline of the history, wealth, power and influence of the Rothschilds

I have posted previously about the power and influence of the Rothschilds and their cohorts in our world, and there are many videos on the ’net discussing this. Few, perhaps, cover this with the essentially fact-driven and unemotional approach of this video. Its primary focus is on their financial strength and how they built it up. It does not get far into how they have used that money and power in creating and steering the world we see and experience.

Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com