Richard Presser's Blog – The Sceptical Bastard

This is not something the drug companies want you to know:

I think we know why it was made illegal. It didn’t fit the model developed by John D Rockefeller to switch all medicines to patentable pharmaceuticals.

Actually, it’s why he created the allopathic medical system in about 1920 that now dominates the Western world and which most people in the Western world think is the only solution.

But more and more people are waking up, as evidenced by the growing interest in cannabis for its healing properties, including its ability to treat cancer. Just don’t expect your allopathic practitioner to recommend it or even condone it, and most people don’t plan ahead for such situations, so they have some choices if such a condition emerges. Out of fear above all else, they simply go with the horrific regime their doctor recommends. Not that your doctor is being intentionally dishonest. They just don’t know any different, having been thoroughly schooled by the system.

But a growing number of these doctors are waking up.

On Monday, the Iraqi forces also captured senior ISIL leader Abu Omar Al-Shishani and two of his top aides in the Northern parts of Iraq.

Al-Shishani and two of his senior aides and commanders were captured in the city of Kirkuk.

Some Arabic-language media reported that Al-Shishani was arrested in a joint military operation with the US special force, but Pentagon rejected that its forces had any role in al-Shishani’s capture.

The report on al-Shishian’s capture comes as the Arab media outlets had reported his death several times before. No Iraqi official has confirmed al-Shishani’s capture yet.

Tarkhan Tayumurazovich Batirashvili known by his nom de guerre Abu Omar al-Shishani or Omar al-Shishani, is a Georgian terrorist who was an ISIL commander in Syria. He was a former sergeant in the Georgian army.

End of quote.

Yet another illustration that Daesh is an Israeli/US creation, serving the interests of Israel.

This brief video reveals a few examples of the extraordinarily racist content of the Talmud.

Take a few minutes to listen if you are unfamiliar with this. There is, perhaps, no more extreme racism than some of the content of the Talmud.

But if you mention it, you are being anti-Semitic… Indeed, it’s forbidden for non-Jews to read it.

Understandably.

More might wake up to what is going on.

It is this double standard, policed with a power and vitriol that is scarcely imaginable that sets the scene for the manipulation, control  and barbarism we see in our world, and people shy away from looking into it.

I can’t imagine the Jewish reaction if Christian, Muslims or Buddhists had even fringe religious texts with these words, but the Talmud is mainstream, and you better not dare mention it.

Actually, it’s much more than a double standard, since the Zionists made up a story about their persecution by Hitler’s National Socialists and blame all goyim by association for it, and meanwhile they have been the most barbarous people on the planet, practising genocide that is entirely consistent with the words of the Talmud. 60M or more Russians in the early 20^th century, 1M Armenians during WWI, who knows how many Germans and others during and after WWII, countless Palestinians which continues to this day, indirectly they are responsible for the American slaughter in the Middle East; I could go on. But when your religious text tells you that non-Jews are equal to or worse than animals – inhuman – and you should lie to, cheat and deceive non-Jews, then it’s all justified and easily conducted without a shred of conscience.

It’s time for the world to wake up to this and more Jews to speak up about it. Your silence condemns you, because you know it far better than non-Jews.

But there I go again, being “anti-Semitic”. I chuckle every time I hear the word, since most Jews are not Semites and most Semites are not Jews. Indeed the Khazarian Jewish slaughter of the Palestinians is the most anti-Semitic act imaginable. But the press slavishly publishes these recent words from Netanyahu: the scope of Jewish terrorism can in no way be compared to the much greater Palestinian terrorism…

And nobody screams?

I hope you are enjoying your Christmas festivities. Far more important.

“Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.” Such irony.

While the mainstream media focus on ISIS extremists, a threat that has gone virtually unreported is that your life savings could be wiped out in a massive derivatives collapse. Bank bail-ins have begun in Europe, and the infrastructure is in place in the US.  Poverty also kills.

At the end of November, an Italian pensioner hanged himself after his entire €100,000 savings were confiscated in a bank “rescue” scheme. He left a suicide note blaming the bank, where he had been a customer for 50 years and had invested in bank-issued bonds. But he might better have blamed the EU and the G20’s Financial Stability Board, which have imposed an “Orderly Resolution” regime that keeps insolvent banks afloat by confiscating the savings of investors and depositors. Some 130,000 shareholders and junior bond holders suffered losses in the “rescue.”

The pensioner’s bank was one of four small regional banks that had been put under special administration over the past two years. The €3.6 billion ($3.83 billion) rescue plan launched by the Italian government uses a newly-formed National Resolution Fund, which is fed by the country’s healthy banks. But before the fund can be tapped, losses must be imposed on investors; and in January, EU rules will require that they also be imposed on depositors. According to a December 10th article on BBC.com:

The rescue was a “bail-in” – meaning bondholders suffered losses – unlike the hugely unpopular bank bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis, which cost ordinary EU taxpayers tens of billions of euros.

Correspondents say [Italian Prime Minister] Renzi acted quickly because in January, the EU is tightening the rules on bank rescues – they will force losses on depositors holding more than €100,000, as well as bank shareholders and bondholders.

. . . [L]etting the four banks fail under those new EU rules next year would have meant “sacrificing the money of one million savers and the jobs of nearly 6,000 people”.

That is what is predicted for 2016: massive sacrifice of savings and jobs to prop up a “systemically risky” global banking scheme.

Bail-in Under Dodd-Frank

That is all happening in the EU. Is there reason for concern in the US?

According to former hedge fund manager Shah Gilani, writing for Money Morning, there is. In a November 30^th article titled “Why I’m Closing My Bank Accounts While I Still Can,” he writes:

[It is] entirely possible in the next banking crisis that depositors in giant too-big-to-fail failing banks could have their money confiscated and turned into equity shares. . . .

If your too-big-to-fail (TBTF) bank is failing because they can’t pay off derivative bets they made, and the government refuses to bail them out, under a mandate titled “Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution,” approved on Nov. 16, 2014, by the G20’s Financial Stability Board, they can take your deposited money and turn it into shares of equity capital to try and keep your TBTF bank from failing.

Once your money is deposited in the bank, it legally becomes the property of the bank. Gilani explains:

Your deposited cash is an unsecured debt obligation of your bank. It owes you that money back.

If you bank with one of the country’s biggest banks, who collectively have trillions of dollars of derivatives they hold “off balance sheet” (meaning those debts aren’t recorded on banks’ GAAP balance sheets), those debt bets have a superior legal standing to your deposits and get paid back before you get any of your cash.

. . . Big banks got that language inserted into the 2010 Dodd-Frank law meant to rein in dangerous bank behavior.

The banks inserted the language and the legislators signed it, without necessarily understanding it or even reading it. At over 2,300 pages and still growing, the Dodd Frank Act is currently the longest and most complicated bill ever passed by the US legislature.

The rest of the article is here.

This video documents David Duke’s journey from an accepter of the atrocities presented as the Holocaust to recognizing its place in the lies and deceit that are such a part of the propaganda we are subjected to.

Duke has done extensive research, which he shares in detail.

This is perhaps the most detailed dismantling of this myth that I’ve seen. I challenge anyone to walk with David through his own journey of discovery and hold onto this myth as being true.

And when you pull this thread, the entire fabric of lies that we have been blanketed in begins to fall apart.

If you still believe that the Holocaust (should I use a ™ there?) is real, do yourself the service of watching this video.

Simon Elliot (Elliot Shimon) aka Al-Baghdadi was born of two Jewish parents and is a Mossad agent.

We offer below three translations that want to assert that the Caliph Al-Baghdadi is a full Mossad agent and that he was born Jewish father and mother:

The real name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is “Simon Elliott.”

The so-called “Elliot” was recruited by the Israeli Mossad  and was trained in espionage and psychological warfare against Arab and Islamic societies.

This information was attributed to Edward Snowden and published by newspapers and other Web sites: the head of the “Islamic State” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, has cooperated with the U.S. Secret Service, British and Israel to create an organization capable of attracting terrorist extremists from around the world.

End of quote.

It would make perfect sense if this is accurate.

And what led me to the Occidental Observer was this article:

Volkmar Sigusch (1940- ) may not be a familiar name to TOO readers, but for those concerned about the modern assault on traditional attitudes to gender and sexuality it should be. You might have encountered the term ‘cisgender,’ a Sigusch creation that is rapidly gaining traction in common speech. For those unfamiliar with it, it has come to replace “normal” and even the more deviant-friendly term ‘heterosexual.’ Specifically, the term refers to those “who feel there is a match between their assigned sex and the gender they feel themselves to be. You are cisgender if your birth certificate says you’re male and you identify yourself as a man.” The goal behind inventing such a bizarre and convoluted label for that which is natural and healthy is, of course, to further dilute the identity of the present and coming generations, and convince us all that there is no “normal,” only different positions within an ever more colorful spectrum.

By undermining the meaning of what it is to be male and female, one undermines the healthy concept of the family. And when the healthy concept of the family possessed by a given group is undermined, that group is pushed ever closer to genocide via (using the United Nations lexicon) “deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,” and “imposing measures intended to prevent births.” The bumper crop of terms like ‘cisgender’, cooked up with alarming frequency by the “sexologists,” helps reduce marriage between a man and a woman and the raising of children within that union, to a mere “option” on a veritable menu of possible sexualities, gender identities, and family structures. In this brave new world there is no “normal” or “ideal” since all “models” are allegedly valid and equal.

This ideology, militant in both theory and execution, stands in opposition to the fact that healthy sexual relationships between males and females stand so far above the other “options” as to represent a gulf, rather than a spectrum, in human behavior. As F. Roger Devlin has so incisively pointed out, heterosexuality is “the natural life cycle of our species” (and all other species) while homosexuality is merely “a way for a few people with exotic tastes to achieve orgasm.” Any argument of equivalence must necessarily be preoccupied with endless abstractions, particularly abstractions surrounding the nature of romantic love, in order to push the debate away from this all-consuming biological fact.

In the same way that we witnessed the tremendous push for “marriage equality,” we have also witnessed the recent championing of those individuals who suffer from the unfortunate delusion that they have been born into the wrong body. While “transgenderism” is a severe mental illness by any definition of the term, the healthy and the normal are now lowered to the same level as these, and other, extremely dysfunctional people. Cultural relativism, once tactically deployed within the West in order to create an artificial parity between Western greatness and the meagre achievements of less advanced races and cultures, is now being deployed within our race and culture to create an artificial parity between the healthy, and the lifestyles of the degenerate and the insane. Much as in the promotion of degenerate art, the end result in both instances is the lowering of the healthy and the superior, and the raising up of the deformed, the sick, and the demented.

But who precisely is introducing these terms and ideas, and thus engineering dramatic change in Western society? In our attempt to answer this question, we might first return to Volkmar Sigusch. Sigusch, a German, is a self-described “sexologist,” physician and sociologist. As founder and co-editor of Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung (Journal for Sexual Research), and Director of the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) at the Goethe University in Frankfurt from 1973 to 2006, Sigusch has been described by Der Spiegel as “one of the main thinkers behind the sexual revolution of the 1960s.” The reasons why the young would-be physician evolved into a cultural radical are quite easy to surmise. After fleeing East Germany, Sigusch studied medicine, psychology and philosophy at Frankfurt. I posit the argument that it was the latter discipline that truly shaped Sigusch and did most to determine his future work. I argue this because he studied philosophy under none other than Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, both of whom had by that date returned from the United States and re-established the notorious Frankfurt Institute for Social Research. Sigusch, a pioneer in the ongoing sexual revolution, is a Frankfurt School protégé.

The following analysis is concerned with the ongoing role of the Jewish-dominated “Culture of Critique” in advancing theories and trends designed to atomize our society. In particular it focusses on Jewish intellectual and political support for the sexually abnormal and explains it as an extension and product of the Frankfurt School’s view that “the unique role of Judaism in world history was to vindicate the concept of difference against the homogenizing forces thought to represent the essence of Western civilization. (My emphasis) ”[1] Kevin MacDonald has noted that the Frankfurt School categorized healthy Western norms, nationalisms, and close family relationships as an indication of psychiatric disorder. By contrast, in the last few decades of the nineteenth century Jewish intellectuals began championing Western society’s outcasts and non-conformers. Using these outcasts, Jewish intellectuals could fight a proxy war against Western homogeneity, and wage a clandestine campaign for the acceptance of pluralism.

End of quote.

Most people have no idea how insidious the destruction of life as those who are non-Jews have lived it has been, especially over the last couple of hundred years, and maybe well before. And this is not just in Europe. For example, Cecil Rhodes began the rape of Africa in earnest on behalf of the Rothschilds. I love this quote from Desmond Tutu:

When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.

It says so much, including how much of this has been done under the guise of Christian missionary work. Few understand how long ago Christianity in all its forms was hijacked for “the cause”.

But today, the pace is truly breathtaking and on so many fronts, and so much of it is conducted under the blessing of some institute or other, academic or otherwise, to give it credibility.

I came across the Occidental Observer today and I found its mission statement of interest:

The Occidental Observer will present original content touching on the themes of white identity, white interests, and the culture of the West. Such a mission statement is sure to be dismissed as extremism of the worst sort in today’s intellectual climate—perhaps even as a sign of psychiatric disorder. Yet there is a compelling need for such a site. A great many other identifiable groups in the multicultural West have a strong sense of identity and interest, but overt expressions of white identity and white interests (or European-American identity and interests) are rarely found among the peoples who founded these societies and who continue to make up the majority.

This is a completely unnatural state of affairs—the result of a prolonged assault on the legitimacy of these concepts by cultural elites that have dominated public discourse on issues of race and ethnicity since before World War II. We reject labels such as “white supremacist” or “racist” that are routinely bestowed on assertions of white identity and interests as a means of muzzling their expression. All peoples have ethnic interests and all peoples have a legitimate right to assert their interests, to construct societies that reflect their culture, and to define the borders of their kinship group.

We are highly cognizant of the fact that many of the most strident critics of the legitimacy of white identity and interests have a strong sense of their own ethnic identity and interests. And they have a deep sense of the importance of preserving their people and culture. Non-Western peoples throughout the world continue to seek political power, and they attempt to control their borders, establish their own cultures, and defend their perceived interests.

Societies in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand that have been controlled by whites for hundreds of years are the only ones to accept their own demise as a moral imperative. We view this outcome as the result of competition over the construction of culture in which the legitimate interests of whites have been compromised.

The Occidental Observer will attempt to rectify that. Major themes will be the bankruptcy of the current culture of the West, the powerful forces of political orthodoxy, and the debasement of the political process in the areas of both foreign and domestic policy.

The situation is particularly worrisome because present demographic trends, especially massive non-white immigration into Western countries, threaten to make whites a minority in these societies within the foreseeable future. Most whites have a gut feeling that the present trends do not bode well for their future and for the prospects of their descendants. We predict that whites will develop a stronger sense of their own identity and interests as a natural outcome of becoming a minority. We are simply ahead of the curve—an unsettling harbinger of things to come.

Whereas The Occidental Quarterly specializes in longer articles and reviews, The Occidental Observer will be more like a newspaper. We will feature op-ed-length articles and reviews, as well as shorter comments on news stories and current events. Every effort will be made to be topical, readable, and intellectually stimulating.

Our content will reflect a deep concern with intellectual honesty and with making claims that are consistent with scientific evidence. Our opponents have erected an intellectual milieu that is scientifically indefensible and that can only be supported by increasingly heavy-handed methods, such as ostracism, removal from employment, and vilification by the cultural and media establishment.

Such “speaking truth to power” is obviously fraught with danger—so much so, that the editorial collective and some of our writers must remain anonymous. We look forward to a future where such tactics will not be necessary. In the meantime, we will do all we can to provide a worldview that is simultaneously intellectually stimulating, scientifically defensible, and pregnant with implications for the future.

Kevin MacDonald (Email him) is Editor of The Occidental Observer and is Professor of Psychology at California State University–Long Beach.

Israeli planes have reportedly sprayed chemical substances on farmlands across the besieged Gaza Strip, killing off the crops in the already impoverished Palestinian territory.

End of quote.

If they won’t leave by us killing lots of them and stealing their land, let’s starve them out… Any tactic against the evil goyim is permitted under the Talmud. After all, it’s really our land that God gave us, His chosen people…

Actually, the world is ours and the goyim are just like cattle, here to serve us and for us to disenfranchise, deprive, enslave and destroy according to our will, our agenda…

After all, we’re only following the guidance of our precious Talmud…

Once more I say, this is not all Jews. But it’s more than enough and it applies to all of those who hold power in our world.

Time for the rest of us to wake up to this fact – non-Jews and those Jews who have been trained from birth to identify with these evil ones but are not truly aligned with them.

Few of us look beyond the version of things given to us by governments, the media or our schooling, most of which has almost nothing to do with the truth, outside of spelling, word use (though even that’s been fiddled with) and working with numbers. Almost everything is up for grabs, in my opinion.

And so, the re-emergence of the use of cannabis oil, after 100 years of suppression is gaining, perhaps, unstoppable momentum. I find this article of interest, since it not only documents this re-emergence but explains how and why it was suppressed – Rockefeller and his allopathic medicine, built to sell pharmaceuticals and to, in parallel, discredit and seek to destroy the well-established alternatives that nature and man’s earlier insights had provided.