Archive for January 2017

Autism is today’s thalidomide – except it’s far worse

Those of you, like me, that have more years behind you than in front of you, will likely remember the thalidomide scandal of the 60s, where many deformed children were born due to the lack of thorough testing of the drug. Today’s equivalent is autism. Of course, if you ask the Western medical fraternity, it couldn’t possibly be vaccination, and the press and politicians are lined up behind this position.

As you should expect.

Allopathic medicine, after all, was created by John D Rockefeller to flog pharmaceuticals about 100 years ago, and it’s done pretty well.

And we are trained to treat our Western medical doctors as gods. All good for business. And many things have been done to strengthen that opportunity – banning cannabis because its powerful role in healing was unmistakeable and it was in widespread use. Not good for business.

And then we have the pasteurisation of milk and the demonization of breastfeeding by mothers worldwide, both of which act to weaken our immune systems, making us better targets for Big Pharma’s products.

But all of this pales in comparison to the impact of vaccination.

I’m not going to get into the arguments in support of vaccination, but if you want to read a little about the myth of herd immunity, you can read this; and there are many similar articles if you look.

Rather, my focus is autism. I have shared this meme with you before:

Compare that picture with this one.

Last year, a documentary called VAXXED was released. Its sole focus is autism.

Unsurprisingly, it has been demonised by the mainstream medical profession, the media and politicians alike. After all, none of these parties are terribly interested in letting the facts interfere with a good story. Jon Rappoport, who sees what’s going on in our world, discusses some of this and also here.

In Australia, that bastion of free speech and the open consideration of alternative views – vaccination is compulsory if you want to get your kids into school and receive child support – the showing of VAXXED triggered this typically enlightened response Chiropractors furious at Melbourne clinic screening of anti-vaccination film Vaxxed. As I said, don’t let the facts interfere with a good story, or more accurately, a good psyop.

Now, anyone who has spoken to mothers of children who have watched their child regress into autism after vaccination – as I have – knows it was triggered by the vaccination. The correlation is unmistakeable. And 10 minutes with Google will give you ample examples. But no, no. Officially they’re making it all up.

Now, VAXXED was never going to see mainstream theatre release, because of what it discusses. Not ever. And so, the makers have been stepping it around the US, with occasional radicals conducting private viewings as the one in Melbourne mentioned above, and recently they released it on DVD. This release doesn’t cover Australia, so I had it delivered to a friend (thanks, Kathy) to send on to me.

And a couple of days ago, I felt strong enough to watch it. I knew the story. I knew it was going to be difficult for me to watch.

The core story is the whistleblowing by CDC  scientist, Dr. William Thompson, who revealed that the CDC had falsified the results of a study (of which he was a co-author) that showed that the timing of the MMR vaccination dramatically impacted the likelihood of African American boys in Georgia suffering from autism.

But it does much more than that. It interviews many parents of autistic children who witnessed the decline of their child into autism after vaccination, especially after the MMR vaccine. Many of these are professional, eloquent advocates who want this travesty exposed.

And it tells a little of the story of the demonization of Dr Andrew Wakefield, who had the temerity to conclude from his studies that their might be a correlation between the timing of the MMR vaccination and the risk of autism. He didn’t say there was. He said the evidence suggested there may be and it deserved further study. How dare he!!!

Of course, if you accept the mainstream, the man’s been discredited. And if you still hold that view, I suggest you do some homework.

And it goes into the depths of the endemic CDC corruption. Mind you, it’s no different from any other US body ostensibly charged with protecting the public’s interest, and similar bodies elsewhere in the world.

A scientist quoted on VAXXED is Dr Stephanie Seneff. Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at MIT in the Computer Science and AI Laboratory. She has a BSc in Biology from MIT and an MSc and PhD, also from MIT in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. So, Seneff is not someone with a vested interest in the autism debate and why I have chosen to quote her here. Seneff got interested in autism when the son of a friend was diagnosed with autism following a DPT shot (NB it’s not just the MMR vaccine that’s causing autism). She observes the following:

Autism did not exist prior to 1930.

The data from 1975 fits a perfect exponential curve.

“By 2032, 80% of boys born will end up on the autism spectrum. Half the children and 80% of the boys.”

Are you listening?

So, if not your own children, then your grandchildren or your great grandchildren will likely suffer from autism. And it didn’t exist prior to 1930. So, don’t think you can ignore this because your children got through unscathed. Will it take an autistic grandchild to have you act?

There are many, many supporting stories in VAXXED and a great number of qualified people sharing their knowledge and insights.

In my opinion, the tragedy of vaccination will dwarf the thalidomide story of the 60s. And autism is just the more extreme end of things. In my opinion, the explosion in ADD and ADHD amongst the young has the same source. It’s just not so extreme.

One more thing. The CDC has NEVER done any trials comparing the risk profiles of vaccinated and unvaccinated children… For anything. What a surprise!!!

So, if you can get to see VAXXED, please do so. Or buy the DVD and watch it, if it’s available in your area of the world. The people who made this need and deserve your and my financial support.

However, there are large parts of the world where it’s not available and, in my opinion, everyone needs to see it and ASAP. So, for those of you unable to access it, given where you live, here is a low quality version.

Please join me in doing everything you can to stop this abuse in its tracks.

And if you agree with me, share this far and wide.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Satanic Illuminati Fashion Show Exposed

This video speaks for itself https://youtu.be/HdwWhgMsRy0 .

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

How I came to Realize I was Wrong About Peak Oil – F. William Engdahl

In my opinion, William Engdahl is one of the great thinkers and researchers of our time. What follows is his most recent newsletter.

In it, Engdahl traces his journey from a believer in Peak Oil to one who understood our planet was continuously creating oil and gas and we could NEVER use it up. The recent understandings of Mehran Keshe suggest the mechanisms of its creation may differ from those outlined below, but both agree it does not arise from the decay of organic, previously surface material, demonstrating the lie behind this example of the false scarcity paradigm we are subjected to on many, many levels every day by those who control our world. Indeed, in my opinion, we live in the time when this scarcity paradigm will be destroyed forever in human consciousness and the knowledge being shared with us by Mehran Keshe is key in that transition.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Dear Reader,

For this edition of my free newsletter I have decided to share with you some personal intellectual history. Namely, how I realized that I was completely wrong about accepting the idea that hydrocarbons–oil, gas and even coal–were a depleting, finite resource that was at or near its “peak” in production worldwide.

I want to give here a personal account of the change in my own belief about the genesis of hydrocarbons as I feel it will become increasingly important in the near future to grasp precisely what the Oil Game of the Big Four Anglo-American oil giants–ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and BP–is truly about. It’s about creating myths, lies and ultimately oil wars based on those myths and lies.

It was during the period in late 2002 as it became clear that the Bush-Cheney US Administration was determined to destroy Iraq and depose Saddam Hussein. How a US government could risk a potential break with its European and other major allies for any real or imagined threat from Iraq at that point puzzled me greatly. There must be a deeper ground, I told myself.

Then a friend sent me an article from a now-defunct website, From The Wilderness, founded by the late Mike Ruppert. The article laid out a major argument as to how the volume of oil in the ground was finite and disappearing rapidly. It argued that the single largest oil field in history, Ghawar in Saudi Arabia, was so depleted that it needed water injection of millions of barrels daily to get an ever declining output of crude oil. They argued that Russia was past the “peak” in its oil. They illustrated their notion with the famous Gaussian bell curve graph. The world, after more than a Century in the hydrocarbon era, had consumed so much oil that we were near to “absolute peak.” Or so they claimed.

Absolute Peak?

I dug deeper, found other articles on the peak oil theme. It seemed to offer an explanation for the mad Iraq War. After all, Iraq according to estimates had the world’s second largest undeveloped reserves of oil after Saudi Arabia. If oil was in such short supply, it would offer an explanation.

I decided I should go deeper on such a pivotal question as the future of world oil and its potential impact on the very questions of war and peace, world prosperity or famine.

I went to the annual conference of something calling itself the Association for Study of Peak Oil (ASPO), held in May 2004 in Berlin. There I met the gurus of Peak Oil–Colin Campbell, a retired Texaco geologist whose research on well production had given the peak oil movement a seeming scientific foundation; Matt Simmons, a Texas oil banker who had writen a book titled Twilight in the Desert claiming Ghawar was well past peak. Mike Ruppert was also there as was peak oil author Richard Heinberg.

Far from being treated to a high level scientific demonstration of the geophysics behind peak oil, however, I was gravely disappointed to be witness to bitter, acrimonious verbal battles between peak oil critics such as an energy expert from the Paris International Energy Agency and various peak oil advocates  who managed to lob mere ad hominem attacks on the Paris speaker rather than lay out serious science.

I decided to make a meeting with the then-President of ASPO International, Swedish atomic physicist, Kjell Aleklett, a few weeks later, at his University in Uppsala, Sweden, in an attempt to get a deeper scientific argument for Peak Oil. There Aleklett treated me to his latest slide show. He argued that, as oil was a fossil fuel, we knew, through study of plate tectonics, where all major oil deposits were to be found. Then, citing depletion of production in the North Sea, in Ghawar, Texas and a few other spots, Aleklett claimed, “voila! The case is proven.” For me it was anything but proven.

An alternative view

At that point, presented by Aleklett with what could only be described as a slide show loaded with unproven assertions, I began to question my earlier conviction about peak oil. Months before, a German researcher friend had sent me a paper by a group of Russian geophysicists on something they called “abiotic origins” of hydrocarbons. I had filed it for future reading. Now I opened it and read. I was impressed, to put it mildly.

As I searched more translations of the Russian scientific abiotic papers, I dug deeper. I learned of the highly-classified Soviet era research begun in the 1950s at onset of the Cold War. Stalin had given a mandate to the leading Soviet geo-scientists to, simply put, insure that the USSR was entirely self-sufficient in oil and gas. They should not repeat the fatal error that had contributed to Germany’s losing two world wars–lack of oil self-sufficiency.

Being serious scientists, they took nothing for granted. They began their work with an exhaustive search of  world scientific literature for rigorous proof of the genesis of hydrocarbons, beginning with the accepted fossil fuel theory. To their shock, the found not one serious scientific proof in the entire literature.

I then read of the cross-disciplinary researches by academics such as Professor V.A. Krayushkin, head of the Department of Petroleum Exploration in the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences in Kiev, one of the leading abiotic scientists.

Krayushkin presented a paper following the end of the Cold War to a 1994 Santa Fe, New Mexico conference of DOSECC (Drilling, Observation and Sampling of the Earth’s Continental Crust). There Krayushkin presented his researches of the Dnieper-Donets region of Ukraine. Traditional mainstream geology would have argued that that region would be barren of oil or gas. Traditionally-trained geologists had argued it senseless to drill for oil or gas there because of the complete absence of any “source rock” — the special geological formations which, according to Western geological theory, were the unique rocks from which hydrocarbons were generated or were capable of being generated – presumably, the only places where oil could be found, hence the term “source.”

What Krayushkin presented to the disbelieving audience of American geologists and geo-scientists went against their entire oil genesis training. Krayushkin argued that the oil and gas discoveries in the Ukraine basin came from what geologists called ‘crystalline basement,’ deep rocks where Western geological theory claimed oil and gas (which they termed ‘fossil fuels,’) could not be found. No dinosaur fossils nor tree remains could have been buried so deep, the Western theory went.

Yet the Russians had found oil and gas there, something tantamount to Galileo Galilei telling the Holy Inquisition that the Sun — and not the Earth — was the center of our system. According to one participant, the audience was not at all amused by the implications of Russian geophysics.

The speaker from Kiev went on to tell the scientists at Santa Fe, New Mexico that the Ukrainian team’s efforts to look for oil where conventional theory insisted no oil could be found had, in fact, yielded a bonanza in commercial oil and gas fields.

He described in detail the scientific tests they had conducted on the discovered petroleum to evaluate their theory that oil and gas originated not near the surface – as conventional fossil fuel theory assumes – but rather at great depth in the Earth, some two hundred kilometers deep. The tests confirmed that the oil and gas had indeed originated from great depth.

The speaker clearly explained that the Russian and Ukrainian scientists’ understanding of the origin of oil and gas was as different from what the Western geologists had been taught as was day from night.

More shocking to the audience was Krayushkin’s report that during the first five years of exploration of the northern part of the Dneiper-Donets Basin in the early 1990’s, a total of 61 wells had been drilled, of which 37 were commercially productive, a success rate of more than 60%. For an oil industry where a 30% success rate was typical, 60% was an impressive result. He described, well-by-well, the depths, oil flows and other details. [1]

Several of the wells were at a depth of more than four kilometers, a depth of roughly 13,000 feet into the Earth and some produced as much as 2600 barrels of crude oil a day, worth almost $3 million per day at 2011 oil prices.

Following such reading, I came into personal contact with one of the leading Russian abiotic scientists, Vladimir Kutcherov, then a professor at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden’s ETH or MIT. We met several times and he tutored me in the confirmed deep earth origins of all hydrocarbons. Not from dead dinosauer detritis and biological remains. Rather oil is being constantly generated from deep in the core of the Earth in the giant nuclear oven we call the core. Under enormous temperature and pressure, the primal methane gas is forced to the surface through what they term migration channels in the Earth’s mantle. [2] Indeed, Kutcherov demonstrated that existing “depleted” oil wells, left capped for several years, had been proven to “refill” with new oil from deep under. Depending on the elements the methane migrates through on its upwards journey, it remains gas, becomes crude oil, tar or coal.

The implications of the deep Earth genesis of hydrocarbons were profound and forced me to change my previously-accepted belief. I read further the fascinating geophysical theories of the brilliant German scientist, Alfred Wegener, the true discoverer of what in the 1960s was dubbed Plate Tectonics. I came to realize that our world is, as the Dutch oil economist, Peter O’dell famously put it, “not running out of oil, but running into oil.” Everywhere, from offshore Brazil to Russia, to China, to the Middle East. I wrote what became one of my most read online articles, “Confessions of an Ex-Peak Oil Believer,” in 2007. [3]

Indeed I realized that the entire foundations of Western petroleum geology  was a kind of religion. Rather than accept the Divine Birth, Peak Oil “church-goers” accepted the Divine Fossil Origins. No proof needed, only belief. To this day there exists not a single serious scientific paper proving the fossil genesis of hydrocarbons. It was posited in the 1760’s as an untested hypothesis, by Russian scientist Mikhail Lomonosov. It has served the American oil industry, especially of the family Rockefeller, to build an immense fortune based on a myth of oil scarcity.

Today, clearly the new US Administration under a President Trump, with his ExxonMobil Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, is returning to the era of Big Oil after eight years of Obama and alternative strategies. If our world is to avoid yet more carnage and unnecessary wars over bountiful oil, it would be important to study the true history of our Age of Oil. In 2012 I published a book based on this work titled Myths, Lies and Oil Wars. For those interested, I’m convinced you will find it a useful alternative.

 

endnotes:

 

[1] F. William Engdahl, Myths, Lies & Oil Wars, edition.engdahl, Wiesbaden, 2012, pp. 150-151.

 

[2] Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas Swedish Researchers Find, http://www.viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html

http://www.viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html.

 

[3] F. William Engdahl, Confessions of an “Ex-Peak Oil” Believer, September 14, 2007, http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Peak_Oil___Russia/peak_oil___russia.html.

I only believe in one conspiracy

Trevor LaBonte lays it out very simply:

I have been called “Captain Conspiracy.” But for the record, I only believe in one conspiracy.

You know, those guys to whom the nations owe trillions upon trillions of dollars? The ones that have accumulated almost all the world’s money through the amoral practice of usury? Yes, them. They own your government, they are the deep state, the plutocrats, the oligarchs, whatever you want to call them.

Call me a conspiracy nut all you want, and I in turn might call you an oblivious gentile…but these banksters are ALL jews, that is a fact. They have names like Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Goldsmith, Goldman, Sachs, Lazar, Warburg, Schiff, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Khan, Sieff, or Solomon…they are all jews, no gentiles in that club. And they OWN your government. From there, it is a big, top-down international crime organization. You have heard the term “cabal?” The word means specifically a group of jewish criminals…that is what we have.

(((Governments))) control nations’ militaries and foreign policies, and also regulate things like education, food, drugs, and medicine. and have you noticed the food, water, and “medicines” are dangerous poisons?

The jewish shadow government also controls academia as well as the news and entertainment media (Frankfurt/Tavistock). This is why there is no 9/11 truth in the mainstream, practically no one has heard of the USS Liberty attack, people do not know that Israel runs ISIS, people do not know who killed JFK and RFK, people do not know about the “Greater Israel” project, they don’t know/care about Israel’s illegal nukes, they have never heard of the Samson option.

 There is not one single show on TV, not one famous artist or comedian, ore one single professor in any Western university that has the balls or the freedom to say that the holocaust story is the world’s biggest rubbish heap. All the evidence needed to definitively disprove the holocaust fairytale has existed for at least 40 years, but it is being suppressed, and there is no “denying” that.

 In the entertainment media, Arabs, Muslims, “Nazis,” and nationalists are always portrayed as deranged devils and terrorists.

 Every manner of perverse, decadent behavior is glamorized, while everything that is normal and healthy is made to look hateful, bigoted, ignorant, and outdated.

 People that believe in God and have strong morals rooted in divine concepts like love, truth, justice, peace, compassion, etc…are made to look like wackos suffering collectively from what charlatan Richard Dawkins has termed a “God delusion.” There is no universal morality in the NWO. Morality and Judaism don’t go together.

We live in an artificial society that is the creation of jewish marxist social engineers, who have given us, among other atrocities, a system of self-censorship, called “political correctness,” that is actually designed mainly to keep people from talking about jews and observing the patterns in their highly organized behavior.

Finally, the most powerful, monied lobbies are the jewish lobbies, and they are the ones that bribe the already jewish-controlled governments to make illegal wars that are in no one’s interest but the jews. The (((government))) also controls western intelligence agencies, which function as wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Rothschilds and Israeli Mossad, which is where terrorism comes from.

All one needs in order to understand the conspiracy is to understand judaism. Jewish people do not believe in other nations or religions. They, as a collective, are out to destroy all of it and in its place they plan to consolidate power into a one world jewish-only government seated in Jerusalem. It is up to awakened gentiles to pull the other ones out of the matrix so we can all spread the truth, taboo as it is, until it goes completely viral and the NWO is eviscerated like the flesh of a vampire when it comes in contact with the dawning of a new day.

End of quote.

Again, all Jews do not willingly subscribe to this model, but this fact does not make the essential claims above untrue.

May the rest of us wake up from the stupor they have placed us in and set ourselves free.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Most Zionists don’t believe in God…

Sometimes these memes are too priceless to ignore…

How To Predict The Behavior Of Globalists

Great article by Brandon Smith:

In my last article, ‘How Globalists Predict Your Behavior’, I outlined the primary method globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent. The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real time.

For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe. In fact, the dangers of growing “populism” were all that elitists and their publications talked about for the first six months of the year. At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me. Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an “extremist fringe”. They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready to topple the globalist structure.

In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul’s existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity.

I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse. In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self. Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.

I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in Montana. An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing rather well in the polls. He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted, but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction. They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches and debates, because they felt this was the best way to “sell” his candidacy. But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take orders from the party leadership.

The point is, the elites dominate the political system. Nothing happens within it without their say. So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that “populist movements” were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious, to say the least.

In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political events, it is important to understand certain dynamics. As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system. Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm. However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.

The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications. They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly. In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read these publications and grasp what is being said.

The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want; to know their ultimate goals. If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.

I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.

For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.

Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even from people in the liberty movement. Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they “saw it coming all along”. I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.

My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven events. So, here is a good place to start:

Learn To Play Chess

The elites are obsessed with chess and chess symbolism. Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops. If you don’t know how to play chess, I suggest you learn. You don’t have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of winning the game.

For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable. If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to take your queen. This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from their true target. They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you focused elsewhere. They will use feints often.

Another core strategy of chess is the “forced sacrifice”. That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces so that it threatens two or more of your pieces. This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others. If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat. The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target. There is always more than one move developing at any given time.

Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.

Get In Touch With Your Darker Side

Going by their behavior and their rhetoric when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well as sociopathy and psychopathy. It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think. This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts. You must be willing to ask yourself – “If I were them, how would I go about getting what I want?”

Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists predictable. Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive. They don’t have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt they have learned how to fake it. They are chameleons.

ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable of great good. You don’t have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places in your own mind. An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked it there.

Read Globalist Publications

As noted above, the globalists have their own media outlets in which they publish their “views”, such as Foreign Policy Magazine, The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda. Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.

I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:

1) The globalists need a large scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions on society and governance. That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.

2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.

3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of globalism. As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism can never truly prevail. Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough. The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations to come.

4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one stone. I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications on the “rise of populism” was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit and the success of Trump. What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink? In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps forever.

Have No Sacred Cows

This is a hard one for many people. We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality. The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership. We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson – grand statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny. The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for freedom on their own.

The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American Revolution was over. At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders. They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain at best.

Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership themselves in their own way. If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.

The globalists take full advantage of the movement’s weakness in seeking out and artificially elevating heroes. Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes with any skepticism. Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.

Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse to consider them as a potential negative factor.

Moving Beyond Predictions

It is one thing to be able to predict the outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them. In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own and in groups to counter globalist activity. Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be the ultimate goal.

The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them. They see themselves as the “history makers”, as the men who act. They see us as the “history watchers”, or the meaningless masses wafting about with geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies. I believe we will become history makers in due course. One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris. They see people as pawns – but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely and acts in an unpredictable way? It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.

People In Dallas Are REFUSING to Vaccinate Their Kids

Are people beginning to wake up and fight back?

Denton County vaccine exemption rates have increased by 78%, according to The Immunization Partnership. That is nearly triple the state’s average. In neighboring Tarrant County, they’ve had more than 4,000 exemptions filed in the past year and a half. According to Dallas / Fort Worth affiliate Fox4, an emergency meeting was called by The Immunization Partnership in hopes of preventing the vaccination rates from going sub-90%.

“By empowering immunization stakeholders in Fort Worth and across the state to speak up, we can better understand what is contributing to these low vaccination rates and high exemption rates,” said Anna Dragsbaek, President of The Immunization Partnership. “And in turn, we can effectively advocate on behalf of positive policy change and education efforts here in Texas.”

The “contribution,” as they so eloquently term it, is likely intelligent people realizing they have an option. This is a heavy hit for the vaccine industry. The counties are both prominent regions of the greater Dallas / Fort Worth area and represent a combined 2.5 million in population, as well as 27 school districts. They vote reliably for Republican candidates and are considered to hold family values high.

As this situation continues to develop, the media will likely paint these citizens who refuse to fall in line as impoverished and uneducated. This is, however, far from what reality is. These people are intelligent people who aren’t afraid of media and government intimidation acts. This also offers proof that more and more communities around the nation are rising up against forced medical procedures of every sort.

Texas has a history of not being pushed around when it comes to vaccination legislation. Here is Texas (R) Senator Donna Campbell, MD., speaking at a Senate Committee meeting fighting against forced vaccination. Don’t mess with Texas, folks.

https://youtu.be/p8Z2_JyFbCw

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Rick Archer conducts an extraordinary interview with Sri M

Last year, an extraordinary biography was recommended to me by an Indian friend who practices Kriya Yoga. Some years ago, he gave me my copy of Paramhansa Yogananda’s “Autobiography of a Yogi”, to which I’ve referred in the past. Whilst a very different book, “Apprenticed to a Himalayan Master: A Yogi’s Autobiography” by Sri M (Sri Madhukarnath) is also the autobiography of a Master of Kriya Yoga, a practice “reintroduced” to the world by Sri Guru Babaji (also known as Sri Mahavatar Babaji), known by some as simply the “deathless one”. Evidence suggests he is over 2,500 years old and looks about 30.

Recently I came across a wonderful interview with Sri M as part of the series “Buddha at the Gas Pump” by Rick Archer. Archer is an American in his 60s who has a firm grasp of the Indian spiritual literature and practice and, as such, makes the perfect interviewer of Sri M for the Western ear. The core of the interview is a series of stories from Sri M’s book; stories of extraordinary experiences that most would struggle to accept, including his meetings with Sri Guru Babaji, being given natural medicine by a yeti, and many, many more.

For me, the most striking aspect of this interview is the unwavering humility of Sri M. As he openly recounts, he had a past life where arrogance caused him to fail early on that life’s journey, and he has so completely mastered that temptation in this life, despite the knowledge and skills that he so clearly possesses.

A beautiful interview of a beautiful man.

I commend this interview to you.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

Edward Snowden talks about FBI’s COINTELPRO, CIA’s MK-ULTRA and Black Lives Matters

Thank you, Ann.

Much has been done to discredit Edward Snowden.

In this interview, you see the intellect of the man, the grasp he has of the issues and the passion he has to see the protections of the public embodied in the US Constitution upheld. He is his own best defence.

He has never said, to my knowledge, that 9/11 was an inside job; however, it’s but a small step from what he says about the Patriot Act.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

John Kerry confirms the US still has its grubby fingers all over the war against Assad in Syria

A recording of John Kerry in a meeting with the members of the National Coalition (22 September 2016, at the Dutch delegation to the United Nations) reveals very clearly the US covert role in the events unfolding in Syria and the overall plan.

This article discusses what was revealed and shares the recording.

But we know whose bitch the US is. They do not and I suggest never have acted in their own interest. If you peel back the Civil War, for example, you find the Rothschild fingerprints all over it. Not in any stories told to the public, of course. That’s not how they work.

Richard

Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com

 

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Follow Me
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join lots of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com