Search results for climate change

Exxon knew of climate change in 1981 funded deniers for 27 more years

I quote from this article:

ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.

The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time.

“Exxon first got interested in climate change in 1981 because it was seeking to develop the Natuna gas field off Indonesia,” Lenny Bernstein, a 30-year industry veteran and Exxon’s former in-house climate expert, wrote in the email. “This is an immense reserve of natural gas, but it is 70% CO2,” or carbon dioxide, the main driver of climate change.

However, Exxon’s public position was marked by continued refusal to acknowledge the dangers of climate change, even in response to appeals from the Rockefellers, its founding family, and its continued financial support for climate denial. Over the years, Exxon spent more than $30m on think tanks and researchers that promoted climate denial, according to Greenpeace.

End of quote.

It is this kind of so-called evidence that the believers in anthropogenic global warming froth at the mouth about with a great sense of victory. Game over.

“See, we’ve been saying for years that it’s these big global sources of pollution that have been promoting the global warming denial. Therefore it has to be true.”

Or so the logic goes.

There are 3 issues here that I see:

  1. Of course the big sources of pollution want to deny it. Their business is driven by being polluters.
  2. Those who run our world have long funded both sides of every significant argument. It lets them control the debate and fashion the nature of the opposition.
  3. There is simply NO correlation between CO2 levels and global warming since man began to contribute to CO2 levels. See the following graph.

CO2 vs. Temp feb2009_fig1

The historical data in this graph is Vladivostok ice core data from Antarctica, with more recent data added.

This shows you that there was a historical correlation between temperature and CO2, but this has clearly broken badly since humanity began to generate CO2.

We are also told that the historical data says CO2 is causal. Actually, closer examination shows us that the CO2 rise LAGS temperature by about 800 years, thought to be because there is CO2 release form the oceans as they warm, which takes a lot longer than warming the atmosphere.

You can also see that Antarctica has been a lot warmer in the past than it is now. This is not the only data to show the our planet has been much warmer in the past.

For me, the important thing about the above article is that it is perfect reinforcement for those who believe in anthropogenic global warming; yet another reason to not look below the surface and see how we are being manipulated on this critical subject, for the specific objective of justifying Agenda 21, a subject NEVER mentioned in the mainstream press, yet it is a major, global, UN-driven programme, justified by this lie.

And just to remind you, I am NOT advocating that we should not behave more responsibly regarding our planet. We should. And this is how global warming deniers are discredited by warming supporters as a simple knee-jerk reaction, when the two issues are not connected. But they have been connected in the public’s mind. It’s like saying because you don’t accept the Holocaust myth based upon the undeniable scientific evidence, you are anti-Semitic. Excuse me?

Indeed, had the work of Nikola Tesla not been foreshortened by JP Morgan, we would have no need for the carbon economy or the planet covered with electricity grids we’ve suffered for the last 100 years or so.

Until enough people recognise that most of what we are told is true on almost every subject is in fact a lie and they need to do some real work to find the truth, then things will not change in this current consciousness. I know there are some wonderful, dedicated people who disagree with me, and I support their efforts to prove me wrong.

Psychologist-led study claims climate change deniers are conspiracy theorists and are damaging the public debate on global warming

I quote this article:

Professor Stephan Lewandowsky, an experimental psychologist at the University of Bristol who led the work, said: ‘These results add to a growing body of research on the nature of internet discourse and the role of the blogosphere in climate denial.


Prince Charles, who campaigns on environmental issues, recently insisted there was no such conspiracy.

He said the international bodies that now accept the threat of climate change could ‘scarcely be accused of being part of some half-baked conspiracy dreamt up by extreme environmentalists intent on undermining capitalism’.

End of quotes.

When they are using psychological research and Prince Charles to shore up the walls, things must be getting grim – the man whose mother is reportedly the world’s largest landowner.

I especially love the “undermining capitalism” bit. If you understand who is behind this scam and why, you will also recognise that the only capitalism they care about is their own. The “state” – meaning them – will own everything and we will be but serfs. If we’re still alive.

Look at what has been done to the world in the name of free trade and promoting democracy. Anyone want the democracy that has been brought to Iraq and Libya, for example? Bombed back to the stone age and the education system and literacy standards destroyed. Similarly Afghanistan.

And the notion of free trade has destroyed the United States and most other established industrial economies. Few are aware that the entire source of US government funding in the plans of its founders came from tariffs on imported goods. There was no personal income tax prior to the first term of Woodrow Wilson, which also saw the introduction of the private Fed, owned and directed by the global Zionist bankers. And who benefited from GATT and NAFTA and will benefit from TPP, etc.? The global companies, of course. GATT and NAFTA were the vehicle to destroy US manufacturing, and they were completely successful.

And I’ve already made my position clear on the global warming scam, created to justify the secretive Agenda 21 by the same forces that gave us the Holocaust hoax to justify the creation of Israel and embarrass the demonising goyim.

But these people hide their tracks carefully. Perhaps I’ll get some time in the coming days to expose more of their activities to you.

Australian PM’s adviser says climate change is UN-led hoax to create ‘new world order’

The Australian prime minister’s chief business adviser says that climate change is a ruse led by the United Nations to create a new world order under the agency’s control. The statement coincided with a visit from the UN’s top climate negotiator.

Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.

“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he wrote in an opinion piece published in The Australian newspaper on Friday, without providing evidence. (though there is plenty… Richard)

“The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, adding that the UN is against capitalism and freedom and wants to create a “new world order.”

End of quote.

Well, what he says is true (see Agenda 21), but why is he saying it?

Is it one of those cases of putting the truth out there in some way, as those running the game behind the game do?

I find it intriguing.

An informed perspective on climate change – and more

Ben Davidson is, in my view, one of the brightest young minds that have come to the subject of our weather and its influences. The ground he covers is truly extraordinary, and he shares all of his sources. I watch his 4-5 minute solar and terrestrial weather update most mornings. Ben has just released a video which discusses climate change and brings the facts to the global warming “debate”. I qualify the word debate because, for the most part, what we are told is a human blame and shame exercise to justify the secretive rollout of Agenda 21, a UN-driven (read global elite) program to transform life on Earth – for the worse for most of us. Ben confirms the 17-18 year global warming pause we have experienced, the latest views on modelling our climate, which have been horrendously bad until very, very recently, he refreshes the data on solar system-wide change, which in some cases completely overwhelms the changes on Earth and much, much more.

I commend Ben’s 20 minute video to you, regardless of your views on the subject of climate change. As always, he brings information to the conversation that you will simply not find anywhere else, expressed with a clarity and directness few can muster, and he gives you the links to check it all out for yourself. Thanks, Ben.

Evidence that the sun is important in climate change

Whilst the IPCC labours away with a budget of an obscene $4BN per annum to find evidence of anthropogenic global warming – their terms of reference EXCLUDE considering the sun – (this spending originally kicked off by George HW Bush, when he was President, with an allocation of $2BN), evidence is emerging – surprise, surprise – that THE SUN is important in climate change!!! (Hold the fanfare and the dancing girls…)

I quote:

In a new study published in the scientific journal Geology, researchers from institutions including Aarhus University in Denmark show that, during the last 4,000 years, there appears to have been a close correlation between solar activity and the sea surface temperature in summer in the North Atlantic. This correlation is not seen in the preceding period.

Since the end of the Last Ice Age about 12,000 years ago, the Earth has generally experienced a warm climate. However, the climate has not been stable during this period, when temperatures have varied for long periods. We have generally had a slightly cooler climate during the last 4,000 years, and the ocean currents in the North Atlantic have been weaker.

“We know that the Sun is very important for our climate, but the impact is not clear. Climate change appears to be either strengthened or weakened by solar activity. The extent of the Sun’s influence over time is thus not constant, but we can now conclude that the climate system is more receptive to the impact of the Sun during cold periods – at least in the North Atlantic region,” says Professor Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz, Aarhus University, who is one of the Danish researchers in the international team behind the study…

…The detailed study makes it possible to draw comparisons with records of fluctuations of solar energy bursts in the same period, and the results show a clear correlation between climate change in the North Atlantic and variations in solar activity during the last 4,000 years, both on a large time scale over periods of hundreds of years and right down to fluctuations over periods of 10-20 years. (My emphasis)

End of quote.

You can find the study here.

There is abundant evidence elsewhere of the impact of sunspot activity on global temperature, the best known being the Maunder Minimum, so-called because a husband and wife team conducted very detailed tracking of the sunspot activity during this time and showed it correlated with that cool period, displaying an apparent “shyness” to release solar flares when the sunspots were Earth-facing, just as we’ve seen in the current period.

And it is so bleeding obvious that the sun should be a major factor in our climate. Yet good ol’ propaganda can convince us that black is white. And it does.

I’m drawn to share with you, once more, this graph of temperature vs. CO2 levels, the basis for the “Inconvenient Truth” video.

CO2 vs. Temp feb2009_fig1


This Antarctic ice core data (updated with more recent direct measurements) shows a very close correlation between temperature and CO2 up until about the time when humanity began to add to the CO2 levels. Then it breaks completely. CO2 levels are not driving global temperature. Al Gore’s pitch conveniently stopped short of the recent data.

But what’s interesting to me is that, if the data is examined more closely, it turns out the CO2 level is actually LAGGING temperature by about 800 years. That is, the rising temperature has caused the CO2 increase, not the other way around, as Al Gore would have us believe. Well, he made a damned good paid shill for a while.

Note, also, that the current high, which appears to have peaked according to this graph, is lower than the previous 3, which occurred roughly every 100-120,000 years.

And as I’ve said before, just as the Holocaust lies were set up over the prior 50 years about 6 million Jews being persecuted and the lies of Auschwitz gas chambers to justify the setting up of Israel and to make the goyim feel guilty for their anti-Semitic behaviour, so it has been that the anthropogenic global warming myth has been created to justify Agenda 21, by the same global elite in both cases. If you have a successful, working model, why change it? And don’t think these are the only examples, because they’re not.

The Slow, Sure Death of “Climate Change” Lies

Writing in the Financial Post in October 2013, Lawrence Solomon, the executive director of Energy Probe, a Toronto-based environmental group, noted that “solar activity is now falling more rapidly than at any time in the last 10,000 years.” The Earth’s climate is primarily a reflection of solar radiation or the lack of it. From 1300 to 1850, the Earth was subject to a mini-ice age. While the global warming hoax began in the late 1980s, Solomon noted that, in the 1960s and 1970s, the scientific consensus was that the Earth “was entering a period of global cooling. The media in those years was filled with stories about a pending new ice age.

It was only the intervention of the UN’s IPCC that changed the “consensus” to one of global warming. A cooling cycle that began around fourteen years ago could lead to another mini-ice age or the planet could be on the cusp of a full-fledged one. On average, the interglacial periods of the Earth have lasted about 11,500 years and we are at the end of such a period.

As I’ve said before, you need to look at the parameters under which the IPCC was set up to understand their reports, and the parameters direct them to only look at man-made effects. Anyone noticed the sun recently? But it will take far more awareness to derail Agenda 21, which used global warming as its justification. Its rollout is at the grassroots level, all over the planet. It is how far the tentacles of this octopus reach.

Children inundated with ‘constant doomsday talk about climate change’ warn psychiatrists – preparing them for Agenda 21

This article discusses the impact of the relentless global warming propaganda on children.

Child psychiatrists and other mental health experts say they are seeing an increase in anxiety among today’s youth over the constant doom-and-gloom atmosphere they are presented regarding so-called global warming/climate change.

What is most disturbing to them, experts say, is so much talk among the scientific community that nothing more than daily life activities are what is causing the planet to be irreparably damaged.

This is how the children of the world are being softened up to accept the imposed solution of Agenda 21. They are being worked over to feel guilty for the way they and their parents are living in excess, so clearing people out of the countryside and into apartments of 300 sq. ft. or less seems to be a responsible way to behave.

Problem/reaction/solution. And it works. Unless we stop it.

And my stance on the lies of global warming do not mean that I argue for ignoring the planetary devastation that corporate greed is wreaking. This also needs to be addressed, and it is important to recognise the same forces who strip mine the planet and have caused us to live in a fossil fuelled world for an extra hundred years than we have need to are the very same forces generating the anxiety in our children (and many of us) over man-made (not) global warming

On a connected note, have you ever looked at the World Wildlife Fund – who set it up and who oversees it? Like so many things in our world, it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing – the United Nations being another. Yet another creation of the Rothschilds and their cohorts. For the most part, it postures as doing good in the world and employs some very well-meaning, intelligent, motivated people. But it’s all a cover for the stealthy progression of global hegemony. The way Agenda 21 was launched from within the UN is a perfect illustration. The greatest changes in our world are implemented by stealth, interspersed by the occasional shock such as a world war or a 9/11.

And if you still think I’m talking nonsense about man-made global warming, take half an hour and watch this excellent presentation from Ben Davidson. And if you agree, begin to wake up those around you – but expect to be considered a nutcase in the beginning. It takes moral courage.

The truth of climate change and how the lies we are told are used to drive the abomination called Agenda 21

I have commented extensively previously on climate change and global warming, perhaps best summarised by this post. Perhaps the most cogent and beautifully presented summary of what is happening with our global climate is this outstanding presentation by Ben Davidson at the Thunderbolts conference in early April. In summary, human CO2 generation is clearly not causing global warming, which has peaked. Indeed the strongest correlation is with sunspot activity, and it seems likely we are actually entering a period of significant cooling.

So why are we bombarded with the message that we are responsible for non-existent global warming?

Put simply, it provides a justification for Agenda 21. I have posted several times about Agenda 21, with this one perhaps containing the most powerful introduction and context. I have also mentioned how this is being rolled out essentially by stealth at the local level.

The video entitled Agenda 21 EXPLAINED provides an outstanding overview of how Agenda 21 was initiated via the UN (remember, it started with the ideas germinated at the Club of Rome in the 70s) and quietly all the pieces are put in place for it to be rolled out locally. John Anthony shares how this was put together and his on the ground experience of how it is getting rolled out across the United States, giving a reality to this I have seen nowhere else. I commend it to you. The story is the same across the planet.

For me, Agenda 21 is a classic example of how the global elite implement their agenda. Lies are sold to the world as a pretense for the unfolding of changes we would never otherwise accept. This is formally known as the Hegelian Dialectic, less formally as problem/reaction/solution. And if we don’t wake up, we will be living the reality of a fully-fledged Agenda 21. And you will not like it.

The case for the Philippines typhoon being triggered to influence the current climate change conference

I suspect that you may have trouble accepting the links I have put in place pointing to typhoon Yolanda, which recently devastated the Philippines as being set to influence the current climate change talks in Poland.

So let me take this from the top and spell out the pieces.

Human activity is not responsible for global warming

This notion is so deeply entrenched that it is almost impossible to consider it to be otherwise. Indeed, it is widely stated that there is a consensus of scientists agreeing that it is so. In fact, it is not so. Yes, there are many apparent pointers to human activity causing global warming; however, it is important to recognise the fundamental impact of directed funding on the focus of research projects and their outcomes. In simple terms, scientists choose to undertake research that will be funded and bring forth outcomes that ensure they continue to be funded. I do not intend this to be a discussion of the scientific process, the nature of science and how it is manipulated, though I will probably do that as a separate posting.

To understand the views of some highly regarded climate scientists that do not get promoted in the mainstream media, watch this video. Their perspective is completely juxtaposed to the mainstream view of global warming.

For a complementary and separate perspective, read this previous post and follow the links in it. Apart from providing you with this graph:


showing there is no correlation with human CO2 generation and temperature, it shares with you careful research which completely discredits the original tree ring research pointing to global warming. Yes, we are in a period where temperatures are warmer, but this warming is not outside earlier ranges.

Unsurprisingly, the warming and cooling on planet Earth is primarily driven by the changing behaviour of the sun, and it is believed by some key climate scientists that we have begun a period of reduced sunspot activity, which may see our planet cool significantly in the next few years. This video covers this ground.

As I said, this truth is so deeply buried, it seems impossible for it to be true. Moreover, had the alternative energy paths been allowed to flourish from early last century, beginning with the work of Nikola Tesla, we would never have needed this century of fossil fuel consumption, nor the abomination of nuclear power.

In making this point about global warming, I am not advocating a disregard for how we treat the planet; quite the contrary.

Why are we told this lie about climate change?

This lie is perpetrated to bring forth Agenda 21 and to impose global taxes such as a carbon tax based upon global warming.

Was typhoon Yolanda man-made?

This conversation was not one I went looking for. The pieces literally landed in my lap – or more accurately in my Inbox.

The first suggestion of this from dutchsinse I shared more as a piece of speculation, as my post at the time showed. I was not convinced, but given he has been tracking this subject for some years, I felt it was of interest to share here. Those who sought to discredit his work triggered him to lay out the background to his claim. However, what interested me most was the completely independent evidence coming forth. Included in this material is video footage discussing the massive SBX-1 mobile phased array radar (i.e.  HAARP –based) platform.


Look at the scale of this beast. It is 28 stories high. The SBX-1 is discussed in detail in this article, along with evidence that it was deployed to the Philippines at the time of this typhoon.

I quote from the document Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, published in 1996:

In extreme cases, it might involve the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting scale.

So was the SBX-1 used in conjunction with land-based HAARP and other installations to trigger this typhoon?

I quote from this article:

A steerable US land-based X-Band Radar system (COBRA DANE phased array radar system) was already built in northern Japan by the United States military and has been operational since 2006 and a second COBRA DANE installation in central Japan came online just prior to super typhoon Haiyan – the strongest wind storm ever recorded – being formed at sea and steered into the Philippines using HAARP AMISR phased array radar beam triangulation.

Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) and satellite weather radar data from the Pacific region detected 2 stationary (land based) microwave hot spots and 1 slow moving hot spot at  sea  (The HAARP SBX-! is a slow moving sea-based X-Band phased array platform)  giving evidence that the U.S. military created and steered typhoon Haiyan using 3 HAARP systems.  The 2 land-based systems in Japan and the seafaring SBX-1. Using 3 phased array radar systems drastically improves the angular resolution of the emitted microwave – steers the microwave beam with pinpoint accuracy.  Another U.S. military controlled HAARP installation was available on Guam – the COBRA DANE installation pictured in this article.

End of quote.

So, the material I have shared with you provides evidence of the ability to create this typhoon and evidence from two sources that it was done.

Why would this typhoon be created, intentionally killing thousands of people?

Perhaps the biggest issue that confronts all of us when we contemplate such an act is that it profoundly challenges our sensibilities. How could anybody do that?

It’s important that we recognise what those who run the game on this planet are willing to do to get where they want to go – literally anything. How many have been killed in Iraq during and since the Iraqi war? Over a million by my reckoning. So, 10,000 people is nothing by comparison. Also, as I’ve said many times, if the target is 0.5BN people on the planet, as expressed on the Georgia Guidestones, what’s a few thousand to get your way?

If it was man-made, it had a purpose, and that purpose will be reflected in its timing. In my view, this typhoon was timed to influence the current conference on climate change in Warsaw, November 11-22. You cannot ignore the timing, and you cannot ignore that the typhoon is being used to influence the decision-making at that conference. See this video and this commentary. We are seeing mass rallies around the world calling for action on climate change. Who cares about the truth? It’s completely lost.

This is how it’s done, my friends, time and time again. The Hegelian Dialectic: create the problem (in this case a manufactured, false problem of man-made global warming); trigger the reaction (mass rallies calling for change, even a hunger strike); bring forth the solution (global carbon taxes, etc.)

It took us a while to figure out what had happened on 9/11. This one some of us are watching in real time and being considered crazy by many for calling it as it is. Remember, I never ask you to believe anything I say. Do your own homework, beginning with the links I have given you.

In my view, it will take a shift in human consciousness to end this horrible, unending manipulation that humanity is inside of. Nothing less. May it be on our doorstep.

Al Gore weighs into debate over links between bushfires and climate change

I have to admit that when Al Gore’s video “An Inconvenient Truth” was released, I was completely taken in by it. I guess I’ve moved on a little since 2006. Now he has again popped up to peddle the NWO bullshit about CO2 driving global warming.

As illustrated in this video, there was a wonderful correlation between temperature and CO2 concentration for a long segment of Earth history – but the correlation broke down with the onset of human production of CO2. There is currently NO correlation and the temperature peak we are currently experiencing is looking like it may be lower than the last couple, which occur every 120,000 years or so.

Time to share this truth with everyone you know, if you are willing. It is but a small stake to put in the NWO wheel and takes little commitment from you. Share a little truth.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email