Archive for April 2015

Rebekah Roth’s “Methodical Illusion” exposes more 9/11 secrets and perhaps another such event in the United States

In her recent book “Methodical Illusion”, Rebekah Roth reveals more hidden threads around the 9/11 false flag events. Rebekah worked as an airline cabin staffer for many years and was encouraged by many to write a book about her experiences. But a strange thing happened. She discovered as she was searching for names for her book that many of the 9/11 so-called hijackers were still alive, several of whom, bizarrely, were Saudi airline pilots. So, she began to look, and she discovered many previously hidden pieces of evidence, looking from her airline trained and informed perspective, that others appear to have missed.

You can find a recent interview by Richie Allen here, and a written review by Kevin Barrett. I find her perspective very interesting and informative.

However, what particularly caught my eye is her reference to a possible future false flag event, which she spells out in this interview which she calls “Could This Be the Next False Flag Attack?.

Rebekah recounts how she was playing with a new iPad a couple of years ago and came across an article in an Israeli news source, which said the following: Israeli intelligence has intercepted details of an Al Qaeda plan to strike 5 or 6 major cities throughout the United States. These will begin on May 2nd and last for 9 days until May 11th. It will mark the anniversary of the United States false flag Osama bin Laden SEAL team death.

Rebekah referred to the Pakistani President announcing bin Laden’s death from kidney failure in 2002 and confirmed that her research shows that Al Qaeda was created by US/Israeli interests. She also noted the reference to 9/11 in the dates. Then the article completely disappeared from the internet, making her suspicious. In her interview, Rebekah makes it clear she is aware of the cabalists’  practice of pre-announcing their plans and speculates whether 2015 could be the year for this to unfold. In her opinion, such an unfolding would lead to the imposition of martial law in the United States.

Is this what the massive current troop and equipment movements that are being reported all across the United States are all about? There has been much speculation that this is connected to a project known as Jade Helm 15, a notion vehemently dismissed by Gordon Duff of Veterans Today.

I do not know what the truth of this is, but there appear to be massive and unusual troop movements and placements happening across the US at this time, and they are doubtless connected to a project of some sort.

Time will tell.

Creating Miracles With Weed

I quote from the accompanying text to this video:

In this video Luke Rudkowski talks to the founder of the CPN Institute Mark Pedersen about the amazing miracles they provide with medical marijuana. Locally, nationally and internationally, Cannabis Patient Network Institute is a vocal advocate for the sick and dying. They travel across the nation to bring education to the children, families and other citizens in need of cannabis therapy and information about its medicinal use.
To find out more check out

End of quote.

Most people today have NO IDEA about the medical value of cannabis. It used to be a major natural product for healing, until it was banned early in the last century. I’m my opinion, there are three possible reasons, and perhaps all three were in play:

  1. It was such a powerful natural medicine that it would have competed with John D Rockefeller’s creation of modern medicine as a way to sell pharmaceuticals, an industry he had essentially purchased since the early pharmaceuticals were made from oil refining by-products.
  2. DuPont was introducing nylon and did not want competition from the extraordinary natural hemp that comes from this plant.
  3. Cannabis tends to break down mind control programming. As Cathy O’Brien explained in her books, drugs were everywhere in her enslaved, mind controlled world, but cannabis use was absolutely forbidden. Unknown to most of the public, forms of mind control programming are conducted via film and television and those driving this do not want their work tampered with.

Of course, we are told it is because it is such a dangerous, harmful drug, which is entertaining since alcohol and tobacco, to name two, are legal, not to mention the addictive, mind altering psychotropic drugs that Big Pharma foists upon the unwary. As Graham Hancock explains from his 30 year cannabis habit, it can be addictive and not necessarily socially helpful when it’s a 16 hour/day habit, but as far as I can tell, it has never killed anyone, which makes it unusual if not unique.

So, it is exciting to see the medicinal properties of cannabis being recognised once more, even if they have to begin by healing issues that western medicine has failed to address. Unsurprisingly, Dr. Rima Laibow is a powerful advocate for the healing properties of cannabis and has a project in Chile to grow organic cannabis for medicinal purposes.

Australia vaccine war update: the people, slaves to the State

Well, I’m not alone in identifying the extraordinary apathy of my fellow Australians as their freedom of choice is simply ripped away.

Here is Jon Rappoport’s take on it:

“Bit by bit and piece by piece, freedom is taken away. Eventually, most people don’t remember what is gone. All they’re left with is the feeling that some thoughts and actions would be dangerous, would leave them vulnerable, on the outside looking in. Of course, ‘on the outside looking in’ is the platform from which any sane person launches his future.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

The other day, I wrote about radical changes in Australian vaccination policy. Principally, the national government has unilaterally decided that parents who receive government money will have that money taken away, if they don’t vaccinate their children. (See: Australia: refuse vaccination, lose $15,000)

Now I have learned that all families in Australia receive some form of government money. So the policy change affects everyone.

Which, of course, is what happens when citizens become beholden to big government. Government taketh, giveth back, taketh again, on their own timetable, according to their own dictates.

But it gets worse. Now, as laid out in a government document titled, “Strengthening Immunisation for Young Children,” we have this:

“Vaccine objection will no longer be an exemption category. Families with children that do not have a medical exemption (medical contraindication or natural immunity certified by an immunisation provider) will not receive [federal funds for] CCB, CCR, and the FTB Part A end of year supplement for that child (except for children under 12 months for the FTB Part A supplement).”

The previous categories of conscientious objection and religious objection to vaccination have been eliminated, in a single stroke. Just like that. These reasons for vaccine-exemption are gone. All across Australia.

This is an object lesson for the rest of the world. Free choice? A family’s own decisions on how to take care of their health? Torpedoed.

In the US press, a combination of information-suppression and unconcern has relegated this Australia story to the status of non-entity. A yawn.

If you’re looking for photos of tens or hundreds of thousands of Australians gathering in the streets to protest the new tyrannical rulings, don’t bother. It’s not happening.

Such a great pacification of the population has already occurred, the vaccination debacle passes through the nation like a mild ripple.

Yes, I have heard from Australians who are awake, who know what this ruling means, who still understand freedom, and I know there are others like them in the country, but on the whole there is silence and surrender.

The surveillance-state apparatus will certainly set up a national registry to track the vaccination-status of every Australian citizen, and dissidents will go on a list. Not only will federal money be taken from them, they will be subject to harassment and intimidation. In some cases, their children will be removed from the home and sent to foster care.

As a message to the unwilling.

In 1987, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I warned that covert medical ops were perfect for controlling populations. Such ops don’t appear to be partisan, they wave no political banners, they insist what they’re doing is humanitarian, they invoke “share and care,” and they invent their own brand of science to justify their actions.

Now, we have a whole nation officially functioning as a medical police state. And trust me, this is the Lite version. There is more to come in Australia. Once the authorities see how easy it is to take step a, they move on to b. They blow the dust off some other tyrannical rule they’ve been keeping on the shelf; they trot it out; they deploy it; and they wait to see whether anyone cares. (my emphasis)

For example, how about extending the mandatory time period during which a person can be held against his will in a psychiatric facility, where doctors force brain-disabling drugs on him?

That would go a long way toward dealing with people who still know what freedom is.

“He’s obviously a threat to himself and others. He disrupts the orderly processes of society. He disturbs others around him. He’s delusional. He keeps thinking there is a problem. There is no problem…”

As I have written numerous times, the medical cartel, in the long run, is the most important branch of Globalism Inc. It builds a cradle to grave system for every person. Traveling in a half-light of multiple diagnoses and toxic drug treatments, the citizens live in parallel universe of debilitation and confusion, where they become too weak to resist what is happening to them.

In part, freedom means freedom from this.

Jon Rappoport

David Icke calls this process the Totalitarian Tiptoe. Do not underestimate this process. James Corbett shared a fascinating perspective on this, which I’ll share with you in the coming days. It’s rolled out, step by step, and if there’s no pushback, it stays. If the pushback is strong, as in the example I have shared with you with Dr. Rima Laibow organising a national protest which stopped a planned vaccination that would have rendered most if not all Americans infertile. But they don’t give up. They regroup and come back around. Time is not  a major factor for these people. If it takes another 50 years, it doesn’t seem to matter. As things stand, “they” will still be there, but Rima will not.

And they roll out different parts in different countries, depending on what they can get away with. Tiptoe by tiptoe. Forced vaccination here, GMO there, horrific legal statutes against revealing the truth of the Holocaust story in another place, secretive investigation of journalists in another, crippling debt in another, and so it goes, often using false flag events or false testimony to justify it.

The public is asleep, but they are not. And when you control what is taught in schools and colleges and universities, a generation sees the truth of what happened buried, just as I shared with the Bolshevik revolution. It’s quite clear when you read sources from the 1920s that many understood that this was a Zionist-driven takeover and a thorough looting of the massive Russian wealth, but today it’s well hidden, and many treat the evidence with disbelief. It seems so incongruous that this happened, that the deaths of over 60 million people in the Soviet Gulags were driven by Zionist Jews, given how the media paints the world. But it is true and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was written out of the picture for revealing it. For example, “Russian people are now confronted by a Jew both as their judge and hangman. Why was it that anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka could count with high probability on standing before a Jewish investigator or being shot by a Jew?

Such revelations are seriously politically incorrect.

A chilling step closer to Australian secret police

I quote from this article by Jonathan Holmes:

Foreign journalists are falling off their chairs in shock at the brutality of our data retention law, yet we hardly blink an eye…

… In particular, Senator Brandis addressed the so-called “chilling effect” on investigative journalism that the media feared would result from the authorities’ ability to scour reporters’ metadata in search of their confidential sources. That’s been fixed, he assured us. The new act contains “a large and detailed architecture for the protection of journalists … which forms no part of the existing law”.

So it does. And I’ve been brooding about that architecture for the past two weeks, as I sat for many hours on aeroplanes, courtesy of the ABC’s Foreign Correspondent. I’ve talked about it to journalists in Paris, Washington and New York, specialists in reporting on terrorism and counter-terrorism. And when I described one particular facet of the act to them – one that has received minimal comment here in Australia – they nearly fell off their chairs.

Division 4C of the amended act lays down that if a law enforcement agency wants to search a professional journalist’s metadata in pursuit of his or her source, it first has to get a “journalist information warrant” from an “issuing authority” – usually a judge or magistrate – or in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation’s case, from the Attorney-General.

The authority should only issue the warrant, the act says, if the public interest in doing so outweighs various other public interests, including the source’s right to privacy. The authority must also weigh in the balance any arguments made by a public interest advocate.

This curious person – a senior lawyer (of course) with the necessary security clearances – will be appointed by the Prime Minister, no less. And, in the soothing words of the opposition defence spokesman, Labor’s Stephen Conroy, “the PIA will be empowered to stand in the shoes of the journalist and argue why it is contrary to the public interest to issue the warrant”.

Well fine. Except there’s a Kafkaesque catch-22. The public interest advocate will not be able to inform the journalist or news organisation that a warrant has been sought, so the advocate cannot be briefed on any public interest aspect of the story, or any particular reason why the source should remain confidential, that is not already blindingly obvious.

Indeed, this public interest advocacy will not be public. It will be utterly private: one lawyer secretly trying to persuade another lawyer why a spook or a copper should not get access to a reporter’s source, while the reporter – and, of course, the source – remain in blissful ignorance.

And here comes the kicker: the clause that had those foreign reporters falling off their chairs, but was barely mentioned by anyone, so far as I can see, in the parliamentary debates about the bill.

Section 182A of the new act says anyone who “discloses or uses” information about a journalist information warrant – about whether one has been applied for, or has been granted, or exists, or even does not exist – can be sent to prison for two years. Think about that. (my emphasis)

What possible justification can there be for this extraordinary provision? After all, these warrants need have nothing whatever to do with terrorism or national security. They can be issued to any agency that is investigating pretty much any crime (including, presumably, the crime committed by any Commonwealth public servant who leaks official information to the media – see section 70 of the Crimes Act).

Section 182A is of a piece with the increasingly draconian enforcement of secrecy that Australians have blithely accepted since 9/11.

End of quote.

FINALLY, and Aussie journalist speaks up about this legislation, and only after is has been passed and only on the basis of the reaction of his overseas colleagues. Extraordinary. Australians, for the most part, are blithely oblivious to the degree of control that is in place over free speech and so many other things in Australia. But it’s OK. I’m a good, law-abiding citizen. It won’t affect me…

As I’ve said before, the jail with no visible bars will not cause any protest. Rather, they are put in place slowly, one step at a time, justified by false flag terrorism, beginning in earnest with 9/11.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email