Search results for Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are real

I have said more than once that I would write about and illustrate the veracity of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

But I don’t need to. There are many others who have done it thoroughly.

The Protocols first appeared in Russia in the late 19th century and the staple argument against them was an article in the British Press of the early 20th century, ostensibly discrediting them as a forgery.

However, the criterion Henry Ford applied in 1920 – do they describe what’s happening in the world? – applies as strongly today as it did in Ford’s time.

For a quick illustration, listen to Jewish born and raised Brother Nathaniel cutting to the chase in his pithy manner.

For a more historical perspective, here is Dr William Luther Pierce.

And in more detail, here is Dr. David Duke. Duke has been thoroughly demonised by the Jewish owned and controlled mainstream press, which you need to take as a vote for the truth of what he is bringing forth; the exact opposite of the MSM’s intent. I consider Duke to be today’s Henry Ford in this area. He writes intelligently and cogently on the subject and he will not go quietly. He has also used Ford’s tactic in his writings of only quoting Jewish sources, letting them expose themselves. They finally shut Ford down by threatening to bankrupt the Ford Motor Company. Duke does not appear to have that vulnerability.

And if you want to understand how our world works and why, I encourage you to seek out a copy and read them. Only then can you begin to make sense of our world. I mean it when I say that it will be as if the scales have fallen from your eyes.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Dr William L Pierce discusses the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Pierce (1933-2002) was a controversial figure in America. Inevitably, the media sought to characterise Pierce as an extremist. This blog shares some of this observations, and indicates he was a considered, intelligent man. There are many other sites that share his writings and radio shows.

But the item I wanted to share with you is his history of and views on the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which has been recently packaged into a video form. In my opinion, his historical perspective and its expression into the world of 1999 when he recorded this, are, for the most part, on the money.

Pierce died suddenly of cancer in 2002, well within the timeframe where we know cancer was being induced in those the global elite wanted to silence. Was he a victim of this? I can only speculate.

Spend the 14 minutes to watch this video. You will recognise so much of what is going on in our world. One item that struck me was his highlighting the use of terrorism, given he was speaking in 1999, which was before the use of 9/11 to put the terrorism story on steroids and to steer almost the entire global conversation that has seen the massive erosion of personal rights and freedoms since that time.

Captured Israeli Flag Officer Confirms the Zionist plan for the world

There have been many pieces of evidence that the Zionists have long planned for non-Jews to be largely removed from the planet in whatever way. Wars between them has been a good strategy, such as WWI and WWII. Those who dismiss the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion will not so readily dismiss the reality of the Talmud, and it contains plenty of evidence to support this notion. Almost everyone not involved thinks such a notion is beyond the possibility of human behaviour, either because they can’t believe a group could be so dark, or if they are Jewish, they still believe the Jewish victimhood story.

(And then we have the refugee crisis in Europe. As Henry Makow pointed out, this war has been going on for four years. Who suddenly turned on the refugee tap?)

And so, most will find a way to dismiss the evidence of this that has come forth the recently captured Jewish Brigadier General or Colonel (depending who you wish to believe), who was advising the ISIL forces, because it doesn’t fit with their beliefs. Nevertheless, let me share the information gleaned from this captured Israeli, translated by Gordon Duff from the Arabic and shared in the irrepressible Veterans Today:

Captured Israeli Colonel Yossi Elon Shahak from the Golani Brigade exposed Israel’s conspiratorial role in the Middle East Region by citing that ISIS and other terror organizations are enslaved to its orders. Israel was behind the abolishment of the precious historic monuments and the theft of masterpieces in Iraq and Syria.

Moreover, it runs sleeper cells with the cooperation of the treachery coalition to bring to ground what is left from the Middle East. The final goal is total destruction for the emergence of the Satan from the black hole that will rule the world.

Obama-Putin Road map 

In the same context, the Vienna accord draws a new Sikis-Pico map as the main players entered the game directly. All countries will have to make painful concessions, and division of Syria and/or Iraq is the worst scenario that will be awaiting the victim and the victimizer.

Further notes from the Shahak interrogation:           

Information Office of Foreign Affairs Commissioner in the USA Parliament (international) and European Department for Security and information Secretary General Ambassador Dr. Haitham Abu Said confirmed  that the Israeli prisoner captured by the popular army in Iraq on Oct. 19, 2015 Colonel Yossi Elon Shahak, whose military  NO is (AZ 231434)  with sequence (RE34356578765) from the Golani Brigade.

Shahak has been removed from his detention few days ago and moved sequestered .  US International Parliament private sources say that a regional power which is coordinating with the Iraqi popular army in Iraq stood in on the details of Shahak ‘s case before being transferred and has listened to the statements that he made.

[ Editor’s note:  We are assuming that Iranian military intelligence handled the interrogation of Shahak.]

In his statements, Shahak pointed out that Israeli security agents monitored and developed plans for ISIS field operations in order to ensure that the organization would stick to the larger plan designed for the Middle East. 

He added that part of the plan was the bombing of all monuments and religious sites, and if the plan was botched, then it could be resorted to ruins theft, in order to eliminate all Arab and Islamic cultural inheritance.

Shahak further noted that Israel directed ISIS to commit crimes under the slogans of Islam in order to eliminate calls for peaceful dialogue between the religions. According to Shahak, ISIS’ acts of theatrical terror were intended to panic the European Union, already deeply stressed by Islamic expansion in the West.

The contrived refugee crisis was, as Shahak continued, simply another step in the planned “clash of civilizations” with Israel as “last man standing.”

The detainee said that there was a plan for instigating a sectarian sedition in some areas in order to stoke Sunni-Shiite civil strife.  This is done to facilitate the Region Division Plan that falls within the three stages, starting from Syria, but it was derailed in Iraq by the popular army during the presence of the US military in Baghdad.

Also, in order to bring the project into activation, The Yemeni front was opened, taking advantage of the various religious doctrines there, where there are sleeper cells working for Israel, in coordination with an Arab country, to facilitate the movement of entry and exit of those cells and the supply of fighters with all the necessary devices and military equipment.

In a separate context , MFA Bou-Said pointed out that the “YINON” plan is still workable for the Middle East and the Vienna agreement has not brought anything new in this regard, but there are very dangerous points that serve as the project foundation stone, such as the rights of the ethnic and religious sects are reserved without addressing their political freedom.

In addition, the plan will leave ISIS as the only source of “official” terrorism while inviting other parties, all covertly controlled, to start a political dialogue with the Syrian government, for the future of Syria and the region, noting that many of these parties belong to internationally banned groups and their programs are religious extremist.

End of quote.

What will it take for humanity to wake up to the satanic plan we are inside of? And it’s not just military. It has a thousand threads.

Zionist/Satanist plans for total world control exposed in 1961

Benjamin H. Freedman was a Zionist and Jewish insider. I quote the introduction to this video of his 1961 speech in Washington:

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermeyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before.

I encourage you to listen to Freedman’s speech. Here is a transcription of that speech.

Remember, Freedman was an insider. He went to the post WWI Peace Conference with Bernard Baruch, the leader of the US delegation. He understood the game. He participated in meetings with Woodrow Wilson and others before and during his Presidency. He knew what he was talking about, and he chose to reveal what he knew.

Freedman explains how the Zionists went to the Government of Great Britain in 1916 when Germany had essentially won the war and had offered Britain generous peace terms, and offered to bring America into the war against Germany and defeat them, in exchange for the Zionists being given Palestine. This is 1916 and the rest is history. I have already shared with you how Bernard Baruch was preparing the US for war in 1915. Purely coincidence, of course.

I quote from Freedman’s speech:

“When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. (My emphasis). And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

“Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone’s head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn’t fight one another with pistols. Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

“The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn’t want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

“The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

“After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.” You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

“In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, “The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.” And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermeyer boldly stated that “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,” which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars’ worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made in Germany,” they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.” Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I’ve been observing women’s legs for many years and it’s been a long time since I’ve seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy’s boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying “murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

“Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

“The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

“Now I don’t like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong.” The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.” Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world… (see my previous article on the Zionist origins of Bolshevism).

“…What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into Eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That’s how big and powerful they were…

“…These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into Eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.” Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

“That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. “

End of quote.

Another Jewish American, Myron C. Fagan, a successful playwright, screenwriter and producer of the early 20th century, also decided to reveal what he knew, for similar reasons to Freedman. I quote from this article:

In 1945, at the urgent request of John T. Flynn, the famous author of “THE ROOSEVELT MYTH,” “WHILE WE SLEPT,” “THE TRUE STORY OF PEARL HARBOR,” etc.; Mr. Fagan attended a meeting in Washington D.C. where he was shown a set of micro-films and recordings of the SECRET meetings at Yalta attended only by Franklin Roosevelt (see also Roosevelt’s address to Congress), Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins, Stalin, Molotov, and Vishinsky when they hatched the plot to deliver the Balkans, Eastern Europe and Berlin to Stalin. As a result of that meeting; Mr. Fagan wrote two plays: “RED RAINBOW” (in which he revealed that entire plot) and “THIEVES PARADISE” (in which he revealed how those men plotted to create the “UNITED NATIONS” to be the “housing” for a so-called Communist One-World Government).
At the same time; Mr. Fagan launched a “ONE-MAN” crusade to unmask the Red Conspiracy in Hollywood to produce films that would aid that “ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT” plot. Out of that came into being the “CINEMA EDUCATIONAL GUILD.”

End of quote.

In 1967, Fagan produced a 3-disc recorded expose on his understanding of the behind-the-scenes Zionist-led plans for global domination and control. This recording has also been transcribed. I quote:

“However, the vitally important thing for all Americans, all you mothers of the boys who died at Korea and are now dying in Vietnam, to know is that our so-called leaders in Washington, who we elected to safeguard our nation and our constitution, are the betrayers and that behind them are a comparatively small group of men whose sole objective is to enslave the whole world of humanity in their satanic plot of one-world government.

“Now in order to give you a very clear picture of this satanic plot (my emphasis), I will go back to its beginning, clear back in the middle of the 18th century and name the men who put that plot into action and then bring you down to the present– today’s status of that plot. Now as a matter of further intelligence, a term used by the FBI, let me clarify the meaning of the expression ‘he is a liberal.’

“The enemy, meaning the one-world conspirators, have seized upon that word ‘liberal’ as a cover-up for their activities. It sounds so innocent and so humanitarian to be liberal. Well, make sure that the person who calls himself a liberal or is described as a liberal is not in truth a ‘red’.

“Now then, this satanic plot was launched back in the 1760’s when it first came into existence under the name of the Illuminati. This Illuminati was organized by one Adam Weishaupt, born a Jew, who was converted to Catholicism and became a Catholic priest, and then, at the behest of the then newly organized House of Rothschild, defected and organized the Illuminati.

“Naturally, the Rothschilds financed that operation, and every war since then, beginning with the French Revolution, has been promoted by the Illuminati operating under various names and guises. I say under various names and guises because after the Illuminati was exposed and became too notorious, Weishaupt and his co-conspirators began to operate under various other names. In the United States, immediately after World War I, they set up what they called the Council on Foreign Relations, commonly referred to as the CFR, and this CFR is actually the Illuminati in the United States. And its hierarchy, the masterminds in control of the CFR, to a very great extent, are descendants of the original Illuminati conspirators. But, to conceal that fact, most of them changed their original family names to American sounding names. For example, the true name of the Dillons, Clarence and Douglas Dillon (once Secretary of the US Treasury Department), is Lapowski. I’ll come back to all this later.

“There is a similar establishment of the Illuminati in England operating under the name of the British Institute of International Affairs [The Royal Institute of International Affairs]. There are similar secret Illuminati organizations in France, Germany, and other nations operating under different names, and all these organizations, including the CFR, continuously set up numerous subsidiary or front organizations that are infiltrated into every phase of the various nations’ affairs. But at all times, the operations of these organizations were and are masterminded and controlled by the internationalist bankers, who in turn were and are controlled by the Rothschilds.

“The details of how they accomplished the setting up of the CFR in the United States as also in the other nations, are far too voluminous to describe in this dissertation. But you can find it complete in news bulletin #122 entitled “UN is Spawn of the Illuminati”, and news bulletin #123 entitled “CFR Completely Unmasked as Illuminati”. Both are published by the Cinema Educational Guild, PO Box 46205, Hollywood California. You can get them for 50 cents per copy by writing to that address. Those news bulletins reveal the names of the original founders of the Illuminati and the Americanized names of their descendants in the present CFR.

“Now I’ll go back to the activities of the original Illuminati conspirators as revealed in news bulletin #122. One branch of the Rothschild family had financed Napoleon. Another branch of the Rothschilds, both branches the real masterminds of the Illuminati, financed Britain, Germany, and the other nations in the Napoleonic wars.

“Immediately after the Napoleonic wars, the Illuminati assumed that all the nations were so destitute and so weary of wars that they’d be glad for any solution, so the Rothschild stooges set up what they called the Congress in Vienna and at that meeting they tried to create the first League of Nations, their first attempted one-world government, on the theory that all the crowned heads of European governments were so deeply in debt to them that they would willingly or unwillingly serve as their stooges.

“But the Czar of Russia caught the stench of the plot and completely torpedoed it. The enraged Nathan Rothschild, then the head of the dynasty, vowed that someday he or his descendants would destroy the Czar and his entire family, and his descendants did accomplish that very threat in 1917.

“At this point, bear in mind that the Illuminati was not set up to operate on a short-range basis. Normally a conspirator of any type enters into a conspiracy with the expectation of achieving his objective during his own lifetime. But that was not the case with the Illuminati. True, they hoped to accomplish their objective during their lifetime, but paraphrasing, ‘the show must go on’. The Illuminati operates on the very long-range basis. Whether it will take scores of years or even centuries, they have dedicated their descendants to keep the pot boiling until, they hope, the conspiracy is achieved.

“Now let’s go back to the birth of the Illuminati. Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit-trained professor of canon law, teaching in Ingolstadt University, when he defected from Christianity to embrace the Luciferian conspiracy. It was in 1770 that the professional money lenders, the then recently organized House of Rothschild, retained him to revise and modernize the age-old Protocols of Zionism, which from the outset, was designed to give the Synagogue of Satan, so named by Jesus Christ, ultimate world domination so they could impose the Luciferian ideology upon what would remain of the human race after the final social cataclysm by use of satanic despotism.

“Weishaupt completed his task May 1, 1776. Now you know why May 1 is the great day with all communist nations to this very day. That was the day, May 1, 1776, that Weishaupt completed his plan and officially organized the Illuminati to put the plan into execution. That plan required the destruction of all existing governments and religions. That objective was to be reached by dividing the masses of people whom he, Weishaupt, termed ‘goyim’, or ‘human cattle’, into opposing camps in ever increasing numbers on political, social, economic, and other issues– the very conditions we have in our country today.

“The opposing sides were then to be armed and incidents provided which would cause them to fight and weaken themselves and gradually destroy national governments and religious institutions. Again I say, the very conditions in the world today. And at this point let me stress a prime feature of the Illuminati plans. When and if their blueprint for world control, the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, is discovered and exposed, they would wipe all the Jews off the face of the earth in order to divert suspicions from themselves. If you think this is far-fetched, bear in mind that they permitted Hitler, a liberal socialist himself, who was financed by corrupt Kennedys, the Warburgs, and the Rothschilds, to incinerate 600,000 Jews.

“Now just why did the conspirators choose the word ‘Illuminati’ for their satanic organization? Weishaupt himself said that the word is derived from Lucifer and means “holders of the light.” Using the lie that his objective was to bring about a one-world government to enable those with mental ability to govern the world and prevent all wars in the future– in short, using the words ‘peace on earth’ as his bait– exactly as that same bait ‘peace’ was used by the 1945 conspirators to force the United Nations on us, Weishaupt financed, I repeat, by the Rothschilds, recruited some 2,000 paid followers. These included the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, the sciences, finance, and industry.

“He then established Lodges of the Grand Orient, Masonic Lodges, to be their secret headquarters and I again repeat, that in all of this he was acting under orders from the House of Rothschild. The main features of the Weishaupt plan of operation required his Illuminati to do the following things to help them to accomplish their purpose…”

End of quote.

I commend this recording to you.

So, in the 60’s we had two Jewish-Americans come forth and separately share what they knew about a Zionist-driven plan for global control. Those Zionists, as Freedman explained, were Khazars who claimed a false Semitic heritage.

Again I am drawn to say that I am not anti-Jewish and see many Jewish people as pawns in this game, even though they do not see it.

Perhaps the most thorough effort to understand the game behind the game has been undertaken by Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval, two very thorough researchers and wonderful authors. If you are not familiar with the breadth and thoroughness of Hancock’s work, along with the humility and forthrightness of the man, this recently posted video from the 2012 EarthKeeper’s conference is an excellent place to start.

Hancock and Bauval worked on this for over a decade, their first book being “Talisman” in 2004 and a subsequent rework being released in 2011 as “The Master Game”. These books draw together many threads of history, including the role of the Freemasons and the origins of their knowledge and traditions, reaching back to ancient Egypt. This video by Robert Bauval provides a great overview of the focus of “The Master Game”.

This work provides, amongst many other threads they trace, clear evidence of the activities of the Freemasons in influencing world events over the last two hundred or so years and their role in the layout and the architecture of London, Paris and Washington and their connections to ancient Egypt along with a plan to build a “new Jerusalem” in these locations. Returning to Bauval’s video, he explains how the Talisman in their books is the site of Solomon’s Temple, a site which has been fought over by Jews, Christians and Moslems for well over a thousand years.

Bauval goes on to explain how the Zionist movement, in his view, began in the late 19th century as a result of the efforts of Theodore Herzl with his 1896 pamphlet Der Judenstaat, leading to the emergence of Israel after WWII; however there is evidence these initiatives preceded Herzl. For example, Henry Ford in the appendices to his book on the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” quotes two articles which date from 1860 which clearly indicate the guidelines contained in the Protocols are much older. Ditto the words from Myron Fagan earlier in this article.

Interestingly, Hancock and Bauval in “The Master Game” and in “Talisman” do not mention the name of Rothschild, dismiss the notion of a Zionist agenda behind events in our world and somewhat equivocally state that Weishaupt’s Illuminati disappeared soon after its creation. They also dismiss the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” as a hoax (I will return to the Protocols in a separate article).

I have wondered why this is so, given the evidence to the contrary I have shared with you, and have wondered if it is because they have been following threads that arise in ancient Egypt, a subject they have both had a great interest in for many years, or the mainstream threads as they flowed into Europe from the Middle East. They rightly point out that the threads of Freemasonic interference in the affairs of Europe reach back prior to the creation of the Illuminati in 1776, though they make no mention of the creation of the Jewish-only masonic lodges under, for example, the name B’nai B’rith. In “The International Jew”, Henry Ford writes “It (B’nai B’rith) may be described as a freemasonry exclusively for Jews.”

Elsewhere, Ford says; “The organization about which the public has heard most is the Independent Order of B’nai B’rith. Its headquarters are not in New York, strange to say, but in Chicago. Its origin, however, as might be expected, was in New York. This interesting order, without a reference to which no survey of Jewry is complete, came into existence in the back room of an Essex street saloon in 1843. Strangely enough, its most moving spirit at the beginning was a Henry Jones, although his colleagues retained their Hebraic names.

“Because most of the founders were from Germany the name was given in German, Bundes Bruder, which is in Hebrew, B’nai B’rith (Brothers of the Covenant). The executive committee was known as The Elders. The order spread first to Cincinnati, apparently taking the course of German immigration through the country, and it is recorded that the second lodge in that city is the first where the English language was used in discussing lodge affairs. The first leap of the order abroad, was to Berlin where in 1885 Grand Lodge No. 8 was installed, followed soon after by Grand Lodges in Rumania and Austria. The order’s literature lays stress on the work of inculcating patriotism, which is said to be one of B’nai B’rith’s special interests. It is perhaps not meant, however, that the head office at Chicago could undertake, especially during recent years, to guide the patriotism of all the districts throughout the world. It would have been rather awkward for District No. 6, which includes Illinois, to encourage District No. 8 to loyalty, seeing that District No. 8 embraced Germany.”

And elsewhere; “The Independent Order of B’nai B’rith, which is now hopeful of reaching the 1,000,000 membership mark, is frankly international. It has divided the world into 11 districts, seven of which are in the United States. Its lodges at last report numbered 426. The four members of its executive committee who do not reside in the United States, reside in Berlin, Vienna, Bucharest, and Constantinople, respectively. Its lodges have been set up in the United States, Europe, Asia and Africa. Henry Morgenthau’s name appears in the 1919-1920 Jewish year book as a member of this executive committee. Mr. Morgenthau will be remembered as the American Minister to Turkey, later talked of as Ambassador to Mexico, then chosen by President Wilson to mediate between the Turks and the Armenians. Mr. Morgenthau also investigated for the President the reports of Polish pogroms.”

So, B’nai B’rith became a force to be reckoned with, alongside “traditional” Freemasonry.

One of the observations Hancock makes in the above-mentioned presentation is the role organised religion has played in the death and destruction on this planet; a view I wholeheartedly agree with. However, there is an underlying thread that I wish to connect with. In simple terms, organised religion has hijacked spirituality for its own ends. If you examine all of the major religions – Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism – they all have a mechanism for generating guilt and shame for people; scarcely the seeds of freedom, love and personal liberation. Most people in the Western world are familiar with the Christian notion that we are born in sin; a powerful mechanism for generating guilt and shame for Christians. Further, the priestly class has a pattern of hijacking great spiritual teachings or endeavours and creating from it a mechanism for control; whether it be the teachings of Mohammed, Jeshua (Jesus to most), Buddha, Moses, etc. We also saw this when the Pharaoh Akhenaten sought to bring forth a monotheistic religion in his time, only to see it destroyed by the priests who had lost their income and power. We saw it in the ancient Egyptian times, when the teachings and practices of Isis and Osiris were overtaken by the priests that followed them, and from less tangible information, the same thing occurred in Atlantis before its demise.

In my view, we have seen the same thing occur with Freemasonry, which appears to derive from a limited set of the knowledge and teachings of the Knights Templar, who history has, in my view, significantly misunderstood, taking control of its essentially positive, well-meaning agenda and turning it Satanic at its highest levels, as indicated by these first hand recollections of horrific, Satanic initiations for the highest level Freemasons. We have also seen it with so-called royalty, where the leaders of the past who generally operated in the interests of their constituents have given way to the deeply satanic crew we see that remain in such roles in Europe. So, this same old pattern has been rolled out for millennia on Earth and, in my view, Freemasonry has suffered the same fate.

In 1954, William Guy Carr (1895-1959), a onetime Canadian Naval Commander, published his book “Pawns In The Game”. I quote from his Introduction:

If what I reveal surprises and shocks the reader, please don’t develop an inferiority complex because I am frank to admit that although I have worked since 1911, trying to find out why the Human Race can’t live in peace and enjoy the bounties and blessing God provides for our use and benefit in such abundance? It was 1950 before I penetrated the secret that the wars and revolutions which scourge our lives, and the chaotic conditions that prevail, are nothing more or less than the effects of the continuing Luciferian conspiracy. (My emphasis)

End of quote.

So, Carr had been on a mission to understand how the world worked and why it could not be peaceful, and concluded it was because of a “continuing Luciferian conspiracy”. In this article, I simply want to focus upon what Carr had to say in regard to the Illuminati’s infiltration of Freemasonry. I quote:

The Illuminati went underground. Weishaupt instructed his Illuminists to infiltrate into the lodges of Blue Masonry and form a secret society within secret societies.

Only masons who proved themselves Internationalists, and those whose conduct proved they had defected from God, are initiated into the Illuminati. Thus the conspirators used the cloak of philanthropy to hide their revolutionary and subversive activities. In order to infiltrate into masonic lodges in Britain Illuminists invited John Robison over to Europe. He was a high degree mason in the Scottish Rite: Professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University; and Secretary of The Royal Society of Edinburgh. John Robison did not fall for the lie that the objective of the one worlders was to form a benevolent dictatorship. He kept his reactions to himself however, and was entrusted with a copy of Weishaupt’s Revised Conspiracy for study and safe keeping.

Because the heads of church and state in France were advised to ignore the warnings given them the revolution broke out in 1789. In order to alert other governments to their danger, in 1798 John Robison published a book, entitled “Proof of a Conspiracy to Destroy All Governments and Religions”. But his warnings have been ignored, as were the others.

Thomas Jefferson had become a student of Weishaupt’s. He was one of his strongest defenders when he was outlawed by his government. Jefferson infiltrated the Illuminati into the newly organized Lodges of The Scottish Rite in New England. Realizing this information will shock many Americans I wish to record the following facts:

  • In 1789, John Robison warned masonic leaders the Illuminati had infiltrated into their lodges. On July 19th, 1798, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, issued the same warning to the graduating class and lectured them on the influence Illuminism was having on American politics and religion.
  • John Quincy Adams had organized the New England Masonic Lodges. In 1800 he decided to oppose Jefferson for the presidency. He wrote three letters to Colonel Wm. L. Stone exposing how Jefferson was using masonic lodges for subversive purposes. The information contained in these letters is credited with winning Adams the election. The letters are in Rittenburg Square Library, in Philadelphia.
  • In 1826 Captain Wm. Morgan decided it was his duty to inform other Masons and the general public what the TRUTH is regarding the Illuminati, their secret plans and intended purpose. The Illuminati obtained the services of Richard Howard, an English Illuminist, to carry out their sentence “That Morgan be EXECUTED as a traitor. Captain Morgan was warned of his danger. He tried to escape to Canada but Howard caught up with him near the border. He was murdered near the Niagara Gorge. Research proved that one Avery Allyn made a sworn affidavit in the City of New York to the effect that he heard Richard Howard report to a meeting of Knights Templars in St. John’s Hall, New York, how he had ‘Executed’ Morgan. He told how arrangements had then been made to ship Howard back to England.
  • Very few people to-day know that general disapproval and disgust over this incident caused nearly 40% of Masons belonging to the Northern Jurisdiction of the United States to secede. I have copies of minutes of a meeting held to discuss this particular matter. The power of those who direct the Luciferian conspiracy against God and Man can be realized by the ability of their agents to prevent such outstanding events of history being taught in our public schools.
  • In 1829, the Illuminati held a meeting in New York which was addressed by a British Illuminist named Wright. Those in attendance were informed that the Illuminati intended to unite the Nihilist and Atheist groups with all other subversive organizations into an international organization to be known as Communism. This destructive force was to be used to enable the Illuminati to foment future wars and revolutions. Clinton Roosevelt (a direct ancestor of F.D. R.) Horace Greeley and Chas. Dana were appointed a committee to raise funds for this new venture. The fund they raised financed Karl Marx and Engels when they wrote “Das Capital” and “The Communist Manifesto” in Soho, England.

End of quote.

From this work by Carr, the penetration of the Illuminati into Freemasonry and also the United States Government at the highest levels is very clear.

This 1943 French film, Occult Forces was made during the time of the Vichy Government in France and was apparently funded by Germany. Following WWII, the film’s writer, Jean-Marie Riviere, was imprisoned and the Producer, Robert Muzard, and the Director, Paul Riche (the pseudonym of Jean Mamy), were condemned to death, Mamy apparently being executed. Today we would dismiss the film simply as German wartime propaganda, but there are some interesting threads associated with it. Firstly, it shows the Masonic initiation ritual in detail, which is probably accurate since Mamy was a former Freemason. Secondly, it shows extensive Jewish involvement in Grand Orient Freemasonry, which may simply be propaganda, but it connects with the testimony of Myron Fagan claiming the Grand Orient lodges were created by the Illuminati. William Guy Carr says the same in his book. Thirdly, there is the interesting story of Professor Bernard Fay, who under the Vichy regime extensively researched the presence of Freemasons in high positions in France and who oversaw the making of Forces Occultes. Fay was imprisoned after the war before being pardoned in 1953. I quote from this article:

As administrator of the Bibliotheque Nationale, he supervised government-ordered research into the archives of Freemasons and other secret societies, a project eventually producing 170,000 leads.  Baron Julius Evola, another esoteric investigator, did similar work with Freemasonic archives in Vienna, also working with German intelligence agencies.  Evola’s work ended when he was severely injured in a Soviet air raid, but Bernard Fay completed his task and reported his findings, from which trials resulted.  After the Allies took over and a new government installed, Fay was charged with war crimes, blaming him for 117 deaths. He was tried by a puppet court, and sentenced to life in prison.  To his credit, during the show trial, he was largely unrepentant.  When interrogated, he said this.

“I was glad to have in my hands the instrument capable of renovating the country. My mission was to organize a service for the detection of the Freemasons and Masonic archives. To be successful in that work, I was obligated to have relations with the Germans, especially as they had an organization parallel with ours.  Fay simply said that he was …a historian who was doing this for intellectual reasons.”

End of quote.

For me, the evidence brought forth by Benjamin Freedman in 1961 is unequivocal regarding the role of the Zionists in the events of the 20th century and the evidence that they have overtaken the highest levels of Freemasonry overwhelming, using them as a front to drive their agenda of global dominance on every level. The Illuminati, in their turn, are a front for the Satanic Zionists (not mainstream Jews, who are also victims of these actions).

By way of illustration, I give you, amongst the Freemasonic symbolism of Washington, the occult symbol of Moloch the owl in the grounds surrounding the Capitol building.Moloch the owl in Washington


Henry Ford exposed the Zionist agenda and their successes to date – in 1920

As I walk this path of exposing the hidden history of our time, I came across these words:

Searching to understand the Forbidden History of our age requires the internal fortitude to challenge establishment convention, while maintaining the accuracies of eternal truths. History is often referred to as His Story. The “his” represents the power to invent the chronicle and fabricate meaning of events.

Courage to face the evidence and corroborate alternative explanations to established accounts is not easy. The slings and arrows that target anyone who dares to dispute the ruling order is a given. Demonization of any contrary storyline that conflicts with the comfort of clichés and tales of self-serving accounts is the price one pays for seeking the truth.

And Henry Ford’s story is one example.

Henry Ford is best known for creating the Ford Motor Company. He has also been branded as being anti-Semitic, that damning, weaponised phrase of the Zionists.

As with so many things on this journey of discovery, it began with a “chance” sighting, in this case this panel in an article:

I was intrigued. What was Ford on about? What did he know, or thought he knew? It turns out quite a lot, and the brief words above express a great deal of the understanding he reached; something we all need to understand, Jews included, because he was speaking about the Zionists.

Just after WWI, Henry Ford could see what was happening in the world and especially the United States, and he wanted to alert other Americans to what he could see. Ford recognised that he would not be able to get the articles he wanted to write published in the mainstream press, since it was either owned by Jewish interests or they were major advertisers who would threaten to withdraw their advertising. So, Ford bought the Dearborn Independent, which meant he could write and publish what he could see.

Ford was writing in an interesting time; 1920-21. So, his view was just after the end of WWI and before the events of the 30’s and WWII had unfolded. Hence, what he wrote provides a fascinating snapshot.

Now, as I said, Ford has been branded as being anti-Jewish, both at the time and since, and I know there are informed, intelligent Jews today who do not believe what Ford wrote. But the key thing Ford did was rely only upon the words and testimony of Jews, supplemented by documented facts. Now, I’m not saying he didn’t express opinions, not all of which I agree with, in part because my view is from 2015 rather than 1920. But by using the words of Jews for his evidence, whilst there were the inevitable protests and accusations of anti-Semitism, what he said could not be refuted, and it was not refuted. Protested against but not refuted.

Soon after he completed the series of articles, he had them printed in book form entitled The International Jew.

The ground that Ford covered was very comprehensive; from banking to immigration; from Bolshevism and its primarily New York origins to the overtaking of the American theatre, the press, their domination of the movie industry from its creation, the compromising of baseball, the Jewish control of the political process; it was comprehensive and far-reaching, as the Zionist plans and processes were and are. And, as I said, he used the words of Jews to illustrate what he was saying.

One item he focussed upon was the document entitled “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, for which he provided extensive evidence to validate (a subject I will return to in another post).

But the example I want to focus upon by way of illustration here is the role of Bernard Baruch during WWI. My reason for doing this is that most people who are picking apart the Zionist picture today appear to consider that the Zionist influence and control of the United States has arisen since WWII with the emergence of Israel, whereas the Zionist involvement with the United States is far older, and became essentially complete with the establishment of the Federal Reserve as a private bank in 1913. If you do not understand the financial history of the United States and indeed the world, I encourage you to read the post I entitled How the Money Masters have painted themselves out of history and watch the videos it links to.

I will quote extensively from Ford’s article of 27 November 1920:

In our own country we have just had a four-year term of Jewish rule, almost as absolute as that which exists in Russia. This appears to be a very strong statement, but it is somewhat milder than the facts warrant. And the facts themselves are not of hearsay origin, nor the product of a biased point of view; they are the fruits of an inquiry by the lawful officials of the United States who were set aside in favor of a ready-made Jewish Government, and they are forever spread upon the official records of the United States.

The Jews have proved for all time that the control of Wall Street is not necessary to the control of the American people, and the person by whom they proved this was a Wall Street Jew. This man has been called “the pro-consul of Judah in America.”

It is said that once, referring to himself, he exclaimed: “Behold the Disraeli of the United States!”

To a select committee of the Congress of the United States he said: “I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”

And in saying so he did not overstate the case. He did have more power. It was not all legal power, this much he admitted. It reached into every home and store and factory and bank and railway and mine. It touched armies and governments. It touched the recruiting boards. It made and unmade men without a word. It was power without responsibility and without limit. It was such a power as compelled the Gentile population to lay bare every secret before this man and his Jewish associates, giving them a knowledge and an advantage that billions of gold could not buy.

Doubtless not one in every 50,000 of the readers of this paper ever heard of this man before 1917, and doubtless the same number have clear knowledge of him now. He glided out of a certain obscurity unlighted by public service of fame, into the high rulership of the nation at war. The constituted government had little to do with him save vote the money and do his bidding. He said that men could have appealed over his head to the President of the United States, but, knowing the situation, men never did.

Who is this figure, colossal in his way, and most instructive of the readiness of Judah to take the rule whenever he desires?

His name is Bernard M. Baruch. He was born in South Carolina 50 years ago, the son of Dr. Simon Baruch, who was a medical man of some consequence. “I went to college with the idea of becoming a doctor, but I did not become a doctor,” he told the Congressional Committee. He was graduated at the College of the City of New York when he was just under 19 years of age. This college is one of the favorite educational institutions with the Jews, its president being Dr. S. E. Mezes, a brother-in-law of Colonel E. M. House, the colonel whose influence and disfavor at the White House has for a long time been a favorite subject of wondering speculation on the part of the American people, though it scarcely need be so any longer.

Apparently young Baruch knew exactly what he wanted to do, and set out to do it. He says he spent “many years” after his graduation in certain studies, “particularly economics” as related to railroads and industrial propositions. “I tried to make Poor’s Manual and the financial supplement of the Financial Chronicle my bible for a number of years.”

He could not have spent very “many years” in these pursuits, for after going down to Wall Street as a clerk and a runner, and when he was “about 26 or 27” he became a member of the firm of A. A. Housman & Company. “In about 1900 or 1902” he left the firm, but he had meanwhile gained a seat on the Stock Exchange.

He then went into business for himself, a statement that must be taken literally in view of his testimony that he “did not do any business for anybody but himself. I made a study of the corporations engaged in the production and manufacture of different things, and a study of the men engaged in them.”

In answer to questions intended to disclose the exact nature of his operations before he suddenly appeared as the man who “had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war,” he stood off from any intimations that he perhaps engaged in mere buying and selling of stock. “My business then became the organization of various enterprises,” he said, “and in connection with that, I, of course, did buy and sell stocks * * * If I organized any concern, I naturally took a large interest in it, or I would not organize it if I did not believe in it, and I stayed with the development of that concern; and then if I cared later on to sell it, I would sell it.”

Pressed by the examiners for a still more detailed account of his activities in business, he said:

“Well, I was instrumental in the purchase of the Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Company; in the purchase of Selby Smelter, Tacoma Smelter, and various copper, tungsten, rubber — I was instrumental in building up one of the great industries in rubber in Mexico, which was the establishment of the source of supply of rubber, and developed a large concern there for the production of raw material, which is still going on * * *

“I became interested in the new process of concentration of low-grade ores in the Mesaba Range, but the interest I had particularly in steel was in the study of the present-day organization, in order to get myself posted so that I could intelligently buy or sell their securities * * *”

It is an important point, one not made very clear in the testimony, what interests Mr. Baruch held at the beginning of the war. His previous activities in various fields, principally perhaps in the field of metals, had been important and numerous. In any case, as a young man, he is found to be master of large sums of money, and there is no indication that he inherited it. He is very wealthy. What change the war made in his wealth, if it made any change at all, is a matter on which nothing may be said now. Certainly many of his friends and closest associates reaped great quantities of money from their activities during the war.

Now, as to the point of his business connections just prior to the war, this testimony appears:

Mr. Graham — “You continued in the operation of these various businesses, in the formation of companies and the flotation of their stocks, and in your business in the Stock Exchange and elsewhere up until the time of the beginning of the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “I was gradually getting myself away from business, because I had made up my mind to retire, and I had been getting less active with that end in view, and I was not very much in sympathy with the organization of companies. I am not criticizing other men who engage in business that resulted in profits even before we had gotten into war. I had made up my mind to leave and do some other things that I hope to be able to do now; but that process was interrupted by my appointment as member of the advisory commission without any suggestion or without any knowledge or idea it was coming.”

Does he mean that the process of getting out of business was interrupted by his appointment on the advisory commission, which appointment led straight to his complete rulership of the United States at war?

Mr. Jefferis — “Had any of the members of the advisory commission been engaged in the production of raw materials or in manufactured products, or not?”

Mr. Baruch — “I had.”

Mr. Jefferis — “In what way?”

Mr. Baruch — “I had made a rather deep study of the production and the distribution and manufacture of many of these raw materials. I had to make an intensive study of these things in order to do the things I was engaged in.”

Mr. Jefferis — “You were not running any raw material production?”

Mr. Baruch — “I was interested in concerns — I was interested in the study and production of a great many of these things, because I developed and organized concerns which did it.”

Does he mean that he was interested in concerns at the time of his appointment? This would be an interesting point to clear up.

Another matter that would be not only of interest, but of great usefulness in explaining the gathering of a Jewish government around the President during the war, is the question of Bernard M. Baruch’s acquaintance with Woodrow Wilson. When did it begin? What circumstances or what persons brought them together? There are stories, of course, and one of them may be true, but the story ought not to be told unless accompanied by the fullest conformation. Why should it occur that a Jew should be the one man ready and selected for a position of greatest power during the war? (There is evidence elsewhere that Wilson’s Presidential campaign was funded by Zionist interests, including Baruch and Paul Warburg – Richard)

Mr. Baruch, in his testimony, sheds no light on this question. He had opportunity to do so, had he wished.

Mr. Graham — “I assume that you were personally acquainted with the President prior to the outbreak of the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir.”

Mr. Graham — “Up to the time that you were appointed as a member of the advisory commission, had you ever had any personal conferences with the President about these matters?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir.”

Mr. Graham — “Had he called you in consultation or had he talked to you about these matters and about the matter of your appointment before you were appointed?”

Mr. Baruch — “Never suggested anything about the appointment, because I would have told him that I would prefer not to be appointed.”

Mr. Graham — “Do you now recall, Mr. Baruch, how long before you were actually appointed as a member of that advisory commission you had your last conference with the President?”

Mr. Baruch — “No * * *” That is not all of Mr. Baruch’s answer, but it is his reply to the question. Having said “No,” Mr. Baruch became very communicative on another matter. His complete reply is:

“No; but I can tell you something that may be of interest, and that is probably what you want to know. I had been very much disturbed by the unprepared condition of this country, so much so that I was one of the first men to support General Wood in the Plattsburg encampment, and I think he will admit I gave him the first money and told him whatever he did I would guarantee to stand behind that movement, which happily only took a few thousand dollars so far as I was concerned, having caught the public approval and it went ahead, and in that relation naturally one had to think about the mobilization of the industries of the country, because people do not fight alone with their hands; they have got to fight with things.”

It is thus shown that Mr. Baruch was a forehanded gentleman. It was only the year 1915. The European war had then not become more than an amazing spectacle to the mass of the American people. But still Mr. Baruch was convinced we were going to have war, and he spent money on his guess. The government which was then “keeping us out of war” was also consulting with Mr. Baruch who was already ahead of the government in creating the atmosphere of war in this country. If the reader, by a mental effort, can reconstruct the year of 1915, and then put into his picture of that year the element of which he was not then possessed, namely, the activity of Mr. Bernard M. Baruch and other Jews, he will see that he did not know much about what was going on, even if he did read the newspapers with attention!

(I will provide testimony in another article that the Zionists in Britain promised to bring America into the war to win against Germany after Germany had essentially won the war by 1916 and offered generous terms to Britain for peace, in exchange for the promise of Palestine for the Zionists. Clearly, this planning was well in hand by 1915. – Richard).

To proceed with the examination, following the place where Mr. Baruch made his interesting disclosure of his part in the Plattsburg experiment:

Mr. Graham — “That was about 1915, was it not?”

Mr. Baruch — ” Yes, 1915; and I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. I went off on a long trip, and it was while on this trip that I felt there ought to be some mobilization of the industries, and I was thinking about the scheme that practically was put into effect and was working when I was chairman of the board. When I came back from that trip I asked for an interview with the President. It was the first time I had seen the President since his election, so far as I can remember now.”

Mr. Graham — “You mean his first election?”

Mr. Baruch — “His first election, yes.”

So it is probable that Mr. Baruch, if any stress may be placed on the manner of his words, had known the President before. Ordinary men, who meet the President seldom, usually have a very clear recollection of those meetings. The fact probably is that Mr. Baruch saw the President so frequently that he found it difficult to distinguish the meetings in his memory. He describes the visit referred to:

“I explained to him as earnestly as I could that I was very deeply concerned about the necessity of the mobilization of the industries of the country. The President listened very attentively and graciously, as he always does * * * and the next thing I heard — some months afterward * * * my attention was brought to this Council of National Defense. Secretary Baker brought it to my attention. This was the first time I had met the Secretary of War. He asked me what I thought of it.”

Mr. Graham — “That was before the bill was passed, before it became a law?”

Mr. Baruch — “I think it was. I am not certain about that. I said I would like to have something different.”

This is rather important. A council is a council. Mr. Baruch wanted something different. Eventually he did get something different. He got the President so to change matters as to make Mr. Baruch the most powerful man in the war. The Council of National Defense eventually became the merest side show. It was not a council of Americans that ran the war, it was an autocracy headed by a Jew, with Jews at every strategic point down the line. What Mr. Baruch did was very masterly, but it was not in the American manner. He did what he set out to do, but it is seriously to be questioned whether any man ought to have done what he did, and probably no one but a member of his race would have wanted to do it.

Mr. Graham — “Did the President express any opinion about the advisability of adopting the scheme you proposed?”

Mr. Baruch — “I think I did most of the talking. I do not remember what the President said on that subject, but I think it can be best seen as expressed in the bill.”

Mr. Graham — “Did you impress him with your belief that we were going to get into the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “I probably did. I would like to tell you exactly, but I do not want to guess at it.”

Mr. Graham — “That was your opinion at the time?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes; I thought we were going to get into the war. I thought a war was coming long before it did.

The examination then reverted to Mr. Baruch’s conference with the Secretary of War, in which the former had said he “would like to have something different.”

Mr. Graham — “Mr. Baker said he thought that was the best that could be gotten at that time?”

Mr. Baruch — “I got that impression. Whether he said so or not, I do not know, but I got that impression that that was the best that could be gotten at that time.”

If the event had not turned out exactly as Mr. Baruch planned it, a great deal of his testimony might be discounted on the principle of the natural boastfulness of the Jew after a scheme has succeeded; but there is no discounting anything that he says. The President did exactly what Baruch wanted in a thousand matters, and what Baruch apparently wanted most of all was a ruling hand upon productive America. And that he got. He got it in a larger measure than even Lenin ever got in Russia; for here in the United States the people saw nothing but the patriotic element; they did not see the Jewish Government looming above them. Yet it was there.

The Council of National Defense, as originally constituted — “the best that could be gotten at that time,” though Mr. Baruch “would like something different” — was headed by six secretaries of the Cabinet, the secretaries of War, Navy, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce and Labor. Beneath this official group was an advisory commission, of seven men, three of whom were Jews; one of these Jews was Mr. Baruch. Beneath this advisory commission were scores and hundreds of men, and many committees. One of the groups subordinate to the two groups just mentioned was the War Industries Board, of which Mr. Baruch was originally merely a member, Daniel Willard being the chairman.

Now, it was this War Industries Board which become the “whole thing” later on, and it was Mr. Baruch who became the “whole thing” in that board. The place where he was put became the corner stone; he became the chief pillar of the war administration. The records show it; he himself admits it.

What influence reached into this Council of hundreds of Americans and chose a single Jew to be their undoubted lord and master for the duration of the war? Was it Baruch’s brains that elevated him? Or was it the suggestion of Jewish finance already well forward in its work of mobilization?

There is no desire to minimize the Baruch brain. Brains and money are the Jews’ two greatest weapons. No Jew is picked for a key place who has not brains. Baruch has brains. He is a ceaseless wonder among men who know him. He can do six things at once and control the most colossal operations without fuss or fever. He has both brains and money. But there is something for Jewry to learn: brains and money are not enough. There is another element that even brains cannot cope with, and which renders money cheap. The chess-playing expert may mystify and compel admiration; but the chess-player does not rule the world.

So, Baruch did things. But Trotsky also has done things. The point is this: Are people to be carried away by an appeal deliberately made to their imagination, or are they to scrutinize what has been done, and weigh its consequences?

The Jews could do greater things in the United States than even Baruch has done, if the opportunity offered, acts of superb ease and mastery — but what would it signify? The ideal of a dictator of the United States has never been absent from the group in which Baruch is found -witness the work, “Philip Dru, Administrator,” commonly attributed to Colonel E. M. House, and never denied by him.

As a matter of fact, Baruch could probably do a better job than Trotsky did. Certainly, the recent experience which he had in governing the country during the war was a very valuable education in the art of autocracy. Not that it is by any means Mr. Baruch’s possession alone ; it is also the possession of scores of Jewish leaders who flitted about from department to department, from field to field, receiving a post-graduate course in the art of autocracy, not to mention other things.

Before Mr. Bernard M. Baruch got through, he was the head and center of a system of control such as the United States Government itself never possessed and never will possess until it changes its character as a free government.

Mr. Jefferis — “In other words, you determined what everybody could have?”

Mr. Baruch — “Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me.”

Mr. Jefferis — “What?”

Mr. Baruch — “That final determination, as the President said, rested within me; the determination of whether the Army or Navy should have it rested with me; the determination of whether the Railroad Administration could have it, or the Allies, or whether General Allenby should have locomotives, or whether they should be used in Russia, or used in France.”

Mr. Jefferis — “You had considerable power?”

Mr. Baruch — “Indeed I did, sir. * * *”

Mr. Jefferis — “And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”

What preceded Mr. Baruch’s attainment of this power, how far his power reached and how it was used will be our next inquiry. [THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 27 November 1920]

End of quote.

To understand the detail, nature and consequences of this power held by Bernard Baruch, I encourage you to read the subsequent article.

What the above illustrates is how Ford used documented evidence to illustrate his arguments. What it also illustrates is something that is now essentially hidden from documented history: a single Jewish man controlled the entire supply process for the United States and in large measure its WWI allies, both for military and domestic purposes.

Also, if you read between the inevitably carefully crafted lines of Wikipedia, Baruch held a similar role during WWII. I quote:

When the United States entered World War II, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a special adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization. He supported what was known as a “work or fight” bill. Baruch advocated the creation of a permanent superagency similar to his old Industries Board. His theory enhanced the role of civilian businessmen and industrialists in determining what was needed and who would produce it.[8] Baruch’s ideas were largely adopted, with James Byrnes appointed to carry them out. During World War II Baruch remained a trusted adviser and confidant of President Roosevelt, who in 1944 spent a month as a guest at Baruch’s South Carolina estate, Hobcaw Barony.

In February 1943, Roosevelt invited Baruch to replace the widely criticized War Production Board head Donald M. Nelson. Baruch had long coveted the job, and responded that he only needed to ask his doctor if he were healthy enough for the post. During the delay, however, presidential advisor Harry Hopkins persuaded Roosevelt that firing Nelson at the army’s demands would make him look weak, and when Roosevelt and Baruch met the at the White House, Roosevelt declined to discuss the job offer further.[9][10]

End of quote.

I share this with you because, above all else, it demonstrates the level of control of the United States held by the Zionists from as early as WWI. And don’t think this grip has lessened. If we watch the mainstream media, the discussion is about the global hegemony of the United States or the posturing between various “nation states” or terrorism or…. But what is NEVER discussed is how the United States is just a tool of Zionism and has been since at least 1913. And the world as a whole is under Zionist control. As David Icke spells out very clearly in this video, Zionists make up most of the members of Obama’s government, despite Jews representing some 2% of the US population. Ever wonder why?

Now, as David says, this is not about Jewish people. They are as much the victims of Zionism as Gentiles are. But you have been trained to believe that an attack on Zionism is an attack on you as a Jew. It’s a lie and you are blinded by it. It has become part of your belief system, and as such your defences go up when Zionism is exposed. You are protecting a belief, believing it to be you, as I describe in this article. There are some wonderful Jewish people whose work I admire greatly, who cannot hear the truths I am bringing forth here because they feel I am attacking them or Jews in general. I am not, but that is what you have been indoctrinated to believe. Perhaps you will, one day, see beyond this belief system. You simply cannot defend what I have been sharing in recent days and will continue to share, and it is important that you stop identifying with it as a Jew. Cut the Zionists loose to suffer the fate they deserve.

I will also say that many involved in this global control and destruction are not Jews nor Zionists; but they are Satanists, as I recently illustrated with the Du Pont family. I will talk more about the Illuminati in due course, which infiltrated the higher levels of Freemasonry and made it their own. I suggest you look more closely at the Yale “fraternity” called Skull and Bones, which produces most of America’s key political and business leaders. Dr. Antony Sutton shares his research on this group, and makes it clear that they are not acting in the interests of America. I suggest that if you reflect on history a little, you will clearly see that they act in the interests of the country’s Zionist controllers. If they did not, they would not be still alive or have lived out their lives to old age. The dots are not at all difficult to join if you are willing to look.

So, I encourage you to read Henry Ford’s book, The International Jew. Treat the discrediting it suffered as the work of the Zionists who want to keep their deeds and plans hidden, and understand for how long the United States has been under complete Zionist control, as evidenced by the actions of Bernard Baruch in WWI.

As a final note, history records that the Ford Motor Company was almost bankrupted some years later, and its support by the bankers correlated with Ford ending his Zionist exposé.

Ronald Bernard reveals the satanic practices including child sacrifice within global finance – Update

My friend Molly pointed out that she’d provided a link to the transcript of this video, as reading the subtitles is a little taxing. It’s here. Thanks, Molly.



I have seen several references to this interview with Ronald Bernard (thanks, Molly), who operated at a very high level within global finance.

He saw that the world the public sees is a façade and that all parties – global terrorists, those apparently fighting them, those countries ostensibly under an embargo, etc., are all working together.

He got to see that those who run this world are either satanists or Luciferians and, at the highest levels, this includes child sacrifice.

It was when he was asked to participate in a child sacrifice that Bernard’s world began to crumble.

Here are a few things Bernard shared:

  • The world is run by 8-8,500 people, maximum
  • Child sacrifice is at the heart of their control system and has been for thousands of years
  • The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is real and everyone should read it (did I hear someone else say that recently?)
  • If enough people woke up to this, the global elite would be swept away in a heartbeat

I encourage you to watch this, if only to confirm that so many of the things I have been writing about for years are real. It is in enough of us understanding and accepting this that change can come.

Apparently, there is a second half of this interview to be shared in a month’s time. I can’t wait, but will it see the light of day?


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Ronald Bernard reveals the satanic practices including child sacrifice within global finance

I have seen several references to this interview with Ronald Bernard (thanks, Molly), who operated at a very high level within global finance.

He saw that the world the public sees is a façade and that all parties – global terrorists, those apparently fighting them, those countries ostensibly under an embargo, etc., are all working together.

He got to see that those who run this world are either satanists or Luciferians and, at the highest levels, this includes child sacrifice.

It was when he was asked to participate in a child sacrifice that Bernard’s world began to crumble.

Here are a few things Bernard shared:

  • The world is run by 8-8,500 people, maximum
  • Child sacrifice is at the heart of their control system and has been for thousands of years
  • The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is real and everyone should read it (did I hear someone else say that recently?)
  • If enough people woke up to this, the global elite would be swept away in a heartbeat

I encourage you to watch this, if only to confirm that so many of the things I have been writing about for years are real. It is in enough of us understanding and accepting this that change can come.

Apparently, there is a second half of this interview to be shared in a month’s time. I can’t wait, but will it see the light of day?


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

Murdered for Speaking Out: Last Words of David Goldberg Warning of Mass Murder of Americans – Veterans Today

Thank you, Brian. 
If what is shared on this link is true, it is important to understand it. It fits perfectly with a lot of what I know and understand and it is important to expose and intercept these plans. This man is dead for a reason…
If you understand the plans that sit behind what unfolded in the 20th century, most notably the two world wars, the Russian Revolution and many other things, you will understand how such action is entirely consistent with it. In truth, the seeds of those plans are centuries old, not decades and I have written extensively about this on my blog. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is a good place to start. Even though a great deal was done to discredit this document, I am satisfied it is genuine, borne out by events that unfolded last century. Few have grasped that one of the key objectives of the two world wars was the creation of Israel, a nation state in the Middle East that houses mostly Khazarian (European) Jews who have no bloodline connection to the Semitic Hebrews of the region.
However, as David Goldberg has said, more and more people are waking up. It is time.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

New Zealand: The Unravelling of an Israeli Mass Murder?

Thank you, Gordon.

As usual, Duff peels the onion of the NZ mass murder to reveal the detailed intelligence story behind it, confirming an Israeli shooter, almost certainly Mossad. It’s their stock in trade.

This video shares a similar story, albeit with the less thoroughly informed view that Gordon brings.

As I said a few days ago, this is clearly NZ’s Port Arthur moment. Even the press has used these words.

I was chatting with a friend about this yesterday, and he swung the conversation to a discussion about gun removal from the public.

There are diverse views on this subject. I mentioned that Switzerland has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world and a very low rate of homicide using guns. So, there is no correlation in truth between the two.

But the real point, for me, is those who run our world set up these events, package the story emotionally in the press along with the words of the politicians, and it’s all over. And who better to push it through than a woman PM who is a young mother, carefully packaged up in tears and an unwavering commitment to new gun controls.

Simple. It’s how it’s done, and it’s the same game that gets countries to go to war with each other. Over and over and over again. And who guides all of this. I’ll let you guess, though you could start by reading “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology 

Inside the Mind of Edward Mandell House, Administrator

In my experience, most Americans cannot conceive of the idea that their country has been a puppet of the Rothschilds and their minions for centuries. Henry Ford’s writings of 1920-2 opened the window on this for me, perhaps most notably through his revealing the complete control that Bernard Baruch wielded over all US supply, military allied and domestic, for the term of WWI. He had a similar though less hands on role in WWII.
On one level or another, they want to believe that one side of the US political system or the other carries the true answer. And it could be Republican or Democrat. 
Indeed, few people can stand back and grasp the agenda that unfolded during the 20th century, which was telegraphed well enough in “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, which Henry Ford strongly argued were real and which Ronald Bernard, the high level Dutch banker who jumped ship from his elite banking role, has recently confirmed as true.
And so, this discussion between James Corbett and Richard Grove  discussing the book “Phillip Dru: Administrator” written by Edward Mandell House, the controller of Woodrow Wilson and others is so affirming. They understand the true history of things, and they unfold its obviousness, whilst explaining the roles of some of the players.
And we still live with the consequences of the planning and manipulation unfolded in the early part of the 20th century. As they say, WWI set the stage for what has unfolded, not just WWII but today.
And perhaps this has been best encapsulated by Henry Makow.
This conversation is a wonderful window into this history, that we need to understand if we are to change our future.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email