I have long been aware of Noam Chomsky’s support for the official view of 9/11, but I was unaware he had adopted a similar position on the assassination of JFK. It is clear that this man is not what he presents himself to be. This article by Professor Jim Fetzer spells this out in stark detail. It is one of the games that gets played – an individual builds a profile that appears to support a particular stance, except when it comes to the core issues, and then they seek to lead their supporters away from the truth. Clearly Chomsky is one such individual.
Next Post
Why Are Commanding Generals Being Sacked?
Thu Nov 13 , 2014
I find this article very interesting and concerning. I quote: All in all, since the second term of the Obama administration, close to 300 commanding generals, admirals, […]
You May Like
-
11 years ago
The History of the United States as you’ve never heard it – and an attempt to reclaim personal power
-
10 years ago
Paris attack used as an excuse to target encryption
-
12 years ago
New iPhone 5S Commercial – with a twist
-
11 years ago
The Relationship between Washington and ISIL: The Evidence
-
10 years ago
Labour peer Lord Janner WILL face prosecution for historic child sex abuse
-
10 years ago
1971 – FBI Office Break-In Changed Everything
Recent Comments