Recent Posts

Postings by date

February 2024



Recent Comments


As I walk this path of exposing the hidden history of our time, I came across these words:

Searching to understand the Forbidden History of our age requires the internal fortitude to challenge establishment convention, while maintaining the accuracies of eternal truths. History is often referred to as His Story. The “his” represents the power to invent the chronicle and fabricate meaning of events.

Courage to face the evidence and corroborate alternative explanations to established accounts is not easy. The slings and arrows that target anyone who dares to dispute the ruling order is a given. Demonization of any contrary storyline that conflicts with the comfort of clichés and tales of self-serving accounts is the price one pays for seeking the truth.

And Henry Ford’s story is one example.

Henry Ford is best known for creating the Ford Motor Company. He has also been branded as being anti-Semitic, that damning, weaponised phrase of the Zionists.

As with so many things on this journey of discovery, it began with a “chance” sighting, in this case this panel in an article:

I was intrigued. What was Ford on about? What did he know, or thought he knew? It turns out quite a lot, and the brief words above express a great deal of the understanding he reached; something we all need to understand, Jews included, because he was speaking about the Zionists.

Just after WWI, Henry Ford could see what was happening in the world and especially the United States, and he wanted to alert other Americans to what he could see. Ford recognised that he would not be able to get the articles he wanted to write published in the mainstream press, since it was either owned by Jewish interests or they were major advertisers who would threaten to withdraw their advertising. So, Ford bought the Dearborn Independent, which meant he could write and publish what he could see.

Ford was writing in an interesting time; 1920-21. So, his view was just after the end of WWI and before the events of the 30’s and WWII had unfolded. Hence, what he wrote provides a fascinating snapshot.

Now, as I said, Ford has been branded as being anti-Jewish, both at the time and since, and I know there are informed, intelligent Jews today who do not believe what Ford wrote. But the key thing Ford did was rely only upon the words and testimony of Jews, supplemented by documented facts. Now, I’m not saying he didn’t express opinions, not all of which I agree with, in part because my view is from 2015 rather than 1920. But by using the words of Jews for his evidence, whilst there were the inevitable protests and accusations of anti-Semitism, what he said could not be refuted, and it was not refuted. Protested against but not refuted.

Soon after he completed the series of articles, he had them printed in book form entitled The International Jew.

The ground that Ford covered was very comprehensive; from banking to immigration; from Bolshevism and its primarily New York origins to the overtaking of the American theatre, the press, their domination of the movie industry from its creation, the compromising of baseball, the Jewish control of the political process; it was comprehensive and far-reaching, as the Zionist plans and processes were and are. And, as I said, he used the words of Jews to illustrate what he was saying.

One item he focussed upon was the document entitled “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, for which he provided extensive evidence to validate (a subject I will return to in another post).

But the example I want to focus upon by way of illustration here is the role of Bernard Baruch during WWI. My reason for doing this is that most people who are picking apart the Zionist picture today appear to consider that the Zionist influence and control of the United States has arisen since WWII with the emergence of Israel, whereas the Zionist involvement with the United States is far older, and became essentially complete with the establishment of the Federal Reserve as a private bank in 1913. If you do not understand the financial history of the United States and indeed the world, I encourage you to read the post I entitled How the Money Masters have painted themselves out of history and watch the videos it links to.

I will quote extensively from Ford’s article of 27 November 1920:

In our own country we have just had a four-year term of Jewish rule, almost as absolute as that which exists in Russia. This appears to be a very strong statement, but it is somewhat milder than the facts warrant. And the facts themselves are not of hearsay origin, nor the product of a biased point of view; they are the fruits of an inquiry by the lawful officials of the United States who were set aside in favor of a ready-made Jewish Government, and they are forever spread upon the official records of the United States.

The Jews have proved for all time that the control of Wall Street is not necessary to the control of the American people, and the person by whom they proved this was a Wall Street Jew. This man has been called “the pro-consul of Judah in America.”

It is said that once, referring to himself, he exclaimed: “Behold the Disraeli of the United States!”

To a select committee of the Congress of the United States he said: “I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”

And in saying so he did not overstate the case. He did have more power. It was not all legal power, this much he admitted. It reached into every home and store and factory and bank and railway and mine. It touched armies and governments. It touched the recruiting boards. It made and unmade men without a word. It was power without responsibility and without limit. It was such a power as compelled the Gentile population to lay bare every secret before this man and his Jewish associates, giving them a knowledge and an advantage that billions of gold could not buy.

Doubtless not one in every 50,000 of the readers of this paper ever heard of this man before 1917, and doubtless the same number have clear knowledge of him now. He glided out of a certain obscurity unlighted by public service of fame, into the high rulership of the nation at war. The constituted government had little to do with him save vote the money and do his bidding. He said that men could have appealed over his head to the President of the United States, but, knowing the situation, men never did.

Who is this figure, colossal in his way, and most instructive of the readiness of Judah to take the rule whenever he desires?

His name is Bernard M. Baruch. He was born in South Carolina 50 years ago, the son of Dr. Simon Baruch, who was a medical man of some consequence. “I went to college with the idea of becoming a doctor, but I did not become a doctor,” he told the Congressional Committee. He was graduated at the College of the City of New York when he was just under 19 years of age. This college is one of the favorite educational institutions with the Jews, its president being Dr. S. E. Mezes, a brother-in-law of Colonel E. M. House, the colonel whose influence and disfavor at the White House has for a long time been a favorite subject of wondering speculation on the part of the American people, though it scarcely need be so any longer.

Apparently young Baruch knew exactly what he wanted to do, and set out to do it. He says he spent “many years” after his graduation in certain studies, “particularly economics” as related to railroads and industrial propositions. “I tried to make Poor’s Manual and the financial supplement of the Financial Chronicle my bible for a number of years.”

He could not have spent very “many years” in these pursuits, for after going down to Wall Street as a clerk and a runner, and when he was “about 26 or 27” he became a member of the firm of A. A. Housman & Company. “In about 1900 or 1902” he left the firm, but he had meanwhile gained a seat on the Stock Exchange.

He then went into business for himself, a statement that must be taken literally in view of his testimony that he “did not do any business for anybody but himself. I made a study of the corporations engaged in the production and manufacture of different things, and a study of the men engaged in them.”

In answer to questions intended to disclose the exact nature of his operations before he suddenly appeared as the man who “had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war,” he stood off from any intimations that he perhaps engaged in mere buying and selling of stock. “My business then became the organization of various enterprises,” he said, “and in connection with that, I, of course, did buy and sell stocks * * * If I organized any concern, I naturally took a large interest in it, or I would not organize it if I did not believe in it, and I stayed with the development of that concern; and then if I cared later on to sell it, I would sell it.”

Pressed by the examiners for a still more detailed account of his activities in business, he said:

“Well, I was instrumental in the purchase of the Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Company; in the purchase of Selby Smelter, Tacoma Smelter, and various copper, tungsten, rubber — I was instrumental in building up one of the great industries in rubber in Mexico, which was the establishment of the source of supply of rubber, and developed a large concern there for the production of raw material, which is still going on * * *

“I became interested in the new process of concentration of low-grade ores in the Mesaba Range, but the interest I had particularly in steel was in the study of the present-day organization, in order to get myself posted so that I could intelligently buy or sell their securities * * *”

It is an important point, one not made very clear in the testimony, what interests Mr. Baruch held at the beginning of the war. His previous activities in various fields, principally perhaps in the field of metals, had been important and numerous. In any case, as a young man, he is found to be master of large sums of money, and there is no indication that he inherited it. He is very wealthy. What change the war made in his wealth, if it made any change at all, is a matter on which nothing may be said now. Certainly many of his friends and closest associates reaped great quantities of money from their activities during the war.

Now, as to the point of his business connections just prior to the war, this testimony appears:

Mr. Graham — “You continued in the operation of these various businesses, in the formation of companies and the flotation of their stocks, and in your business in the Stock Exchange and elsewhere up until the time of the beginning of the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “I was gradually getting myself away from business, because I had made up my mind to retire, and I had been getting less active with that end in view, and I was not very much in sympathy with the organization of companies. I am not criticizing other men who engage in business that resulted in profits even before we had gotten into war. I had made up my mind to leave and do some other things that I hope to be able to do now; but that process was interrupted by my appointment as member of the advisory commission without any suggestion or without any knowledge or idea it was coming.”

Does he mean that the process of getting out of business was interrupted by his appointment on the advisory commission, which appointment led straight to his complete rulership of the United States at war?

Mr. Jefferis — “Had any of the members of the advisory commission been engaged in the production of raw materials or in manufactured products, or not?”

Mr. Baruch — “I had.”

Mr. Jefferis — “In what way?”

Mr. Baruch — “I had made a rather deep study of the production and the distribution and manufacture of many of these raw materials. I had to make an intensive study of these things in order to do the things I was engaged in.”

Mr. Jefferis — “You were not running any raw material production?”

Mr. Baruch — “I was interested in concerns — I was interested in the study and production of a great many of these things, because I developed and organized concerns which did it.”

Does he mean that he was interested in concerns at the time of his appointment? This would be an interesting point to clear up.

Another matter that would be not only of interest, but of great usefulness in explaining the gathering of a Jewish government around the President during the war, is the question of Bernard M. Baruch’s acquaintance with Woodrow Wilson. When did it begin? What circumstances or what persons brought them together? There are stories, of course, and one of them may be true, but the story ought not to be told unless accompanied by the fullest conformation. Why should it occur that a Jew should be the one man ready and selected for a position of greatest power during the war? (There is evidence elsewhere that Wilson’s Presidential campaign was funded by Zionist interests, including Baruch and Paul Warburg – Richard)

Mr. Baruch, in his testimony, sheds no light on this question. He had opportunity to do so, had he wished.

Mr. Graham — “I assume that you were personally acquainted with the President prior to the outbreak of the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir.”

Mr. Graham — “Up to the time that you were appointed as a member of the advisory commission, had you ever had any personal conferences with the President about these matters?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir.”

Mr. Graham — “Had he called you in consultation or had he talked to you about these matters and about the matter of your appointment before you were appointed?”

Mr. Baruch — “Never suggested anything about the appointment, because I would have told him that I would prefer not to be appointed.”

Mr. Graham — “Do you now recall, Mr. Baruch, how long before you were actually appointed as a member of that advisory commission you had your last conference with the President?”

Mr. Baruch — “No * * *” That is not all of Mr. Baruch’s answer, but it is his reply to the question. Having said “No,” Mr. Baruch became very communicative on another matter. His complete reply is:

“No; but I can tell you something that may be of interest, and that is probably what you want to know. I had been very much disturbed by the unprepared condition of this country, so much so that I was one of the first men to support General Wood in the Plattsburg encampment, and I think he will admit I gave him the first money and told him whatever he did I would guarantee to stand behind that movement, which happily only took a few thousand dollars so far as I was concerned, having caught the public approval and it went ahead, and in that relation naturally one had to think about the mobilization of the industries of the country, because people do not fight alone with their hands; they have got to fight with things.”

It is thus shown that Mr. Baruch was a forehanded gentleman. It was only the year 1915. The European war had then not become more than an amazing spectacle to the mass of the American people. But still Mr. Baruch was convinced we were going to have war, and he spent money on his guess. The government which was then “keeping us out of war” was also consulting with Mr. Baruch who was already ahead of the government in creating the atmosphere of war in this country. If the reader, by a mental effort, can reconstruct the year of 1915, and then put into his picture of that year the element of which he was not then possessed, namely, the activity of Mr. Bernard M. Baruch and other Jews, he will see that he did not know much about what was going on, even if he did read the newspapers with attention!

(I will provide testimony in another article that the Zionists in Britain promised to bring America into the war to win against Germany after Germany had essentially won the war by 1916 and offered generous terms to Britain for peace, in exchange for the promise of Palestine for the Zionists. Clearly, this planning was well in hand by 1915. – Richard).

To proceed with the examination, following the place where Mr. Baruch made his interesting disclosure of his part in the Plattsburg experiment:

Mr. Graham — “That was about 1915, was it not?”

Mr. Baruch — ” Yes, 1915; and I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. I went off on a long trip, and it was while on this trip that I felt there ought to be some mobilization of the industries, and I was thinking about the scheme that practically was put into effect and was working when I was chairman of the board. When I came back from that trip I asked for an interview with the President. It was the first time I had seen the President since his election, so far as I can remember now.”

Mr. Graham — “You mean his first election?”

Mr. Baruch — “His first election, yes.”

So it is probable that Mr. Baruch, if any stress may be placed on the manner of his words, had known the President before. Ordinary men, who meet the President seldom, usually have a very clear recollection of those meetings. The fact probably is that Mr. Baruch saw the President so frequently that he found it difficult to distinguish the meetings in his memory. He describes the visit referred to:

“I explained to him as earnestly as I could that I was very deeply concerned about the necessity of the mobilization of the industries of the country. The President listened very attentively and graciously, as he always does * * * and the next thing I heard — some months afterward * * * my attention was brought to this Council of National Defense. Secretary Baker brought it to my attention. This was the first time I had met the Secretary of War. He asked me what I thought of it.”

Mr. Graham — “That was before the bill was passed, before it became a law?”

Mr. Baruch — “I think it was. I am not certain about that. I said I would like to have something different.”

This is rather important. A council is a council. Mr. Baruch wanted something different. Eventually he did get something different. He got the President so to change matters as to make Mr. Baruch the most powerful man in the war. The Council of National Defense eventually became the merest side show. It was not a council of Americans that ran the war, it was an autocracy headed by a Jew, with Jews at every strategic point down the line. What Mr. Baruch did was very masterly, but it was not in the American manner. He did what he set out to do, but it is seriously to be questioned whether any man ought to have done what he did, and probably no one but a member of his race would have wanted to do it.

Mr. Graham — “Did the President express any opinion about the advisability of adopting the scheme you proposed?”

Mr. Baruch — “I think I did most of the talking. I do not remember what the President said on that subject, but I think it can be best seen as expressed in the bill.”

Mr. Graham — “Did you impress him with your belief that we were going to get into the war?”

Mr. Baruch — “I probably did. I would like to tell you exactly, but I do not want to guess at it.”

Mr. Graham — “That was your opinion at the time?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes; I thought we were going to get into the war. I thought a war was coming long before it did.

The examination then reverted to Mr. Baruch’s conference with the Secretary of War, in which the former had said he “would like to have something different.”

Mr. Graham — “Mr. Baker said he thought that was the best that could be gotten at that time?”

Mr. Baruch — “I got that impression. Whether he said so or not, I do not know, but I got that impression that that was the best that could be gotten at that time.”

If the event had not turned out exactly as Mr. Baruch planned it, a great deal of his testimony might be discounted on the principle of the natural boastfulness of the Jew after a scheme has succeeded; but there is no discounting anything that he says. The President did exactly what Baruch wanted in a thousand matters, and what Baruch apparently wanted most of all was a ruling hand upon productive America. And that he got. He got it in a larger measure than even Lenin ever got in Russia; for here in the United States the people saw nothing but the patriotic element; they did not see the Jewish Government looming above them. Yet it was there.

The Council of National Defense, as originally constituted — “the best that could be gotten at that time,” though Mr. Baruch “would like something different” — was headed by six secretaries of the Cabinet, the secretaries of War, Navy, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce and Labor. Beneath this official group was an advisory commission, of seven men, three of whom were Jews; one of these Jews was Mr. Baruch. Beneath this advisory commission were scores and hundreds of men, and many committees. One of the groups subordinate to the two groups just mentioned was the War Industries Board, of which Mr. Baruch was originally merely a member, Daniel Willard being the chairman.

Now, it was this War Industries Board which become the “whole thing” later on, and it was Mr. Baruch who became the “whole thing” in that board. The place where he was put became the corner stone; he became the chief pillar of the war administration. The records show it; he himself admits it.

What influence reached into this Council of hundreds of Americans and chose a single Jew to be their undoubted lord and master for the duration of the war? Was it Baruch’s brains that elevated him? Or was it the suggestion of Jewish finance already well forward in its work of mobilization?

There is no desire to minimize the Baruch brain. Brains and money are the Jews’ two greatest weapons. No Jew is picked for a key place who has not brains. Baruch has brains. He is a ceaseless wonder among men who know him. He can do six things at once and control the most colossal operations without fuss or fever. He has both brains and money. But there is something for Jewry to learn: brains and money are not enough. There is another element that even brains cannot cope with, and which renders money cheap. The chess-playing expert may mystify and compel admiration; but the chess-player does not rule the world.

So, Baruch did things. But Trotsky also has done things. The point is this: Are people to be carried away by an appeal deliberately made to their imagination, or are they to scrutinize what has been done, and weigh its consequences?

The Jews could do greater things in the United States than even Baruch has done, if the opportunity offered, acts of superb ease and mastery — but what would it signify? The ideal of a dictator of the United States has never been absent from the group in which Baruch is found -witness the work, “Philip Dru, Administrator,” commonly attributed to Colonel E. M. House, and never denied by him.

As a matter of fact, Baruch could probably do a better job than Trotsky did. Certainly, the recent experience which he had in governing the country during the war was a very valuable education in the art of autocracy. Not that it is by any means Mr. Baruch’s possession alone ; it is also the possession of scores of Jewish leaders who flitted about from department to department, from field to field, receiving a post-graduate course in the art of autocracy, not to mention other things.

Before Mr. Bernard M. Baruch got through, he was the head and center of a system of control such as the United States Government itself never possessed and never will possess until it changes its character as a free government.

Mr. Jefferis — “In other words, you determined what everybody could have?”

Mr. Baruch — “Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me.”

Mr. Jefferis — “What?”

Mr. Baruch — “That final determination, as the President said, rested within me; the determination of whether the Army or Navy should have it rested with me; the determination of whether the Railroad Administration could have it, or the Allies, or whether General Allenby should have locomotives, or whether they should be used in Russia, or used in France.”

Mr. Jefferis — “You had considerable power?”

Mr. Baruch — “Indeed I did, sir. * * *”

Mr. Jefferis — “And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?”

Mr. Baruch — “Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”

What preceded Mr. Baruch’s attainment of this power, how far his power reached and how it was used will be our next inquiry. [THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 27 November 1920]

End of quote.

To understand the detail, nature and consequences of this power held by Bernard Baruch, I encourage you to read the subsequent article.

What the above illustrates is how Ford used documented evidence to illustrate his arguments. What it also illustrates is something that is now essentially hidden from documented history: a single Jewish man controlled the entire supply process for the United States and in large measure its WWI allies, both for military and domestic purposes.

Also, if you read between the inevitably carefully crafted lines of Wikipedia, Baruch held a similar role during WWII. I quote:

When the United States entered World War II, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a special adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization. He supported what was known as a “work or fight” bill. Baruch advocated the creation of a permanent superagency similar to his old Industries Board. His theory enhanced the role of civilian businessmen and industrialists in determining what was needed and who would produce it.[8] Baruch’s ideas were largely adopted, with James Byrnes appointed to carry them out. During World War II Baruch remained a trusted adviser and confidant of President Roosevelt, who in 1944 spent a month as a guest at Baruch’s South Carolina estate, Hobcaw Barony.

In February 1943, Roosevelt invited Baruch to replace the widely criticized War Production Board head Donald M. Nelson. Baruch had long coveted the job, and responded that he only needed to ask his doctor if he were healthy enough for the post. During the delay, however, presidential advisor Harry Hopkins persuaded Roosevelt that firing Nelson at the army’s demands would make him look weak, and when Roosevelt and Baruch met the at the White House, Roosevelt declined to discuss the job offer further.[9][10]

End of quote.

I share this with you because, above all else, it demonstrates the level of control of the United States held by the Zionists from as early as WWI. And don’t think this grip has lessened. If we watch the mainstream media, the discussion is about the global hegemony of the United States or the posturing between various “nation states” or terrorism or…. But what is NEVER discussed is how the United States is just a tool of Zionism and has been since at least 1913. And the world as a whole is under Zionist control. As David Icke spells out very clearly in this video, Zionists make up most of the members of Obama’s government, despite Jews representing some 2% of the US population. Ever wonder why?

Now, as David says, this is not about Jewish people. They are as much the victims of Zionism as Gentiles are. But you have been trained to believe that an attack on Zionism is an attack on you as a Jew. It’s a lie and you are blinded by it. It has become part of your belief system, and as such your defences go up when Zionism is exposed. You are protecting a belief, believing it to be you, as I describe in this article. There are some wonderful Jewish people whose work I admire greatly, who cannot hear the truths I am bringing forth here because they feel I am attacking them or Jews in general. I am not, but that is what you have been indoctrinated to believe. Perhaps you will, one day, see beyond this belief system. You simply cannot defend what I have been sharing in recent days and will continue to share, and it is important that you stop identifying with it as a Jew. Cut the Zionists loose to suffer the fate they deserve.

I will also say that many involved in this global control and destruction are not Jews nor Zionists; but they are Satanists, as I recently illustrated with the Du Pont family. I will talk more about the Illuminati in due course, which infiltrated the higher levels of Freemasonry and made it their own. I suggest you look more closely at the Yale “fraternity” called Skull and Bones, which produces most of America’s key political and business leaders. Dr. Antony Sutton shares his research on this group, and makes it clear that they are not acting in the interests of America. I suggest that if you reflect on history a little, you will clearly see that they act in the interests of the country’s Zionist controllers. If they did not, they would not be still alive or have lived out their lives to old age. The dots are not at all difficult to join if you are willing to look.

So, I encourage you to read Henry Ford’s book, The International Jew. Treat the discrediting it suffered as the work of the Zionists who want to keep their deeds and plans hidden, and understand for how long the United States has been under complete Zionist control, as evidenced by the actions of Bernard Baruch in WWI.

As a final note, history records that the Ford Motor Company was almost bankrupted some years later, and its support by the bankers correlated with Ford ending his Zionist exposé.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Next Post

#OpDeathEaters FAQ and Friday the 13th global events

Thu Feb 12 , 2015
Heather Marsh, the driver behind #OpDeathEaters, has posted an FAQ for the project on her blog, and explained the effort tomorrow (Friday the 13th) to […]
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email