Archive for February 2015

Stolen generations: children still being removed, say Indigenous protesters

In case you think the removal of Australian aboriginal or children of mixed blood has stopped, think again. This article shows otherwise.

So does this one.

The truth of the matter is that indigenous people are continuing to be killed and/or their cultures broken up, all over the world. When it’s so widespread, you have to ask; Who is driving it?

One thing is for certain, and that is they carry wisdom and understanding about the nature of life and reality that does not fit inside the widely promoted paradigm, best expressed as the scientific worldview.

A dear friend of mine, a very spiritual woman who was worked extensively with Australian aboriginal teachers and healers, shared a story with me from a wonderful aboriginal teacher she had worked with. This teacher had been brought up as a child inside Catholicism. She began to be initiated by an aboriginal elder and, at one point, the elder stepped through a large boulder and then asked her pupil to follow. The initiate said she could not and her initiation stopped at that point. On reflection in later years, she put her fear and doubt down to her Catholic upbringing.

Again, anyone living inside the scientific worldview will dismiss this story out of hand. “Where’s the scientific verification?”, you are likely to ask. Or, “Give me time and I’ll explain it away.”

You can find similar stories in the books of Carlos Castaneda and Yogananda’s book “Autobiography of a Yogi”.

These understandings punch holes in the scientific worldview and are being eliminated with our indigenous peoples.

But they are fighting back. May they succeed and help to liberate us all.

The story of Manny Waks, who blew the whistle on Jewish sexual abuse in Melbourne

The story of Manny Waks makes sobering reading.

On one level, it’s just another story on covered up sexual abuse, and far less graphic than some others I have shared with you.

But, apart from the cultic nature of the Chabad sect of Judaism, I find this element of interest:

The rabbinic law of mesirah – the prohibition of a Jew informing on a fellow Jew to secular authorities – was used by leaders to keep victims silent, the commission heard. When victims did go to police, they were labelled mosers, or “informers”, a charge so serious they were threatened with exclusion so severe it was akin to being excommunication, which would mean being ripped away from a culture, identity, religion and community. It meant everything from marriage prospects to opportunities for religious honours would be forever taken away.

Now, if you look on the Internet, you will find many who argue that mesirah has outlived its usefulness. However, I am drawn to refer to the descriptions of Henry Ford in his writings in the Dearborn Independent, where he describes how the American Jewish community set up its own court processes and rallied to defend a Jewish person who was the subject of a court action, as is illustrated to have occurred more recently towards the end of this video. It is clear that this practice is alive and well, not only from Manny’s experience.

I quote further from this article:

It does not matter that peak Jewish bodies have publicly said the concept of mesirah does not, and should never, apply to cases of child sexual abuse. Even today, Waks says, victims remain fearful of being shunned.

“The fact that to this day I am the only victim who has been willing to be named should say plenty,” Waks says.

The peak Jewish bodies are not saying the practice should not continue, only that it should not apply in such a circumstance.

In other words, at least some elements of the Jewish community believe their fellow Jew is above the law of the land.

Justifying My Existence – David Cole

A post from a man who has paid dearly for speaking the truth:

It is the tragic reality of my being that I’m forced to justify myself every time someone learns what I did in the past and what I’ve been thrust back into doing in the present. When I’m fortunate enough to be in a room with people who have no idea who I am, if I’m asked what I do for a living, I always answer “ceramic lobsters,” because there’s no better way to ensure dead silence and zero follow-up questions.

But more often than not, I’m forced by my infamy to give an honest answer: “I attempt to correct the historical record regarding the Holocaust, primarily by sniffing out and exposing fake artifacts and fraudulent or improperly-used documents.”

And that’s when I get the almost inevitable response: “Why?”

The “why” argument goes something like this: “Why make a big deal about fakes or frauds in Holocaust history? Isn’t the essence of the Holocaust still true? Jews suffered and died, right? So all you’re doing is empowering those who would take your work and deny the whole thing. Even if this or that gas chamber is fake, why point it out?”

And my usual reply to the “why” question is: “I do it precisely because people like you are so quick to ask such a fucking inane question.”

In no other field are fakes, frauds, and forgeries tolerated as they are in Holocaust history. And in no other field are the people who try to sort the fakes from the facts so ruthlessly attacked and (in many countries) imprisoned.

“Let’s get something straight—I am not the one ‘empowering’ Holocaust deniers. That honor goes to the mainstream ‘experts’ who manufacture or tolerate the fakes.”

Let’s look at the art world. Fakes are a massive scandal whenever they’re exposed. No art historian is going to say, “Well, that might be a phony Vermeer, but it’s such a nice picture—I’ll label it as genuine because it’ll help get kids interested in the Old Masters.”

“Professor Van der Hoogenmeep, have you checked to see if that new Rembrandt in your museum is genuine or not?”

“Meh. What’s it matter? It’s purdy.”

Sure, there have been cover-ups of artistic forgeries, but that’s because the price an expert pays in the art world for having presented one is high. There are repercussions. For the forgers, too.

When someone responds to my revisionism with the “why” question, I’ll ask them if Holocaust history is more important than art history. Typically, they’ll say something like, “Of course Holocaust history is more important! Never again! Remember to never forget, and never forget to remember!” I’ll then close the conversation by pointing out that if I had said that my job entails sniffing out art forgeries, I wouldn’t have been asked such a stupid question as “Why?”

Let’s get something straight—I am not the one “empowering” Holocaust deniers. That honor goes to the mainstream “experts” who manufacture or tolerate the fakes. Those are the folks who’ve polluted the history; I’m just trying to sort that mess out. If you want to get angry at someone, get angry at them. Every fake I discovered or helped expose in the 90s was the product of people who should’ve known better:

For decades, the staff of the Auschwitz State Museum misrepresented an air raid shelter as an “original state” gas chamber. I exposed that fraud in 1992 after interviewing senior curator Dr. Francizsek Piper on camera.

After the opening of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum of Tolerance in 1993, the curators took a 1961 Polish fictional film titled The Ambulance and reedited it to appear as “found footage” of a Nazi gassing of children. I torpedoed that sham in 1995.

For years, the officials at the Majdanek State Museum displayed a supposed gas chamber—equipped with a window and doors that lock from the inside and open into the room. In 1994, the museum’s research director, Tomasz Kranz, admitted to me that it was actually a simple delousing room after I showed footage of the phony “chamber” on national TV.

The U.S. National Archives and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum “celebrated” the museum’s grand opening in 1993 by collaborating on a book in which old Army Signal Corps footage of a Paris rifle range was “repurposed” as footage of a gas chamber. I uncovered that deceit the same year.

In 1996, Raye Farr (then-film archives director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum) wrote a letter to me in which she revealed that the “Mogilev footage” (the supposed footage of the first Nazi gassing) was widely considered to be a Soviet fake. Ten years later, she was still gushing publicly about the footage being authentic.

In a 1994 interview with noted “skeptic” and acclaimed prop comic Dr. Michael Shermer, Michael Berenbaum (then-director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and its research institute) conceded, after being quizzed about my work, that he’d never actually examined the supposed gas chamber door displayed in his own museum as proof of the Nazis’ infamous murder weapon.

Not to be outdone, Jerzy Wróblewski, director of the Auschwitz State Museum, told the New Yorker in 1993 that he has “neither the time nor the resources to deal with all the issues” I raised regarding authenticity.

For good measure, I should add all the times that respected Holocaust professionals admitted to me (when they knew me as Stein) that the “gas chamber” at Dachau was a fake, built for show by the U.S. Army after liberation.

None of the fakes I uncovered or helped bring to the public’s attention alter the basic reality of the Holocaust. Mass murders of Jews still occurred, on the Eastern Front, and in camps like Treblinka and Sobibor. In other words, the fakes inserted into the historical record by governments, archivists, and historians are not necessary to prove the Holocaust. Their presence serves only to undermine the integrity of the historical record, and rooting them out is a noble cause.

Those who denounce me as a “denier” are essentially saying that the fakes I exposed are the totality of the Holocaust. They are saying that Holocaust history can’t survive without lies. That’s genuine “Holocaust denial” right there. The people who point to me and ask “Why?” should ask themselves what they’re afraid of.

The world is about to mark the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. Isn’t it time to stop imprisoning people who call out the fakes and frauds in the historical record? Perhaps it’s time to view Holocaust history in the same way we view art history. Fakes are bad, and the people who expose the fakes are not necessarily villains.

Personally, I go about my work with a clear conscience. Not that there aren’t days when I long for the calm, uneventful life of a ceramic lobster master-craftsman. Oh well, there’s always tomorrow, and a man can dream.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email