I have written extensively about a carefully hidden and protected group, primarily of Khazarian origin who present themselves as Jewish but have no Semitic origin, who control our world. These people are satanic and use horrific practices, including child abuse and child sacrifice, to control those in power, in all elements of power, and through them the rest of humanity.
This is carefully occulted from the general public. However, the evidence of it is everywhere if you look.
I recently watched an interview with Wayne Jett, the author of “The Fruits of Graft”, and Jett spoke about the writings and influence of H G Wells. Most of us know of him for his science fiction writings; however, Wells also wrote Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought. Anticipations was, in essence, the blueprint of the elite’s plan for global domination. Jett explained that he had written the bulk of The Fruits of Graft before coming across Anticipations, and he subsequently added Chapter 17, which covers Wells’ book as well as material from the “transcript of the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, former ambassador to France from the Soviet Union, conducted by Joseph Stalin’s agent amidst purges which preceded Stalin’s assassination of Leon Trotsky”. Interestingly, I had previously read the first 16 chapters of Jett’s book, stopping short of… Chapter 17.
I quote: Sociopaths pursue their goals, not by declaring them openly, but through deceit. They use multi-layered deception (Keynesian economics, for example) to create “elaborate fallacies and misleading theories,” while concealing designs and motives…
…Wells and his sponsors realized that the “solutions” he described could not be admitted in public discourse, much less fully implemented, until the timing was right—when men of the new republic took full power. Why not use votes of “people of the abyss” to gain power before letting them in on the true social agenda?
End of quote.
And a quote related to the Rakovsky testimony:
He asserted that New York financiers “are revolutionaries objectively and subjectively, quite consciously,” and “these people, the bankers, have the impulse towards full power … [s]uch power as Stalin has in the USSR but world-wide … absolute power.” He identified the Rothschilds as treasurers, or more likely chiefs, of the first Comintern, or cell of the Communist International in Europe. He said this Comintern relationship funded the Rothschild expansion as international bankers, and further identified Kuhn, Loeb & Co. as successor to the House of Rothschild.
Notice Rakovsky’s references to “revolutionaries” and “impulse towards full power” are essentially identical with terms used by H. G. Wells during the Thirties in commenting on Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt and the Brain Trust. Rakovsky said “not one of ‘Them’ is a person who occupies a political position or a position in the World Bank.” Such positions are given only to “intermediaries.” He told how young Leon Trotsky, leader of the 1905 revolt in Petrograd against Czar Nicholas II, leapt ahead of older revolutionaries by marrying into a family partnered with the bankers Warburg. “They” accomplished “organized defeats” of Russian forces in World War I sufficient to inspire overthrow of the Czar by parliamentary officials led by Alexander Kerensky. Kerensky conspired with “Them” to hand over power to Trotsky led Bolsheviks as the Communist vanguard. The “October revolution” was financed by “Them” through Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other American and European banks, including a Swedish bank where Rakovsky “participated in the transmission of funds.”
Rakovsky explained the Versailles Treaty following World War I as “the most decisive pre- condition for the revolution.” Reparations payable by Germany to France far exceeded the value of all of France. Hyper-inflation followed by barriers to international trade produced hunger and unemployment and then financial aid from Allied nations—all orchestrated by “Them”—prepared Hitler-led Germany as the only nation situated to invade the Soviet Union so Stalin (the “bonapartist”) could be toppled in favor of Trotsky (“Their” agent).
Rakovsky attributed to “Them” an objective to provoke war by Western democracies to topple Hitler in Germany because Hitler “removed … private and international capital [and] took over … the privilege of manufacturing money and put it to work for the benefit of the State.” (My emphasis) Although Germany had almost no gold reserves, Hitler produced jobs and prosperity for seven million workers by means of economies achieved through direct issuance of currency. Though Hitler’s objective was rearmament, similar strides were possible in commercial production using the same financial methods. “They” saw this as “hidden danger … very serious …” in its implications for their control of other nations. Pressed to name names, Rakovsky said he did not have direct knowledge of who was a part of “Them,” but had assurances from Trotsky, who must have known, that Walter Rathenau was one. He was confident that Lionel Rothschild was, also. Others he concluded from “work and personality” as under control of “Them” included the Wall Street bank Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and its families Schiff, Warburg, Loeb and Kuhn. Further, Rakovsky named “Baruch, Frankfurter, Altschul, Cohen, Benjamin, Strauss, Steinhardt, Blom, Rosenman, Lippmann, Lehman, Dreifus, Lamont, Rothschild, Lord, Mandel, Morgenthau, Ezekiel, Lasky…. Most of them in the United States.” He said he was uncertain whether any one person named was actually one of “Them,” but even so each one named could present a proposition to “Them” through indirect channels by expressing thoughts or hypothesis. No direct answer to such a proposition is ever received; only “facts” and events may be observed by waiting and watching.
Were it not for Franklin Roosevelt’s actions to deepen and prolong the Great Depression, one could argue that assertions made against the U.S. president by a condemned man under interrogation by the Soviet NKVD should not be repeated. But three points overcome this position.
The first is that any claim Franklin Roosevelt might make to a presumption of good intentions is undercut by the content of this book. Second, Dr. Landowsky’s transcript of Rakovsky’s testimony was first published in Madrid years ago as Chapter XL called “Sinfonio en Rojo Mayor” of an 800-page book entitled La Lucha por el Poder Mundial by publisher Senor Don Mauricio Carlavilla. Senor Carlavilla validated authenticity of the material as prepared under his supervision by translation of copybooks found on Landowskys body by a Spanish volunteer at the Petrograd front of World War II. And, third, the American people have not been exposed to this information so as to evaluate it fully. Therefore, we proceed to what follows.
Rakovsky was told by his inquisitor that “proofs” of his truthfulness must be validated within days; otherwise, his time might run out before all aspects could be checked out. Under this Sword of Damocles, Rakovsky asked whether the new U.S. ambassador Joseph Davis were present in Moscow. He commented that his “exceptional situation gives me the right, as I see it, against the rules, to make use of an official intermediary.” The context of the comment signaled to the NKVD inquisitor that the U.S. ambassador was an intermediary of “Them” capable of providing “proofs” helpful to Rakovsky’s cause. When asked whether the U.S. government was “behind all this,” Rakovsky answered it was “under all this,” implying “They” controlled the American government.
Rakovsky then explained that October 24, 1929, the first day of the Great Crash, was the beginning of the “real revolution” and more important than the seizure of power by the Bolsheviki in Russia in October, 1917. In February, 1929, Trotsky left Russia, the financing of Hitler was agreed in July (recall that Baruch was then vacationing in Europe and Scotland), and the Great Crash occurred in October. He said Hoover’s term of office was used to prepare for seizing power in the U.S. by “financial revolution” and in the USSR (replacing Stalin with Trotsky) through war and defeat. He continued: “[E]xecution of the plan on such a scale requires a special man, who can direct the executive power in the United States, who has been predetermined to be the organizing and deciding force. That man was Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.”(Emphasis added.) He then referred to Eleanor as “this two-sexed being” included in the definition of “special man” because Franklin “had to avoid any Delilah.”
When asked specifically if Roosevelt was one of “Them,” Rakovsky answered: “I do not know if he is one of ‘Them,’ or is only subject to ‘Them,’ I think that he was conscious of his mission, but cannot assert whether he obeyed under duress of blackmail or he was one of those who rule; it is true that he carried out his mission, realized all the actions which had been assigned to him accurately.”
In other parts of his testimony, Rakovsky advised regarding the nature of threats to Stalin presented by “Them” in preparing Hitler’s Germany for invasion of the USSR, and he prescribed intricate countermeasures. Almost certainly, neither Stalin’s intellect and knowledge nor those of his advisors were on par with Rakovsky. Leon Trotsky was assassinated by Stalin’s agent in Mexico on August 20, 1940. Hitler’s forces invaded the
USSR in June, 1941. Some report Rakovsky was executed at that time; others say he lived well into the 1950s under a changed name.
Thanks to Landowsky and Knupffer reporting Rakovsky’s testimony, the depth of the U.S. crisis in 2008-2010 can be better estimated. America’s affliction was not merely rampant financial criminals assisted by government to strip capital from middle class investors, though this reality itself was gigantic in its consequences. America’s exposure included near- term bankruptcy and fall of constitutional government. This risk was a predictable probability based on known facts, partly because it was an interim objective of the vast, aggressive power which exerted dominant influence in writing laws and molding thought. Rakovsky asserted the eventual demise of Communism and installation of “state capitalism” in Russia to be “Their” plan, as was the destruction of nationalism in Germany, Russia and the U.S. The ultimate objective, or “end of history,” in “Their” minds was absolute power in the U.S. and worldwide—far from the rise of republican democracy as Francis Fukuyama mused was the future after the fall of the Soviet Union.
End of quote.
For me, none of this is knew but it is valuable to find these confirmations.
And in the face of the huge global propaganda that demonizes Hitler, note the above acknowledgement that Hitler took Germany from a basket case to the powerhouse of Europe in 4 years!!! He did this by eliminating the Khazarian Mafia’s central banking system in Germany (though he retained a Jewish head of the nationalised bank). No wonder they were out to destroy him and totally discredit him. There are also periods in US history where there was no central bank and similar explosive growth was experienced.
Where is the evidence of this today?
In truth, the evidence is everywhere, if you look. Almost everything we accept as being true has been fashioned by this elite, though most people cannot comprehend this could be true. Perhaps the clearest illustration is from 100 years ago when, in 1920, Henry Ford bought his own newspaper, the Dearborn Chronicle, to write about this control system and its impact on the United States. He knew no editor would publish what he wanted to write, because already the press was either owned or effectively controlled by this elite. The series of articles that Ford wrote from 1920-2 were subsequently published as “The International Jew”. It makes powerful reading. This is 100 years ago!!! And today??? Did you know Rupert Murdoch is Jewish? Most people don’t, nor that he has direct business interests with the Rothschilds.
However, I want to illustrate their modus operandi by some events occurring in my home country of Australia. As a precursor, I will mention the well-recognised practice of distraction and acting when people are distracted. The 1913 legislation to create the US Federal Reserve, introduced when most people, including most politicians were preparing for Christmas, is one of many examples.
Back to Australia. Most Australians have no idea that banking bail-in legislation has been introduced in Australia. It was introduced on Valentine’s Day (February 14) 2018, with no press publicity. This was then followed by legislation in the last session of parliament for 2018 demanding companies provide a backdoor to their software, ostensibly to protect us from “terrorism”, another elite created paradigm.
Then, last week, again with no publicity, legislation was introduced, on a Friday afternoon, to ban cash transactions in Australia for amounts over $10,000.
So, we are distracted by the day to day bickering of politics whilst the key steps to advance the global agenda that Jett and Wells both wrote about in their own ways are moved forward in the shadows.
However, I remain optimistic, for many reasons, that we live in the time when this hidden satanic control will be removed from our world. The impact will be huge and most people will be in shock for some time.
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com