Archive for April 2014

“Freedom of the Press” and “The Shield Law”: A wolf in sheep’s clothing

This article discusses how A Shield Law is a law which “provides statutory protection for the ‘reporters’ privilege” is in fact doing the exact opposite when it comes to the fine print. How often this is done.

In this case, I quote the following:

While overall it may seem like a good bill, there are a number of problems with this Shield Law, officially known as the Free Flow of Information Act of 2013. For starters, this law would “allow the government to seize reporters’ records without notifying them for 45 days – a period of time that could be renewed by a judge 45 additional days – if investigators convince a judge pre-notification ‘would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of a criminal investigation.’”[4] This power of seizing records without notifying reporters was used most recently in regards to the Associated Press, when the federal government seized their phone records in May of last year, with the government only saying that “they were needed for investigation of an unspecified criminal matter.”[5] Oh yes! What transparency and accountability! Infringing upon the First Amendment rights of reporters and then only giving what is essentially a BS, purposefully vague explanation.

In addition to this, the government can force journalists to give up information in the name of national security.[6] This is quite worrying as the US government has time and time again been involved in operations of entrapment.[7,8] Due to this, they could potentially have a scenario where they create a case of entrapment, label it terrorism, and then force all journalists to give up information on any and all sources as well as seize their records under the guise of national security.

Yet in this current bill, not only can the government continue to engage in the above behavior, but they are also defining who is and who is not a journalist. Initially, the bill defined a journalist as “a person who has a ‘primary intent to investigate events and procure material’ in order to inform the public by regularly gathering information through interviews and observations” and added the stipulation that “The person also must intend to report on the news at the start of obtaining any protected information and must plan to publish that news.”[9] This seems to be rather fine as it would include mainstream and independent journalists. However, the situation became problematic when in September 2013, an amendment to the bill was proposed that- let’s just say- ‘more clearly’ defined who and who was not a journalist.

This is where the real implementation is and severely undermines current journalistic freedom and practice. Beware the old National Security catch-all. The sins of the rich and powerful are hidden behind this and have been since it came into place in 1947.

Operation American Spring – On May 16th 2014

Thank you, Susan.

Citizens across the country will converge on the Washington D.C. mall to demand the restoration of our Constitutional Republic, Rule of Law, Freedom, Liberty “of The People, for The People, by The People” from overreaching and corrupt federal leadership.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email