I’m talking about little defenders of consensus science, bloggers who love and adore every official pronouncement that comes down the pipeline from medical journals and illustrious doctors.
Dear Bloggers: Thousands of published studies you cite and praise are wrong, useless, irrelevant, deceptive—and the medical journals know it, and they’re doing nothing useful about it.
The issue? Cell lines. These cells are crucial for lab research on the toxicity of medical drugs, and the production of proteins. Knowing exactly which cell lines are being studied is absolutely necessary.
And therein lies the gigantic problem.
Statnews.com has the bombshell story (July 21, 2016):
“Recent estimates suggest that between 20 percent and 36 percent of cell lines scientists use are contaminated or misidentified — passing off as human tissue cells that in fact come from pigs, rats, or mice, or in which the desired human cell is tainted with unknown others. But despite knowing about the issue for at least 35 years, the vast majority of journals have yet to put any kind of disclaimer on the thousands of studies affected.”
“One cell line involved are the so-called HeLa cells. These cancerous cervical cells — named for Henrietta Lacks, from whom they were first cultured in the early 1950s — are ubiquitous in labs, proliferate wildly — and, it turns out, contaminate all manner of cells with which they come into contact. Two other lines in particular, HEp-2 and INT 407, are now known to have been contaminated with HeLa cells, meaning scientists who thought they were working on HEp-2 and INT 407 were in fact likely experimenting on HeLa cells.”
“Christopher Korch, a geneticist at the University of Colorado, has studied the issue. According to Korch, nearly 5,800 articles in 1,182 journals may have confused HeLa for HEp-2; another 1,336 articles in 271 journals may have mixed up HeLa with INT 407. Together, the 7,000-plus papers have been cited roughly 214,000 times, Science reported last year.”
“And that’s just two cell lines. All told, more than 400 cell lines either lack evidence of origin or have become cross-contaminated with human or other animal cells at some point in their laboratory lineage. Cell lines are often chosen for their ability to reproduce and be bred for long periods of time, so they’re hardy buggers that can move around a lab if they end up on a researcher’s gloves, for example. ‘It’s astonishingly easy for cell lines to become contaminated,’ wrote Amanda Capes-Davis, chair of the International Cell Line Authentication Committee, in a guest post for Retraction Watch. ‘When cells are first placed into culture, they usually pass through a period of time when there is little or no growth, before a cell line emerges. A single cell introduced from elsewhere during that time can outgrow the original culture without anyone being aware of the change in identity’.”
Getting the picture?
HUGE numbers of published studies are based on knowing which cells are being used and tested. And much of the time, the researchers don’t know. They pretend they do, but they don’t.
Their work is completely unreliable.
Everyone involved (for decades) looks the other way.
It’s the secret no one wants to talk about.
Thousands and thousands and thousands of medical studies are useless, and their conclusions are unfounded, and turn out to be random.
This is like saying, “Well, we built all those buildings in the city, but the concrete we used was probably cardboard. Let’s not talk about it. Let’s just wait and see what happens.”
Millions of patients who are taking drugs are guinea pigs. Researchers originally tested the toxicity of drugs on cells they assumed were relevant, but they were wrong. They said the drugs were safe, but they were working with cells that had no bearing on safety.
This is one reason why, on July 26, 2000, Dr. Barbara Starfield, a highly respected public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, could conclude, in the Journal of the American Association, that FDA approved medical drugs kill 106,000 Americans every year—which becomes a MILLION deaths per decade.
The original researchers on those drugs pretended they knew what they were doing.
Pretended.
Everything I’m describing and citing in this article?
The FDA knows about it.
The CDC knows about it.
The World Health Organization knows.
National health departments all over the world know.
Medical schools know.
Many doctors know.
Many, many researchers know.
Many hospital executives know.
All pharmaceutical executives know.
Many mainstream medical reporters know.
All medical journals know.
But they continue to promote life-destroying fake news.
Blog that.
End of quote.
As I read this, I’m reminded of the bombshell I found when I was researching the JFK assassination, which had fundamental connections to New Orleans and the research work of Dr. Alton Ochsner, who was involved with the early vaccine work. This revealed to me that it was well recognised that the early polio vaccine was contaminated with the SV40 virus. I quote:
The development of the first vaccine for polio back in the 1950s is still glorified in the mainstream media as one of the most important public health breakthroughs in recorded history. But a little-known documentary which aired on the Canadian news network CBC back in 1997 tells a much different story about the polio vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, including its known tainting with a monkey virus linked to causing cancer and death.
The risk of an epidemic of soft tissue cancer arising from the Salk vaccine in particular was well understood by those on the inside, such as Dr. Alton Ochsner, who was working very hard in secret to address it (and was part of the putsch that saw JFK assassinated, but that is another story…). This information comes out in both Dr. Mary’s Monkey and Me & Lee. (BTW, Ochsner insisted on vaccinating two of his grandchildren. One died within 48 hours, the other contracted polio…)
Of course Joe Public was never to know such things. The skeletons were well hidden even back then. Ever wondered why we have such a dramatic increase in the rate of soft tissue cancers in our world in the last 50 or so years, with no seeming answers?
End of quote.
And there are some interesting links in this article that open doors to the background of vaccination that we are not meant to look behind. And if you support vaccination, take the time to look. Things like the evidence that the decline in disease rates occurred BEFORE vaccination and Dr Tenet’s extraordinary video on viruses, vaccine and cancer history. And if you resist, the following meme may well apply to you.
Richard
Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at www.magravsplasmaproducts.com
