Archive for April 2017

Frightening times indeed

I share this article from the Irish Savant with you, not because of his concerns about nuclear war but because of his recognition of the selection process of US Presidents and who is behind it. His Monomorium Analogy is perfect and worth reading, also. This has been in place for at least 100 years in the US and certainly in some cases well before:

For the first time since the mid-sixties I believe nuclear war to be terrifyingly close. The Trump regime seems hell (sic) bent on provoking a major conflict with Russia. And anyone else that likes to join in, the more the merrier.  That Russia poses no threat to America or Europe is beside the point. The US Administration is like that bellicose drunk who wants a fight and will not be dissuaded by logic or appeasement. Eventually you have to deck the fucker because there’s no alternative. That’s the way I’d feel if I were in Putin’s shoes.
What’s behind this insanity? A commentator on Zero Hedge says this: ‘You, like many Americans, still believe that people make a difference in American politics – elect the right bloke and things will change for the better.
The undeniable fact is that your government has been taken over by others who don’t even recognise the people of America as anything other than enemies of the state. No one in America will reach the presidency who has not been vetted deeply by these folks. And if by some VERY remote chance someone did get through the screen, they would be instantly marginalised or assassinated – as was Trump.
You have lost your country. Face it
Reminds me of what Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote in ‘300 Years Together’. (It’s 200, not 300 – Richard)
‘You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.’
To better understand what’s going on read The Monomorium Analogy.

End of quote.

May people continue to awaken and rise up.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

21 Questions regarding the holohoax

For me, the debate over any truth to the holohoax story is long gone. It’s overwhelming and it fits perfectly into the much bigger psyop that’s been perpetrated on the goyim by the elite Jews and their lackeys, Jewish and otherwise, of whom most Jews are also just cannon fodder, a psyop that encompasses both WWI and WWII and began in earnest at least as far back as the middle of the 19th century or, arguably, with the founding of the Illuminati in the late 18th century, fostered and funded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

But most of you reading this are most likely yet to accept this undeniable truth. If you haven’t seen it, I documented my own journey of understanding here.

And for those of you still struggling with this, I share with you this list of “21 Questions regarding the holocaust”.

It’s not the facts that have you struggle with this, because there are none. What you struggle with is that anyone could create such a comprehensive lie and reinforce it so comprehensively that the idea that it is one is completely unimaginable to you and most people. But when you wake up to this one, you’ll begin to see the literally hundreds if not thousands of them that make up the reality you accept.

Now, was that the red pill or the blue pill?


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

An update on the Syrian false flag chemical weapons attack

A few items worthy of note have emerged related to the chemical weapons attack in Syria, used as a pretext for the failed missile strike (yes, failed) by the US.

Firstly, a spoof by James Corbett. If you’ve seen his 9/11 spoof, you’ll immediately recognise this one as being a rework along the same lines; however, the bullshit story deserves this kind of treatment.

Did I say failed? Well, Corbett covers this but Gordon Duff gives it the more serious treatment – 34 of 59 missiles failed to reach their target.

Then we have the erudite and unique super sleuth James Perloff’s 10 REASONS TRUMP’S ATTACK ON SYRIA WAS A BAD IDEA & BASED ON LIES.

And now to the heart of the matter (thanks, Richard):

Award-winning Iran-Contra journalist Robert Parry says the chemical weapons attack in Syria was launched from a joint Saudi-Israeli special operations base in Jordan, according to his intelligence sources.

U.S. intelligence analysts determined that a drone was responsible for the attack and “eventually came to believe that the flight was launched in Jordan from a Saudi-Israeli special operations base for supporting Syrian rebels,” according to the source.

“The suspected reason for the poison gas was to create an incident that would reverse the Trump administration’s announcement in late March that it was no longer seeking the removal of President Bashar al-Assad,” writes Parry.

As we highlighted back in 2013 after another chemical weapons attack in Ghouta that was blamed on Assad, rebels freely admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they had been given the weapons by Saudi Arabia but had “handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions.”

Parry’s background lends the information credibility. He covered the Iran-Contra scandal for the Associated Press and Newsweek and was later given a George Polk award for his work on intelligence matters.

The contention that the incident was a “false flag” to create a justification for air strikes has also been voiced by former Congressman Ron Paul as well as numerous other prominent voices, including Vladimir Putin himself, who went on to warn that rebels could now stage a similar incident in Damascus to goad the U.S. into toppling Assad.

Whoever was responsible for the attack does not take away from the horror of the event and the fact that innocent people and children died.

Parry dismissed the four page report released by President Trump’s National Security Council that blames the Syrian government for the chemical attack as being heavy on assertions but lacking actual evidence.

End of quote.

You mean Israel and Saudi Arabia were behind it?

Surely not!!!

Finally, a version that rings true.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email