Search results for Darwin

The hidden Jewish agenda, Darwinism and Soros nailed in one article…

This is a long article by Jonas Alexis, but it covers very well some key hidden truths of our world:

We have argued earlier that Darwin’s project is consistently compatible with the essentially Talmudic ideology, which states that the Goyim are beasts. Darwin argued that the “imbeciles” and the “weak” ought to be eliminated; the Talmud teaches that the Goyim were created essentially to serve Jews.[1]

This point was articulated by the late Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef back in 2010. “Why are Gentiles needed?,” he asked, “They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created.”[2] Yosef continued:

“In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. Gentiles were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.”[3]

Yosef also said of Arabs: “How can you make peace with a snake? Those evildoers, the Arabs — it says in the Gemara [Talmud] that God is sorry he ever created those sons of Ishmael.”[4]

Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu quickly distanced himself from Yosef when he uttered those wonderful words. He issued a statement saying that Yosef’s sermons “do not reflect my approach or the stand of the Israeli government.” So far, so good.

But when Yosef died in 2013, Netanyahu declared: “The Jewish People have lost one of the wisest men of his generation.”[5] One of the wisest men?

Well, according to this logic, Yosef taught the Jewish people, including Benjamin Netanyahu, that the Goyim are donkeys. How else would the Israeli government, under Netanyahu’s watch, continue to slaughter, maim, and mercilessly exterminate the Palestinians?[6] How else would they continue to expand the settlement?[7] How else would “A large majority of US Senators, both Republican and Democratic, ask President Obama to increase military aid to Israel”?[8]

… It is often said that “Social Darwinism” was a movement that had little or nothing to do with Darwin’s public or private beliefs, but as biographers Adrian Desmond and James Moore point out, Darwin’s own notebooks “make plain that competition, free trade, imperialism, racial extermination, and sexual inequality were written into the equation from the start—‘Darwinism’ was always intended to explain human society.”[12]

In other words, the Social Darwinists were more consistent in following Darwin’s reductionism than Darwin consistently following the extension of his own weltanschauung. In fact, Darwin was confronted with this dilemma right after the publication of the Origin of Species.

A Manchester newspaper quickly realized that he was implicitly and subtly advertising the idea that “might is right” and that “every cheating tradesman is also right.” Like his intellectual children, Darwin disagreed with no serious justification. Yet one year before he died, Charles Darwin proved that his critics were right all along. He said,

“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago, of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is!

“The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”[13]

Darwin, as it turns out, was intellectually dishonest, largely because he deliberately excluded practical reason from his project. His intellectual children have never been able to recover from that intellectual dishonesty.

In fact, some of them (like Marc Hauser of Harvard) have deliberately forged lies and complete fabrications to propound their ideas. And no one wants to talk about the so-called Piltdown Man anymore because the story is now too embarrassing.[14] Ernst Haeckel’s fake drawings seems to have fallen into the same category.

The deduction we are trying to make here is that when practical reason is excluded from any intellectual project, then contradiction, blatant dishonesty, illogical leaps, and sometimes deliberate deceptions would be the end result.

Immanuel Kant quickly realized this and immediately put practical reason back into the intellectual firmament, which inevitably allowed him to come up with a much more rigorous and intellectually satisfying system known as the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative prohibits contradiction and irrationality precisely because it is based on the moral law itself. It states:

“Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.”[15]

That obviously throws Darwin out the window because there is no Darwinian maxim that can logically become a universal or moral law. In fact, Darwin denied a universal and moral law. Keep in mind that this universal law does not depend on how you and I feel on a given day. It also is not contingent upon what we may think is right. This universal law is independent of our appetite and preference. In other words, we obviously did not make this universal law; we just happen to discover it…

… In fact, it can easily be argued that intellectual and scientific dishonesty is largely the hinge upon which Darwinism is built in academe. If you do not think so, then call immunologist Caroline Crocker, a former professor at George Mason University, evolutionary biologist Richard Stenberg, formerly of the Smithsonian Institute, neurosurgeon Michael Ignor of Stony Brook University, Dean Canyon of San Francisco State University, etc.

If you don’t get fired for criticizing Darwin, then rest assured that your arguments will be either ignored, ridiculed, dismissed without serious thought, or politically castrated.

For years, philosopher Thomas Nagel of New York University maintained that Darwinian evolution provides the best explanation for life.[17] But Nagel dropped that position in his recent book Mind and Cosmos, in which he cogently argues that “the materialist Neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false.”[18]

The academic community obviously owes Nagel a serious response, but no one has ever bothered to formulate a cogent counter-argument. It was really funny to watch how so-called thinking people were all interested in talking about Nagel as a person and not about the arguments he presents in the book—a classic example of a straw-man and ad hominem attack.[19] The same thing happened to mathematician and philosopher David Berlinski, who criticized some of the central tenets of Neo-Darwinism. In response, Daniel Dennett said:

I love it: another hilarious demonstration that you can publish bullshit at will—just so long as you say what an editorial board wants to hear in a style it favors.”

Well, if it is “bullshit,” then the case is closed. No evidence needs to be provided; no counter-argument is required; no logical or scientific or empirical evidence ought to be presented. Bullshit is bullshit, and that is the end of the story. Berlinski humorously responded,

We lost something in the literary and intellectual culture that’s no longer accessible. You get a guy like Daniel Dennett, whose greatest intellectual achievement was growing that stupid beard of his, masquerading as a scientific expert on Darwinian theory, staring at the camera, and no one is dousing him with a bucket of water. It’s incredible to me….It should be sad.”

We are constantly told over and over that “science” is self-correcting and that scientists are always open to constructive criticism. According to Crocker, you simply cannot criticize Darwinism without being fired.[20]

Why did she get fired? Well, Crocker was demonstrating that the Miller-Urey experiment, among other frauds, was almost certainly “irrelevant” to the tenets of Darwinism.[21] In fact, if the experiment were successful, Darwinism would have once again received a low blow precisely because it would have proven that it takes intelligence (namely Miller and Urey) to create life!

Once Crocker announced that there are some frauds in the biology textbooks, the Washington Post itself declared that “Gasps and giggles burst out” in the classroom. In other words, Crocker was an intellectual terrorist who ought to be expunged. But there were some good reactions.

One student by the name of Carolyn Flitcroft who thought she was getting a decent education declared: “So far, we have only learned that evolution is true. This is the first time I have ever heard it isn’t.”[22] Another student declared, “If science is the pursuit of truth, why is evolution not questioned?”[23]

Well, that was the end of Crocker’s academic career.[24] She said: “I lost my job at George Mason University for teaching the problems with evolution. Lots of scientists question evolution, but they would lose their jobs if they spoke out.”[25]

But then some scientists would run around and declare things like, “Darwinism is true because nearly all the major scientists believe it.” This is a vacuous statement precisely because serious scientists are not allowed to touch the theory without being politically castrated.

End of quote.

Most people accept the teaching they have received that science is sacrosanct and everything in the “Scientific World View” got there through the application of the scientific method. That happens to be pure propaganda and is well illustrated by the fact that work conducted areas that do not support the principles of the Scientific World View are either actively destroyed as described above or studiously ignored, such as the work of Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin, who have both rigorously applied the scientific method to what would be considered by the mainstream to be the paranormal.

But it seems more and more people are waking up. My writing of this was interrupted by a phone call from a guy who, it turned out (not the reason for the call), discovered GcMAF and got his prostate cancer under control after the Allopathic medical diagnosis (a Rockefeller creation) of “two years to live”.

May the waking up continue.



The reason that Darwinism was thrust upon us

I was reading this engaging review of David Livingstone’s Transhumanism: How the Illuminati Depose God by Henry Makow and found an interesting comment at the bottom. Here is part of that comment:

The biggest leg on this “transhumanist chair” that I haven’t seen discussed yet is Darwinism. There’s not enough room here to debate the failings, frauds, or otherwise of Darwinism, but suffice to say that between Piltdown man, Java man, and dozens if not hundreds of other hoaxes and frauds, Darwinism is at best on some very shaky ground. But in transhumanism, we can now finally begin to see the real raison d’etre behind why Darwinism was sold to the public in the first place.

In Darwinism you have a belief structure which claims man began as slime, and over billions of years slowly worked his up, first to pond scum, then to monkeys, and then to a tool-using primate, who — (you have to cue up “Thus Spake Zarathustra” from 2001 Space Odyssey as you’re reading what I’m writing here) — now is able to invent a computer, to program a computer, and now — (music climaxing) — is ready to merge with the computer!! Evolution has been perfected!! Man has become the machine!! All is once again good in the Cosmos!!

In my opinion, Darwinism is nothing more than a fake “theory” that was sold to the public for the purpose of warping the minds of the scientific elite (who, previously, had generally been of a Christian persuasion) to get them to more readily accept and fall in line w/ this transhumanist agenda (which, I think, has been in the works for a very long time).

End of quote.

I have commented before that Darwin himself never believed his theory could explain all life.

But I am drawn to share what the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, specifically Protocol No. 2, has to say:

The goyim are not guided by practical use of unprejudiced historical observation, but by theoretical routine without any critical regard for consequent results. We need not, therefore, take any account of them—let them amuse themselves until the hour strikes, or live on hopes of new forms of enterprising pastime, or on the memories of all they have enjoyed. For them let that play the principal part which we have persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the goyim will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.

Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. (My emphasis) To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.

It is indispensable for us to take account of the thoughts, characters, tendencies of the nations in order to avoid making slips in the political and in the direction of administrative affairs. The triumph of our system, of which the component parts of the machinery may be variously disposed according to the temperament of the peoples met on our way, will fail of success if the practical application of it be not based upon a summing up of the lessons of the past in the light of the present.

In the hands of the States of today there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the goyim States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remain exist. It proves that Dr. Weizmann knows all about the gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim.

End of quote.

So, I agree that “Darwinism is nothing more than a fake “theory” that was sold to the public for the purpose of warping the minds of the scientific elite”. Anyone who has any understanding of consciousness knows it is the context for life, not vice versa. It is this fundamental truth that is revealed by the rigorous application of the scientific method to the paranormal by the likes of Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin, and why those mired in the scientific worldview cannot bring themselves to seriously consider their work and its implications, believing they can find a way to squeeze it back inside the box called their strictly temporal view of life. Consciousness is the context for their temporal box, not vice versa, and that temporal worldview was created in part for the reasons outlined above. It also contains the model of allopathic medicine, which focusses on treating the symptoms, not locating and healing the true cause.

Does Darwin’s theory of evolution explain how life came to be?

For pretty much every nature programme we might watch – and I love David Attenborough’s wonderful nature videos – the underlying explanation is that everything in life as we see it, unfolded through the Darwinian model of evolution. It is also what is taught in schools around the world, and anyone who questions this “self-evident truth” is treated as some kind of ill-informed trouble maker or incompetent. It’s an approach that’s used widely to hold the preferred view in place. Everyone is familiar with the notion of the Earth being flat, but there are many similar examples currently in place, one being that humanity lived in caves 10,000 years ago, in complete denial of the great body of evidence that demonstrates the presence of an advanced civilisation that disappeared about 13,000 years ago, the last time we were in alignment with Galactic Center as we are now.

So, what is the essence of Darwin’s theory?

To quote Wikipedia:

Charles Darwin was the first to formulate a scientific argument for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is a process that is inferred from three facts about populations: 1) more offspring are produced than can possibly survive, 2) traits vary among individuals, leading to different rates of survival and reproduction, and 3) trait differences are heritable.[4] Thus, when members of a population die they are replaced by the progeny of parents that were better adapted to survive and reproduce in the environment in which natural selection took place. This process creates and preserves traits that are seemingly fitted for the functional roles they perform.[5] Natural selection is the only known cause of adaptation, but not the only known cause of evolution. Other, non-adaptive causes of evolution include mutation and genetic drift.[6]

In my view, these other sources of evolutionary change mentioned above would also be selected by the Darwinian “survival of the fittest” model.

Does Darwin’s theory stand up in the face of the evidence?

Let me begin this with the thoughts of Amit Goswami.

Amit Goswami, Ph. D. is a professor of theoretical nuclear physics (retired) at the University of Oregon where he served since 1968. He is a pioneer of the new paradigm of science called “science within consciousness”, an idea he explicated in his seminal book, The Self-Aware Universe, where he also solved the quantum measurement problem elucidating the famous observer effect.

The following are comments made in Goswami’s DVD Quantum Activist.

Goswami says the following relating to Darwin’s theory:

People are entrenched in Darwinism. Is this theory so well established? Does it agree with the experimental data?

There are variations in the hereditary material of living creatures, produced by natural phenomena, such as mutation. Sexual reproduction combines the hereditary material of two people, leading to genetic variation in the offspring.

Environment has been changing, sometimes violently, and organisms survive through evolution. Nature selects those best suited for survival in these changes in nature, brought about by the environment. This is survival necessity.

This is a strictly materialist perspective, except for the notion of survival, which steps outside of the simply material.

Now think about the organs. An organ like the eye takes thousands upon thousands of mutations to be created. Literally. It requires thousands upon thousands of mutations, one after the other to create the eye; but why is nature selecting them? Is one thousandth of an eye any good for doing anything? One thousandth of an eye obviously cannot see.

Darwinians argue that “permutations might be useful for some other purpose”. Suppose the evolution happened, not for seeing but for some other reason that nature chooses them.

This is the end of their story. They don’t elaborate it. So let’s elaborate:

Let’s begin with one mutation which has one purpose. Now another mutation, another survival necessity. You need thousands upon thousands of scenarios which enables nature to preserve these mutations and not throw them away, not reject them because they have no utilisation, because only if they have survival necessity, only then will nature select them.

The storyline becomes unbelievable.

You will never catch this if you read biologists’ sympathetic presentation of this storyline, which is not to give you the details. Only if you look at the details will you catch this.

Intelligent design is more intelligent in this regard, but it also has much stupidity because these theorists mainly completely ignore the idea of evolution. They say it is not necessary. They pick data which shows many organisms never change.

Darwin’s theory does work for microevolution, but it is problematic when we begin to look at organs such as the liver, eyes, muscles; how did they develop?

They require thousands upon thousands of coordinated changes. Somehow they have to be preserved. Nature should not select them away, but nature should, according to Darwin’s theory. If not beneficial, serving a survival necessity, it should be thrown away. It just doesn’t happen that way. Even Darwin was puzzled.

It takes DNA to make protein and protein to make DNA. In reality, you could never make them. It is the chicken and the egg scenario.

Darwinism is a good theory (created in 1857) – a long time ago. Not even genes were known.

Evolution exists, but it is not Darwinian:

  • You cannot explain what life is and how it originated.
  • You can never explain macro-evolution using Darwin’s kind of argument

The data suggests Darwin’s theory doesn’t hold. If Darwin’s theory held, then we would see these steps of macro-evolution. We would see thousands upon thousands of intermediates, not the one or two that we see. We don’t see the thousands upon thousands of intermediates in the fossil record.

The article entitled Darwin’s Doubts has this to say:

Even Charles Darwin thought his own theory was “grievously hypothetical” and gave emotional content to his doubts when he said, “The eye to this day gives me a cold shudder.” To think the eye had evolved by natural selection, Darwin said, “seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.” But he thought the same about something as simple as a peacock’s feather, which, he said, “makes me sick. ” Of course, anyone who has knowledge of the intricacies of the human eye and other living structures immediately realizes the problem Darwin sensed. How could an organ of such an intricate magnificence ever have originated via random chance?

Oller and Omdahl (Creation Hypothesis) Page 274

The same article contains Darwin’s thoughts about whether his theory was proven:

But Darwin was not so dogmatic. He described his theory as an inference grounded chiefly on analogy. And he praised the author of one review foreseeing “that the change of species cannot be directly proved and that the doctrine must sink or swim according as it groups and explains phenomena ” (Darwin 1899, 2:155). In an 1863 letter, he amplified by pointing out that evolution by natural selection was “grounded entirely on general considerations” such as the difference between contemporary organisms and fossil organisms. “When we descend to details,” he wrote, “we can prove that no one species has changed [i.e., they cannot prove that a single species has changed]; nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others have not” (Darwin 1899, 2:210). In other words, Darwin was aware that the scientific evidence was short of compelling.

Nancy Pearcey (Mere Creation) Page 77

So much for what Darwin thought. Indeed he was noted for his extensive revision for each new reprinting of “Origin of the Species”.

If you are an observer of nature, you will be aware of a vast array of unique and specific relationships between plants and the insects, birds or animals that pollinate them, such as the emu’s tropical cousin, the cassowary, in Northern Australia, where at least one tree relies on the consumption of the fruit by the cassowary to trigger germination. Or the following example:

Dung beetles find their way – in the stars. What would Darwin think?

How do lost dung beetles find their way home? By using the Milky Way to navigate, according to a team of researchers awarded the dubious honour of an Ig Nobel award in biology and astronomy.

The annual Ig Nobels, announced in America on Friday, are a parody of the Nobel Prizes given out by the jokey journal The Annals of Improbable Research.

The awards, selected from hundreds of entries, are given to research which both makes people laugh and think.

Among the award-winning dung beetle team is Australian-born Eric Warrant, whose unusual field of physics and entomology played a key role in the research which was the first to document the use of the Milky Way for orientation and navigation in the insect world.

The revelations of the dung beetle’s reliance on celestial landmarks to travel in a straight path, by researchers from Sweden, Australia, South Africa, the United Kingdom and Germany, was published in the journal Current Biology earlier this year.

At the time the article was published Professor Warrant, now with Lund University in Sweden, told National Geographic that it was a complicated navigational feat.

“It’s quite impressive for an animal that size,” he said.

Previously, it was thought only birds, humans and seals used the stars for orientation. Read more here.

So why has Darwin’s theory come to be so slavishly promoted?

Once you accept that the complex elements of life cannot come about by randomness alone, then you have to acknowledge a creative or intelligent “hand” or force in the creation of life (or come up with an alternate theory that practically addresses the reality of life, which I have not seen and seems highly unlikely). I do not want to get into the various alternate theories about how this might arise, because this is not my focus here. Rather, I simply want to highlight this consequence.

Once you acknowledge this and also acknowledge the obvious limitations of Darwin’s theory, acknowledged freely by Darwin himself, the question arises as to why it has been so slavishly and powerfully promoted.

In my view, we come face-to-face with yet another tentacle from that thousand-tentacled octopus to which I have referred several times. Put simply, if you want people to believe they came forth from primordial slime, lived in caves 10,000 years ago, are alone in the Cosmos, and there will be nothing left of you when you die, then you need a theory like Darwin’s to explain how we got here. Pure and simple. And the evidence is abundant that a lie that is widely promoted and powerfully supported will be believed.

So, for me it is simply part of this web of illusion that we have been persuaded to accept about who and what we are, so we can be demeaned, disempowered and controlled by a very small and powerful group, a group we already know is at work in the world.

Postscript – Here is another article expressing similar views.

Ancient Syrian site discovered and destroyed – part of a much bigger plan

This article by Ian Greenhalgh highlights what, in my opinion, is a much broader phenomenon: the destruction of everyone and everything that does not fit inside the model of life, humanity and the world that the global elite are imposing upon us. This process is hundreds if not thousands of years old. Ian’s article says the following:

We have been aware for some time that there has been a organised and concerted effort to locate and steal or destroy ancient artifacts throughout the areas of Syria and Iraq under IS control, this is just the latest example of that. Furthermore, this ‘seek and destroy’ operation stretches back to the looting of the Baghdad museum after the fall of Saddam in 2003. On that occasion, the locals broke in and cleared the shelves, most of what was looted was soon recovered from local market places and shops. However, the night before, a German team went to the museum with a shopping list, they broke into the basement levels and took a large number of items that had never been shown to the public.

So why is someone sponsoring this wholesale looting and destruction? Of course, there is profit to be made and artifacts looted by IS have indeed turned up in the antique markets of Europe, however, there is a far deeper and far more sinister reason.

Note that one of the items that is mentioned as being found and destroyed are cuneiform clay tablets. These are among the very oldest writings known and examples of them form a large part of the basis of knowledge about the oldest civilisations of the middle east – Sumer and their religion which was based around two gods Enki and Enlil – the Annunaki. It is said that the three Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all based on the religion of ancient Sumer and this is a secret that has to be kept.

End of quote.

Actually, I think it goes deeper than just the origins of the mainstream religions. It sits behind the centuries old and continuing slaughter of indigenous peoples across the globe. It sits behind the imposition of the slavish teaching of Darwin’s model of evolution to explain life, a claim Darwin himself would never have made. It sits behind the scientific worldview doctrine, again slavishly taught and embodying the Darwin model, that implicitly carries the notion that the only thing that exists is what is in the temporal domain that we by default experience, with the sleight of hand that everything inside that scientific worldview got there through the application of the scientific method and that, by extrapolation, anything proven by the application of the scientific method is inside the scientific worldview – a complete fiction on both counts.

And there is a parallel thread in this post that I will return to for other reasons, which is quoting from A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties (aka the Yinon Plan):

“The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible.”

End of quote.

The global elite’s strategy for Israel is implicitly entangled in all of this.

Until and unless we begin to more broadly grasp the depth and breadth of this strategy, a large part of which is detailed in Captain Archibald H. Maule Ramsay’s The Nameless War, we have little chance against them and their horrific plans.


Check out the extraordinary new, life-changing technology at

US Evacuating ISIS/Israeli Military Commanders from Ramadi

As I keep saying, the picture of what is going on in Syria and Iraq, etc. with and around Daesh and their relationship with Israel and the United States in the MSM is a long way from the truth. Even more, it appears to run deeply into ancient buildings and knowledge. I have been watching how the wars in the Middle East, going back to at least the Iraqi wars, have involved the destruction of ancient archaeological sites that carry connections to spiritual, religious and the re-emergence of civilisation in what can be broadly termed the Western world, the most recent being Palmyra. Let me share some quotes from this article by Gordon Duff:

We begin with a report of American helicopters ferrying ISIS commanders out of Ramadi as Iraqi Army forces close in.  To this, we add our previous reports which place this act in context.

We have more than strong evidence, we can say “inexorable proof” that the US and Israel are commanding ISIS operations in Iraq. Those who have been ordered to participate in this are not happy about it

…The ISIS drive on the ancient city of Palmyra has a special significance, according to documents seized on May 16, 2015 by Syrian Special Forces units in a near dawn attack on al Mayadin, along the Euphrates River.

The al Mayadin attack, simultaneous to an American attack only a few miles further north along the Euphrates, brought both nations a trove of vital intelligence.  Documents found on a laptop used by a top ISIS commander showed direct communications via “social networks” with Israel, but that isn’t all that surprising nor is it what is of real significance.  The message received from Israel had several startling elements:

  • Orders for the ISIS drive that took Palmyra came from Israel but also reference “the freemasons,” a group whose historical origins are tied to the Knights Templars, a religious and military organization believed to have discovered the First Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem and to have looted its gold and artifacts.
  • The document orders ISIS to find and destroy the Second Temple of Solomon to be found in Palmyra, long the subject of “fringe” archeology, and thought to be a mythological site built by superhuman beings or even extraterrestrials.
  • The document goes further, indicating that Israel will destroy the al Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest site in Islam that has been under attack by Israeli settlers in recent weeks.The ISIS drive on Palmyra, a UNESCO World Heritage site and an incomparable archeological treasure was carefully coordinated with a drive that took the Iraqi city of Ramadi and a Turkish backed drive on Aleppo by Al Nusra.  All three operations were totally unhindered by US and “coalition” air attacks, curiously so.  Moreover, reports from Ramadi of American C130 aircraft resupplying ISIS units have multiple confirmation despite US denials.  When questioned about this, US Army Special Forces representatives blamed Iran for spreading the rumor as part of a psychological operations ploy despite the fact that the US had previously admitted to “accidentally” resupplying ISIS forces near the Syrian Kurdish town of Kobani.  The Kobani “accidents” happened several time over a period of days during the height of the battle there.

End of quote.

There is a great deal of evidence that those who run our world want to disconnect us from all threads of the past, having us believe we lived in caves 10,000 years ago, that Darwin’s theory of evolution or variations thereof can explain human life, that consciousness arises in the brain, and many other related notions. Even Graham Hancock, who very much “sticks to the facts” when writing about evidence of prior advanced civilisation on Earth, when he saw the roof that has been placed over Gobekli Tepe, shutting an astronomical/astrological site off from the sky, writing in his recent “Magicians of the Gods”, was drawn to say:

The roof has cut Göbekli Tepe off entirely from the cosmos. It feels almost like a deliberate, calculated act of disempowerment—as though someone among the powers that be suddenly woke up and realized how dangerous this ancient place has become to the established order of things and how subversive it potentially is to the system of mind control, very much including control of the past, that keeps modern society in order.


So, thank you, Gordon, for revealing this thread that gives support to the idea of intended destruction and a deeper, hidden plan in all of this.

‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress

This is a typically wonderful presentation by Graham Hancock on some of the work he has done in preparation for his pending update to “Fingerprints of the Gods”, to be called ‘Magicians of the Gods’. I quote from the webpage:

In late 2015 Graham Hancock will bring out his new book, ‘Magicians of the Gods’, the sequel to his worldwide bestseller ‘Fingerprints of the Gods’. In this lecture, recorded in March 2014 for Alternatives London at Saint James’s Church in Piccadilly, he reviews his past work and shares some of the research for the new book.

The evidence is now undeniable that an advanced human civilisation or civilisations pre-dated our current civilisation and, for all intents and purposes, the last of it disappeared some 12,980 years ago, courtesy of the debris from a comet striking the Earth.

Mainstream archaeology has been in complete denial of this.

If I understand Graham’s position correctly, he feels this is essentially due to the inevitable, strident defence of existing views and understandings. I see the reasons for this denial as being more deliberate and sinister, created in a similar manner as Darwinism has been sold to us as the entire answer to the presence of life on Earth, and the “scientific world view”, as Rupert Sheldrake calls it. These both have been created for the clear purpose of distracting us from looking at the reality of life more deeply and, in my view, modern archaeology serves a similar purpose.

Either way, I thank Graham for his extraordinary, painstaking and thoroughly professional work and the understandings he shares with us as a result. I commend his presentation to you.

How do we make sense of what is happening in our world?

I have written about many things that I see going on in our world in my posts, yet I have not really drawn them all together. I have pointed to the role of the bankers and how they have painted themselves out of history. I have written about Agenda 21 many times, perhaps the most invasive and destructive process for humanity that has been conceived. I have shared the work of Graham Hancock, who has worked tirelessly to reveal the carefully buried ancient history of an advanced civilisation on this planet, which appears to have essentially disappeared some 13,000 or so years ago. I have shared with you that, whilst Darwin’s theory of evolution has been promoted as the answer to the development of life on this planet, Darwin himself never actually saw it in those terms, recognizing it could never explain the totality of life as it exists on this planet. Of course, the existence of similar beings living elsewhere in the cosmos blows this supposed chance evolutionary process on Earth clear out of the water, which is one of the reasons that it is so carefully hidden from the public.

But I have not joined all of the dots. Today, I want to give you the opportunity to join these dots for yourself. But before I do, I want to share with you what I consider some of the most dedicated and comprehensive work I know of in revealing some of most gross and world-impacting cover-ups of the last century.

Emeritus Professor James Fetzer has conducted some of the most thorough research into the JFK assassination, 9/11 and now the Holocaust that I have come across.

Recently, Jim was involved with organising a seminar entitled Academic Freedom: Are there Limits to Inquiry? JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust. Apart from restating these events as massive hoaxes, the seminar pointed up how the discussion of alternatives to the official view of events is suppressed in academic circles. However, what I wanted to bring your attention to is Jim’s own presentation, which summarises the research he has himself done on these three subjects; research that demonstrates unequivocally that none of the official stories hold water. For me, these are all important subjects and I have already written extensively about the JFK assassination and 9/11, and I plan to say more about the so-called Holocaust shortly.

Part of the reason I share Jim’s work with you is because it provides a wonderful illustration of so many things going on in our world that are not as they are purported to be, such as climate change (you may recognise the pundits called it global warming till they realised the warming had actually stopped…), and one of the tell-tale signs is when we are not allowed to go against the promoted meme and to do so is likely to see you lose your job if you have one, and even your life if you are revealing something that has been hidden. Graham Hancock has spoken about the war on consciousness, which is a very apt term and in my view goes much further than Graham discussed in his presentation.

Indeed, the rabbit hole is far deeper than most wish to contemplate and there are few brave enough to try and reach the bottom of this rabbit hole. One of them is David Icke.

David began his journey as a soccer player, dropping out of school at 15 to play football full time. The early onset of arthritis saw his playing career cut short, which saw him join the BBC as a commentator. Seemingly set for life, some 25 years ago, he found himself being “told” to go into a bookshop across the road from where he was, go into a section of the bookshop he would not normally go to and take out a book by Betty Shine, who was a very talented psychic (I recently met a wonderful man who counted Betty as a dear friend for many years and confirmed David’s description of her). In a session with Betty, David was told he would expose important information about how the world worked, he would write many books about it, and the information would either come to him or he would be guided to it. And so it has been.

I have taken a moment to introduce David in this way because he has been excoriated in the mainstream press for 25 years regarding the things he has been saying for almost all of that time.

But what is interesting is that, as the years have passed, many if not all of the things David has been writing about have been confirmed by others and much of it has become widely accepted. He was revealing widespread child abuse and sacrifice decades ago and now it is being revealed by witnesses and prosecuted in common law courts. Moreover, David is a very thorough researcher, and his books are full of references and illustrations.

The heart of what David has to say is that humanity and the human experience are being manipulated and directed by a small group on Earth, who are doing the bidding of off-planet or interdimensional beings for their own benefit and potentially for the elimination of humanity from Earth, and all of what is playing out in our world can be traced back to the unfolding of those carefully hidden plans.

To most of you, this sounds impossible and ridiculous. For me, I have been researching much of this on my own and also doing my own work in these areas and, firstly, I have no doubt that there are beings that are hidden who dictate much of what goes on on planet Earth, as illustrated by this interview with the wonderful aged Zulu shaman called Credo Mutwa. Further, I have worked with many people in the work I do where they have been deeply interfered with by off-planet or interdimensional beings. This is not a world that most of us are encouraged or drawn to investigate, but it is very real and is my daily experience and has been for some years.

Few would have the courage to reveal what David has revealed over the years and keep going despite the attacks; but he cares not what others think of him. He follows his internal compass, his internal truth.

I have recently finished reading David’s latest book, “The Perception Deception”. Released in February 2014, it is up to date with illustrations and examples of the way our world works and why. There are a couple of historical areas where I disagree with David’s interpretation and there are a couple of areas where I am still unsure, but the majority of what he shares, supported by endless examples and illustrations, I agree with completely.

Simply, I know of no other way to get a solid grasp of what is happening in our world and why than this book. But be willing to have your sense of reality deconstructed, something most people are not willing to do. Most people have this unrecognised fear that if they accept something that deconstructs their beliefs, they will be lost; that they will fall through into nothingness and keep falling. Nothing could be further from the truth, because what will begin to happen is you will begin to understand who and what you are; perhaps the greatest gift you can give yourself.

Evidence of ‘life after death’ in biggest ever scientific study

Thank you, Graham.

As Graham Hancock says, “I look forward to seeing how hard-line materialists like Randi, Dawkins and Dennett spin their way out of this.”

If you have read any of the Near Death Experience (NDE) literature, you will know there are common threads and very clear evidence of life after death, something those with any spiritual interest will readily understand. Of course our temporal-based, existential mainstream scientific perspective, aided and abetted by the mainstream media, gives no credence to the notion that part of us survives death and that Darwin’s theory tells us all we need to know – despite the fact that Darwin himself did not believe such a notion.

The article shared by Graham shares details of a scientific study into NDE:

The largest ever medical study into near-death and out-of-body experiences has discovered that some awareness may continue even after the brain has shut down completely.

It is a controversial subject which has, until recently, been treated with widespread scepticism.

But scientists at the University of Southampton have spent four years examining more than 2,000 people who suffered cardiac arrests at 15 hospitals in the UK, US and Austria.

And they found that nearly 40 per cent of people who survived described some kind of ‘awareness’ during the time when they were clinically dead before their hearts were restarted.

One man even recalled leaving his body entirely and watching his resuscitation from the corner of the room.

These regular posts are ending

I am discontinuing regular postings to this email list and my blog. Beginning a few weeks ago, triggered by a misalignment in my back, I suffered a severe health crisis.

Whilst I’m well on the way to full recovery thanks to some outstanding chiropractic work, I have long understood that events such as this carry usually multiple messages for us, and one of these was loud and clear. I have a tendency to overwork and I have allowed my life to get significantly out of balance, including the neglect of my physical health and well-being.

These postings have been an attempt to share with those interested a few of my insights and understandings about how the world in which we live is created and manipulated, and I feel that I have done this. I do not intend to take down my blog, as I feel it remains a useful reference list of the subjects covered for those interested. The search field will give you rapid access to the relevant postings on a given subject. And whilst there continue to be several attempts per day to hack my blog, I do seem to have found sufficiently effective ways to keep them at bay.

Whilst there are few who have grasped the totality of the manipulation and control of the consciousness in which we live, perhaps best illustrated by the work of David Icke, there are many who have worked diligently to expose aspects of what you might consider the Matrix. For example, there are those who have worked diligently to reveal the lies and deceit behind the JFK assassination and 9/11 (e.g.  Jim Fetzer and Gordon Duff), along with some of the more recent major false flag exercises such as Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing, in my assessment these individuals do not truly understand the context within which all of this arises.

For example, if you placed yourself in the position of being able to persuade the world to place a value on paper money whilst, at the same time, placing yourself as the ones who would create that money for all of the major countries in the world, I think you can see that, given that you can print such paper money or more accurately the digits in a computer in any bank credit account of your choice, you could readily place yourself in the position of paying anyone’s price that they may demand.

This is EXACTLY what the Rothschilds and their banking friends have done, and they have ruthlessly maintained that financial control, murdering American Presidents and other Government leaders who stood in their way. Seen the Rothschilds or Rockefellers or any of their banking cohorts on any list of the world’s richest? I think not.

Few have understood that one of the key foci of the 20th century was the creation of the state of Israel by the Rothschilds. It is no accident that the creation of the US Federal Reserve by the world’s bankers in 1913 was quickly followed by WWI in 1914, funded primarily out of America, followed swiftly by the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Zionist interests, funded out of America and seeing the rapid removal of the great Russian wealth into the coffers of the Rothschilds.

If you stand back from the personal horrors of WWI and WWII and look behind the deceit of 6 million Jews dying in the Holocaust, to see the truth that the rooms claimed to have been used at Auschwitz as gas chambers could not practically have been given their design, nor do they contain either the inevitable cyanide residues or the blue staining that would show up from the use of Zyklon B. Certainly there were many Jews killed by Hitler’s regime, but not 6 million. You have to look to Russia for the death of 6 million during WWII – in fact the number was more like 27 million, but we don’t hear about it, nor the 10-20 million Chinese. What we hear about is the fictitious 6 million Jews.

Moreover, I have shared with you the evidence that the genetic origins of most Jewish people is from the Kazakh region, not Semitic and, indeed it has been demonstrated that the so-called Exodus is also a modern myth.

I am not blaming the average Jewish person here, because they are simply the human fodder in this travesty created to serve the interests of the Rothschilds. Which brings me on to the next major plank of this summary, which is how what David Icke calls Rothschilds Zionists essentially control the world behind the scenes.

If you look carefully, it is not difficult to see that Israel is far and away the most powerful country in the world. I had a recent illustration of this when a contact of mine who works in event management in Washington DC mentioned how at the recent AIPAC convention, he was amazed to witness Obama bow and almost kiss the ring of Netanyahu. Obama is in no doubt about where the power lies, and David Icke has demonstrated how the major roles in his administration are filled by Rothschild Zionists. Moreover, Israel has been able to steal technology, nuclear weapons materials, nuclear and other weapons from the United States over the years with impunity, all the while seeing major funding support for Israel flowing from the United States. AIPAC is the controlling vehicle within the United States for the Zionist forces and they are present in all Western and perhaps other countries of the world. But you will not hear of this in the press.

Further, if you scratch the surface of the CIA’s history, you will see that its founder, Allen Dulles was involved prior to the creation of the CIA with helping get Hitler to Argentina after his job was complete and then with Operation Paperclip to move German scientists and human experimenters and abusers to America. It is why I argue that the CIA was actually created to serve Zionist interests, not America’s. Indeed it was co-created with Mossad after WWII and these two have been joined at the hip since their creation.

These are but the financial and political threads. Layered on top of this are so many other lies and deceits. Apart from the audacious 9/11 lie to justify the so-called war on terror and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and which changed the world we live in forever, we have the man-made global warming lie, set up to justify Agenda 21. Whilst the climate lie is looking more threadbare by the day, Agenda 21 has not yet got in the sights of many and it is rolling out rapidly at the local level.

Moreover, we are told that we are alone in the universe and humanity, through Darwinian evolution, has evolved to its highest point at this moment. These are claims that Darwin would never have made, and there is wonderful work being done by Graham Hancock and others to reveal the truth of advanced civilisation on Earth, ending around 13,000 years ago; evidence for which, along with advanced abilities of indigenous people all over the planet have been systematically denied and destroyed for hundreds of years. Moreover, there is abundant evidence of many races and forms of beings from beyond our planet, perhaps the most blatantly ignored being the 2001 National Press Club presentation in Washington, organised by Steven Greer, where extensive evidence was presented by many, well-credentialed witnesses.

These are but a handful of the threads I have shared in this blog. I could readily add vaccination, fluoridation, GMO, Georgia Guidestones… Just today I was talking to a woman who can point without hesitation to the day her son received his MMR shot and the onset of his autism some 15 years ago. The reason I have painted this picture here is to begin to give you a sense of the complexity of what has been and is being created in our world.

I have long held the view that all of this will not be solved within this consciousness. We may see some of its extremes exposed through such things as the common law court ICLCJ associated with the work of Kevin Annett, as it is revealing the satanic cult which exists behind the Catholic and Anglican churches and the so-called royalty of Europe, but all of the best efforts, in my view, will not derail this monster. Indeed, the focus of my blog has really been to expose some of this.

I come from the perspective expressed by Einstein – “Problems cannot be solved at the same level of consciousness that created them.” This is the actual focus of my work – to seek to bring forth a change in the consciousness on this beautiful planet of ours.

Will we succeed? I cannot say. There are a group of people who work with us who share that vision. I do know that we live in a special time on planet Earth, a time in the precession of the equinoxes pointed to by ancient cultures across the planet in their monuments, myths and legends. If my understanding is accurate, the civilisation on Earth which disappeared 13,000 years ago also saw humanity carrying abilities most of us no longer have access to.

My focus is to see humanity reclaim that ability, and in doing so escaping the clutches of those who seek to bind us completely – indeed destroy most if not all of us. So I have turned off the flood of information that was coming to me on so many topics, and I am focussing on taking better care of myself and the work I understand I am here to contribute to. May it succeed.


PS I have intentionally placed few links in this article. The search field on my blog at will quickly give you access to any of these subjects.

The hidden ancient history of America – and the world

Strange stone tunnels and chambers, perhaps pre-historic, have been found in Leyden, Wendell, Pelham, Montague, New Salem, Whitingham, VT and throughout New England. Who built these structures and when? Why?
Ashfield stonemason Jim Vieira has been exploring local stone chambers for years as a member of the Northeast Antiquities Research Association, which has studied these structures for 60 years. He describes the stone ceremonial landscape of New England, carbon-dating evidence and historical texts.
His slides document local sites and others in New England, and he discusses what they represent and who may have built them. They also list evidence of giant skeletons over 10 feet tall,  – evidence that has since disappeared – all over. “Something is profoundly wrong with what we are being told.”

Why are these hidden away?

Also, a study of the substantial evidence for a former race of giants in North America and its 150-year suppression by the Smithsonian Institution shows how thousands of giant skeletons have been found, particularly in the Mississippi Valley, as well as the ruins of the giants’ cities Explores 400 years of giant finds, including newspaper articles, first person accounts, state historical records, and illustrated field reports Reveals the Stonehenge-era megalithic burial complex on Catalina Island with over 4,000 giant skeletons, including kings more than 9 feet tall. It includes more than 100 rare photographs and illustrations of the lost evidence, drawing on 400 years of newspaper articles and photos, first person accounts, state historical records, and illustrated field reports, Richard J. Dewhurst reveals in his book The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian cover-up, not only that North America was once ruled by an advanced race of giants but also that the Smithsonian has been actively suppressing the physical evidence for nearly 150 years.

This is but one of thousands of examples of evidence of advanced cultures across the planet that have been suppressed, a suppression that began in earnest at least 100 years ago.

Why is this suppressed?

In my view, it is all part of the plan to have us all believe we were in caves 10,000 years ago and we now live in the most advanced form humanity ever has. The slavish focus upon Darwin’s theory of evolution is part of this, and many other made-up beliefs. As I’ve said previously, not even Darwin believed his theory explained life. It is part of the plan to keep us separate and living in fear of lack, to keep the truth of who and what we are suppressed.

Wake up, my friends, if you have not already begun to, to the truth of who and what you are – a magnificent spiritual being on a human journey.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email