Archive for October 2015

Netanyahu’s War on Palestine. Premeditated State Terror

Netanyahu’s premeditated state terror against defenseless Palestinians continues. Multiple Israeli provocations began things. Palestinians responded in self-defense as expected and justified. Israel calls it terrorism.

The latest incident involved murdering six Gazan youths on Friday, wounding 60 others, 10 in serious condition.

Scores of Palestinians protested Israeli West Bank violence by throwing stones across the heavily guarded barbed wire fencing, separating Gaza from Israel.

Israeli soldiers responded with live fire, committing cold-blooded murder. Clashes continued Friday throughout the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) reported 1,640 Palestinians injured so far – 101 from live fire, hundreds more from rubber-coated steel bullets, many from toxic tear gas inhalation. Another 31 bystanders were brutally beaten by soldiers.

Separately, Israeli border police murdered a Palestinian youth. Hours earlier, soldiers shot and killed a Palestinian woman. Israel claimed it foiled an attempted stabbing incident. Video footage showed she threatened no one.

End of quote.

This will continue, in one form or another, until the Palestinians are either dead or move.

Some Israelis refer to the regular attacks on the Palestinians as “mowing the lawn”.

But no action will be taken, just as no action will be taken regarding their double standards regarding their well-known extensive cache of nuclear weapons and their nonsense stance against Iran, who has no such plans. Why would they? They have Keshe’s technology, which they deployed some years ago, which makes all current weapons technology obsolete in one Earth-shattering step.

Israel is the creation and the play toy of the Rothschilds as foretold by the Balfour Declaration of 1917. The Rothschilds are feted in Israel and have buildings and streets named after them – and why wouldn’t they be?

Judges plan to outlaw climate change ‘denial’

A semi-secret, international conference of top judges proposed to make illegal any opinion that contradicted climate change.

Poles apart: in 2013, the year scientists had forecast that the Arctic would be ‘ice free’, its thickness increased by a third  Photo: Alamy

We might think that a semi-secret, international conference of top judges, held in the highest courtroom in Britain, to propose that it should be made illegal for anyone to question the scientific evidence for man-made global warming, was odd enough to be worthy of front-page coverage.

Last week I mentioned that the Prince of Wales had sent a message to this conference calling for the UN’s forthcoming climate meeting in Paris to agree on “a Magna Carta for the Earth”. But only a series of startling posts by a sharp-eyed Canadian blogger, Donna Laframboise (on Nofrakkingconsensus), have alerted us to what a bizarre event this judicial gathering turned out to be (the organisers even refused to give her the names of those who attended).

Including senior judges and lawyers from across the world, the three-day conference on “Climate Change and the Law” was staged in London’s Supreme Court. It was funded, inter alia, by the Supreme Court itself, the UK government and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

As one of the two UN sponsors of its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UNEP has been one of the main drivers of alarm over global warming for 40 years. The organiser and chairman of the conference was the Supreme Court judge Lord Carnwath, a fervent believer in man-made climate change, who has worked with the Prince of Wales for more than 20 years, and with UNEP since 2002.

The purpose of this strange get-together was outlined in a keynote speech (visible on YouTube) by Philippe Sands, a QC from Cherie Blair’s Matrix Chambers and professor of law at University College, London. Since it is now unlikely that the world will agree in Paris to a legally binding treaty to limit the rise in global temperatures to no more than 2 degrees C from pre-industrial levels, his theme was that it is now time for the courts to step in, to enforce this as worldwide law.

End of quote.

I have to say, I was not expecting this but, on reflection, it fits.

The same people driving this at the highest level are the very same people who have made it illegal to question the Holocaust in many countries and sold us that story. Now, I have made my views clear on both of these issues, with no shortage of evidence but, regardless of this, we should all defend the right to disagree, to hold an alternative point of view.

Not if these judges and Prince Charles get their way, along with those who set their agenda but you never see.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :
Follow by Email