Archive for October 2015

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures, practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing.

“The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’ obtained by the use of  torture.” So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer.

At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me some stomach-churning details about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never committed.”

I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal, nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing went on at Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been unaware that American  Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers.

Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators, I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex with disinterred corpses.  (See below)

Yes, so this is something we ought to bear in mind when watching all those Hollywood movies celebrating the heroic deeds of the Allies in World War Two and lamenting the horrors of the Holocaust : that Jewish interrogators, working for the Americans, are known to have beaten, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants before charging them with war crimes at Nuremberg. Without these confessions, obtained under extreme torture, there is no solid proof that any Jewish Holocaust took place at all. There is only legend, hearsay and “eyewitness accounts” : like those of Elie Wiesel and his kind—accounts that have turned out, in retrospect, to be based on pure fantasy, fiction, and grotesque exaggeration.

End of quote.

Be clear this is not hearsay. It is documented:

It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel Alexander Scotland, who ran the interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”.

End of quote.

On a related subject, I thought it was ironic listening to a Jewish gentleman a few days ago expounding on the demolition of the so-called Nuremberg defence of “just following orders” when I had recently watched this video I recently linked to of a Jewish American woman sharing her horrific experiences of Palestine and quoting Israeli soldiers saying EXACTLY THAT – we are just following orders. Life has a way of bringing humour and irony to the darkest of events.

Someday, perhaps, sufficient people of a thinking mind will see and hear the irrefutable scientific and other evidence that there were not 6M Jews killed in gas chambers and other ways under the Nazis in WWII. But, it seems the world is not ready for this truth to emerge.

And speaking of dark humour, this one always brings a wry smile:

6 million killed

And so it goes…

How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation

It is difficult to overestimate the impact of the subtle processes being used to destroy life as it has been lived in, perhaps, every culture and social group. In this process I would include the genocide of lesser groups that has been going on for several hundred years, and the so-called Cultural Marxism that is being used to destroy culture if not directly killing the people, primarily but not only in the so-called Western world.

This article summarises the issues and suggests some solutions:

It is perhaps no mistake that cultural Marxists in the form of “social justice warriors”, PC busybodies and feminists tend to create artificial divisions between people and “classes” while attacking and homogenizing very real and natural divisions between individuals based on biological reality and inherent genetic and psychological ability. This is what cultural Marxists do: divide and conquer or homogenize and conquer, whatever the situation happens to call for.

They do this most commonly by designated arbitrary “victim status” to various classes, thus dividing them from each other based on how “oppressed” they supposedly are.  The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc.) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., generally the more victim group status is afforded to them by social justice gatekeepers.  Whites and males (straight males) are of course far at the bottom of their list of people who have reason to complain and we are repeatedly targeted by SJW organizations and web mobs as purveyors of some absurd theory called “the patriarchy”.

Although cultural Marxism does indeed target every individual and harm every individual in the long run, my list of personal solutions outlined in this article will be directed in large part at the categories of people most attacked by the social justice cult today.

I do not write often about PC cultism and social justice because the movement is only a symptom of a greater problem, namely the problem of collectivism. The only true and concrete social (group) division is the division between collectivists and individualists: between those who believe the individual should be subservient to the group mind and those who believe the group is meaningless without the individual mind.

End of quote.

In simple terms, we need to reclaim our personal power, act out of what intuitively feels to be right and true and come together as individuals in social structures for common benefit, not be dictated to by these false organisations that posture as social structures and governments in our world.

I commend the rest of the article to you.

Michael Meacher MP – 9/11, The PNAC & Peak Oil

Michael Meacher MP was an Environment Minister in the British Government. The only genuinely radical UK parliamentarian in recent times.

He died earlier this week. Watch this interview in which he exposes The Project for A New American Century and the military ambitions of the USA.

End of quote.

This brief video expresses his views on the above issues.

In my opinion, we live in the moment when humanity’s concern over energy is about to disappear, and perhaps the United States hegemony as its weaponry is obsoleted.

Peace, Piece: What’s in a word?

We live in a world where almost nothing means what we think it means.

This discussion is an excellent illustration. We all have an understanding of what peace means, but is that understanding the same one that those on the global stage use when they talk of peace?

I think not. Here is a brief snippet from this discussion:

ok, so with the POPE and AGENDA 30 making references to PEACE I felt that looking at the etymology of the word was in order. Follow the links to connected words to get the full picture.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=peace

peace (n.)

mid-12c., “freedom from civil disorder,” from Anglo-French pes, Old French pais “peace, reconciliation, silence, permission” (11c., Modern French paix), from Latin pacem (nominative pax) “compact, agreement, treaty of peace, tranquility, absence of war” (source of Provençal patz, Spanish paz, Italian pace), from PIE *pag-/*pak- “fasten,” related to pacisci “to covenant or agree” (see pact). (highlighting from the discussion).

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=pact&searchmode=none

pact (n.)

early 15c., from Old French pacte “agreement, treaty, compact” (14c.), from Latin pactum “agreement, contract, covenant,” noun use of neuter past participle of pacisci “to covenant, to agree, make a treaty,” from PIE root *pag- “fix, join together, unite, make firm” (cognates: Sanskrit pasa- “cord, rope,” Avestan pas- “to fetter,” Greek pegnynai “to fix, make firm, fast or solid,” Latin pangere “to fix, to fasten,” Slavonic paž “wooden partition,” Old English fegan “to join,” fon “to catch seize”).

End of quote.

I’m sure you’re beginning to get the picture. And the conclusion of the discussion:

So now….. when you hear Pope Francis, Obama, or any other talking head, speaking about “Peace”, pushing the “Peace” agenda, we can see that their meaning of “Peace” is radically different from what we’ve been taught, and programmed to think it means.  Can you see the Agenda now?

When the talking heads say “Peace”, what they really mean is:

Peace= New World Order

End of quote.

I agree with the conclusion, but it is not what most of us think of when the word PEACE is used. This is how the game works, and most people have no clue.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
RSS
Follow by Email