In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.
Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” (source)…
…There is much more than anecdotal evidence to support these claims, however, including documents obtained by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, which reveal that vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, and health authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is scientific fraud, and their complicity suggests that this practice continues to this day. (source)
End of quote.
There are many who have been brought up to believe that the scientific worldview is sacrosanct, that it forms the foundation of modern life and everything expressed within that worldview is how things are, and continue to believe that is true. I, too, was brought up inside that model, but no longer hold it as my reference point as I understand its purpose and the deliberate corruption and outright untruths it contains. There is a fundamental difference between this scientific worldview and the rigorous application of the scientific method. The scientific method, applied correctly, is a powerful tool for revealing truth.
This article demonstrates that the belief in the scientific worldview, without understanding the agendas behind it, is flawed scientific method. Particularly in the areas of pharmaceuticals and also in many other areas, including the life sciences in general, the worldview is threadbare at best and, in some cases, outright deception.